
Madeleine McCann: ‘Screaming Contradictions’, Scotland Yard And Francisco Marco Interviewed
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY EXPRESS (front page): “MADELEINE – News call for Scotland Yard probe”
Are Scotland Yard for hire? Benazir Bhutto. And McCann? Have the discovered who killed Rhys Jones yet?
“Retired Chief Superintendent Dai Davies, former head of the Yard’s Royal Protection unit, says that if the Yard can send detectives to probe the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan, then they should also fly to Portugal to try and solve the Madeleine mystery”
He says:
“The Portuguese investigation has quite simply not solved the crime and it is now looking increasingly likely that it will be shelved. I would suggest that this is the time to call on the Yard to take the lead and to get them to form a team of detectives to work on the case”
Retired copper suggests his old boys are the best – Read all about it!
GLASGOW SUNDAY MAIL: “Police Ready To Clear McCanns Over Maddie”
“Police in Portugal are set to clear Kate and Gerry McCann as suspects, it was claimed last night”
A fact claimed by “insiders” who say “officers did not have a shred of evidence against the 39-year-old couple”
The McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, says: “This report is extremely encouraging”
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “Kate and Gerry ‘in the clear’”
“Police do not have a shred of evidence against Gerry and Kate McCann and they are set to be cleared as suspects, it was claimed yesterday. The couple’s status as ‘arguidos’ in the case of missing daughter Maddie, four, will be lifted unless they make ‘screaming contradictions’ in a new police quiz, said Portugal paper Expresso”
How does Expresso know? The paper does not say
SUNDAY MIRROR: “McCann cops: No evidence”
“A review of the case by homicide experts from the Judicial Police has turned up no proof that Kate and Gerry McCann played a part in four-year-old Madeleine’s disappearance.
“Attorney General Fernando Pinto Montiero told respected Portuguese newspaper Expresso: ‘The couple’s legal status will be considered at the appropriate moment, depending on various elements still to be obtained’”
Says Expresso: “They will only remain arguidos (suspects) if there are screaming contradictions revealed in the answers to the letters sent to England”
DAILY STAR ON SUNDAY: “MCCANNS TO BE CLEARED”
“Last night the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell said the sooner they are questioned the better”
He says: “There won’t be any screaming contradictions and hopefully the emphasis can then be put on finding Madeleine, who we believe is still alive”
Says the paper: “Legal letters outlining the 40 questions are to be sent to the Home Office this week. Interviews are then likely to be carried out by detectives from Leicestershire police, the McCanns’ local force”
Says Gerry McCann’s brother John McCann: “Any sensible person realises Madeleine was abducted. We didn’t anticipate being in this position after nine months”
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Madeleine McCann and Metodo 3: Private eyes, public lies”
“Paid £50,000 a month to find Madeleine McCann, the Spanish detective Francisco Marco said he hoped to have her home for Christmas. He issued this photofit of a suspect last month; it set off a media frenzy, but Portuguese police say it has ‘no credibility’. Christine Toomey turns the tables on a private eye who is anything but…
An interview with Francisco Marco. His company is being paid £50,000 a month by the McCann’s fighting fund
“We won’t answer any questions about Maddie. Maddie is off limits – is that understood?” Marco’s cousin Jose Luis, another of the agency’s employees, warns me sternly”
But they are not the police. What can they not talk about the big case? It was Mr Franciso who told he’d find Madeleine by Christmas – last Christmas
“I cannot ask him to clarify what he did say, or whether talking about an ongoing investigation is potentially detrimental. Instead, I am left to discuss the matter with a handful of other private detective agencies in Barcelona, the private-eye capital of Spain. What they tell me is disturbing”
Marco walks in. Does he bring his Maddy dolly? And:
“Marco slaps on the table a 144-page pre-prepared dossier of articles written in the Spanish press about himself and M-3. He goes on to list some of those in the city he says I have already been speaking to about his company. Had my movements been monitored? If so, why would a private detective agency be interested in this at a time when they were supposed to be tirelessly searching for the most famous missing child in the world?”
Fame.
