
Madeleine McCann: Marcos Correia Knows, A Find And Jeremy Vargas
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR front page: “DIVERS HUNT FOR MADDY IN LAKE – Underworld tip-off leads to fresh search”
“The hunt, near the Algarve resort where she went missing in May, followed an underworld tip-off to lawyer Marcos Correia
Says Marcos: “They told me she was thrown into a deserted lake with murky waters. I’m convinced this is the place”
Pages 4 and 5: “I believe this is where Madeleine’s body lies”
Mr Correaia is a “Good Samaritan”. He is paying for a team to search the lake. And the name of this lake? It’s the Barragem do Arade reservoir. The police have been here before
Marcos says: “I was able to identify the site on December 10 and immediately informed police. Who did nothing”
The Mirror says he was “ignored”
Says Marcos: “I got tried of waiting for them to act on my information, so I decided to act”
The police went to the reservoir in October, and here
“MY BOYS LOST TOO” – Jeremy Vargas is missing. He went missing form Gran Canaria eight weeks before Madeleine McCann vanished
Says Jeremy’s mum Ithaisa Suarez: “Police from Madrid told me that they have been in contact with Portuguese police investigating Madeleine”
DAILY STAR front page: “Maddie: Divers’ shock find at bottom of lake”
They’ve found here?
Page 12: “’Maddie’s body is in this lake’,” says Marcos Correia. Divers have made a “significant” find
It’s a…length of knotted cord “which could have been used to truss up a body”
Says Marcos: “I am determined to carry on until I find Madeleine’s body or satisfy myself she is not here”
Says the dive coordinator Alan Wilson: “The divers are searching entirely by touch, feeling in the silt”
The search could take some time
DAILY EXPRESS: “MADELEINE: LAKE IS SEARCHED AFTER UNDERWORLD TIP-OFF”
A team of frogmen are “trawling the massive Barragem do Arade lake 30 miles from Praia da Luz where the little girl went missing last May”
Found anything?
“They have recovered a length of plastic cord which has been handed to Portuguese police and are examining a large square-shaped block found at the bottom of the reservoir”
What other treasures lurk in the deep?
Says Marcos Correia: “It is logic that if you throw a body in the water you would tie it to something to weigh it down. It could have been a madman or a gang, I don’t know”
But let’s speculate, anyhow
Says the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We are grateful to anyone who has important information in the search for Madeleine”
“PARENTS ‘WERE MADE SUSPECTS TOO FAST’” -Words from Alipio Ribeiro, the Policia Judiciaria’s national director
THE SUN: “Maddie divers in lake tip-off”
“A lawyer claims he was told Maddie, four, was killed within 48 hours of being snatched in Praia da Luz, 40 miles away. Police have dismissed the theory”
Not Finding Madeleine McCann - but making news
Posted: 4th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (931) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 5th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
Mods I have just seen your comment to my post, a comment about which I shall be making a formal complaint, I resent your vieled threat and it only confirms why I and others choose to restrict our posts. PeterO, still read don’t post to often, was amazed at the amount of feeling Sledgehammers expulsion has provoked. I agree with you 100% that this was manipulated, and it was manipulated by Sledgehammer. Mods did not come out of it very well and trying to stifle peoples views on it does them no favours either, there was only one loser yesterday and it wasn’t Sledgehammer, who as far as I can see has provided most of the real information on this case. The post that caused the furore, is a verifiable post, so what was the Hammers real motive, he certainly is not as stupid as some posters like to make out, I don’t think we have heard the last of this.
Administrator: Utter rubbish. No-one’s views have been stifled. Motivation? Try distraction. For instance, this has the feel of a soothsayer’s prediction. Like to hear one of mine?
Administrator: This posting has been deliberately manipulated to suggest I have just made the foregoing comment. That is disgraceful and unacceptable. I sincerely hope the implication was in error.
Complain at once, please do. -agw
February 5th, 2008 at 11:34 am
i think the man that came around that ladies house at least knows where madeeline maccan
same as holy and jessicaathey suspected the teacher and found out he was the one that killed the two incent girls
February 5th, 2008 at 8:51 am
this is annoying
February 5th, 2008 at 8:49 am
Will get it right
February 5th, 2008 at 8:42 am
Try try try again
February 5th, 2008 at 8:33 am
February 5th, 2008 at 6:39 am
PeterO, still read don’t post to often, was amazed at the amount of feeling Sledgehammers expulsion has provoked. I agree with you 100% that this was manipulated, and it was manipulated by Sledgehammer. Mods did not come out of it very well and trying to stifle peoples views on it does them no favours either, there was only one loser yesterday and it wasn’t Sledgehammer, who as far as I can see has provided most of the real information on this case. The post that caused the furore, is a verifiable post, so what was the Hammers real motive, he certainly is not as stupid as some posters like to make out, I don’t think we have heard the last of this.
Administrator: Utter rubbish. No-one’s views have been stifled. Motivation? Try distraction. For instance, this has the feel of a soothsayer’s prediction. Like to hear one of mine?
February 5th, 2008 at 6:18 am
Thanks for a nice reply Duncan. Appreciated.
February 5th, 2008 at 6:17 am
Another disappearance of a little boy in Spain (in March ‘07) has been linked to Madeleine now……but wait a minute, the parents of the boy have been corresponding with the McCanns since May. Then nine months later they establish a link and go to the media. They have to be kidding.
IMO Everything coming from the McCann camp is just too transparent. There must be another angle otherwise it looks that they are being led to their own funeral by their own advisors.
Maybe a sacrifice or two is on the agenda. IMO.
