
Madeleine McCann, Shannon Matthews And Missing Child Protocol
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann.
Shannon Matthews is missing. Is the media treating her case the same way as it views Madeleine McCann? And, in light of missing Madeleine, is there now a protocol for what occurs when a child goes missing?
DAILY MIRROR: “LOST TO US ALL”
Sue Carroll: Most of us won’t have an instant recollection who Shannon Matthews is. After thinking twice, of course we all know she is the nine-year-old missing from her home in Dewsbury Moor, West Yorkshire.
But what a terrible indictment of the media that, when a child has disappeared in Britain for over a week, her name doesn’t spring to our lips, we don’t know her school, favourite toy or what she was wearing when last seen.
Shannon is as precious to her family as Madeleine McCann, missing for 300 days, is to hers. But where are the front-page pictures, campaigns, the furore? Would this be different if she was the daughter of two middle-class, mediasavvy parents? Not a working-class child from up North.
THE SUN: “Marchers wants Shannon home”
THE family of Shannon Matthews led a poignant candlelit vigil for the missing nine-year-old last night – as police admitted hopes of finding her alive looked “bleak”.
Anguished mum Karen and stepdad Craig joined 300 neighbours on a march through streets near their home.
Children carried a banner showing the youngster’s face and a hotline to ring with information.
A hotline. Like Madeleine. A vigil. There is picture of Shannon on her birthday.
Balloons bearing pleas for Shannon’s safe return were released during last night’s vigil.
THIS IS LONDON: “Police search house of missing Shannon’s uncle as detectives treat case ‘as seriously as a murder’”
A dozen police officers conducted a fingertip search of the house belonging to the uncle of missing nine-year-old Shannon Matthews today.
Officers from West Yorkshire Police filed into the property in Moorside Road, Dewsbury Moor which adjoins the home of the schoolgirl who disappeared last week.
The house belongs to Neil Hyett, Shannon Matthews’ uncle, and his wife, Amanda.
Detective Superintendent Brennan, who is heading up the search, says:
“I’m convinced that if Shannon had run away that night of her own volition, in a den or hideaway of some sort, we would have found her by now - over a week on from when the investigation opened.
“It is very rare in searches of this kind that a girl of Shannon’s age should be missing for this long without any clues pointing to her whereabouts.
“It is extremely concerning and we are now looking at this on a scale as serious as a murder investigation.
“It can now be said that the tone of our enquiry has changed to a bleaker outlook.
“The shift in emphasis is that we are now looking for individuals who may have been seen on the day of her disappearance, acting suspiciously, or unknown to the local community.
“We are also appealing for anyone who may have friends or family that may have been behaving strangely since Shannon went missing, to come forward.
“At this stage, any shred of information, however insignificant it seems, may help.
“We have a grave concern that she may have fallen into the wrong hands but no arrests have been made at this point, and I must stress at this point that we are not ruling out any possibilities as to what might have happened to her.”
DAILY MAIL: “Now police say missing Shannon, 9, could have been abducted”
A week after Shannon Matthews was last seen walking away from school in Dewsbury Moor, West Yorkshire, it also emerged that another girl called Shannon escaped an abduction attempt 10 miles away earlier the same day.
Shannon Selby, 12, was walking to school alone in Wakefield when a man pulled up and ordered her to “get in this car now”.
She ran away as the man parked and made to chase her on foot.
She reached home safely and her mother rang the police.
An efit of the attacker was released yesterday.
Allison Pearson: “Poor Shannon was already a lost child”
When Madeleine McCann went missing, her parents soon came under attack for leaving their daughter alone in a holiday apartment just a couple of hundred yards from where they were having dinner.
At the time, critics claimed that if the middle-class McCanns had lived on a council estate, they would have been in trouble with the police for neglect. So where is the outcry over the disappearance of Shannon Matthews?
Only nine years old, Shannon was reported missing by her mum, Karen, at 7pm last Tuesday when she had still not walked the mile home. She was last seen leaving school at 3.10pm.
Four hours is an eternity for a little girl to be out on a dark winter’s evening. And Shannon was afraid of the dark. Why did no one walk with her or care where she was?
Karen, who has seven children by five fathers, admitted that she had found a note scrawled on her daughter’s bedroom wall saying that she wanted to go and live with her biological dad in Huddersfield.
Shannon’s friends say she told them she didn’t want to go home. But Karen insists Shannon was fine and enjoys a good relationship with her current boyfriend, 22-yearold Craig.
“Only on Monday, they were having tickling fights and telly cuddles. She views him as her dad.” Oh really? In that case, why was Shannon so desperate to be reunited with her real father? No one can doubt Karen’s anguish.