“In most of the many pictures of himself included in the material he hands me”
Metodo 3 is the most famous private detective agency in Europe
“He seems eager to please. He summons a female assistant on several occasions to bring me material, including a book he has recently written, to illustrate what he is talking about. Even when I make it clear this is not necessary – aware that these distractions eat into the time we have to talk – he insists, partly showing off”
Then:
“When I ask about his background, Marco summons her [secretary] to photocopy the first pages of his doctoral thesis on private investigation: he has a master’s degree and a PhD in penal law”
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “McCanns to be cleared as no evidence found”
Attorney General Fernando Pinto Montiero told Expresso: “The couple’s legal status will be considered at the appropriate moment, depending on various elements still to be obtained.”
Madeleine McCann: Money. Speculation. Sensation. A child is missing…
Posted: 10th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (926) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 10th, 2008 at 10:01 pm
pppfffhhhh
February 10th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
simon x
February 10th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
mic - were you lurking on the evening of may 3rd 2007 - perchance???
February 10th, 2008 at 9:59 pm
and you are bad for me
February 10th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
can’t - i have always said that this site is bad for me!!!
February 10th, 2008 at 9:56 pm
506
can’t say no Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 9:40 pm
*******************************
no….they like travelling too much. Maybe they could get a one way ticket to somewhere. Dont suppose they will welcome in too many places now…at least i hope not
February 10th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
528
look your blood pressure
noseycow
Nosey
February 10th, 2008 at 9:54 pm
pppfffhhhh
February 10th, 2008 at 9:53 pm
516
RedRooster
They would frozen it
February 10th, 2008 at 9:53 pm
Next step Europe?
Post-season holiday to Portugal on a mAddy Hunt?
February 10th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
you had a good w/e
February 10th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
mic - but this is where all the fun is…
simon - you was lucky! - now the black cats on the other hand - starting their ascent up the table.. next step europe
February 10th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
520
Mic
hihi
I like people like ya
February 10th, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Châtelaine
D’ya know french ??
February 10th, 2008 at 9:49 pm
back after another great win…
February 10th, 2008 at 9:49 pm
509 cantsay..
where did you get my photo from? It’s just like me!
512 Noseycow..
Have lurked for ages. I stick my oar into the forums, and occasionally in opinions, but have stayed clear of most of the McCann stuff due to the aforementioned CBA.
thankfully tax return is sorted. Those barstewards have had enough of my cash without an aditional £100.
February 10th, 2008 at 9:48 pm
514
Ian Says:
February 10th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
****************************
one things for sure everything since 3rd may certainly has been
February 10th, 2008 at 9:47 pm
evenong simon - back in the smoke????
February 10th, 2008 at 9:46 pm
châteleine- though you must note that our mic suffers from ‘new varient cba’ and i suffer from ‘cba syndrome’ - the cure for the later being many a long hour posting (mostly drivel )on anorak…
February 10th, 2008 at 9:45 pm
506
can’t say no Says
****************
i was rather hoping they might go to HELL this year
February 10th, 2008 at 9:44 pm
hi
February 10th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
501
RedRooster
One wonders if the last one was ‘gratis’?
February 10th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
461
Dr. Watson
I think the current legislation (I take it you refer to the law in England and Wales?) is sadly lacking. I believe the applicable Act is The Childrens Act 1933? It really isnt specific enough talking about recognition of risks and allowing too many to slip through the net.
It needs to be explict and say that you do not leave children under 10 (I believe this is the recommended age used by the NSPCC and BUPA?) alone and unsupervised…full stop. Needs to be unambiguous and apply without the need for ‘mens rea’ (strict liability) in my opinion.
If clever dicks like consultants and GP’s who should live and breathe the Act can manipulate it with immediate claims of ‘abduction’ then in my opinion it is insufficient.
However, the issue is, I guess, portuguese law. What are the rules for this issue in force in that ‘civil law’ jurisdiction?
February 10th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
I’m going to try ,and read the posts from today ,that i haven’t read yet
February 10th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Mic
£100 fine for you then
have you been lurking long???
February 10th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
503
in my opinion….blah blah blah
lydia Says:
**********
hi lydia who’s the 3rd person then??? we know gerry and kate are involved
February 10th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
507
Mic
February 10th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
châtelaine - can’t be arsed
Red - i should hope so too - new password for your internet connection i hope .
February 10th, 2008 at 9:40 pm
498
Noseycow
I make my own:-
Grind one set of teeth into a half-completed tax return
Add two quarts of blood, sweat and tears and a pinch of sarcasm
Simmer slowly until the blood is almost boiling, then garnish with a sprig of cynicism.
February 10th, 2008 at 9:40 pm
501
RedRooster
At home ??
Or where they went for xmas ?