Madeleine McCann: Legal Action Fury
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “Fury over McCanns’ poster girl”
There are 17,400 A3-size prints of Madeleine McCann in Spain and Portugal. The posters show Madeleine McCann, four, Mari Luz Cortes and Jeremy Vargas, seven, both missing.
Juan Jose Cortes, father of the missing girl, says: “Why didn’t they ask us? The three cases are not connected. We are with our lawyers.”
McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell says: “We did have permission from the family”
Fury – always fury
THE SUN: “Fury over McCanns’ poster girl”
DAILY EXPRESS: “Madeleine: Now Mari’s parents hit out at poster”
DAILY STAR: “McCANNS RAPPED OVER POSTER OF MISSING GIRL”
Posted: 19th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (2,071) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- susan jones on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- The Real Stig on The Great Cathay Pacific Blocked Toilet Mystery
- SoDak-GhostDog on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Katie Norman on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
February 20th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
1303
brandon flours Says:
pmsl how funny lol, i needed cheering up, we just got back after laying flowers outside the school for little Hayden Waller.
February 20th, 2008 at 4:06 pm
1466
noseycow Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
—————-
February 20th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
Not quite to do with madeleine but the news is being looped on Sky that police have found the gun that Killed little Rhys Jones in Liverpool. They have had it a while but have now identified it via ballistics. Hope they can now get the shooter. Apparently they know who he is but everyone is scared of the extended family he is part of……. horrendous!
Inane local reporte said that……. ‘ its six months on and the parents still haven’t come to terms with the tragedy’…. wow a whole six months! I doubt even six years down the line they’ll have come to terms with it!
February 20th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
DCB - i don’t know what their normal routine is - i doubt that maddie sleeps in the same room as them at home, so whether they would think it strange who knows.
I do know that if they had asked where she was, say at bed time and the parents had given a ‘normal’ response, then children that age will accept it as normal, and generally not question it again. eg She’s sleeping over with the her friend tonight..
Parents mislead their children all the time, without question or doubt, otherwise how do we explain that they believe in santa or the tooth fairy until they are older and start to question more deeply.. ?
February 20th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Well it looks like Ians done a bunk!
Woosey
If you want to take over………………. the floors yours
February 20th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
1463
Ciara-Louise
************
oh no what are you going to do ???
February 20th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
1459
RedRooster
No car yet.
but the insurance called to say my car can’t be repaired , too much damage.
Got your email.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Ian
Regarding point 1
If (as you say) by waiting till the night of the 3rd it thus enabled them to plan the events leading up to a false abduction then why claim that Madeleine was at the creche on that day? Knowing full well that the likelyhood of anyone giving them an alibi to be zero? They could quite easily have gone away for the day instead of parading around the pool side etc. And do you think (with all this planning needed) that Gerry would have time, let alone the arrogance, to play tennis?
Regarding point 2
Tanner had a daughter of similar age. What it not be easy for the PJ to ask if she had been playing with Maddie yesterday?
Point 3
We dont indeed. But they do claim they feel something happened to her on May 3rd.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
1455 Dr. Watson
Must go!
February 20th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
1451
Grande Finale
Thanks! I’ll watch this for sure, but at the moment - wifey is calling!
Bye all, see ya Garth…thanks for the debate!
February 20th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
1456
Ciara-Louise Says
*****************
hi babe did you get your car yet? and more importantly did you get my email this afternoon?
February 20th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
1454
noseycow Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Not strange when Madeleine didn’t go to bed?
February 20th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
Garth 1452
Old hat it might be.
I’ve not seen it before, and there maybe others like me.
Some of us work, and don’t have time to trawl the internet constantly.
I thought it was interesting, considering it was written in May last year.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
1433
RedRooster
Hi.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Ian,
The poster has been here since before the creation of Stevo’s website. The poster has had several names; he is not a professional pro-, but a low quality troll with grammar problems. Ignoring him is the action of choice.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
grande - that is another very good point
also if the twins are used to maddie going to playgroup say when they go to nusery they will not have though it odd when she was not around on may 3rd..
imo and allegedly etc etc etc.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
1452
Garth Says
***********
old hat hey garf….a bit like your ludicrous abduction theory
February 20th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
1448
gillyflower Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 3:45 pm
Found this.
http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2007/05/21/the-tragic-case-of-madeleine-mccann
thought it was interesting
—————-
Not really Gilly…………..its old hat!
