
Madeleine McCann: Tabloid Snap, Metodo 3 PD and McCanns Innocent
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “I’M NOT GUILTY”
“A loner who looks like a drawing of a ‘creepy’ Madeleine McCann suspect has denied any links to her disappearance”
Joaquim Agostinho says: “It’s not me in the picture. I accept that the drawing looks like me”
The Mirror reports: “The former cockle picker, who lives in Altura, 90 miles from Praia da Luz, added: ‘I did not kill Madeleine and I’ve never been to Praia da Luz. I cannot even drive’”
But still his picture is in the paper in connection with a story about a missing child. Fingers are pointed
MADELEINE in Chile. What news of that? “Yesterday, police ruled out a “Madeleine” sighting in Chile after the girl was identified as American Haylee Dreyer, six”
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – Amazing lookalike: ‘I did not kidnap and kill her’”
Mr Agostinho looks like an artist’s impression of man whom British tourist Gail Cooper says she saw acting hanging around Praia da Luz. He is the “oddball”
Page 11: “DRIFTER MATCHES NEW MADELEINE SUSPECT”
Matches. Like in a game of snap? Snap! Snap! Snap!
“Investigators want to quiz a Portuguese drifter suspected of involvement in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Detectives working for the youngster’s parents are to question Joaquim Agostinho, 42, in the resort of Altura”
Does he have to speak with the McCanns detectives?
“Mr Agostinho, who lives in Altura, said yesterday: ‘I did not kill Madeleine and I’ve never been to Praia da Luz. I cannot even drive.’ Altura is close to the Spanish border and detectives from Metodo 3 – the agency working for the McCanns – were last night travelling there from their headquarters in Barcelona”
Again, does he have to speak with private detectives?
THE SUN: “McCANN COPS QUIZ SUSPECT LOOKALIKE”
“Detectives are to quiz a drifter who looks uncannily like a mystery suspect in Maddie McCann’s disappearance. Joaquim Agostinho, 42, denies he is the creepy man depicted in a sketch issued by parents Kate and Gerry McCann
“But Metodo 3, the Spanish private investigators hired by the McCanns, are taking the possibility seriously”
Is Metodo 3 now a police force?
A source close to Metodo 3 says: “We are going to be talking to this man as a priority, to establish if he is the one Mrs Cooper saw”
What of the McCanns?
“COPS now accept Kate and Gerry, both 39, may be innocent in Maddie’s disappearance, it has emerged. They have so far clung to just one theory — that Maddie was accidentally killed and her parents disposed of her body. Now they are taking seriously the alternative that she was snatched from the holiday apartment last May — which Kate and Gerry have always insisted must have happened”
DAILY MAIL: “Is this drifter the man in Madeleine drawing?”
Mr Agostinho says no. He delivers newspapers for a living. He says he is innocent
Metodo 3 are looking to speak with him
DAILY STAR: “MADDIE: THREE MEN RULED OUT – McCanns’ new hopes shattered”
It’s not Joaquim Jose Marques – police have ruled him out; and the Star was so certain
It’s not the girl in Chile – she’s a girl on holiday with her family
It’s not Joaquim Agostinho – he says it’s not him
METRO: “Twins play ‘find Maddie’”
“Leading world sex crimes expert Ray Wyre” has met with Kate and Gerry McCann
He sees the McCanns’ twins children. Wyre tells the paper: “They said they were going to go and find the monster that took Maddie. Then they dashed off to play the game. It’s a sad story, but it is healthy that Madeleine remains a real presence in their lives”
“A spokesman for the McCanns denied the story”
Madeleine McCann: No news is still news
Posted: 28th, January 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,332) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





January 28th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
allo arold !!
January 28th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
clouseau
January 28th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
bet you he didnt look in the back of the jeep
January 28th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
“what appeal process?”
Indeed
“You can ask for your status of suspect to be reviewed ”
And in the rest of the world, an Appeal means to an independent, higher court - not to the man who took the original decision.
“For someone w an LLB you seem to think that the law is made of victories and defeats? ”
And if I neede proof that you really want to weasel out of this….avictory, in a Court Case is a decison in your favour. A defeat is one against you.
Do you realise the scale of Portugal’s problems in this area?
12 Article 6 cases in 1999 7 where Portugal was ruled in violation, five settled by the State paying compensation out of Court;
18 in 2000 - 9 violations, nine out of court compensation settlements;
26 in 2001 - ten violations, sixteen out of court settlements
32 in 2002 - thirteen violations, eighteen out of court settlements, and one finding in the favour of the Portuguese state.
17 in 2003 - sixteen violations, one out of court settlement (looks like the portuguese state had decided to do it’s out of court settlements much earlier)
A mere eight in 2004 - all bar one violations.
And that’s the last year for which we’ve numbers.
“The portuguese criminal code has been revised as recently as two years ago… ”
Indeed, and was supposed to have introduced an eight month limit for Judicial Secrecy - but as soon as the system faced a challenge, it scuttled back for cover. And the McCanns may well be thr first test case of that.
On the basis of portugal’s track record, don’t be overly optimistic!
