Madeleine McCann: A Jetski, A Bag And Terrorist Attacks On Israel
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann and Shannon Matthews
DAILY MAIL: “Couple saw bundle taken out to sea near where Madeleine disappeared but police ignored them”
A bundle?
A British couple saw a package being bundled onto a jetski on a beach just six miles from where Madeleine McCann went missing. The tourists had been for a morning swim just nine hours after the little girl disappeared when they spotted the jetski.
A man in a dark wetsuit was riding it, with a 2ft- to 3ft-long black package on the front. He took it to a small “official-looking” grey boat moored just off the coast at Salema.
Man with bag spotted… Read all about it!
The McCanns’s spokesman said they were concerned the Portuguese police had not followed up such a “potentially significant lead”. Really.
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: “Maddie Jetski Snatch Riddle”
A riddle? A man with a bag on a jet ski? A riddle? Or a man with a bag on a jetski?
CHILD snatchers may have smuggled Madeleine McCann out of Portugal on a jetski within 10 hours of her kidnap. Two new witnesses have emerged saying they saw a man carrying a large bundle on a beach near Praia da Luz the morning after Madeleine vanished.
They said the man sped off on a jetski with the 3ft-long load on his lap and met a small boat offshore.
A boat. Offshore. On the sea. Not on the land…
One witness, a 58-year-old British woman, says: “The man was acting very strange, he was dressed in black and left on a black jetski with a bundle on his lap. The bundle was definitely big enough to hold Madeleine. It could have been her.”
McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “If these people had a sighting which is potentially significant, then clearly our investigators will require this information as a priority.”
THE SUN: “MADDY OFF ‘ON JET SKI’”
Say the Policia Judiciaria: “The Policia Judiciaria have carried out all the pertinent and sensible operation”
ARAB NEWS (Saudi Arabia): “Israel’s Moral Compass Is Flawed”
A propagandist called Linda Heard manages to aliken the disappearance of a missing child with terrorists firing rockets upon Israel and that country’s response:
Ponder on the morality of the media-inspired public response to Madeleine McCann as opposed to Gaza’s maimed and orphaned babies. According to the British newspaper Independent, there were 465 stories about her in the British press, the family received 1.1m pounds in public donations, while a host of celebrities — including Simon Cowell, Sir Richard Branson and J.K. Rowling — offered rewards totaling 2.6m pounds.
To the best of our knowledge, Kate and Gerry McCann have not vowed to push an entire nation of people’s into the sea, fired rockets upon them and used children as a human shield…
Madeleine McCann: The media frenzy so far
Posted: 4th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, War On Terror Comments (382) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Evie Walton on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- yampster on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- yampster on Join The Campaign For Straight Gay Marriages
March 4th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Val
Yes it is
someone has
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Tappas9/TAPPAS9.htm
March 4th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
135…Fair
In what way “more dodgy” ?
March 4th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
131 & 132
But we don’t really know anything much yet do we?
However…..I do think this case looks more ”dodgy” at this early stage than the McCanns case did.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
129 Brandon Flours
I think someone ought to write a little pamphlet on Who”s Who” …..in the Madeleine
case…… is the Instructer the one who sat at their table for a while on that fateful night?
March 4th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
A group of girlfriends went on vacation and they see a five-story hotel with a sign that reads ‘For Women Only.’ Since they were without their boyfriends, they decide to go in.
The Bouncer, a very attractive guy, explains to them how it works. ‘We have 5 floors… go up floor by floor, and once you find what you are looking for, you can stay there. It’s easy to decide, since each floor has signs telling you what’s inside. But once to go up to the next floor, you can’t go back.’
So they start going up, and on the first floor the sign reads ‘All the men here are horrible lovers, but they are sensitive and kind.’ The friends laugh and without hesitation move on to the next floor.
The sign on the second floor reads ‘All the men here are wonderful lovers, but they generally treat women badly.’ This wasn’t going to do, so the friends move up to the third floor where the sign read ‘All the men here are great lovers and sensitive to the needs of women.’ This was good but there were still two more floors.
On to the fourth floor, the sign was Perfect. ‘All the men here have perfect builds; are sensitive and attentive to women; are perfect lovers; they are also single, rich and straight.’
The women seemed pleased but they decide that they would rather see what the fifth floor has to offer instead of settling for the fourth. When they reach the fifth floor, the sign reads:
‘There are no men here. This floor was built only to prove that it is impossible to please a woman.’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSZHT2XvoLM&feature=related
March 4th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Fair
People seem to be ok saying similar things re madeleine case but not about Shannon?