February 5th, 2008 at 6:13 am
Some comments are put into Mod queue by Admin/Mods for review if we are in doubt about anything in the post.
Majority of items in Mod queue, however, are placed there automatically by software that protects the site. If a post contains more than one link, if it is a first time poster, or if a regular mispells their name etc then the software will dump that comment in Mod queue. The software is also triggered by certain ‘key words’ in the post. Sometimes, however, even Mods/Admin don’t know why a particular post has triggered the site defense software. In the case of your theory, the delay in releasing it was simply because it was overshadowed by everything else that was happening yesterday
Apologies, Duncanr
February 5th, 2008 at 5:54 am
Hi Duncan thanks.
Appreciate that.
The moment has sort of gone now lol. Different mind set today.
More interested in why it was considered for moderation. Not being funny, but just interested. Might help define a boundry for my next theory.
Might seek out a herbal inspiration for that one too.
Appreciate the time and humour you guys put into the forum.
regards from sweltering NZ.
February 5th, 2008 at 5:38 am
Will
Have released your theory from Mod queue
However, you may want to repost it here so people don’t miss it?
February 5th, 2008 at 5:23 am
935 - Will
+++++++++++++++++++++
Just about to take 3 dogs for a walk before they piss all over the floor.
Can you hang on a bit. I’ll check the mod queue when I come back
(btw ingenious theory!)
February 5th, 2008 at 5:07 am
935
Maybe Scrappy Doo will sort it out for you? Offer a Scooby snack?
February 5th, 2008 at 4:53 am
650
willo Says:
February 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Mods And Admin,
I had a post moderated yesterday (490, I think) and it’s still under moderation. Could you tell me why?
Cough, excuse me. Anybody there to answer my question yet?
Or are you waiting for rogatory letters to arrive?
Can I repost my theory?
February 5th, 2008 at 4:51 am
The above was lifted from BestSmileys web site. For explanation how it was done see below
February 5th, 2008 at 4:32 am
Nite, V.Q.
February 5th, 2008 at 4:21 am
Night Duncan,
I am out for the count too.
My little feral kitty has survived the worst of the cold!
(My signficant other thinks s/he is a neighbourhood cat that prefers our catfood but I think this theory is rubbish)
February 5th, 2008 at 4:18 am
929 DuncanR Says:
921 - markskidd
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ssshhh!
Not so loud!
~~~~~
He’s a kid, doesn’t know better. He’s asleep now anyway, the wee one.
February 5th, 2008 at 4:07 am
921 - markskidd
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ssshhh!
Not so loud!
February 5th, 2008 at 3:42 am
So does this mean if she is found that ‘The MCcanns’ are proven to be innocent of any involvement???
I sincerely would like to think they have no part in this, but …….. if they are capable of leaving 3 very young children alone, and appearing to get on with their lives, and seemingly having given up searching, or even checking out the children that have been recognised, and thought to be their beautiful daughter, then they have to realise … why … the people have doubts about their honesty and integrity.
I am amazed how they have held their heads up, and accepted this as her fate, when if given proper supervision, she would be enjoying this celebration of the ‘Twins’
NO PARENT, would or could forget, or accept, that purely because of their own actions, that a child should suffer, and regardless, as to whether they had any role in this, the cause is firmly at their feet, because these children were left vulnerable.
Bless this sweet, innocent little girl, sad she was to become head-line news in order to allow her parents to opt out of responsibility, to enjoy their holiday, without the disruption of their kids.
Why ony one of them? ………… Probably never know.
rel:dr:05.02
February 5th, 2008 at 3:36 am
Another commercial break.
The Dutch investigative team has nailed Juran.
February 5th, 2008 at 3:11 am
If I recall correctly, there has been some effort to shift the window by discrediting some of JT’s accounts.
February 5th, 2008 at 2:59 am
925 annie123 Says:
February 5th, 2008 at 2:50 am
—-
Ian has narrowed a rather implausible scenario to an implausible window of about 5 minutes.
He has been the devil’s advocate, to my way of thinking.
M was not abducted.
February 5th, 2008 at 2:50 am
897
Ian Says:
This is what I am trying to grasp.
The McScum are concetrated on 9-15pm. Why?
The 9-30pm - 10pm would seem more plausible? What is so special about 9-15pm?
Think about it - had you committed a crime at say 9pm, wouldn’t you try and change the timeline in order to put people off the real time line to put you in a safe environment?
Ok, there has been debate about MM disappearing on the 2nd. But put this aside for a sec and look at what you are left with. 9-15pm is significant in order to give certain people an alibi IMO.
T10 is the key to all this IMO. Who is T10?
February 5th, 2008 at 2:49 am
Commericial break.
(there may be some justice finally for Natalee, or at worst information for her family to move on)
Nite to you too, Markskidd.
Let’s hope for the best for Madeleine.
February 5th, 2008 at 2:32 am
the truth is out there and in Rothley. Sweet dreams
Soon Maddie soon
February 5th, 2008 at 2:31 am
Checked the other thread, more action here.
I am off to watch the ABC special on Natalee Holloway, but may check in during commercials.
February 5th, 2008 at 2:30 am
DUNCAN!!!!!!
February 5th, 2008 at 2:28 am
918 markskidd Says:
February 5th, 2008 at 2:24 am
very quiet, is ther another thread with disco lights on?
–
the other thread was slow, last I checked.
these are just slow hours . . . if you can hang on for a few hours there will be more traffic.
Duncan is probably out somewhere, so you could try waking him up.
February 5th, 2008 at 2:27 am
night then truth investigators