
Madeleine McCann: Britney Spears, Lolita And Birthday Cards
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MAIL: “Woolworths forced to withdraw LOLITA bedroom furniture range for girls”
The Lolita Midsleeper Combi, a wooden bed with pull-out desk and cupboard designed for girls aged around six, retails on the Woolworths website for £349.99
The name has “sexual connotations”. A “mother” sees it and writes: “Am I being particularly sensitive, or does anyone else out there think it’s bad taste for Woolies to have a kiddy bed range named ‘Lolita’?”
Well, you don’t have to buy it…
A spokesman for the company says: “What seems to have happened is the staff who run the website had never heard of Lolita, and to be honest no one else here had either. We had to look it up on Wikipedia. But we certainly know who she is now”
Trusting Wikipedia for information has its own dangers. (And look out for an article on the state of British education.) But no danger is bigger than a bed named, perhaps, in honour of a charcter in a novel by Vladimir Nabokov
Or Lolita Fatjo, pre-production coordinator for Star Trek
Or many other women called Lolita
“On-line parent power has been growing in recent years. In 2006 Tesco stopped selling a pole-dancing kit on its website over accusations it was destroying children’s innocence. And last summer an on-line campaign by Mumsnet resulted in a cinema advert about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann stopped from being screened before the children’s film Shrek the Third”
THE TIMES: “Staff at Woolworths baffled by fuss over the little girl’s bed called Lolita”
“Woolworths has withdrawn bedroom furniture for young girls bearing the sexually charged name Lolita after a campaign waged by a mothers’ online chat room”
An internal company e-mail seen by The Times goes: “As discussed, we’ve got the product below on our website. Can it be hidden as soon as is possible? Then I really need to find out how it came about being on our site and who bought it. Lolita is a word that means sexually active young teenagers, so a young girls’ range of bedroom products is in very poor taste. We’ve had an approach from a website who are clearly a little disturbed by this”
THE SUN: “Gift from Maddie for twins”
No, not furniture
“Twins Sean and Amelie McCann will get a special present from their missing sister Maddie today on their third birthday. Parents Kate and Gerry got the gift for the pair who, at three, are the same age as Maddie when she vanished last May”
Sad. But is it relevant to the case? Is it news?
Grandmother Eileen McCann tells us: “Of course Madeleine being there would be our dream but we’ll do our best to make sure the twins have a lovely day”
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Card from Madeleine at McCann twins party”
The twins are getting a gift in the Sun…
“Gerry and Kate McCann will throw a birthday party for their twins tomorrow - complete with a card from their missing four-year-old daughter, Madeleine”
DAILY STAR: “MISSING MADDIE’S SPECIAL PREZZIE”
“Little Sean and Amelie McCann will open a special present from their big sister as they celebrate their third birthday today”
With a card?
Says Eileen McCann: “There will be presents galore, lots of fun and games, lots of food and a big cake. Of course, Madeleine being home would make it complete and we continue to pray for that blessing”
SUR (Spain): “Marbella suffer their first loss of the year against Linares”
A football match: “Wearing T-shirts to raise awareness of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and Mari Luz Cortés, the children playing in the tournament accompanied the players onto the pitch as mascots at the beginning of the game”
RADAR: “Theater of Cruelty, Carnival of Souls”
“British rags hardly pretend to be providing straightforward news. What they are doing is what used to be the job of popular fiction; namely, processing myth out of characters sucked in from real life. Right now the cast list includes such durable regulars as Kate Moss—with or without Pete Doherty—Princes Harry and Wills, Posh and Becks, and Kate and Gerry McCann, whose daughter Madeleine’s kidnapping/disappearance in Portugal made them last year’s headliners”
ALISTAIR CAMPBELL (TIMES): Britney Spears: person or news commodity? She’s a great singer but obviously ill: we in the media have to decide to leave her alone”
Britney Spears and Madeleine McCann..?
“In some sections of the media, Madeleine McCann and her family are there. As I said in the Cudlipp Lecture on Tuesday, her disappearance was an interesting and important story, the stuff of every parent’s nightmare. But it quickly became a commodity in which most of the media got close to hysteria, and some have remained there. Let us not pretend the coverage was driven by concern for the child - there are many missing children - or compassion for the parents - certainly not once the mood shifted - or regard for the truth. It has been the worst example of recent times, on a par with Diana, of some newspapers thinking that the word “Madeleine” sells, and finding literally any old nonsense to keep her name in that selling position on the front”
THE GUARDIAN: “Mechanics of the McCann campaign - Professional media management may have generated coverage of Maddy’s disappearance, but it hasn’t helped with public sympathy for the family”
“Try as they might neither Clarence Mitchell nor Justine McGuinness could quite shake off the sense that the way they’ve managed this case might have contributed to some negative public sentiment towards the family. In place initially as what Mitchell described as “a buffer” between the shocked and distraught parents and the world’s media, hungry for news about Madeleine, it’s clear that what developed was a professional media management operation. With city PR firm Bell Pottinger on hand - primarily, we can assume, to defend the interests of their clients Mark Warner Holidays - as well as Justine and, latterly, Clarence with all their experience of Westminster spin, the McCanns could not have wanted for more professional advice. But as time went on media management itself - and once you’ve started feeding stories to the press to get control of the agenda, you really can’t stop - began generating negative reaction from other parties”
Madeleine McCann: Making news and sensation from grief
Posted: 1st, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,022) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 1st, 2008 at 4:59 pm
Coolandcalm, as you are well aware, that article, in an earlier form, was shown to be complete and utter cobblers.
