
Madeleine McCann: Carlos Anjos Says, Clarence Mitchell Replies And The Daily Express Is Quiet
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Maddie cops snub”
Carlos Anjos, head of the Portuguese Police Federation, says: “There are bigger problems in the police”, than the case of Madeleine McCann
Says Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns’ spokesman: “Mr Anjos is entitled to his opinion but it is entirely unhelpful”
This the same Carlos Anjos who once noted:
“There is no criminal investigation which can feed a news frenzy for six months, so what we have seen are both English and Portuguese journalists behaving in a scandalous and unprofessional way. Writing terrible stories in the papers, some of which have clearly affected the McCanns… now we have to say that the McCanns are partly to blame for this. Because it was something they created”
And then one of the oddest lines yet seen in a newspaper:
“Meanwhile cops have ruled out a theory the four-year-old could have been snatched by Swiss pervert Urs Hans Von Aesch. He blew his chance in august after killing a girl of five”
Anyone care to explain that comment?
DAILY STAR: “FIND MADDIE? WE’VE GOT BETTER THINGS TO DO. HEAD COP BLASTS McCANN SEARCH”
Says Mr Anjos: “There are bigger problems than the Maddie case”
Why the Star should appear shocked at this seem unclear, given the tabloid stories of paedophilia being rife in Portugal
Says Mr Anjos: “I am certain that all of my colleagues involved in the investigation are doing everything they can to discover what happened”
DAILY MIRROR: “Maddy’s ‘not our priority’”
Mr Anjos made his views known in Portuguese newspaper 24 Horas
MARI Luz Cortes – Still missing. Her father has posted a £110,000 reward, The paper reports that police are “scaling down the search”
DAILY MAIL: “Maddie? We’ve got bigger problems”
Says Mr Anjos: “But with respect, there are bigger problems in the Policia Judiciaria than the Madeleine case”
DAILY EXPRESS: NO MADELEINE NEWS – Which is the biggest Madeleine McCann news of the past six months
Madeleine McCann: hype, frenzy and speculation
Posted: 8th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (978) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 9th, 2008 at 2:05 am
Ciara-Louise
Who is RR and why is he missing?
February 9th, 2008 at 2:04 am
jo Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:59 am
849
the watcher
We are all panting with excitement to hear your very respected version/speculation.
Dont be shy.Say what you believe/think has happened.It could well be very valuable.
my opinion is
we know nothing
February 9th, 2008 at 2:04 am
859

)
Karen
(Dont assume it is a “he”!!!!
February 9th, 2008 at 2:03 am
849
the watcher Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:56 am
no it means money was spent on posters etc
not on them personally
**************************
1,000 posters £10.00 Tops, they drove all the way to Huelva to give one poster to a garage ??????
and you read that in the tabloids
so my point is
what are the facts
we were told all the tappas 9 kids were in the apartment that night
retardo 3 told us maddy would be home for xmas
that a man with a magic dna tracker would find her
that a diving team had found something
all bullshit to sell papers
but in reality
wake up
no real news
************************
You really are a very bright person, so if you apply that intelligence you WILL find that ther are MUCH better sources out there than those you’ve quoted.
So I will save my ammo for people who have managed to look beyond the limited sphere that yuou are presenting.
February 9th, 2008 at 2:02 am
Jo
I know. He’s just a knob.
February 9th, 2008 at 2:02 am
852
Ciara-Louise
He will be back! be patient….we didnt see you either since the last 2 days more or less
I miss him as well…..for different reasons,even garth hasnt been much around actually….oh dear RR come back soon!!!
February 9th, 2008 at 2:01 am
grande - love conundrums - though they often make me feel really thick….
C- Lou - isn’t RR travelling back home today?? he’ll be back tomorrow i’m sure…
February 9th, 2008 at 2:01 am
noseycow Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:47 am
watcher - i agree with you i don’t think that they personnally are taking any money out of the fund at the moment.
However Justine Mcguiness was piad over £50,000 in salary and expenses, inculding meal receipts etc - did she ever dine with the mcc’s?
Travel expenses for some of the family have been paid for by the fund apparentely, also the funds board of directors is made up of family and friends. While we are told that no salary is being paid to them (i would question that but hey give you the benefit of the doubt), they can claim expenses….
Clarrie once said on camera that ‘once g returns to work they will no longer need to rely on the fund for living expenses’ - read into that what you will….
However G is now earning again (though i think he was probably on paid sick leave - as he was entitled to it for 6 months). K is not earning and i doubt that g is doing his private clinic work.. so income must be reduced. However they have one less mouth to feed, one less nursery bill to pay, one less to clothe….
yes
i get the picture
but feel that it was in bad taste
February 9th, 2008 at 2:00 am
I think the trouble is that there’s no way of The Abduction story fitting with the McCanns story about being responsible parents but K & G are determind to make it fit - so we’re left with all these inconsistencies.
February 9th, 2008 at 1:59 am
849
the watcher
We are all panting with excitement to hear your very respected version/speculation.
Dont be shy.Say what you believe/think has happened.It could well be very valuable.
February 9th, 2008 at 1:58 am
DCB - yes clarrie did say that he was inpaid leave - but given the circumstances he would have had no trouble being signed off sick for stress - and the trust have always been supportive of him .
So as he was entitled to up to 6 months sick leave on full pay, and returned to work exactly 6 months after the end of their holiday, i think perhaps this is more likely IMO.
