Madeleine McCann With Britney Spears And David Beckham
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Maddie resort ‘perv’ snaps Brit”
“A suspected pervert who fled the resort where Maddie McCann vanished is taking photos of Britney Spears in LA, The Sun can reveal.
“Christian Ridout, 32, is wanted for questioning in Praia da Luz, Portugal, for allegedly trying to groom a 12-year-old girl”
DJ Shifty..?
“But for several months Ridout has used the name Dexter Troy to work as a paparazzo in Hollywood, where he has trailed the likes of Britney, David Beckham and Kiefer Sutherland”
Says Ridout: “These allegations are ridiculous. At the time of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance I was in London. I have not been to Portugal for three years”
But Britney Spears. Madeleine McCann. Both in the same story. Remarkable stuff at the Sun. has Ridout every taken a picture of Princess Diana? We demand to be told…
DAILY MIRROR: “McCann: Clear our name bid”
“Kate and Gerry McCann are planning a formal appeal to be cleared as suspects over missing daughter Madeleine, it was revealed yesterday. Lawyers for the couple, both 39, in Portugal and Britain, held talks to decide the timing of an application to lift their ‘arguido’ status”
McCanns talks with lawyers – read all about it!
Madeleine McCann: Cleudo for your armchair
Posted: 9th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,164) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
February 9th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Oh, no one else said what they look like? Just me ?
February 9th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
How does f***ing RedRooster get to dominate these threads when he/she’s around??!!
Far more interesting is the reference back to Tony B and the Tapas7. As Dcb said, in all ways, those people should have been shoulder to shoulder with the McCanns, instead of which each slunk back into anonymity.
Because they too had neglected their children?
Or for more sinister reasons/
February 9th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
1038 ciara louise
thankyou for joining in, i have been told i look like goldie hawn, in her younger days i may add! hope your not too young to remember her!
February 9th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
1033
jass Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
*******************************
im really not interested so unless you want to get some serious abuse from myself i suggest you drop it. I know where i stand with you now so do yourself a favour and dont start with me ok????
February 9th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Angelina Jolie……….according to some staff/kids in the school. When I tie my hair up and take a class for PE some kids say I look like the woman in the Tomb Raider game. I’m the same height and build as her but don’t have the pout! I’ve been told in nightclubs I’m like Andrea Corr and sometimes Martine McCutcheon. Hope that helps with a kind of image of me, in height, build colouring etc.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
1031
Châtelaine Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
*********************
fine with me, we’re all friends now i think
February 9th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
1031
Châtelaine Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
“……….End of story.
:-)”
++++++++++++++++
Bit like the Mccanns then!
February 9th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Rooster, don’t get involved with rank amateurs like jass.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
1029
dcb Says:
Thank you for your response.
When I posted this before, it was greeted by very anti Mc opinions - nothing constructive.
It has shown me another group involved in the Mc mania = pro’s , anti’s, both of which are extremists then the intelligent pro’s and anti’s who listen, digest and theorise. Sadly the last 2 seem to be rare.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
RR
I absolutely refute that!
I may find you irritating, but I wouldn’t bother to complain about you.
Check with Mods .
February 9th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
1029
dcb Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
*******************************
exactly and it doesnt mean it was madeliene either ?????
February 9th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
1027
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
“1023
Châtelaine Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
if you had been paying attention Lady chatelaine then you would know that “that he infact was a she” it was mrs RedRooster anyway its all in the past so best left there i guess ”
****
Fine with me, RR, RRR or RRJ.
I would never have evoked the matter, had it not been that Saul had requested. And rightfully so, as he felt belittled and hurt. Yes?
End of story.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
1026
jass Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
***********************
oh i see now, you’re the saddo that got both me and C-Lou put into moderation are you?? Nice one, did it feel good did it. Instead of being jealous and winging why dont you try adding to the debate. Now grow up hey
February 9th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
1024
annie123 Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
++++++++++++++++++
I have thought this before and posted it a long time ago. Tanner could have seen someone carrying a child - but it doesn’t mean to say it was an abducter. She only added recognising the pyjamas much later apparently.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
metodo 3- private eyes public lies
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3327947.ece
February 9th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
1023
Châtelaine Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
it was mrs RedRooster 
anyway its all in the past so best left there i guess 
**************
if you had been paying attention Lady chatelaine then you would know that “that he infact was a she”
February 9th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
I’m laughing a bit, I must admit. I quite enjoyed Rooster’s cock-of-the-walk aggression!
No, it’s just this: that I know the flirty bed-me thing with Ciara Louise must be interesting and amusing and all to some people, I do find it really irritating.
That’s all.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
http://google.the-news.net/display.aspx?id=945-1
February 9th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
1018
PeterMac Says:
I posted another ‘possibility’ sometime ago but didn’t get a satisfactory response. Maybe you can tell me why my theory wouldn’t work?
What if the McC’s version of abduction is incorrect, JT saw a father taking his child home from creche, the actual abduction occured between 9-30pm and 10pm?
What if?
February 9th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
894
saul Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Perhaps Milady can adjudicate as to whether any falling took place.
*****
It’s a long time ago, yet I cannot remember any “falling”, Saul.
Just a tumultuous back and forth with RedRooster.
I must admit that at the time I lived under the impressions he was a she …
I also remember someone mentioning to other posters, asking what this was about, that it was a “bitch” fight
February 9th, 2008 at 11:32 pm
1021
jass Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
******************
well excuse me but i cant see you can i ??? I assumed with your attitude and you pathetic attempt at having a go at me….so come on what is your problem?? Have i upset you or something??
February 9th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
On account I’m a bloke, according to Mr Rooster
February 9th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
1019 jass
February 9th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
I’ve been likened to Jane Birkin.
But can’t see it myself.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
749 TB
Good point, and a very obvious one that I confess I had missed
“Do [the Tapas 9] really believe the abductor theory?”
REPLY: NO. Otherwise they would have also appeared side by side alongside Gerry and Kate McCann in some of their many photo opportunities and would have joined in with the appeals to the public to ‘find Madeleine’.
They are silent, IMHO, because they dare not speak lest they inadvertently tell the truth. JT has already blown massive holes in the official story. A second JT would be a disaster.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
1015
jass Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
******************
ok jass whats your beef??? come on tell me, cause yer know its been a pleasant night all evening so whats yer problem mate ??
February 9th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
1015 jass
for gods sake stop being so childish, play the game! well? who you like?
February 9th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Rooster…as arnie schwarzenegger??
Rooster..as Dot off EastEnders, more like
February 9th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
1011 chatelaine
Wow!
February 9th, 2008 at 11:24 pm
1009
Ciara-Louise Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
************
how about you gorgeous ??