Madeleine McCann With Britney Spears And David Beckham
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Maddie resort ‘perv’ snaps Brit”
“A suspected pervert who fled the resort where Maddie McCann vanished is taking photos of Britney Spears in LA, The Sun can reveal.
“Christian Ridout, 32, is wanted for questioning in Praia da Luz, Portugal, for allegedly trying to groom a 12-year-old girl”
DJ Shifty..?
“But for several months Ridout has used the name Dexter Troy to work as a paparazzo in Hollywood, where he has trailed the likes of Britney, David Beckham and Kiefer Sutherland”
Says Ridout: “These allegations are ridiculous. At the time of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance I was in London. I have not been to Portugal for three years”
But Britney Spears. Madeleine McCann. Both in the same story. Remarkable stuff at the Sun. has Ridout every taken a picture of Princess Diana? We demand to be told…
DAILY MIRROR: “McCann: Clear our name bid”
“Kate and Gerry McCann are planning a formal appeal to be cleared as suspects over missing daughter Madeleine, it was revealed yesterday. Lawyers for the couple, both 39, in Portugal and Britain, held talks to decide the timing of an application to lift their ‘arguido’ status”
McCanns talks with lawyers – read all about it!
Madeleine McCann: Cleudo for your armchair
Posted: 9th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,164) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- agw on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- Bat E Bird on I’m A Celebrity: Samantha Fox Is Shrinking As ‘Lesbian’ Lover Katie Price Quits
- Bat E Bird on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- yampster on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
February 9th, 2008 at 11:10 am
78
RedRooster
Somebody has been missing you!!!!!
February 9th, 2008 at 11:10 am
78
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:07 am
74
Garth Says:
****************
dont be a dick garf…its widely accepted by those with a brain
—————————–
Widley accepted by whom. YOU? You are a halfwit pal!
February 9th, 2008 at 11:09 am
76
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:06 am
**************************
well of course they checked it you pratt, thats how they found out that no one had left that way…. are you really that thick garf…?????
February 9th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Come on woosey im waiting……………..
February 9th, 2008 at 11:07 am
74
Garth Says:
****************
dont be a dick garf…its widely accepted by those with a brain ( obviously not you) that the outside sill was not touched and no one had left the building via the window. Where have you been ffs garf… now give it a rest yer sound like a bleedin broken record
February 9th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Does anyone have that picture of a detective handing a blanket to Rebelo through the window? I’ve done searches but can’t find it. Plus
Is this the window with the shutters?
February 9th, 2008 at 11:06 am
bearing in mind woosey, that the PJ have checked the window sill for forensics etc etc
February 9th, 2008 at 11:05 am
72
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 11:03 am
66
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:54 am
*******************************
i think maybe panarama was one of the times it was stated. But i think we have been over and over this garfy, its getting bloody boring now mate. Look little man there was no bleedin abductor, why cant you get that through yer thick head now stop talking bollocks and tell us why you are supporting a pair of child neglectors at any cost…..its pathetic garfy and that makes you look pathetic imo.
————————-
Do you know how long it was between Panorama putting out their programme and May 3rd?
Go on……..have a guess?
February 9th, 2008 at 11:04 am
And who said the abductor didnt touch the window sill. Im still waiting on that one.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:03 am
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id76.html
Watcher
Here’s some info you asked for last evening.
Brian Kennedy is paying for Retardo3.
He HIMSELF admitted this in a Spanish interview.
Richard Branson declared he would pay their legal cost.
There is NO WAY the Holy Ones could have spend 700000 so far on “finding” Madeleine in the last months.
February 9th, 2008 at 11:03 am
66
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:54 am
now stop talking bollocks and tell us why you are supporting a pair of child neglectors at any cost…..its pathetic garfy and that makes you look pathetic imo.
*******************************
i think maybe panarama was one of the times it was stated. But i think we have been over and over this garfy, its getting bloody boring now mate. Look little man there was no bleedin abductor, why cant you get that through yer thick head
February 9th, 2008 at 11:03 am
68
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:57 am
61
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am
********************************
worked on building sites have yer garfy , in and out of windows garfy??? with a child in arms garfy??? FFS garfy didnt anyone ever tell you how to lift safely garfy.. So the abductor carefully climbed out the window making sure not to touch the outside sill, then lent back in to the window again carefully not to touch the sill, and then lifted the dead weight of a child arms streched out several feet no doubt. Garfy stop being a baffoon you really do talk crap at times garfy
——————
How many bleedin feet is it between the bed and the firkin wall numbuts? None. Wake up ya daft fecker!
Wotsamatta, are you a bleedin dwarf with no arms or summat?
February 9th, 2008 at 11:00 am
69
Vera Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:58 am
——————————
Well back up why you think this and maybe we could try and clear up a few shady areas you are struggling with. And Vera, dont mind me asking, but how old are you?
February 9th, 2008 at 10:58 am
51
Garth Says:
..”This to me suggests that he picked her out of the bed and carefully laid her on the bed nearest the window. After clambering out of the window he leant back in and picked up Madeliene whose head would now be to his left shoulder and thus how Tanner seen him”….
