<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Four, Three Men, DNAboost And Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207299</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207299</guid>
		<description>909
Chloe Spain Says: 
January 30th, 2008 at 11:55 am
902 Saturn

As I understand it, it’s probably the copyright of the software that was used, not of the site itself. I expect someone on here can give a fuller explanation but that is, in general terms, what I’ve been led to believe.

********
Me too at the beginning, but .... then all pages should have been [and remained] 2006 ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>909<br />
Chloe Spain Says:<br />
January 30th, 2008 at 11:55 am<br />
902 Saturn</p>
<p>As I understand it, it’s probably the copyright of the software that was used, not of the site itself. I expect someone on here can give a fuller explanation but that is, in general terms, what I’ve been led to believe.</p>
<p>********<br />
Me too at the beginning, but &#8230;. then all pages should have been [and remained] 2006 <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207297</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207297</guid>
		<description>908
Rockhopper Says: 
January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am
902
Saturn Says:

January 30th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Whatever happened with the fact that the FindMadeleine On-line Store was copyrighted 2006? You could see that copyright on the bottom left of every page on the site. That was insignificant?

How could it have been copyrighted prior to May, 2007? Are these copyright records public?

—————————-
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007.

********
I checked a while ago and then the home page  had changed to 2007, yet all other pages were still copyrighted 2006 ...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>908<br />
Rockhopper Says:<br />
January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am<br />
902<br />
Saturn Says:</p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:50 am<br />
Whatever happened with the fact that the FindMadeleine On-line Store was copyrighted 2006? You could see that copyright on the bottom left of every page on the site. That was insignificant?</p>
<p>How could it have been copyrighted prior to May, 2007? Are these copyright records public?</p>
<p>—————————-<br />
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007.</p>
<p>********<br />
I checked a while ago and then the home page  had changed to 2007, yet all other pages were still copyrighted 2006 &#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207279</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207279</guid>
		<description>Thanks Saturn....

New thread started for today....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Saturn&#8230;.</p>
<p>New thread started for today&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gillyflower</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207276</link>
		<dc:creator>gillyflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207276</guid>
		<description>Chloe  Spain

Stevo is on the new thread that has just opened</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chloe  Spain</p>
<p>Stevo is on the new thread that has just opened</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockhopper</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207275</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockhopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207275</guid>
		<description>916
Saturn Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 12:02 pm 
908
Rockhopper Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am
902
Saturn
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007.
****************
When I first looked, all pages had 2006. Then, the home page was changed to 2007, while all other pages remained 2006.
See:

“Mirror.co.uk (cache) - copyright on online store- ]Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: copyright on online store… The home page of the store is 2007, but specific pages therein say 2006.”

This is why I ask if copyright records are public or not.
-----------------------------

Just googled copyright, not very helpful. Of course you can easily copyright something by posting it to yourself, copyrighting something in that way is cheap, would not appear on any official register (if such a thing exists) but would be sufficient to prove a design or logo was yours at a certain date. The link below is interesting.

http://james.cridland.net/code/copyright.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>916<br />
Saturn Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 12:02 pm<br />
908<br />
Rockhopper Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am<br />
902<br />
Saturn<br />
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007.<br />
****************<br />
When I first looked, all pages had 2006. Then, the home page was changed to 2007, while all other pages remained 2006.<br />
See:</p>
<p>“Mirror.co.uk (cache) - copyright on online store- ]Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: copyright on online store… The home page of the store is 2007, but specific pages therein say 2006.”</p>
<p>This is why I ask if copyright records are public or not.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Just googled copyright, not very helpful. Of course you can easily copyright something by posting it to yourself, copyrighting something in that way is cheap, would not appear on any official register (if such a thing exists) but would be sufficient to prove a design or logo was yours at a certain date. The link below is interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://james.cridland.net/code/copyright.html" rel="nofollow">http://james.cridland.net/code/copyright.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe Spain</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207274</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207274</guid>
		<description>My 923

Sorry, bad grammar - should be "it was he who explained"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 923</p>
<p>Sorry, bad grammar - should be &#8220;it was he who explained&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe Spain</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207271</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207271</guid>
		<description>921 Saturn

Wait and see if Stevo turns up this afternoon. I think I recall it was him that explained the lack of significance of the date when the question was raised before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>921 Saturn</p>
<p>Wait and see if Stevo turns up this afternoon. I think I recall it was him that explained the lack of significance of the date when the question was raised before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207270</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207270</guid>
		<description>Coolandcalm

Hopefully it's just the Disgusted Brigade.

