
Madeleine McCann: ‘Screaming Contradictions’, Scotland Yard And Francisco Marco Interviewed
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY EXPRESS (front page): “MADELEINE – News call for Scotland Yard probe”
Are Scotland Yard for hire? Benazir Bhutto. And McCann? Have the discovered who killed Rhys Jones yet?
“Retired Chief Superintendent Dai Davies, former head of the Yard’s Royal Protection unit, says that if the Yard can send detectives to probe the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan, then they should also fly to Portugal to try and solve the Madeleine mystery”
He says:
“The Portuguese investigation has quite simply not solved the crime and it is now looking increasingly likely that it will be shelved. I would suggest that this is the time to call on the Yard to take the lead and to get them to form a team of detectives to work on the case”
Retired copper suggests his old boys are the best – Read all about it!
GLASGOW SUNDAY MAIL: “Police Ready To Clear McCanns Over Maddie”
“Police in Portugal are set to clear Kate and Gerry McCann as suspects, it was claimed last night”
A fact claimed by “insiders” who say “officers did not have a shred of evidence against the 39-year-old couple”
The McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, says: “This report is extremely encouraging”
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “Kate and Gerry ‘in the clear’”
“Police do not have a shred of evidence against Gerry and Kate McCann and they are set to be cleared as suspects, it was claimed yesterday. The couple’s status as ‘arguidos’ in the case of missing daughter Maddie, four, will be lifted unless they make ‘screaming contradictions’ in a new police quiz, said Portugal paper Expresso”
How does Expresso know? The paper does not say
SUNDAY MIRROR: “McCann cops: No evidence”
“A review of the case by homicide experts from the Judicial Police has turned up no proof that Kate and Gerry McCann played a part in four-year-old Madeleine’s disappearance.
“Attorney General Fernando Pinto Montiero told respected Portuguese newspaper Expresso: ‘The couple’s legal status will be considered at the appropriate moment, depending on various elements still to be obtained’”
Says Expresso: “They will only remain arguidos (suspects) if there are screaming contradictions revealed in the answers to the letters sent to England”
DAILY STAR ON SUNDAY: “MCCANNS TO BE CLEARED”
“Last night the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell said the sooner they are questioned the better”
He says: “There won’t be any screaming contradictions and hopefully the emphasis can then be put on finding Madeleine, who we believe is still alive”
Says the paper: “Legal letters outlining the 40 questions are to be sent to the Home Office this week. Interviews are then likely to be carried out by detectives from Leicestershire police, the McCanns’ local force”
Says Gerry McCann’s brother John McCann: “Any sensible person realises Madeleine was abducted. We didn’t anticipate being in this position after nine months”
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Madeleine McCann and Metodo 3: Private eyes, public lies”
“Paid £50,000 a month to find Madeleine McCann, the Spanish detective Francisco Marco said he hoped to have her home for Christmas. He issued this photofit of a suspect last month; it set off a media frenzy, but Portuguese police say it has ‘no credibility’. Christine Toomey turns the tables on a private eye who is anything but…
An interview with Francisco Marco. His company is being paid £50,000 a month by the McCann’s fighting fund
“We won’t answer any questions about Maddie. Maddie is off limits – is that understood?” Marco’s cousin Jose Luis, another of the agency’s employees, warns me sternly”
But they are not the police. What can they not talk about the big case? It was Mr Franciso who told he’d find Madeleine by Christmas – last Christmas
“I cannot ask him to clarify what he did say, or whether talking about an ongoing investigation is potentially detrimental. Instead, I am left to discuss the matter with a handful of other private detective agencies in Barcelona, the private-eye capital of Spain. What they tell me is disturbing”
Marco walks in. Does he bring his Maddy dolly? And:
“Marco slaps on the table a 144-page pre-prepared dossier of articles written in the Spanish press about himself and M-3. He goes on to list some of those in the city he says I have already been speaking to about his company. Had my movements been monitored? If so, why would a private detective agency be interested in this at a time when they were supposed to be tirelessly searching for the most famous missing child in the world?”
Fame.
