
Madeleine McCann: Tabloid Snap, Metodo 3 PD and McCanns Innocent
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “I’M NOT GUILTY”
“A loner who looks like a drawing of a ‘creepy’ Madeleine McCann suspect has denied any links to her disappearance”
Joaquim Agostinho says: “It’s not me in the picture. I accept that the drawing looks like me”
The Mirror reports: “The former cockle picker, who lives in Altura, 90 miles from Praia da Luz, added: ‘I did not kill Madeleine and I’ve never been to Praia da Luz. I cannot even drive’”
But still his picture is in the paper in connection with a story about a missing child. Fingers are pointed
MADELEINE in Chile. What news of that? “Yesterday, police ruled out a “Madeleine” sighting in Chile after the girl was identified as American Haylee Dreyer, six”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – Amazing lookalike: ‘I did not kidnap and kill her’”
Mr Agostinho looks like an artist’s impression of man whom British tourist Gail Cooper says she saw acting hanging around Praia da Luz. He is the “oddball”
Page 11: “DRIFTER MATCHES NEW MADELEINE SUSPECT”
Matches. Like in a game of snap? Snap! Snap! Snap!
“Investigators want to quiz a Portuguese drifter suspected of involvement in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Detectives working for the youngster’s parents are to question Joaquim Agostinho, 42, in the resort of Altura”
Does he have to speak with the McCanns detectives?
“Mr Agostinho, who lives in Altura, said yesterday: ‘I did not kill Madeleine and I’ve never been to Praia da Luz. I cannot even drive.’ Altura is close to the Spanish border and detectives from Metodo 3 – the agency working for the McCanns – were last night travelling there from their headquarters in Barcelona”
Again, does he have to speak with private detectives?
THE SUN: “McCANN COPS QUIZ SUSPECT LOOKALIKE”
“Detectives are to quiz a drifter who looks uncannily like a mystery suspect in Maddie McCann’s disappearance. Joaquim Agostinho, 42, denies he is the creepy man depicted in a sketch issued by parents Kate and Gerry McCann
“But Metodo 3, the Spanish private investigators hired by the McCanns, are taking the possibility seriously”
Is Metodo 3 now a police force?
A source close to Metodo 3 says: “We are going to be talking to this man as a priority, to establish if he is the one Mrs Cooper saw”
What of the McCanns?
“COPS now accept Kate and Gerry, both 39, may be innocent in Maddie’s disappearance, it has emerged. They have so far clung to just one theory — that Maddie was accidentally killed and her parents disposed of her body. Now they are taking seriously the alternative that she was snatched from the holiday apartment last May — which Kate and Gerry have always insisted must have happened”
DAILY MAIL: “Is this drifter the man in Madeleine drawing?”
Mr Agostinho says no. He delivers newspapers for a living. He says he is innocent
Metodo 3 are looking to speak with him
DAILY STAR: “MADDIE: THREE MEN RULED OUT – McCanns’ new hopes shattered”
It’s not Joaquim Jose Marques – police have ruled him out; and the Star was so certain
It’s not the girl in Chile – she’s a girl on holiday with her family
It’s not Joaquim Agostinho – he says it’s not him
METRO: “Twins play ‘find Maddie’”
“Leading world sex crimes expert Ray Wyre” has met with Kate and Gerry McCann
He sees the McCanns’ twins children. Wyre tells the paper: “They said they were going to go and find the monster that took Maddie. Then they dashed off to play the game. It’s a sad story, but it is healthy that Madeleine remains a real presence in their lives”
“A spokesman for the McCanns denied the story”
Madeleine McCann: No news is still news
Posted: 28th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,332) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 28th, 2008 at 11:32 pm
This reminds me of when the powers-that-be closed down the X-Files. Come to think of it, we could use Mulder and Scully right now…
January 28th, 2008 at 11:30 pm
1185
Totje
It’s as been for hours
January 28th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
“The 3 Aguidos?” I’d never been there. Sounds great. I hope there is a photoshopped picture of Steve Martin, Chevy Chase and Martin Short with KM, GM and RM’s faces superimposed on. That would be hilarious.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
1183
thank You
Marie Nicholas
Although there is a lot of rubish there ,there are a few interesting posters
Thank you ,again
January 28th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Ciara-Lou
come back babe and talk to me
January 28th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
1178
can’t say no Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
1more site has been closed ???
************************
It says : “Sorry but the board is temporarily unavailable, please try again in a few minutes.”
So what’s “closed”??????????????
January 28th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
1182
can’t say no Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
—————-
hope you’re right but why are you so sure ??
January 28th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
1176 Can’t say no
Someone said today that the 3 arguidos site explained it was temporarily closed for repair, nothing to worry about.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
1180
RedRooster
Nope this one will not close
IMHO
January 28th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
1169
Marie Nicholas Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:07 pm
1117 Chère Châtelaine
“I can see how someone who hasn’t been brought up that way will see the call for a priest as a strange reaction. Do you think if the little girl hadn’t been baptised, her parents might have asked the Portuguese priest to do that for them? [...]”