I've never understood why they think children can't look at a woman in a low-cut dress. It sort of suggests that they think young children are rampaging sex fiends who will perv on adults if adults don't cover up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coolandcalm</p>
<p>Hopefully it&#8217;s just the Disgusted Brigade.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never understood why they think children can&#8217;t look at a woman in a low-cut dress. It sort of suggests that they think young children are rampaging sex fiends who will perv on adults if adults don&#8217;t cover up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturn</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207269</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207269</guid>
		<description>909
Chloe Spain Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 11:55 am 
902 Saturn

As I understand it, it’s probably the copyright of the software that was used, not of the site itself. I expect someone on here can give a fuller explanation but that is, in general terms, what I’ve been led to believe.
***************
For something so astonishing and disconcerting, "probably" is not enough. This could be the explanation, but then why was the copyright on the front page changed from 2006 to 2007?

On the face of it, the FindMadeleine On-line Store was copyrighted in 2006 -- the copyright mark refers directly to the on-line store, not any software.  &lt;b&gt;That, if nothing else, definitely deserves a completely thorough explanation. &lt;/b&gt; Equally astonishing -- more astonishing!-- is that no one forcefully demands such an explanation. 

Again, revelation by omission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>909<br />
Chloe Spain Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:55 am<br />
902 Saturn</p>
<p>As I understand it, it’s probably the copyright of the software that was used, not of the site itself. I expect someone on here can give a fuller explanation but that is, in general terms, what I’ve been led to believe.<br />
***************<br />
For something so astonishing and disconcerting, &#8220;probably&#8221; is not enough. This could be the explanation, but then why was the copyright on the front page changed from 2006 to 2007?</p>
<p>On the face of it, the FindMadeleine On-line Store was copyrighted in 2006 &#8212; the copyright mark refers directly to the on-line store, not any software.  <b>That, if nothing else, definitely deserves a completely thorough explanation. </b> Equally astonishing &#8212; more astonishing!&#8211; is that no one forcefully demands such an explanation. </p>
<p>Again, revelation by omission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gillyflower</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-47#comment-207268</link>
		<dc:creator>gillyflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207268</guid>
		<description>There's a new thread

Are we going over there or staying here???????

:smile:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a new thread</p>
<p>Are we going over there or staying here???????</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gillyflower</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207264</link>
		<dc:creator>gillyflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207264</guid>
		<description>918 just-me

Wish I had sound to watch that with!

I just lurve South Park.

Looks reeally comical 

:grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>918 just-me</p>
<p>Wish I had sound to watch that with!</p>
<p>I just lurve South Park.</p>
<p>Looks reeally comical </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just_me</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207259</link>
		<dc:creator>just_me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207259</guid>
		<description>http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=x1HU6iYHVVw&amp;feature=user</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=x1HU6iYHVVw&amp;feature=user" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=x1HU6iYHVVw&amp;feature=user</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207250</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207250</guid>
		<description>912
can't say no Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 11:56 am 
Anyone knows where Chernier is ??
****************
Not since saturday.

Politicos: G.Brown has excluded portugal AND spain from his short meeting about I dont know what..... I havent folowed.Any news on that front?
So, Madeleine is now (or may be as early as her "disappearance") a political figure. She has entered history and her "parents" are thriving on her death.
May be,we should gather as Citizen of the World and take the case further.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>912<br />
can&#8217;t say no Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:56 am<br />
Anyone knows where Chernier is ??<br />
****************<br />
Not since saturday.</p>
<p>Politicos: G.Brown has excluded portugal AND spain from his short meeting about I dont know what&#8230;.. I havent folowed.Any news on that front?<br />
So, Madeleine is now (or may be as early as her &#8220;disappearance&#8221;) a political figure. She has entered history and her &#8220;parents&#8221; are thriving on her death.<br />
May be,we should gather as Citizen of the World and take the case further&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturn</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207249</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207249</guid>
		<description>908
Rockhopper Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am 
902
Saturn 
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007.
****************
When I first looked, &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; pages had 2006. Then, the home page was changed to 2007, while all other pages remained 2006.  
See:

"Mirror.co.uk (cache) - copyright on online store- ]Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: copyright on online store... The home page of the store is 2007, but specific pages therein say 2006."