By the way - i am not having a go - any parent in these circumstances deserves support by their employer IMO
February 9th, 2008 at 1:57 am
846
jo
Jo, I’m missing RR.
February 9th, 2008 at 1:56 am
846
jo Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:53 am
…”jumping over a wall….”
Well it seems to be the only thing to do with a kid in your arms oe not?
*****************
Coooooooperman!!!!
Yeahh! that Superman could do it!
February 9th, 2008 at 1:56 am
842
to wind us up,so dont give s/he the pleasure.Ignore it.
Karen
Not worth it my dear….. thats exactely what s/he wants
February 9th, 2008 at 1:56 am
Grande Finale Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:44 am
823
the watcher Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:39 am
no it means money was spent on posters etc
not on them personally
**************************
1,000 posters £10.00 Tops, they drove all the way to Huelva to give one poster to a garage ??????
and you read that in the tabloids
so my point is
what are the facts
we were told all the tappas 9 kids were in the apartment that night
retardo 3 told us maddy would be home for xmas
that a man with a magic dna tracker would find her
that a diving team had found something
all bullshit to sell papers
but in reality
wake up
no real news
February 9th, 2008 at 1:54 am
837
noseycow Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:49 am
Grande - thanks for that - ooohhhh
i just love gossip 
*****************************
Do you like Conundrums?
February 9th, 2008 at 1:54 am
843
noseycow Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:52 am
++++++++++++++
By the way - I remember reading that Gerry was on unpaid leave - not paid sick leave.
February 9th, 2008 at 1:53 am
827
Totje
…”jumping over a wall….”
Well it seems to be the only thing to do with a kid in your arms oe not?
February 9th, 2008 at 1:53 am
840
dcb : right!
February 9th, 2008 at 1:53 am
827
Totje Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:43 am
I don’t know! But let’s speculate.
Window/shutters : who passed? Tanner, Oldfield and O’Brien if I remember correctly.
Did they know the window/shutters had to be closed in stead of opened? Are they observant people? Did they have any reason at all to have a look at the apartment? Weren’t they rushing up and down to check their children and have dinner?
THEY were their kids security! so if they weren’t checking who was ? Oh and you forgot Wilkins
No trace on window ledge? How do we know? The papers or a formal statement by the PJ? And what if the abductor [IF there was any] leave through the front door or the patio doors?
No traces on window ledge then.
Martin Brunt! SOCO report from SKY!
Pink blanket? Could that be Madeleine’s comfort blanket?
Young blonde: for illegal adoption more likely, for evil minds the eldest more preferred I guess.
I guess but not old enough apparently! Blonde, twins adoption 10 x the money!
Lock front door? Just close it and its locked, don’t you ever carry a child or groceries and shut the door with your feet?
Always double lock the doors in an apartment to prevent unbolting! even when inside!
Jumping over a wall? Why?
Because their Video producer said so ! Out of the apartment over that 20ft drop and onto the street!
February 9th, 2008 at 1:52 am
dcb - in a better mood now???
February 9th, 2008 at 1:52 am
Jo
I’m more than happy to subject the Watcher to abuse. He started it.
February 9th, 2008 at 1:51 am
833
Karen
February 9th, 2008 at 1:50 am
It’s a strange hobby asking questions on here and then, when people reply, dismissing the reply as not being accurate because it is taken from the tabloids etc.
If a definite answer is what is required then surely the question should be directed to the appropriate source.
February 9th, 2008 at 1:49 am
829
the watcher
Look…ejem…may be you are just a bit tired now and you have a rest?
Anorak can be a bit of a drain if you are not caredul
IF you had been “abused” as you say,I can guaranty you that M&Adm would tell us off….so dont be obtuse ok?
February 9th, 2008 at 1:49 am
825
the watcher
Be fair. What abuse by me? post 779?
February 9th, 2008 at 1:49 am
Grande - thanks for that - ooohhhh
i just love gossip
February 9th, 2008 at 1:47 am
watcher - i agree with you i don’t think that they personnally are taking any money out of the fund at the moment.
However Justine Mcguiness was piad over £50,000 in salary and expenses, inculding meal receipts etc - did she ever dine with the mcc’s?
Travel expenses for some of the family have been paid for by the fund apparentely, also the funds board of directors is made up of family and friends. While we are told that no salary is being paid to them (i would question that but hey give you the benefit of the doubt), they can claim expenses….
Clarrie once said on camera that ‘once g returns to work they will no longer need to rely on the fund for living expenses’ - read into that what you will….
However G is now earning again (though i think he was probably on paid sick leave - as he was entitled to it for 6 months). K is not earning and i doubt that g is doing his private clinic work.. so income must be reduced. However they have one less mouth to feed, one less nursery bill to pay, one less to clothe….
February 9th, 2008 at 1:47 am
815
noseycow Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 1:33 am
grande finale - remember that famous quote - none of their valuables had been taken???
***********
Ouch, that must hurt!
February 9th, 2008 at 1:46 am
noseycow
Gossip?
Somebody stole G”s wallet at the airport…with 2 of madeleine”s pictures in it and 100 euros.
The “thief” returned it without the 100 euros note…the comments were that probably the thief felt guitly when he heard about Madeleine”s spectacular disappearance!!
G”s was very distressed to have lost the pics.
Wat do u fink?