The poor woman can hardly speak, except to sob to the cameras: “Shannon, come home, please come home.” But allowing a passing parade of boyfriends to play tickling games with your vulnerable small girl is, at best, naïve
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Shannon ‘may be in the wrong hands’”
Reports that an alleged abduction attempt of another girl on the same day that Shannon disappeared a week ago were being looked into by police.
According to reports, a man in a gold Ford Mondeo tried to coax a 12-year-old into his car at about 9am in Wakefield, about six miles away.
The girl ran away from him.
THE TIMES: “Abducted, abused… survived”
Lisa Hoodless and Charlene Lunnon were abducted and raped nine years ago, aged 10. They found strength in each other to survive the four-day ordeal and, remarkably, to rebuild their lives
Alan Hopkinson was found by police with the girls huddled together in his front room. He pleaded guilty to the crime and was given nine life sentences.
And that, for the public at least, is where stories like this usually end. Children don’t often survive adbuction by men such as Hopkinson, a truth that weighs heavily on the mind as we await news of nine-year-old Shannon Matthews, missing now for more than a week. If they do survive, we rarely hear from them again.
Hope:
They say that in some ways what happened has had a positive effect on their lives. Both seem vaguely surprised that anyone would want to interview them about it because it is “not that amazing” but, in a climate in which missing girls such as Madeleine McCann dominate the news, they want to urge people never to give up searching because “children can come back”.
Posted: 27th, February 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (1,154) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





February 27th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
In response to earlier post about what makes a pro or anti Mccann I am not sure - I am not a pro but keep an open mind to their guilt or innocence in being involved in the child going missing. I dislike the way they have conducted themselves since regarding the fund, blog, photoshoots etc. I also find them arrogant and unsympathetic characters.
Having said that then I must add that no, I don’t know what I would do in their shoes but I sure as hell would not have left my children unattended at that age in the way that they did.
Whether or not they are guilty of more than that remains to be proved.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
701
catkidd Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
was that place in jersey run by the christian bros by any chance
—————–
February 27th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
696
RedRooster Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 7:12 pm
693
Garth Says:
***********
to be honest I think june was pretty clear….but if you dont get it garf, well theres not much I can do to help you.
————–
Rooster, I do understand, your not wistening! Its the other pros that are struggling as you suggest. So because you get the gist of it could you please explain to the other poor bleeders? Thats it………nothing more!
And thankyou in advance………
February 27th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
698
Maria Says:
***********
well thats very kind of you maria
February 27th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
698
Maria
Much more than you think
Along with a good sense of humour RR also has a vein for satire.
The less I can say is you have none of them
February 27th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=520929&in_page_id=1811
the taxi driver
February 27th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
was that place in jersey run by the christian bros by any chance
February 27th, 2008 at 7:16 pm
695
Maria Says:
************
they will get what they deserve and if that means they will spend the rest of their lives miserable tough…..they should have thought of that before doing what they did. How can you sympathise with these monsters…. they didnt stop for a second to think of poor madeleine did they….? selfish Mcf@ckers
February 27th, 2008 at 7:16 pm
696
RedRooster
Its all diversion
Trolls in action
Lets skip it
Go Move Shift
February 27th, 2008 at 7:16 pm
Garth
As you say, it’s obvious from his/her posts over the weeks that RR is very clever.
Wow! What an intellect.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:13 pm
691
Garth
http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/archive/2007/11/25/diplomate-avait-avertie-londres-de-possible-implication-des.html
Has the uk govt got involved in Amy”s disappearance? NO
She surely has been reported missing there of course but nothingelse
February 27th, 2008 at 7:12 pm
693
Garth Says:
***********
to be honest I think june was pretty clear….but if you dont get it garf, well theres not much I can do to help you.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:11 pm
June Johnson
On rereading your message, I think you may mean that if they hadn’t had the privilege of being on that sort of holiday, Madeleine wouldn’t have suffered as she did? Of course, that’s correct. There is no excusing what they did. I’ve never tried to excuse it.
I don’t think any such “privilege”, a “lovely house” etc. etc. will ever be any consolation to them now, if they are not guilty of more direct involvement. The only sort of peace they may ever get would be through working to help others in a similar situation and other missing children. Their lives are destined to be miserable forever so those who think they should be punished for their neglect will be able to feel that they deserve that misery, even if it turns out that they are not guilty of more and therefore do not face punishment from the law. ( I doubt if their neglect would qualify for legal punishment, but it might.)
________________
Mods and Admin
I meant privilege of parenthood of making the decisions the choices they freely made that led to the fate of their child, and it could have been children.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:10 pm
692
RedRooster Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 7:08 pm
691
Garth Says:
************
dont be silly garf you know thats not true…….
————-
Its what it all boils down to RR.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
690
RedRooster Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
684
Maria Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 6:53 pm
675 June Johnson
What privilege? What consolation? Sorry to be thick but I don’t understand.
