Madeleine McCann With Britney Spears And David Beckham
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Maddie resort ‘perv’ snaps Brit”
“A suspected pervert who fled the resort where Maddie McCann vanished is taking photos of Britney Spears in LA, The Sun can reveal.
“Christian Ridout, 32, is wanted for questioning in Praia da Luz, Portugal, for allegedly trying to groom a 12-year-old girl”
DJ Shifty..?
“But for several months Ridout has used the name Dexter Troy to work as a paparazzo in Hollywood, where he has trailed the likes of Britney, David Beckham and Kiefer Sutherland”
Says Ridout: “These allegations are ridiculous. At the time of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance I was in London. I have not been to Portugal for three years”
But Britney Spears. Madeleine McCann. Both in the same story. Remarkable stuff at the Sun. has Ridout every taken a picture of Princess Diana? We demand to be told…
DAILY MIRROR: “McCann: Clear our name bid”
“Kate and Gerry McCann are planning a formal appeal to be cleared as suspects over missing daughter Madeleine, it was revealed yesterday. Lawyers for the couple, both 39, in Portugal and Britain, held talks to decide the timing of an application to lift their ‘arguido’ status”
McCanns talks with lawyers – read all about it!
Madeleine McCann: Cleudo for your armchair
Posted: 9th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,164) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
February 10th, 2008 at 1:46 am
1131 val
Neither do i, am off to bed now. good night
February 10th, 2008 at 1:44 am
1129
man on a hill
I have no idea. Does anyone else know?
If I did I would go to he police
February 10th, 2008 at 1:43 am
1124 man on a hill
See my post to Yampster-1127
I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that Mark Warner will see a big drop in bookings because
of all the so called sightings of “creepy” people around the complex and that they could sue the
McCann camp for loss of earnings, as could the people who buy to rent on the complex.
Saturn replied with the solution that it would not be a problem because Bell Pottinger would
book the apartments!!!!!!!!!
Maybe the residents have complained about all the attention PDL is still receiving , hence
the need for closure….who knows what”s true, I certainly don”t.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:42 am
1127
val
Let’s get one thing straight. Just because the majority of people posting on this board are idle. Sleuthing, whatever that means does not consist of typing a few keywords into google. Anyone can do that, but few on here do. The ones that do are held up as some sort of gurus. The fact that Joe Bloggs first job was with Nat West, 20 years ago, is totally irrelevant
February 10th, 2008 at 1:37 am
1128 yampster
So what do you think happened? Where is M?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:35 am
1126
man on a hill
I have no evidence that the world is not a flat disc supported by four elephants on the back of a giant turtle.
However, personally, I doubt it
February 10th, 2008 at 1:32 am
1123 Yampster
Stevo, as much as he is good at sluething and very generous to tell us what he has found, does rather lean towards the realms of Fantasy as does Saturn, that”s why they seem to post to each other mostly.
I do believe there has been undue support from moneyed people and there may be a sinister
reason for this. Just another example IMO of how corrupt our Government is, and what
little alternative there is for good, honest, alternatives.
I also believe the McCanns are involved in Madeleine”s disappearance, and have never
shown either remorse for being directly responsible for her disappearance, or showing real
grief, but will we ever really know what happened? I doubt it.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:30 am
1125 yampster
I have no evidence. Does that make it untrue though? Maybe.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:24 am
1124
man on a hill
Interesting theory. Can you show me any evidenceof this secret drug trial, other than from this board.
Oh, and the billions evidence would be good too, go on suprise me.
I can wait
February 10th, 2008 at 1:20 am
1121 Val
My interpretation would be that some sort of secret drug experimentation for free holidays was going on. Something went wrong, the company might look bad. The company has been loaned billions from bank like RBS for example. They want to protect their interests.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:18 am
1121
val
No Val, you have it right. It looks like the McCanns will not be charged so this blog has lurched, ponderously, into conspracy theory. The fact that someone they know once had a job at a bank is completely irrelevant.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:14 am
1117 Val
Yes I did with woah. Where do you start? Always held the belief that the jesus story could have been used to control people through fear. Now I have confirmation, which is nice! Totally believe in 9/11 conspiracy theory. It makes sense. Thank you for recommendation.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:12 am
1119 man on a hill
I scrolled down and read Stevo post 849, but can”t really see the connection, what has Kennedy working at NatWest in his twenties to do with a Drug Company owing a bank
a lot of money?
Iv”e probably missed a lot of posts on this question so if you can give me a potted history,
please do so.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:06 am
1119
man on a hill Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 1:03 am
1115 Châtelaine
I think i’d have to agree with stevo and saturn then. I’m not confident for justice now. We might find out what actually happened years hence, but so what, that’s not justice for M. Only someone standing trial for her murder would be justice.”
