Teenage Student Moves In With RE Teacher
“GIRL of 16 moves in with her RE teacher, aged 49.”
Mr Clive Richards is pictured in the Daily Mail.
He has been married three times. Jess Anderson has not been married, but is believed to be in line for some favourable GCSE grades, not least of all, one imagines, in the scriptures.
The Mail says Richards has refused to comment. But no comment is a comment, and verily he sayeth unto the scribes: “We have done nothing wrong.”
For it is written out 100 times…
Posted: 4th, February 2008 | In: Tabloids Comments (7) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
Recent comments
- Hippo on Detective James Arthur Ray Investigates Sedona
- julie on X Factor: Jedward, John & Edward, Are Voted Out, But Then
- yampster on Portmouth Woman Has Morbid Fear Of Vegetables
- Hippo on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Bat E Bird on X Factor: Jedward, John & Edward, Are Voted Out, But Then
Regular Features
February 11th, 2008 at 12:22 am
The Brits don’t get the handle on sexual grooming via education, they’ve missed out on lessons learned in Utah, they also employ sex offenders routinely in their schools, they use to send them to Africa or Australia, in the 1920s, they had to do a re-think on that.
The global stereotype of the Brit teacher as pedophile is more than a little justified. In Ohio a teacher that fails to report sex abuse gets arrested, in the UK, a headteacher who doesn’t cover-up sex abuse, doesn’t have a career. It is that English thing they do.
February 9th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
wow he taught me last year
February 4th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Clive Richards? Religious type?
It’s not Cliff working under a pseudonym is it, and lowering his stated age in order lure in the young totty?
February 4th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Mods and Admin
Excellent point regarding crminals. Of course, linking with the slightly busier McCann thread, they are always referring to the value of their house, their jobs, their salaries etc.
————–
Mods and Admin
You forgot the FUND!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
The Mail article tells us 1) the estimated value of her parent’s house 2) her father’s profession (the ubiquitous noughties ‘property developer’) and 3) the estimated monthly rental of the cottage that they live in. Can someone please enlighten me as to why the Mail feel that these ‘facts’ are in any way relevant to the story? Do we have a new middle class parameter - that something is made worse if it happens to people whose homes are worth in excess of £500,000.
——————
Mods and Admin
An interesting point you make Shield of Truth re value of property = value of worthiness personally.
On the other side some fraudulent criminals own masses of property, wonder how the Daily Mail value them?
February 4th, 2008 at 11:51 am
Cue for all the ‘Little Britain” gags.
February 4th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Damn Baptist are more prolific and annoying than penster at the moment