—————————————————————————————-
I really think you’re struggling with this….I can’t personally believe that it is possible for all this to happen without Madeleine or the twins waking unless of course they had been sedated….I do think your theories are even more outlandish than many I have read.
Task complete!
February 9th, 2008 at 10:57 am
61
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am
you really do talk crap at times garfy 
********************************
worked on building sites have yer garfy , in and out of windows garfy??? with a child in arms garfy??? FFS garfy didnt anyone ever tell you how to lift safely garfy.. So the abductor carefully climbed out the window making sure not to touch the outside sill, then lent back in to the window again carefully not to touch the sill, and then lifted the dead weight of a child arms streched out several feet no doubt. Garfy stop being a baffoon
February 9th, 2008 at 10:57 am
58
mrs pigeon aka brandon f Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
How can you climb out of a window with a 4 year old and leave no trace ?
A drugged sleeping child?
All floppy.
The window would have needed a jump and 2 hands free.
————–
WTF are you talking about? Explain it again ffs
February 9th, 2008 at 10:54 am
64
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:52 am
58
mrs pigeon aka brandon f Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
*****************************
exactly and without touching the outside window sill ?? errmm why would anyone do that?? Surely if you were climbing out the window you would use the outside side to make it a bit easier??? And wouldnt you have to lean over the sill to pick maddie up that was left on the bed??? errmm i think garfy needs to have a rethink… Wonder when garfy will wake up and realise there was no bleedin abductor
————————–
Where have you heard the abductor didnt touch the outside window sill?
February 9th, 2008 at 10:53 am
59
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:45 am
57
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:41 am
******************************
didnt take you long to start the abuse garfy. If you would like to be a little more polite my little feathered firkin i will happily explain to you garfy why your theory is complete and utter bollocks
————————
You’ve got a nerve little man. But come on then I’ll be polite to you (only cos I cant grab hold of yer :evil:) and we can hear an intelligent convo for the first time from wedwooster.
Clean slate
Now explain why its utter bollocks. And Im not talking about the abduction. Im talking about how it is inconceivable to think that the way I have stated I might have happened is complete and utter bollocks as you put it.
Your turn…………..
February 9th, 2008 at 10:52 am
58
mrs pigeon aka brandon f Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
*****************************
exactly and without touching the outside window sill ?? errmm why would anyone do that?? Surely if you were climbing out the window you would use the outside side to make it a bit easier??? And wouldnt you have to lean over the sill to pick maddie up that was left on the bed??? errmm i think garfy needs to have a rethink… Wonder when garfy will wake up and realise there was no bleedin abductor
February 9th, 2008 at 10:50 am
Like all previously known abductors!
February 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am
If You wanted to abduct a child, surely you would do it when it was easy pickings and no hurdles?
And with your getaway car arms length away?
February 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am
56
slyfox Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:40 am
Morning! Just had to pop in and say:
51
Garth Says:
Thanks Garth. Everything is so much clearer now. Could you just clear up the distance from the window ledge to the empty bed?
If half male body height then possible, if more, then wouldn’t abductor have to be bendy-stretchy man?
———————-
It was against the wall. No distance.
Wisten to what Im telling you.
Beleive me (unless you are a complete wimp) leaning into a window and taking a child would be a doddle. Not that I’ve dont that of course
but I do work on building sites and have had plenty of clambering in and out of window believe me.
With regard to carrying a tot. Feck in el. When we go a party in one of our neighbours houses (which happens quite regulalry in our road) I have, many a time carried my 3 year old home and he hasnt stirred one bit. Infact I have carried my son and my neighbours daughter back whos’s 3 and neither woke!
February 9th, 2008 at 10:46 am
58
mrs pigeon aka brandon f Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
“[...] The window would have needed a jump and 2 hands free.”
****
Remember Mrs Match’s reconstruction, which actually needed 8 hands …?
February 9th, 2008 at 10:45 am
57
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:41 am
******************************
didnt take you long to start the abuse garfy. If you would like to be a little more polite my little feathered firkin i will happily explain to you garfy why your theory is complete and utter bollocks
February 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
How can you climb out of a window with a 4 year old and leave no trace ?
A drugged sleeping child?
All floppy.
The window would have needed a jump and 2 hands free.
February 9th, 2008 at 10:41 am
55
RedRooster Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:38 am
51
———————
Come on the n wooster. Explain clearly why this is so hard for a halfwit like to you to comprehend.
February 9th, 2008 at 10:40 am
Morning! Just had to pop in and say:
51
Garth Says:
Thanks Garth. Everything is so much clearer now. Could you just clear up the distance from the window ledge to the empty bed?
If half male body height then possible, if more, then wouldn’t abductor have to be bendy-stretchy man?
February 9th, 2008 at 10:38 am
51
Garth Says:
February 9th, 2008 at 10:32 am
*******************************
NEWSFLASH - garfy has been spotted in cloud cookoo land
February 9th, 2008 at 10:36 am
man on the hill
Jesus existed alright its just that Rome jumped on the band wagon and exploited him because he was so popular.
Just like Branson did with Madeliene
and all the others
February 9th, 2008 at 10:35 am
47 - Brandon - ok, as it happens the files have got jumbled up and its actually redemption song, but will try and sort it out later.