*********************************************************************
dont worry you’re not the only thick pro-mccann, most of them are
————–
RR
I know what June is getting at but I dont think it was put across very well. Could you explain it a little clearer so others can understand as you are obviously quite clever!
February 27th, 2008 at 7:08 pm
691
Garth Says:
************
dont be silly garf you know thats not true…….
February 27th, 2008 at 7:07 pm
685
Maria Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
683 Mary
I agree that the article was a disgrace.
————–
Agreed, a disgrace, however, I dont agree with you Mary on the class thingy some like to jump at. I think, unfortunately, the McCanns have been castigated for that very misconception. It seems, at least to me, that certain people have personal issues. If a child had been taken in Portugal from their bedroom apartment and it was as public as the Maddie case then there would have been intervention by the uk government no matter what so-called class the family were.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
684
Maria Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 6:53 pm
675 June Johnson
What privilege? What consolation? Sorry to be thick but I don’t understand.
*********************************************************************
dont worry you’re not the only thick pro-mccann, most of them are
February 27th, 2008 at 7:01 pm
684
Maria
Why dont you go back to your knitting or learn english?
You are NOT a cynic NOR a sceptic.You are just …well Id rather shut up.
The ONLY victim is MADELEINE
Her PROGENITORS do not have any sympathy from anybody apart from bigots or idiots like you.
Stop whining will ya?
February 27th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
682
Garth Says:
***********
?? you’re very confusing garfy..?
February 27th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
679
jo Says:
*******
well sort of yeah……..quite enjoyed winding it up
February 27th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
683
mary
There will be more comments of the kind dont you worry….
What really gets at me more than anything is the mccann to be watching for the next sad story to be in the front page….
They make me sick
February 27th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
683 Mary
I agree that the article was a disgrace.
February 27th, 2008 at 6:53 pm
Gerry Mccanns father was a labour MP hence all the government help in my opinion
Administrator: No that’s wrong. Dr Gerry McCann’s father was not the Labour MP named McCann. The mistaken identity has so upset the McCann (deceased) Labour MP’s family so much his son sent a very full and frank posting to Anorak detailing the facts. They are NOT related. Sorry, but those are the facts -agw
February 27th, 2008 at 6:53 pm
675 June Johnson
What privilege? What consolation? Sorry to be thick but I don’t understand.
Please do not suggest that people who have some sympathy for the McCanns (if they are NOT directly guilty) do not also have sympathy for Madeleine. It simply isn’t true. They are mocked here on Anorak by some posters but there is a whole group of people, I believe (the HTFM people?), who spend much of their time actively involved in the campaign to find Madeleine. It may be a waste of time, it probably is (I’m a cynic and a sceptic) but they are doing whatever they can. They are not doing that just for the McCanns, I assume, but for Madeleine!
February 27th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Alison Pearson today in the Daily Mail continues to defend the Mccanns while she passes judgement on the mother of Shannon for letting her 9 year old daughter walk home alone - its ok to leave much younger children alone if you are a nice, photogenic, educated doctor. Shannon’s mum has seven kids by five different dads but, unlike Kate, has not been named prime suspect in the disappearance of her daughter.
Well done Pearson for proving the point that some of us have been trying to make for months - it is indeed a class thing.
Talking of the Daily Mail I wonder what the late, great Lynda Lee Potter would have made of it all.
February 27th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
673
RedRooster Says:
February 27th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
661
Garth Says:
*********
i was garf
——–
You’re a new women.
Pppy
This claim is weird to say the least. Why is it weird? Because its the first we’ve heard about it.
This person could be totally mistaken of course but if so, and after his statement to the PJ you would assume, or at least hope, that this persons claim has been thoroughly investigated. And assuming that to be the case you can only draw the conclusion that indeed h e was mistaken.
However, going on the PJ’s initial sleuthing standards the question that does beg to be answered is whether the PJ did act upon it? And if not……..why not?
February 27th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
“Could the childrens’ parents have been at work? earning a living has less connotations of neglect and selfishness”
Not sure who added this to the end of my post??
Yes, they could have been at work, and of course I agree that’s “better” than eating a meal with friends, but it still doesn’t excuse the neglect. You have to make appropriate arrangements for your children. I’d even go so far as to say that, even though one should NEVER leave small children out of ear-shot, as the McCanns did, if they were asleep and always slept soundly, and were being checked on regularly, then they were probably at less of a risk, statistically speaking, than these two little ones.
I felt quite angry. Not sure what could be done. Parents were probably working because it was early, well before school would actually be starting. Must get TB on to it.
February 27th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
Bye for now
Maria
I have absolutely NO sympathy for them.
They dont deserve any
February 27th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
678
RedRooster
Do you really care?