*****
IMO manslaughter or accidental death
Don’t know the “official” English terms, but you’ll get what I’m saying.
But, jeeeez … have to go to bed now.
Good night again
February 10th, 2008 at 1:03 am
1115 Châtelaine
I think i’d have to agree with stevo and saturn then. I’m not confident for justice now. We might find out what actually happened years hence, but so what, that’s not justice for M. Only someone standing trial for her murder would be justice.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:03 am
1116
man on a hill
I have to say that I loved the ‘maybe’ at the end of your post.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:58 am
1102 man on a hill
Hi there, we keep posting when the other os off site don”t we.!!!!!
I don”t know how to go back to previous days so couldn”t read your 722 post. Did you
watch Zeitgiest? If so, what did you think of it?
Jass is convinced the government has intervened, I”m inclined to agree, but at this moment in time GB has his hands full trying to hold the Government together, and Branson trying
to buy Northern Rock I think is enough for them to keep their distance.
Given that the initial investigation by the Portugese Police was bungled, after nine months,
surely there would be enough evidence to charge them? It is probable we will never know
what evidence there really was, but in any event it is very disappointing.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:57 am
1113 debs
That’s what i was asking. Have you read Stevo’s post on 849. M’s death embarrassed a huge corporation, maybe.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:54 am
1111
man on a hill Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 12:51 am
1106 val
Stevo might have dug up the answer. See post 849.”
****
O.K.
A last one.
I think that both Stevo & Saturn are on a track that indicates a much wider play
and in line with the “puppet-master” of a couple of days ago…
February 10th, 2008 at 12:53 am
Exactly, Val.
It is the question that has troubled everyone for months.
The parents have never seemed genuinely bereaved, and if they thought their child was being abused by some abductor, wouldn’t they have been worse than bereaved, but beside themslves with agony?
Then in step that publicity-crazed Branson, and Topshop’s Green, plus other multi-millionaires, hopping around with jets to Rome and all.
Yet the Tapas friends disappear into the background. Never knew them, m’lud, except for Jane Tanner, dragged in to exaggerate the sighting of a man she didn’t even mention for two days after the “abduction”…
February 10th, 2008 at 12:52 am
Perhaps we are overlooking Clarry’s role in all of this. I keep asking why he was seconded to assist the Mcs so early on. Given that his expertise is media management - far removed from child abduction. Prior to that there was Justine MCGuinness another PR parasite.
Anyone care to elaborate on the Media Monitoring Unit and why we have one?
February 10th, 2008 at 12:51 am
1110
Ciara-Louise Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 12:50 am
1108
Châtelaine
Goodnight, take care. xx”
***
Good night “Dear-Louise”
over and out.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:51 am
1106 val
Stevo might have dug up the answer. See post 849.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:50 am
1108
Châtelaine
Goodnight, take care. xx
February 10th, 2008 at 12:49 am
Something sick and strange is going on . If this case is shelved then there will never be justice for Maddie.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:47 am
Bâtmân, ét âll: göödníght.
I really hope, tomorrow will bring some “good” news.
I’m not desperate yet, still have hope of “surprises”…
However, have to take the dogs in and go for the silken sheets.
Good night.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:44 am
1097 Jass
One thing above all else puzzles me………..how can the McCanns command such high
profile support? Given that they are middle class, Gerry is a well respected Doctor in his
field, it still doesn”t account for the fact that Kennedy is paying CM, salary, Branson donates
£100,000 towards the McCanns Legal fees, the PR machine gets them an audience with the
Pope and a visit to the White House, what”s going on?
February 10th, 2008 at 12:43 am
Wouldn’t be surprised if the questions asked don’t come from the Home Office or Gordie B himself.
Does seem strange to announce they are going to be ‘freed from being arguidos’ and yet are still to be questioned.
Could all be a ploy to sell papers tomorrow…..but unless the PJ come out with a strong counterclaim, then - sorry Ian - but I think Madeleine will never get her justice.
Night night (again)!
February 10th, 2008 at 12:43 am
IF the case of Madeleine is shelved, I will be certain that our government, led by Gordon Brown, is completely responsible.
I will also believe that something very unpleasant is at the root of it.
Like most people, I have always hoped that - whatever happened to this little girl - it wasn’t too horrible. In a way, it was better that she had died from too much sedative, or some domestic accident, than that she had been taken by a vile paedophile.
But if this case ends by the PJ withdrawing…defeated…then I do honestly think the cover-up is deeply sinsiter.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:39 am
http://itn.co.uk/news/337e7f1682079cb2293a081f2fbfe70a.html
scroll down.