“In most of the many pictures of himself included in the material he hands me”
Metodo 3 is the most famous private detective agency in Europe
“He seems eager to please. He summons a female assistant on several occasions to bring me material, including a book he has recently written, to illustrate what he is talking about. Even when I make it clear this is not necessary – aware that these distractions eat into the time we have to talk – he insists, partly showing off”
Then:
“When I ask about his background, Marco summons her [secretary] to photocopy the first pages of his doctoral thesis on private investigation: he has a master’s degree and a PhD in penal law”
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “McCanns to be cleared as no evidence found”
Attorney General Fernando Pinto Montiero told Expresso: “The couple’s legal status will be considered at the appropriate moment, depending on various elements still to be obtained.”
Madeleine McCann: Money. Speculation. Sensation. A child is missing…
Posted: 10th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (926) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 10th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
PS from last post. Note to Katy.
re: Val’s snooty little remark to look to me for help….
I will respond to your post about economic consequences.
The point is that , yes, some people will suffer from economic consequences induced by Team McCanns’ intense and eternal publicity blitz telling the world their phony paedophile abduction story. But no one associated with Team McCann will suffer. They will profit. It is the ordinary folk like you and anyone else not privvy to insider information that will suffer economic consequences. And I doubt you can sue Bell Pottinger or anyone else. Team McCann is the one that makes the threats of lawsuits. lol
February 10th, 2008 at 1:50 pm
168 - http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/letterx.jpg
February 10th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
Hi Everyone :)166 Val - with reference to the star chart….http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/letterx.jpg
February 10th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
Recommended viewing on a Sunday afternoon: Part 2 of BBC the mystery of madeleine mccann on the mccannfiles website. What Jane Tanners says.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
141 Katy
I went to Portugal many years ago before it was developed. Can”t remember the name of the
place we stayed but remember having to wade through water up to your waist to reach the
Beach with your belongings carried over your head if the tide was in!!!!!!
Back to Madeleine, you will obviously feel sad every time you pass 5a, especially if Justice
is not seen to be done. What I find strange is that Kate was said to award Madeleine a Gold
Star every time she slept in her own bed, because she was always trying to get in with Kate and Gerry. Yet they could still leave her for hours in the safe knowledge that she would not
wake up for hours……not just one night but every night apparently?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
162 Ian
No, I’m sorry, Ian, I don’t have the time to do so. As I briefly alluded to, I had spent quite some time trying to pin down the urine test request, back when TB’s list was first published on Anorak, and was unable to. I am concerned that some of the information on TB’s list could be attributed to rumor and speculation on forums and not backed up by at least some official news source (even if tabloid publication). It just isn’t proper to state something as fact, particularly in a serious case such as this, if you really don’t know what the source of your information is, just because you read it ’somewhere’ and can’t recall where it was.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
139
val Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
108 Katy
I mentioned this before and Saturn said Bell Pottinger would fill up the complex with their
Staff, Courtesy visitors etc, why don “t you ask him for help?
******************
Val,
You keep bringing this up. I already answered you on the other thread. What you said, and I replied to, was that in your opinion Mark Warner has grounds to file a lawsuit because their business was adversely affected. I replied that you have no evidence that their revenues have been adversely affected, and were merely making a wild guess about this. It’s not a good guess, IMO, because Bell Pottinger is not likely to allow its clients to suffer adverse consequences. They arelikely to make sure that any such consequences are mitigated and compensated by advantageous opportunities. That is their, after all, the service that they provide clients.
I also mentioned that Ocean Club’s co-owner Symington’s family is into real estate, and would be in a position to benefit by a manipulation of real estate values in the area, if they knew of the intentions regarding sustained negative publicity.
I myself posted an article concerning real estate values, which contained assertions that less people will holiday in Algarve due to Team McCann’s artificial sustained publicity emphasizing their phony paedophile abduction. This “news” has now been placed on the latest ANORAK thread.
Yes, there is an economic effect, but there is NO evidence that this particular Ocean Club resort has suffered adverse economic consequences. Certainly you provided none. Even if they have, you showed no grounds for any lawsuit. Instead, you made snide remarks about my posts and Stevo’s consisting of “fantasy”.
Your constant inaccurate reference to my comments on this subject has become tiresome. Ironically, your own initial remarks about Mark Warner suing BP was pure fantasy.
Instead of carping and sniping, why don’t you find some evidence for your assertions? Show us evidence that the owners of Ocean Club Resorts have suffered as a result of the “McCann crisis”. It’s not likely at all that you can.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Ian
Please tell me this is not true.
