
Madeleine McCann: Britney Spears, Lolita And Birthday Cards
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MAIL: “Woolworths forced to withdraw LOLITA bedroom furniture range for girls”
The Lolita Midsleeper Combi, a wooden bed with pull-out desk and cupboard designed for girls aged around six, retails on the Woolworths website for £349.99
The name has “sexual connotations”. A “mother” sees it and writes: “Am I being particularly sensitive, or does anyone else out there think it’s bad taste for Woolies to have a kiddy bed range named ‘Lolita’?”
Well, you don’t have to buy it…
A spokesman for the company says: “What seems to have happened is the staff who run the website had never heard of Lolita, and to be honest no one else here had either. We had to look it up on Wikipedia. But we certainly know who she is now”
Trusting Wikipedia for information has its own dangers. (And look out for an article on the state of British education.) But no danger is bigger than a bed named, perhaps, in honour of a charcter in a novel by Vladimir Nabokov
Or Lolita Fatjo, pre-production coordinator for Star Trek
Or many other women called Lolita
“On-line parent power has been growing in recent years. In 2006 Tesco stopped selling a pole-dancing kit on its website over accusations it was destroying children’s innocence. And last summer an on-line campaign by Mumsnet resulted in a cinema advert about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann stopped from being screened before the children’s film Shrek the Third”
THE TIMES: “Staff at Woolworths baffled by fuss over the little girl’s bed called Lolita”
“Woolworths has withdrawn bedroom furniture for young girls bearing the sexually charged name Lolita after a campaign waged by a mothers’ online chat room”
An internal company e-mail seen by The Times goes: “As discussed, we’ve got the product below on our website. Can it be hidden as soon as is possible? Then I really need to find out how it came about being on our site and who bought it. Lolita is a word that means sexually active young teenagers, so a young girls’ range of bedroom products is in very poor taste. We’ve had an approach from a website who are clearly a little disturbed by this”
THE SUN: “Gift from Maddie for twins”
No, not furniture
“Twins Sean and Amelie McCann will get a special present from their missing sister Maddie today on their third birthday. Parents Kate and Gerry got the gift for the pair who, at three, are the same age as Maddie when she vanished last May”
Sad. But is it relevant to the case? Is it news?
Grandmother Eileen McCann tells us: “Of course Madeleine being there would be our dream but we’ll do our best to make sure the twins have a lovely day”
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Card from Madeleine at McCann twins party”
The twins are getting a gift in the Sun…
“Gerry and Kate McCann will throw a birthday party for their twins tomorrow - complete with a card from their missing four-year-old daughter, Madeleine”
DAILY STAR: “MISSING MADDIE’S SPECIAL PREZZIE”
“Little Sean and Amelie McCann will open a special present from their big sister as they celebrate their third birthday today”
With a card?
Says Eileen McCann: “There will be presents galore, lots of fun and games, lots of food and a big cake. Of course, Madeleine being home would make it complete and we continue to pray for that blessing”
SUR (Spain): “Marbella suffer their first loss of the year against Linares”
A football match: “Wearing T-shirts to raise awareness of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and Mari Luz Cortés, the children playing in the tournament accompanied the players onto the pitch as mascots at the beginning of the game”
RADAR: “Theater of Cruelty, Carnival of Souls”
“British rags hardly pretend to be providing straightforward news. What they are doing is what used to be the job of popular fiction; namely, processing myth out of characters sucked in from real life. Right now the cast list includes such durable regulars as Kate Moss—with or without Pete Doherty—Princes Harry and Wills, Posh and Becks, and Kate and Gerry McCann, whose daughter Madeleine’s kidnapping/disappearance in Portugal made them last year’s headliners”
ALISTAIR CAMPBELL (TIMES): Britney Spears: person or news commodity? She’s a great singer but obviously ill: we in the media have to decide to leave her alone”
Britney Spears and Madeleine McCann..?