****
Marie, in an earlier thread someone said that children don’t need last rites or sacraments as they will go to “heaven” anyway. I could imagine that certain people, who turned VERY religious after an abduction… might not have known this and urgently needed comfort for whatever happened. Aie, with all of libel-things going on, notice that I try and phrase more and more like a bad lawyer
As for morality, I absolutely agree with you and the major part of posters on here: better care for your loved ones while they’re still alive.
And also: if she died, yes, may it have been quick, hopefully even subconscious. If she didn’t die, may she be indeed be treated like a princess, and not be at the hands of the paedophiles her parents refer to, without losing too much sleep about that idea IMHO.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
1178
can’t say no Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
1more site has been closed ???
………………………………………
wont be long till it us then i guess??
January 28th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
1159 Totje,
I agree. Especially at three, the little girl will call for Daddy at night rather than for Mummy, even if she has never heard of Freud !
January 28th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
By the way
“your comment is awaiting moderation”
I’d rather our comments were not moderated, thankyouverymuch.
—————–
Mods and Admin
Into every life some rain must fall, you’ll live
You may prefer they aren’t , but its site policy
January 28th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
1more site has been closed ???
January 28th, 2008 at 11:24 pm
1173
Ciara-Louise Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
————————-
stop teasing me babe you know how much i want you
January 28th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Just came to see that the 3 arguidos is closed ,anyone knows hat happened ??
January 28th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
1173
Ciara-Louise Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
————-
what have i said that would make you think otherwise.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:20 pm
Ciara-Lou, the Red Rooster is both male and female. Hope this helps.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:20 pm
1173
Ciara-Louise Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
RR,
Please tell me you are male. I cannot know for sure
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
come over here and i’ll show you if you like
January 28th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
RR,
Please tell me you are male. I cannot know for sure
January 28th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
Ciara-Louise
??
??
January 28th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
1164 Jass
I am not sure about the legal knowledge of Increasingly Ridiculous as Jo named him.
I trust Salomon much more ; I have read his posts many times and found them wise and accurate. He also has a broad view of things, and puts them into perpective. He didn’t seem to think a lot of Increasingly Ridiculous who is not concise and didn’t convey any idea at all really but was good at only one thing : challenging. After a little while it got boring.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Robert Murat - what’s his angle?
January 28th, 2008 at 11:09 pm
621
Cheryl Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Mods and Admin
Fine thats absolutely fine, what about Robert Murat?
______________
One would presume that is why he also has a lawyer - to protect his interests!
_______________________
Mods and Admin
Are you not defending him Cheryl? after all presumed innocent until proved guilty?
But the McCanns have lawyers to protect their interests……
___________________
REPLY: Did I not say above one would presume that is whyhe has a lawyer to protect him and his interests? I know he has a lawyer - didn’t you? The only times I’ve ever alluded to Murat even existing in this tragedy is when people talk about the two suspects and I merely remind them there are three suspects. I rather like to even up the playing field - make sure all players are on the field and none left on the bench.
Am I defending the Mccanns in your eyes? No, I can’t be that intelligent to defend someone or be cognizant that there are two sides to every story and attempt to present the other side just in case …- NO Way - I’m just a simple American, remember? No brains like those briliant, complex, thinking Europeans!
However, what I do attempt to do as a simple American is show the civilized side of simple Americans ….
——————
Mods and Admin
????????
January 28th, 2008 at 11:07 pm
1117 Chère Châtelaine
I can see how someone who hasn’t been brought up that way will see the call for a priest as a strange reaction.
Do you think if the little girl hadn’t been baptised, her parents might have asked the Portuguese priest to do that for them?
Anyway, moralité : It is best to take proper care of the ones you love when they are still alive, don’t you think? When they are dead, too late. What a waste. And the poor little girl, what an ordeal for her, whatever happened. On the other thread this morning a American poster said an accident and a sudden death were the least horrible thing the little one could have gone through. I agree.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:04 pm
1166
Ciara-Louise Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
RR,
I’m confused.
”””””””””””””””””
hi Ciara-Lou, how are you sweety?? What are you confused about??
January 28th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
1156
Ian,
It’s adressed to the suspects….
And not the first time these kind of remarks are/were made.
A while ago I objected to that and of course was called a “troll”
January 28th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
RR,
I’m confused.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:01 pm
1162
Garth Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 11:00 pm
———————–
of course you’re not garf
January 28th, 2008 at 11:01 pm
Anyway..
One of the main reasons for thinking there is something DEEPLY fishy about the whole thing is, as Brit Abroad said, the weird behaviour of the British press.
When, for instance, Louise Woodward was accused in America of shaking a child to death, the press was very critical. In no way did she get the 100 per cent support the McCanns are getting.
Which definitely leads one to think the press is being leaned on.
And by whom? And why?
Today that Incredulous person banged on and on, obviously with a lot of legal knowledge.
Who was pulling his/her strings?