It is contradictory:on one hand it is said the mcHorror are going to be cleared,on the other they havent even been quizzed again!!!
Sin? truth?
Deep down something tells me it cant be true but this is just a gut feeling.
I simply dont know anymore and yes,I am confused
February 10th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
157 Jolie
Is the purpose of your post to assist, if it is, could you help find the sources?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Gandolf really was a wizard. He just disappeared. lol.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Says Gerry McCann’s brother John McCann: “Any sensible person realises Madeleine was abducted”
Oh really? The basis for this assertion is what exactly?
If the PJ drop this case and even let the McCanns off, then justice has not been served.
Maybe letting Scoland Yard take over might be a very good move.
I wonder what the defnition of ’screaming contradiction’ is….are we now to be told that a contradiction must not be subtle? So a 5 minute window of opportunity cancelled out by Gerry and Tanner quoting different times for a sighting by Tanner wouldnt count as a screaming contradiction?
Surely we already know enough ’screaming contradictions’? Is this a new spin on the degree of contradictions?!!!
Surely after the outcry regarding the ‘hasty’ comment, the Portuguese arent going to bow to their British masters?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
If K+G did not speak to Tanner in the few days because they were “busy”, and th eTapas 7 were not searching - then was was Tanner doing? When did she go home?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
147 Val
Mods and Admin, thanks for the explanation re “Whore of Rome”, still none the wiser as to who it refers to,…………the Catholic Priest in PDL?
Incidentally, 142 is Maravilha now, have you zapped you know who?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
64 Tony Bennett
I read through your list again and wondered if you had ever found a source stating that the police asked for the twins’ urine to be tested at the time of Madeleine’s disappearance, as I had been unable to back when you first published the list.
Also, I don’t remember reading about the Tapas 7 not searching for Madeleine (just Kate sitting in her apartment) and was hoping that you would provide some sources for this as well.
I know you can’t put more than one link on posts, but perhaps you could type up your sources by publication/website and date to help others confirm the truth and accuracy of what you are putting forth.
Thanks.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
137
lilith Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
“130 - Katy - But what about the cadaver fluids and the smell of death?”
*****
Believe it or not, but you BUY cadaver smell. It’s used to train dogs.
I’m NOT saying that this is the case, but in a complicated conspiracy [cry abduction for adoption...], it would explain …
February 10th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Have some posts been deleted?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
147
Tony Bennett
…but then how comes with all this they are not charged?
If you/we know it how comes?
I am bewildered,disgusted and more than that….
When is justice going to be made to Madeleine?
What is REALLY going on here?
Is it all lost?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
That’s the f..*ing question:
WHY?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Tony, I meant Buck, sorry misspelling.
He’s “gone to a role in industry” I read. Bot he and the Consul resigned within days of the arguido status - and in the middle of the Portuguese presidency!! Buck has been replaced by a guy from EU commisison who had been in Portugal before, speaks portuguese. There to smooth any ruffles? He’s also reorganising the consular services; they won’t be issuing passports form Lisbon any more etc.
Sounds like a guy with a career, Portuguese assignment a little out of his normal path?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
PLEASE
Telle me this is NOT true
I just cant come around
February 10th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
A simple comment before going out (family lunch) following some man of a hill previous post:
Are all British suspects so much protected by the very Primer Minister and the goverment?
We all acept that Mccanns had an abnormal protection from authorities, and we deal with it as though that were not very strange, BUT IT IS… The Mc’s are overprotected, yes, so
WHY??????????????????????????????????????????
Because they are (supposeedly) good looking, photogenical and young? No
Because they are doctors ? I would say No
Because they are devouted catholics and good neighbours? No
WHY THE BRITISH GOVERMENT DOES NOT WANT THE REAL TRUE TO BE DISCOVERED????
February 10th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
142 Gandolf says (February 10th, 2008 at 12:55 pm):
“There is no motive…”
REPLY: A sudden loss of temper is not a ‘motive’. Nor would Madeleine’s ‘accidental death’, caused perhaps by an overdose of sedatives - or Madeleine having hurt herself and been unable to summon help because her parents were away knocking back strawberry daiquiris -amount to a ‘motive’
==========
“There is no evidence…”
REPLY:
1. 6,000 pages of PJ evidence
2. Cadaver dogs
3. Circumstantial evidence
4. Forensic Science Service DNA results
5. ‘Phone records…
Let’s wait and see
==========
“There is no body…”
REPLY: Deliberately hidden or destroyed?