“In some sections of the media, Madeleine McCann and her family are there. As I said in the Cudlipp Lecture on Tuesday, her disappearance was an interesting and important story, the stuff of every parent’s nightmare. But it quickly became a commodity in which most of the media got close to hysteria, and some have remained there. Let us not pretend the coverage was driven by concern for the child - there are many missing children - or compassion for the parents - certainly not once the mood shifted - or regard for the truth. It has been the worst example of recent times, on a par with Diana, of some newspapers thinking that the word “Madeleine” sells, and finding literally any old nonsense to keep her name in that selling position on the front”
THE GUARDIAN: “Mechanics of the McCann campaign - Professional media management may have generated coverage of Maddy’s disappearance, but it hasn’t helped with public sympathy for the family”
“Try as they might neither Clarence Mitchell nor Justine McGuinness could quite shake off the sense that the way they’ve managed this case might have contributed to some negative public sentiment towards the family. In place initially as what Mitchell described as “a buffer” between the shocked and distraught parents and the world’s media, hungry for news about Madeleine, it’s clear that what developed was a professional media management operation. With city PR firm Bell Pottinger on hand - primarily, we can assume, to defend the interests of their clients Mark Warner Holidays - as well as Justine and, latterly, Clarence with all their experience of Westminster spin, the McCanns could not have wanted for more professional advice. But as time went on media management itself - and once you’ve started feeding stories to the press to get control of the agenda, you really can’t stop - began generating negative reaction from other parties”
Madeleine McCann: Making news and sensation from grief
Posted: 1st, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,022) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 1st, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Ok…talking about being able to manipulate digital images…this is what I’ve found out about Bell Pottinger’s resources:
1. Bell Pottinger are the firm that Alex Woolfall works for.
2. Bell Pottinger are a high-end PR and advertising firm. Very high end.
3. One of their board members is Dave Allen. He is Worldwide CEO of Enterprise IG. He was also involved with Kodak and Epson.
4. Enterprise IG have a blog discussing photo manipulation. This is high-end, state of the art photo manipulation: http://eigdigital.blogspot.com/2006/01/tilt-shift-photography.html
5. Alex Woolfall may know a man who knows a man etc. He was the one who downloaded Gerry’s photos to his laptop and there is significant dispute as to when he actually arrived in PDL.
6. Alex Woolfall is experienced in investigating pharmaceutical tampering.
Ok, lots of connections that may be tenuous ones at best. But…it needs looking at in respect that Woolfall released some of those photos of Madeleine into the media. The question is…what was his real involvement in this case?
February 1st, 2008 at 1:56 pm
422
Karen Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
June
Thanks. I’m 20 but now I’m old who cares about my exact age - it’s all the one thing. Not a teenager!!!
—————————————
Teenager is a state of mind! One you can dip back into at any time of life!!
February 1st, 2008 at 1:56 pm
418…markskidd
Thank you, markskidd.
The link I was most interested in was the one re the McCann Lawyer saying
“Preparing a Defence to a Charge of Murder”.
Was reported a day or three after those “Dumped” reports.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Happy Birthday KAREN
Welcome to Adultmania…
February 1st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
I hope the Home Secretary isn’t on the Door at this fancy dress party otherwise half an hour into it they’ll be a denial of tickets being received and we’ll all get kicked out…
February 1st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
June
Thanks. I’m 20 but now I’m old who cares about my exact age - it’s all the one thing. Not a teenager!!!
—————-
******************
OLD???????????????????????? argggghhhhhhhhhhhhh
February 1st, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Stevo
The day before the party I could come as the ‘grim reaper’.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:51 pm
413..Stevo
Yes….very interesting indeed.
Difficulty is getting hold of rock solid info.
A very smokey landscape.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:50 pm
409
SteveT Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 1:44 pm
This is a lovely site today with people making up for past dissagreements and passing on birthday greetings.
——————————-
Ah go feck yerself
February 1st, 2008 at 1:49 pm
408 Matt
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=507782&in_page_id=1770
February 1st, 2008 at 1:49 pm
333
dcb Says:
His [Woolfall's] comments about non abduction are certainly strange in view of everything else that was being said right from the start. BUT - he may have been wanting to play the whole thing down as it could do considerable damage to the resort.
*************
Yes, yes, but the problem is that Woolfall’s comments did not take hold at all. Therefore, they remain glaringly disparate. Everyone else was clearly talking about a paedophile, and he alone bizarrely insisted that they were not talking about a paedophile. Not a single person supported him, and the talk about the predator/paedophile continued.
If his purpose was to minimize damage to the resort, I guess he failed. And moreover he (or even anyone else) did not even persist. No one ever supported or reiterated his comments.
Red flag!
February 1st, 2008 at 1:48 pm
413
Stevo
408 Matt
Matt, I remember that.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Brandon
Haapppyyy biirrtthhhdaayyyy tooo youuu!