The letters may now be BACK inProtugal, but they have been to UK and sent back for “legal procedural reasons”. i.e. the Brits are stalling the investigation.
You are on this forum a lot. You were well aware of all the above. So why waste everyone’s time with this discredited piece?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Did anyone notice when June told Reporter that if he posted again without presenting a link he would get a yellow card.
No more Reporter - but who suddenly pops up but good 0ld screwdriver, jackhammer, ummm help me out guys.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:56 pm
630
Aardvarko Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 4:51 pm
+++++++++++++++++++
I was referring to several previous posts:
#
449
dcb Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 2:08 pm
438
Ian Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 2:03 pm
So theres the challenge to pro-McCanns every where - show us an original resolution of the final photo.
+++++++++++++++
Ian - you know as well as everyone else that there is no “hard” evidence in the public domain of anything - for or against.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:56 pm
This from the local paper in the Algarve….. should be a fair representation of the facts re: the rogatory letters.
In other words they’re still Portugal.
http://portugalresident.com/portugalresident/showstory.asp?s=MADDY&sid=209
February 1st, 2008 at 4:56 pm
632, stevo…..yep just about sums it all up..ha ha!
February 1st, 2008 at 4:55 pm
633
delboy Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 4:54 pm
sc46 Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Well another no news day then.
uh! what you talking about, sledgie got some news for us……………………….as’nt HE
Yeah he said ‘crown office’ then done one.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:54 pm
632 - Stevo - yes read it, thanks., looking forward to their reply
well done great email!
February 1st, 2008 at 4:54 pm
sc46 Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Well another no news day then.
uh! what you talking about, sledgie got some news for us……………………….as’nt HE
February 1st, 2008 at 4:52 pm
just_me
I posted the letter…and a new reply…did you read it?
614 clouseau Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Sledgie
any predictions for the coming week ?
____________
I have a prediction which will definitely come true: “More shite from Sledgehammer.”
February 1st, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Well another no news day then.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:51 pm
627 dcb - you might not prosecute, but you would at least investigate. This is what is so exasperating - the Brits are undoubtedly blocking this investigation. Much of the speculation on this forum is about why this could be.
That’s why some of the stuff on here gets a little outlandish at times; I’m sure you understand that perfectly well, and are just being a little disingenuous!
February 1st, 2008 at 4:49 pm
616 Justlooking
I think perhaps experimental drugs may be behind it all - and binding them in a pact of silence.
This goes a long long way to explaining it all - more so IMO than the Leicester NHS thing.
But…who knows?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:49 pm
And the big story is……….da da dada! YES go on then what have I missed, go on Im ready,
just back from being pushed around and fighting with people,otherwise known as shopping,did I miss anything?….
February 1st, 2008 at 4:48 pm
#
484
Ian Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 2:26 pm
467
dcb
Verbal (on TV) statements from Tanner and others, written statements from Gerry on his blog, offical releases by Clarence, all are first hand evidence.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ian sorry for the delay in replying. Would you be prepared to prosecute a case on this information?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:46 pm
LP
625
… or Brian …?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:45 pm
I wonder if there’s any connection between Michael and John Kennedy?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Am I out of spam yet?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:43 pm
This document is relevant to the examination of witnesses in cross border criminal cases, and features Ms NBS:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldeucom/138/4051903.htm
February 1st, 2008 at 4:42 pm
606
Stevo
Thank You
Till later
February 1st, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Did sledgy run from here ???
February 1st, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Natalie Barclay-Stewart works for the crown service abnd eurojust. She is scottish. Is there any link with her and GM?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:38 pm
Hi Sledgy
pmsl
February 1st, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Back
625
Lone Pigeon
February 1st, 2008 at 4:34 pm
620
Tanya Byron
They arent in line for nomination for parents of the year, thats for sure. To think these idiots are supposed to advise patients!
Scares the life out of ya doesnt it.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm
Basically the crown office will accept the letters and then pass on to the home office. The crown office yused to work within the home office but recently they have become their own ‘international’ unti workign with territories. I think they will deal with the rog letters first before it gets to the home office. The crown service will deal with the Portugese on legal matters and probably even hold the court case whilst videoing it out to Portugal.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Sledgie
Are the McCanns being investigated for fraud?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Ian
619
I know! Tedious, isn’t it?
Probably, the Crown Office ‘information’ is as spurious as the 11.30am news alert and the suggestion that arguido status will be lifted.
There is no way that status will be lifted (at least from the parents) until the other Tapas crew, and then the parents, have been questioned further, or until all legal processes obstructing that have been exhausted.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Sledgie
any predictions for the coming week ?
February 1st, 2008 at 4:20 pm
609
Sledgehammer Says:
So what has this got to do with anything? C’mon now.
February 1st, 2008 at 4:19 pm
repeat post:
Sometimes it’s difficult to see the difference between lying and taking the piss.