This is why I ask if copyright records are public or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>908<br />
Rockhopper Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am<br />
902<br />
Saturn<br />
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007.<br />
****************<br />
When I first looked, <b>all</b> pages had 2006. Then, the home page was changed to 2007, while all other pages remained 2006.<br />
See:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mirror.co.uk (cache) - copyright on online store- ]Post Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: copyright on online store&#8230; The home page of the store is 2007, but specific pages therein say 2006.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is why I ask if copyright records are public or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolandcalm</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207245</link>
		<dc:creator>coolandcalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207245</guid>
		<description>Karen 900

I don't think its because it was just because it was a MMC joke,  there are people who just complain.  They read the papers and watch TV looking to complain. I know someone like that...  forever whinging about anything and everything and searching gleefully for the next thing.  Send letters everywhere. 

How about all of those dumbos who phoned in to complain about Holly Willoughby's dress on 'Dancing on Ice'?  reason?  children were watching.  Er? Should she have bandaged her boobs out of sight? 

so odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen 900</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think its because it was just because it was a MMC joke,  there are people who just complain.  They read the papers and watch TV looking to complain. I know someone like that&#8230;  forever whinging about anything and everything and searching gleefully for the next thing.  Send letters everywhere. </p>
<p>How about all of those dumbos who phoned in to complain about Holly Willoughby&#8217;s dress on &#8216;Dancing on Ice&#8217;?  reason?  children were watching.  Er? Should she have bandaged her boobs out of sight? </p>
<p>so odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Flours</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207244</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Flours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207244</guid>
		<description>http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fm3Z6-nRj9U
A short film 

Hidden a New Short Film / Movie released January 2008
based upon the Madeleine McCann story.

A brief insight into the lives of two parents following the disappearance of their young child, and how the world's media and public affect them. A loose interpretation of the Madeleine McCann disappearance. 

Four-year-old Madeleine McCann Maddy Maddie. The McCann case is covered extensively in the US and in Europe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fm3Z6-nRj9U" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fm3Z6-nRj9U</a><br />
A short film </p>
<p>Hidden a New Short Film / Movie released January 2008<br />
based upon the Madeleine McCann story.</p>
<p>A brief insight into the lives of two parents following the disappearance of their young child, and how the world&#8217;s media and public affect them. A loose interpretation of the Madeleine McCann disappearance. </p>
<p>Four-year-old Madeleine McCann Maddy Maddie. The McCann case is covered extensively in the US and in Europe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockhopper</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207243</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockhopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207243</guid>
		<description>908
Rockhopper Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am 
902
Saturn Says: 

January 30th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Whatever happened with the fact that the FindMadeleine On-line Store was copyrighted 2006? You could see that copyright on the bottom left of every page on the site. That was insignificant?

How could it have been copyrighted prior to May, 2007? Are these copyright records public?

—————————-
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007. ++++ Front page
------------------------------------------

Other pages 2006!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>908<br />
Rockhopper Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:53 am<br />
902<br />
Saturn Says: </p>
<p>January 30th, 2008 at 11:50 am<br />
Whatever happened with the fact that the FindMadeleine On-line Store was copyrighted 2006? You could see that copyright on the bottom left of every page on the site. That was insignificant?</p>
<p>How could it have been copyrighted prior to May, 2007? Are these copyright records public?</p>
<p>—————————-<br />
Just looked at the site, copyright 2007. ++++ Front page<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Other pages 2006!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: can't say no</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207242</link>
		<dc:creator>can't say no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207242</guid>
		<description>Anyone knows where Chernier is ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone knows where Chernier is ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe Spain</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207241</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207241</guid>
		<description>908 Rockhopper

It did used to say 2006 though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>908 Rockhopper</p>
<p>It did used to say 2006 though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: can't say no</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/179990/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-four-three-men-dnaboost-and-risk.html/comment-page-46#comment-207240</link>
		<dc:creator>can't say no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179990.html#comment-207240</guid>
		<description>904
jo
;)

Yep, I also need to go somewhere like Tibet :)

Till later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>904<br />
jo<br />
 <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yep, I also need to go somewhere like Tibet <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Till later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