Not read all this thread. There’s a very interesting thread on 3ags titled death - something-videos. The poster was asked to pull it so it might disappear again. Not sure of the current ettiquet of lifting from other threads but someone go and have a look! quick before it gets deleted again.
Looks like theory of death on eve of 2nd/early 3rd could eb spot on - plus Payne…..
February 1st, 2008 at 1:48 pm
I hope Mr Amaral and Mr Rebello come as themselves.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:47 pm
408 Matt
Can’t remember that but it’s interesting. I’ll look at it in a bit.
I’m really interested in this Bell Pottinger thing. They have vast professional resources to do anything with photos. They are big league PR and spin. Litvinenko was a massive story and Tim Bell was involved. Combine their investigations into pharmaceutical tampering and the confusion about when Alex Woolfall got to PDL and it all gets interesting.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:45 pm
403
firestar Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 1:40 pm
400
firestar Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
392
Rockhopper Says:
———————
come to think of it, ticking the ‘notify me of new comments’ box on anorak does much the same thing, as i can vouch for personally.
————————————
I have to confess I’m floundering in mid ocean regarding computer techie things and websites, the thought I had was; Could the nastier elements of the internet be policed and destroyed (remotely)? Mods and Admin if you can enlighten me I’d be grateful
—————-
Mods and Admin
For the determined its always possible to hack a site, but we do have back ups for the site, and I do personally too. Having more than one string to your bow helps, and there are a total of 6 people on the Mods and Admin here.
However when a computer IP is proved to be aggresive and destructive his ISP will drop him, word gets round, and eventually no one will connect him to the internet.
Any site operating without safeguards could be seen as naive or very amateur and you learn by your mistakes. Also the host servers and domains have got very wise and telephone the owner before any changes are made.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:45 pm
407
Stevo
No change there then!
February 1st, 2008 at 1:44 pm
396 firestar
Cheers and appreciated!
February 1st, 2008 at 1:44 pm
This is a lovely site today with people making up for past dissagreements and passing on birthday greetings.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:43 pm
380…Stevo
Trying to find a report link.
Do you remember that lurid headline story regarding “Madeleine was Murdered and
Dumped in a Reservoir”. ?
A day or two after that there was a report that a McCann Lawyer said that they
were preparing a “Defence to a Charge of Murder”.
Can’t find it…..so far.
Was within a day or two of Garth posting his Theory…”That Madeleine was Murdered
by a Paedo in the Apartment”.
Coincidence or what, Huh ?
February 1st, 2008 at 1:42 pm
404 SteveT
So you’ll be sniffing everyone? Or cocking your leg up? Or both?!
February 1st, 2008 at 1:42 pm
388 Ian
Sorry…no. A few weeks ago I joined the AP News photo gallery but the only pic in hi-res in there was the playground castle pic - not the main playground pic. Still looking.
But I think Alex Woolfall’s involvement is interesting. He is at Bell Pottinger. They are an ad agency and as such are experts with Photoshop. I’m looking at their company connections right now. Very, very interesting and lots of puzzles. Read the McCannfiles and see what they say about Mr Woolfall.
392 Rockhopper
To do that, an injunction would have to be served with some valid reason. The problem with government intervention to take it down any other way would have to be of national security. Anything less than that and I’m sure the press and public would be outraged and it would really hit the fan. Either way it would be big news. The problem with what you’re saying is that if it was done via sabotage, it would take hundreds of sites down at the same time. Most websites are “shared hosting” meaning they are just a folder on a hard disk shared by many websites.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:41 pm
393
mary
I think I will come as Eddie.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:40 pm
400
firestar Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
392
Rockhopper Says:
———————
come to think of it, ticking the ‘notify me of new comments’ box on anorak does much the same thing, as i can vouch for personally.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:40 pm
just me
thanks for your card!!!!
February 1st, 2008 at 1:40 pm
399 - no, i wont be able to dress up! lol
February 1st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
I dont know when you will get this
THANK YOU FOR MY BIRTHDAY WISHES EVERYONE XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sorry I have been spammed.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY KAREN XXXXXXXXX
Lone pigeon
Can I have it on Monday ? xxxx
February 1st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
no Brandon?
February 1st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
392
Rockhopper Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Stevo, I know this is well off subject but you seem to have a good working knowledge of computers.
I was wondering the other night how easy it would be for a govt or similarly resourced organisation to zap a website and take it down?
——————————
on places like astalavista etc you can download kits to do it with.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
I think people should go in some sort of fancy dress which would represent their posting name!
No, on second thoughts, scrap that!!