
Is Madeleine McCann Disappearing From The UK Press?
THE Anorak has been watching the media’s treatment of the Madeleine McCann story for some months.
The tragedy of a missing child was turned into a media feeding frenzy, a grim story with any gaps in the narrative plugged with speculation and voyeurism.
We were invited to become sleuths, armchair detectives working out who had done what and how. Nothing meaningful has been achieved by this. Madeleine McCann is missing.
Who cannot feel for those involved? Who would want to be them?
Now Anorak learns from a reader that the Madeleine McCann story may be disappearing from the British press, and newspapers’ websites.
Anorak’s team of moderators seeks to weed out libellous comments and anyone making accusations against individuals they cannot back up. We seek not to mirror the press but show you how the story is presented by media outlets to their audiences. Now read this:
. xklamation |
Madeleine McCann is vanishing from the British Press
Every single story in the Daily Express and in the Daily Star regarding Madeleine McCann has disappeared.
This was the answer given by the Daily Express’ online editor, Geoff Marsh:
“Hi xxx, Many thanks for your email. For operational reasons, some articles previously available on express.co.UK have been temporarily removed. I’m afraid I can’t go into any more detail. Best wishes, Geoff”
And from the web team of Daily Express:
“Hi xxx
Many thanks for your email - and indeed your continued support as a regular reader.
I assure you, we do value you - and your input.
Daily Express
Due to operational reasons, a number of stories which previously appeared on express.co.uk have been made temporarily unavailable.Apologies if this causes any inconvenience or disrupts your use of our website.
I’m afraid I can’t go into any more detail.
However I would like to emphasise once again that we value your readership - and are grateful for your ongoing support of express.co.uk.
Best wishes
The Web Team”
Why is thia happening?
Posted: 22nd, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (410) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 22nd, 2008 at 11:50 pm
278
val Says
*********
all will be revealed in the goodness of time
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:50 pm
271 Ian
Ah but the very fact that they “threaten to sue” should frighten everyone to death!!!
I read a few days ago that Matthew Oldfield had flown back to Portugal
recently, also that Mrs cooper has been called back by the PJ re her Statement.
Do you know anything about this?
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:48 pm
266
Ian Says:
**********
indeed and if you remember in gerrys blog he used to tell us each day how long it took him and katie to jog to the top of the hill
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Blood screeps where it can go [as we say in Dutch] so…
266
Ian Says:
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm
” [...] I’d like to find the video where Gerry first spoke to the press, reading from a piece of paper - not sure when this was but I had the idea it was actually on 3rd May? I was wondering if he was wearing his watch?
*****
He spoke May 4 or 5 [difficult to document]:
http://www.prphotos.com/store/category.cgi?item=SPX-012505&type=store&ps=6&start=322
Good nigh to “all” [Thanks Marie
]
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:46 pm
281
Lex
yes at least “odd” and becoming tiring….
When the home office finishes with being a pain in the PJ”Ss backside and let them do their job then…..we will all be relieved I guess.
I certainly will
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Châtelaine
I feel the same as you at times.
So long dear Châtelaine. I’ll look for you here around this time. When there is some real news, you’ll turn up again.
XXXX Châtelaine, au revoir.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:43 pm
276
Ian Says
++++++++++++
yes Ian I am English, and not trying to trip you up - just that I don’t remember Gerry doing a press interview on that night/early next day.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:43 pm
270 Daily Mail article
The pictures in that article were taken after May 3rd, weren’t they? The Tapas crew all look very worried, except for Kate-lookalike Fiona Payne, who has a blissfully vacant expression. How odd.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:41 pm
269
Marie Nicholas
There is so much to this case.
It is like a giant pieces that professionals are trying to put up together with a scientific team psychologists etc…etc….
As I was saying to Chateleine I am saturated.I cant think correctly anymore.
I am like you and many others just waiting now.
I dont even expect new spins anymore…..
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 pm
269
Marie Nicholas Says:
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:32 pm
228 Noseycow
I read somewhere that, according to the waiters, they didn’t leave the table as often as they said. Actually, I read contradictory things about it. I am not trying to understand. All I can say is I have a strange feeling. Not my understanding of a good life. Obviously a lack of good, common sense. And priorities not in the right order.
———————————————————————————-
I think if they left as often as they said no one would have eaten at all. JT said on interview she left to check as the starters were being served that was after 9pm.
Their priorities were their own enjoyment and fun, the kids weren’t included.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 pm
222 Red Rooster
Que Sera, Sera, whatever will be will be etc, don”t you wish we had some
Crystal Ball and could see what”s going to happen? I know I do, can”t say this
forum will last too long, lots of people going and some new posters etc.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 pm
275
Saul
That is such a good saying!