==========
“There are no witnesses…”
REPLY: How can you be so sure? There may well be witnesses to (a) exactly how Madeleine died and (b) how her body was hidden or destroyed.
You appear to be living in something of a make-believe world, Gandolf
February 10th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
138:man on a hill
We could do with a few more Banksy’s on the ground.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
142 Gandolf
O.K. give us a clue, who IS the Whore of Rome.?
If you don”t want to join the discussion here, fine, but please don “t keep interrupting the
flow with your “mystic” pronouncements.
We welcome anything lucid you have to say.
————–
Mods and Admin
The Whore of Rome is the RC Church
February 10th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
146 Katy says (February 10th, 2008 at 1:06 pm):
“I am interested in the resignations of Buk and the Algarve consul. Have you gone after them?”
REPLY: No. It is a question of time and resources. We hope to co-operate with all others interested in this case and who are doing excellent work in digging up information and asking questions. We will do what we can when we can, but are open to all suggestions - so thanks for the idea
February 10th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
122 Irene says (February 10th, 2008 at 12:22 pm)
“This is a theory (only my opinion). Maybe, for some reason…so: It is possible that: 1) The holiday was intended for more than just a family break. 2) Arrangements were made in England prior to the trip…
REPLY: We must firmly rule out such speculation.
IF you were right,
THEN the abduction would have been much better organised. For example, a patio door left open, and Madeleine gone during the night. Much easier to explain.
THEN we would not have had the cadaver dogs, and the blood, and the McCanns’ bizarre and unbelieveble explanations for them.
THEN we would not have had all the contradictions and changed stories etc. surrounding what happened on 3 May.
No, all of this points to a sudden and unexpected event - Madeleine’s death, I’m afraid - which triggered the panic of creating the abduction hoax, the abduction smokescreen, or the abduction lie, call it what you will.
That abduction hoax does not seem to have been that well worked out, with hindsight, though it’s been good enough to persuade the British media for the past nine months that there really was an abduction.
The only thing I would concede is that it is very possible that Madeleine was in more ways than one a ‘problem’ to the McCanns and that one or both parents may have at least *thought* as to how she could ‘disappear’ from their lives
February 10th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Thanks for reply Tony.
FOI very useful and having been on the receiving end of such requests in a previous job, I suggest that you need to know exactly what document you want, so you need help in advance from inside really.
Re med council, slow process, and no proof of medical negligence, unless of course sedation piece. Though not getting the twins checked out was odd, did they actually impede a medical examination of their kids? IF so you might have something there. Did the police offer a medical check? For eg drugs, or dna (semen)
You might go after the other consular offices in Portugal - what briefings were other eg Irish diplomats given about on this?
A very blank rely from a diplomat friend of mine suggests there may be a policy on this.
The response I got was “Oh I hate getting involved in the families in these things, you never know what to believe….and people get very aggressive if you don’t go along with them…” Interesting …
I am interested in the resignations of Buk and the Algarve consul. Have you gone after them?
February 10th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
124 can”t say no
Phew……….that was some outburst, but I agree with everything you say. well said!!!!!
I remember what the McCanns being interviewed by a “searching” Interviewer, think he might
have been Sky. He was very good and asked the McCanns if they felt they had been
neglectful.
Gerry: No, it felt as safe as being in your back Garden.
Kate: If I was guilty of anything it would be being naive.
February 10th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
This is the email address of the Portuguese police in Portimao, Algarve.
dic.portimao@pj.pt
If you know something about this story, tell them.
They are obliged to keep secret every information.
February 10th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Val, I’m not too worried we have repeat visitors and we mainly use the place for ourselves and friends.
Last summer the foreign visitors were there because they had already booked; but I was told that the real drop was inthe Portuguese, who resented the media intrusion etc.
Actually I’m looking forward to an unspoilt Luz this year.
i pass Apt 5A on my 5 minute walk to the shops, so I will always i magine little Madeleine leaning out over the little gate, as I’m sure she must have. I guess we’ll always remember her.
And I’ll try not to look for things floating in the water!!!
Actually I am pretty sure that in coming years the truth will emerge in Luz, as people start to talk….