Why is that? Is it because the case is still relatively new?
+++++++++++++++
The reasons that I am not saying similar things to the madeleine case are :
1. she was not 3 years old
2. she was not left alone in an apartment abroad
3. the last sighting was CCTV footage going home - not with her parents
4. it is not possible that something else had happened to her maybe days before being reported missing.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
Fair
Its early days and the parents behaviour is not like the Mc Canns.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
122
DELBOY Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Ask yourself…why a little girl would not want to go home to her mum?
why why why? scribblings on the wall, the kid is saying something,
—————————————————————————
Absolutely! Thank you.
However she was allegedly on her way to her dad’s…..
People seem to be ok saying similar things re madeleine case but not about Shannon?
Why is that? Is it because the case is still relatively new?
March 4th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Val
The aerobic instructor has kept very quiet too.
Hopefully she will be a good witness.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
122…DELBOY
Have you heard who the “Locally known sex-offender” who the Police said
was being also investigated might be ?
No name required.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
105
brandon flours Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Rock hopper
No idea!
Hows you ferrett this morning ?
=================
Chillin’
March 4th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
DELBOY
++++++
Have you ruled out kidnapping by stranger then?
March 4th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Gandolf
++++++
I think they have been doing it right from the start - with close family. I share your hopes.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Brandon
If they did it (I don’t want sued) - then they probably dumped it in the sea or something when they were out jogging. I think Gerry said the press were good at giving them privacy outside of arranged photo-ops.
It would be audacious, but then some people who have done shocking things have said that they felt like it wasn’t really them doing it.
So maybe for K and G, in their heads, they’re great parents and Madeleine was kidnapped and ‘whatever’ didn’t really happen???
March 4th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
What the fecks symbolic logic???
——————————————–
The finger
The v sign
The side hand shake
The ‘wanna drink’ sign
March 4th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Ask yourself…why a little girl would not want to go home to her mum?
why why why? scribblings on the wall, the kid is saying something,
March 4th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
dcb, only they seem to have done it in reverse, and are now working in, after all it has been a fortnight. I just pray Shannon turns up safe and sound, hope springs eternal.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
101
Karen Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Rockhopper
I don’t get what was so confusing about it.
We don’t know what happened to Shannon.
But based on our assumptions about her Mother’s love life and the appropriateness of her step-father’s tickling games we could make a case for the step-father being guilty.
But there are no facts to back it up beyond our assumptions.
=============================
That’s staightforward enough
——————————————–
(I can’t do symbolic logic either and it’s part of my course only a small part though. )
========
What the fecks symbolic logic???
March 4th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Karen - I have real problems with this type of statement that you made:
“But based on our assumptions about her Mother’s love life and the appropriateness of her step-father’s tickling games we could make a case for the step-father being guilty.”
March 4th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
102 Brandon Flours
I posted a reply to you earlier on the other thread. No need to look, it just said I agree
with you about the Waiter, he has been reinterviewed and his identity kept secret.
Now where was I……oh yes, if “nothing to hide “gives YOU goosebumps, think how
the McCanns must be feeling!!!!!!!!!!
Please let the interviews (if they do take place) produce hard evidence . The PJ must
be seething at all the British comments about their incompetence, hope the PJ have
the last laugh.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
114
brandon flours Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Delboy
Rockhoppers ferrett and I are friends lol!!!
oh well then, that explains a lot……….lol..
March 4th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Karen, based on your assumptions, assumed on hearsay.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
114
Gandolf
++++++++
Start close and then work further out - standard procedure isn’t it?
March 4th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Delboy
Rockhoppers ferrett and I are friends lol!!!
March 4th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
The plod on the TV said 10% of Yorkshires finest circa 350 plod are on the Shannon case, seems a lot if, as some claim they are looking close to home.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
102
brandon flours Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
A spokesman for the McCanns said: “They’ve nothing to hide.”
That gives me goosebumps for some reason
Brandon no they havnt they already hidden it….imo
March 4th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Karen
Thats what I mean it seems to me to say ‘ There isnt one anymore’
March 4th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
Brandon
Well, they don’t. Apart from the body.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
105
brandon flours Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Rock hopper
No idea!
Hows you ferrett this morning
Thats a bit personal isnt it!
March 4th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
sorry
It sounds like an arrogant statement as if to say ‘we made sure of it’ .