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:39 pm
273
dcb
Thats why I said I had the idea, thats why I said ‘I had the idea’…the term infers …’but I could be mistaken’ - it might have been early hours of the 4th?
May I ask, are you English?
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:37 pm
“Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive”
Sir Walter Scott
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:37 pm
272
Lex
That would explain the shambles it turned in to! However, I doubt all of the T9 were in on it, whatever ‘it’ was!
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:36 pm
266
Ian Says:
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm
++++++++++++++++++
Ian sorry - I know you were addressing red rooster but surely - “..I’d like to find the video where Gerry first spoke to the press, reading from a piece of paper - not sure when this was but I had the idea it was actually on 3rd May?..” can not be correct as madeleine was only reported missing at 10pm ish that night?
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:35 pm
266 Ian says…
Of course they all wore watches. I suspect that May 3rd was planned in infinitesimal detail. Actually, maybe they took their watches off before ‘the performance’ began.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:34 pm
264 val
I doubt anyone will be sued.
It would put them in a UK court and the McCanns do not want to be in a court, allegedly and in my opinion and true belief (in case I’m wrong!).
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:33 pm
266
Ian
This is exactely why the PJ want to re-interview at least 6 of them….
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=488961&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:32 pm
228 Noseycow
I read somewhere that, according to the waiters, they didn’t leave the table as often as they said. Actually, I read contradictory things about it. I am not trying to understand. All I can say is I have a strange feeling. Not my understanding of a good life. Obviously a lack of good, common sense. And priorities not in the right order.
I am waiting to know how the PJ see it all.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm
Everyone knows that the only thing holding up this investigation is Jaqui Smith and her cronies dismissing the rogatory letters.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm
256
Ciara Says:
**********
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:31 pm
252 RedRooster
I’d like to find the video where Gerry first spoke to the press, reading from a piece of paper - not sure when this was but I had the idea it was actually on 3rd May?
I was wondering if he was wearing his watch?
I’m also wondering if they told the police that night that they hadnt been wearing watches so the times might not be exact?
I still think the issue is the difficulty with finding a balance between telling us they checked their kids religiously and providing sufficient opportunity for an abductor to do the abducting.
They are trapped in a paradox. The way out chosen seems to be shifting the times around - creating a confused picture and claiming no watches.
I still think that Gerry stating 9:10 on his blog as the Tanner sighting after she had been in the public domain with 9:15 is a highly significant and revealing move. Another is the fact that Clarence has nevr clamped down on the blog. The first thing I’d have done if I were representing thr McCanns would be to take immediate control of any communications gateways. - the most blatently obvious one is Gerry’s blog.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:29 pm
235
]
Marie Nicholas Says:
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:10 pm
202 Châtelaine
What do you mean? Are you leaving? Why?
****
See above/below [depends on how you read posts ...]
I’ve had it for now.
Will follow you too [if I may...
good night
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:28 pm
216 Grande Finale
With all the commotion going on , re gagging of Press, shutdown of Mirror
forum, watch out for the “spies” who might report on your “Portrait” of KM
and you will be sued!!!!!!!!
Funny though!
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:25 pm
261
jo Says:
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:23 pm
242
Châtelaine
Real shame you are going.Pleased to meet you too.Lots of posters have gone but I am sure they will be back when the news will become “breaking news”
I am posting less and less I must say.I am saturated.
We know nothing we know what weve been fed.I know the investigation is not stalling but it has become very very slow.I believe something is going to happen soon but I am not sure I want to spend all my free time being a masochist with myself squizzing my poor neurones about the mcFools.
Bye for now and dont hesitate come and lurk
Mes bons souhaits a Maman
***
Thank you, Jo. Aussi de part de Maman
Take care.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Interesting, Val. I look forward to hearing it.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:23 pm
242
Châtelaine
Real shame you are going.Pleased to meet you too.Lots of posters have gone but I am sure they will be back when the news will become “breaking news”
I am posting less and less I must say.I am saturated.
We know nothing we know what weve been fed.I know the investigation is not stalling but it has become very very slow.I believe something is going to happen soon but I am not sure I want to spend all my free time being a masochist with myself squizzing my poor neurones about the mcFools.
Bye for now and dont hesitate come and lurk
Mes bons souhaits a Maman
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:22 pm
255 Lex “If we are lucky, the newspapers are deleting their archive of Maddie articles because they have been tipped-off about impending developments in the case and their staunch pro-McCann stance is going to look quite embarrassing soon…”
god, i hope so. but i have hoped before.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:22 pm
It seems very convenient as the thread is dying that the usual suspects turn up.