February 20th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
Good Afternoon everyone……
Mccanns and the Media……….Mp3 Podcast THIS is the meeting in London that Clarrie attended
Scroll down to January 2008 to the story…at the bottom you can right click and save as….
http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/podcasts/publicLecturesAndEvents.htm
(PS it took about 3.5 mins to download the track is 99 mins long but is very revealing as to the thought patterns of the news editors/gurus? some of the posters on here ask pertinent questions about the coverage and the fund as well…….very revealing)
February 20th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
1445 Garth
Good points as ever Garth, thanks.
My response…
1. One of the arguments made that they didnt do anything on 3rd of May is that they didnt have time to sort it out. If this argument is valid, then an event prior to that removes the problem. I dont think all were involved, I suspect 4 of them and I think they did think it through and plan it for 3rd May.
2. There were 10 little blonde children, female. Of course we dont know the circumstances but I suspect it might have been pretty easy to manage - most people know only their own kids (I’ve some experience regarding the confusion of these situations as I have kids and delivered them to and picked them up from nursery school etc).
3. We dont know what the PJ are thinking.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
1436
Garth Says:
***********
well i wouldnt want to disturb you when you are so obviously deep in conversation with others here, so i’ll just sit back and watch for a while. But dont worry im here and im listening…
February 20th, 2008 at 3:45 pm
Found this.
http://www.nbrightside.com/blog/2007/05/21/the-tragic-case-of-madeleine-mccann
thought it was interesting
February 20th, 2008 at 3:45 pm
1443
Ian Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
1437 Garth
..and forget about it, brush it under the carpet….talk for years and years about abductors…let the McCanns start lecturing us on cross border security and how to protect our kids?
I dont think so - its the primary intention of the McCanns and their supporters - lets direct blame at mysterious abductors and away from the failed parents.
——————
Nah nah nah nah………….thats only in your cynical eyes……
And noones saying brush it under the carpet. And with you on this forum there’s no chance of that!
February 20th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
1442 dcb
Dont worry, their posts are very revealing to all of us - poor old Gandalf (spelling corrected) dropped himself right in it didnt he!
Its gratifying to be their target!
February 20th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Ian
Lets put a little logic to all of this.
And so for arguments sake lets say something did happen prior to May 3rd. Answer some of these questions if you will……….
1 Why would they wait until May 3rd to claim the abduction, knowing full well they would have to cover their tracks.
2 Why state that Madeleine was at the creche on May 3rd when by all accounts someone would have seen her. Nannies?
3 Why do the PJ claim that they believe an accident happened on the night of May 3rd?
February 20th, 2008 at 3:41 pm
1340
Aardvarko Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 2:02 pm
That’s one of the reasons I can’t get my head around this theory that something happened BEFORE May 3rd.
How could they have trusted the twins to keep quiet at the creche on the 3rd if Madeleine wasn’t there. They would be bound to ask for her, or to look for her if they hurt themselves etc.
I can accept that the creche staff may not know the difference between Madeleine and A.N.Other, but the twins certainly would have.
*****************************
The twins would have gone to the Creche but Maddie would have gone to the Kids club, two different things! That is why they said they were all reunited later in the day.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
1437 Garth
..and forget about it, brush it under the carpet….talk for years and years about abductors…let the McCanns start lecturing us on cross border security and how to protect our kids?
I dont think so - its the primary intention of the McCanns and their supporters - lets direct blame at mysterious abductors and away from the failed parents.
There is no way on this earth that I (and many others) will forget the root cause of the whole affair.
We owe it to Madeleine and millions of kids - to send a message to all parents -
DO NOT FAIL IN YOUR DUTY OF CARE!
February 20th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
1440 - Argue - don’t bite Ian
February 20th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
1437
Garth Says:
February 20th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Well Im glad you agree. Maybe you can stop waffling on about child neglect?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Child neglect by the Mccannns is the one thing I am certain of. And it is also the thing you have never tried to defend before garth.
February 20th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Ian, thanks I am now a celebrity in the office, have never been that high on any list, however you are still a tosser, old Gando is tossin you about like a rag doll.