Graham Calvert Gambles On Court

MR Graham Calvert is not a happy loser. He wants bookies William Hill to pay back his £2million losses.

He claims Hills should have stopped taking his money when he asked them to bar him because he was an addict.

 

Hills took £3.5million of his money, and retained £2,028,858 of it. Bets included a record £347,000 on the US to win the 2006 Ryder Cup.

Mr Calvert now owes £1.5million. his lfie is changed. Says he: “This has ruined my life. It was like taking heroin.”

Opinions are many. Tony’s blog calls is “pathetic whining”.

Lawyers Tony Coles from Jeffrey Green Russell, says in the Times:

“There have been a number of similar cases in America: a lot of casinos offer self-exclusion programmes and cases have tested what happens when a casino messes up and allows a person back in to gamble, and what happens when the gambler says he no longer wishes to be self-excluded…and what happens when people have masqueraded as someone else to get round a self-exclusion that they or more usually their family have put in place.

“Negligence is the way to argue this case and I think the judge will certainly listen to Mr Calvert. It depends rather a lot on the facts. How careful were William Hill, did he really self-exclude himself, and did he go out of his way to get round it?”

We are not armed with all the facts. But checking Mr Calverts’s credit hardly seems possible when he is gambling in cash.

Where does the responsibility for addiction lie, with the addict or the supplier?

Play online - click on the sidebar links and get an Anroak bonus… 

 

 

 

Advertisement


Anorak

Posted: 15th, February 2008 | In: Poker And Casino Comment | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Live
  • Fark
  • TwitThis


da vinci diamonds online slots
Play Da Vinci Diamonds
slots at Kerching
online casino
TWITTER UPDATES
    follow me on Twitter
    Wordpress theme by Cite
    Related Posts with Thumbnails