January 28th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
613 - Wasn’t GM looking for his tennis bag?
January 28th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
611
and cleaning
January 28th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
610
Batman
There was no point looking on the 3rd IMO. Still, it would have looked better for them. Wasn’t Gerry witnessed looking around though?
January 28th, 2008 at 4:34 pm
Nosey - Did you have a good weekend? Apparently I just missed you on Saturday.
January 28th, 2008 at 4:34 pm
Batman
They were busy on the phone
January 28th, 2008 at 4:32 pm
127 Garth
Kate McCann is on record saying that neither of them went looking on night of 3rd May - but that they were very busy nonetheless. Just going on what she said!
January 28th, 2008 at 4:32 pm
sc46
eugh!!!!
January 28th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
if they would like to have the support of everbody
take a polygrapgh…the reluctance to do so makes people draw one conclusion
THERE GUILTY imo allegedly
jj j28 17.14
January 28th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
BF - Kate in LAtex?
January 28th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
604 Cheryl
May I clarify a point fundamental to the McCann case?
Do you think that its acceptable to leave a 3 year old child and two 2 year old children alone in an apartment unsupervised?
I just like to ascertain peoples views on that point before engaging.
January 28th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
598 Salomon
I only argue with them because they provide a good platform - its possible to shoot them to bits in full view of everyone here, as many have been doing today!
I think its damned odd that sledgehammer is so similar to increasingly incredulous, even having negative (to themselves) names. ‘Sledgehammer’ infers no finesse and ‘increasingly incredulous’ could easily apply to a person who cannot believe what the McCanns are doing!
Not very clear unambiguous names are they?
January 28th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
19
jo Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 9:14 am
14
Dr. Watson Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 9:10 am
The real punishment will come when the twins grow up and realise that their parents killed their sister - only my personal opinion, of course.
**************
Poor little children…. what are the social services position towards the Twins?
The mccdrifters have had psychological counselling over the month.
Are those “parents” allowe to “look” after them in their state…of rage????
_______________
REPLY: Dr. Watson: your words: “The real punishment will come when the twins grow up and realise that their parents killed their sister - only my personal opinion, of course.”
What an interesting word “killed” to be used on here. Oh yes in your personal opinion, of course - heaven forbid anyone should consider your opinions coming from a deep thinker such as you be wrong! Your mind is what? I am at a loss for the appropriate word to use and your self-opinion of yourself so remarkable that you even pontificated on here weeks ago what ages women should or should not have children.
REPLY to Jo: What ‘rage” do you speak of? The parents had counselling - you know what is really ‘weird’ - majority of parents who lose their child are given counselling and even seek counselling to be able to cope with the grief. Let’s take it a step further - the McCanns child is missing, as yet REAL FACTS are not known how she went missing. They are in grief over the loss of their child, they are on the receiving end of condemnation, scorn, innuendos as to what if any actually hands on of her being missing they are responsible for, their own guilt of leaving her alone…now tell me please, is it remotely possible in your mind that just maybe the list above could be the reason they are being given counselling?
January 28th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
585
no evidence of an abduction because there was none
January 28th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
I would love to have seen a spitting image version of Kate and Gerry
January 28th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
salomon - re my earlier post - can you please provide a link to the claim that you made about a child maddies age or lower going missing every day in the uk -
I’ve not heard this before - and its scaring me :9
January 28th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
592
delboy
Its so ironic isnt it!
Its like the way they say that WANT to talk to the Police - yet hide away in the UK behind their lawyers.
Do they not realise that if they were to have the status lifted, they couldnt hide behind it!
Of course they do, but then they’d claim not wanting to compromise the very investigation they compromise daily with their stupid attempts at being a police force themselves.
The fact is that being ’suspects’ has one very awkward effect - the public see them as labelled ’suspects’ and they can’t ask for money. ‘Money’ (or the love of it) is, of course, ‘the root of all evil’ as the quotation goes!
January 28th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
They are just typing a script they cant answer questions
January 28th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
595 Ian
I really think that “Inc Inc like sledge” is just here to disrupt the forum and try to dictate the agenda.
I for one will just ignore him / her. I did try my best to explain things - but clearly someone was not very interested to understand - therefore - any attempt of dialogue w Inc Inc is IMO a waste of time.
January 28th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Nosey - lol
January 28th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
delboy its far too glaswegian and liverpudlian for them!!!
They re from Rothley now dont yer know
January 28th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
584 Salomon
It seems that although the UK has not accepted in full the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Portugal has.
The poster ‘Increasingly like sledgehammer’ does not appear to be legally qualified, judging by his or her lack of understanding and should be take to task for posting that they are. Its probably illegal to falsely represent oneself!
January 28th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
591
just_me Says:
January 28th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
hahahahahahaha very good. he’s scarier than the last one
January 28th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
matt
just-me
January 28th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
mccanns dont like being arguidos one bit do they? but it seems like they will let everyone and anyone be one, as long as it aint them………..but it is them init,
January 28th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
587 - YES — http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/stick_man_a.jpg
January 28th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
587…brandon flours
Give me a chance. Have a pub to look after.
Will be drawing new sketch asap.