Madeleine McCann: A Jetski, A Bag And Terrorist Attacks On Israel
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann and Shannon Matthews
DAILY MAIL: “Couple saw bundle taken out to sea near where Madeleine disappeared but police ignored them”
A bundle?
A British couple saw a package being bundled onto a jetski on a beach just six miles from where Madeleine McCann went missing. The tourists had been for a morning swim just nine hours after the little girl disappeared when they spotted the jetski.
A man in a dark wetsuit was riding it, with a 2ft- to 3ft-long black package on the front. He took it to a small “official-looking” grey boat moored just off the coast at Salema.
Man with bag spotted… Read all about it!
The McCanns’s spokesman said they were concerned the Portuguese police had not followed up such a “potentially significant lead”. Really.
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: “Maddie Jetski Snatch Riddle”
A riddle? A man with a bag on a jet ski? A riddle? Or a man with a bag on a jetski?
CHILD snatchers may have smuggled Madeleine McCann out of Portugal on a jetski within 10 hours of her kidnap. Two new witnesses have emerged saying they saw a man carrying a large bundle on a beach near Praia da Luz the morning after Madeleine vanished.
They said the man sped off on a jetski with the 3ft-long load on his lap and met a small boat offshore.
A boat. Offshore. On the sea. Not on the land…
One witness, a 58-year-old British woman, says: “The man was acting very strange, he was dressed in black and left on a black jetski with a bundle on his lap. The bundle was definitely big enough to hold Madeleine. It could have been her.”
McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “If these people had a sighting which is potentially significant, then clearly our investigators will require this information as a priority.”
THE SUN: “MADDY OFF ‘ON JET SKI’”
Say the Policia Judiciaria: “The Policia Judiciaria have carried out all the pertinent and sensible operation”
ARAB NEWS (Saudi Arabia): “Israel’s Moral Compass Is Flawed”
A propagandist called Linda Heard manages to aliken the disappearance of a missing child with terrorists firing rockets upon Israel and that country’s response:
Ponder on the morality of the media-inspired public response to Madeleine McCann as opposed to Gaza’s maimed and orphaned babies. According to the British newspaper Independent, there were 465 stories about her in the British press, the family received 1.1m pounds in public donations, while a host of celebrities — including Simon Cowell, Sir Richard Branson and J.K. Rowling — offered rewards totaling 2.6m pounds.
To the best of our knowledge, Kate and Gerry McCann have not vowed to push an entire nation of people’s into the sea, fired rockets upon them and used children as a human shield…
Madeleine McCann: The media frenzy so far
Posted: 4th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, War On Terror Comments (382) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- THENTHEREWERE4 on Madeleine McCann: Kevin Halligen Becomes The ‘Maddie Faudster’
- Anorak on Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 FBI And NYPD Pager Messages, Conspiracy Theorists Read On
- James Mcdiffett on Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 FBI And NYPD Pager Messages, Conspiracy Theorists Read On
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
March 4th, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Karen, just think of it as a note from your Anorak Branch office, nothing to get barking about.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:19 pm
dcb, but it could be a virtual tree, or a shoe tree, or a tree by tree, maybe that should be tree by four, where’s Tarazan when you need him, he knows all about trees, oh oh don’t even go there.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:17 pm
Gandolf
Well, it did, didn’t it.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:17 pm
just in case for some strange reason anyone on here thinks they are really my children, trust me, they are NOT !!!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Gandolf
+++++
But it won’t hurt unless you assume it is a tree.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
just_me, aint that the bleedin problem some ones been innit to bleedin often, at least 5 times to bleedin often brenda.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
dcb
I don’t know… I really didn’t think it was that complicated.
I mean Poster Y outright said she felt in her gut that x did it and no one minded. I say x doing it always a possibility and I get a hammering.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:15 pm
and furver to me post 217, dont none of ya accuse me of not keeping me baby safe whem im at da pub…..
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/baby.jpg
March 4th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
217
OMG!!
The one on the left looks like she really means it (already) too!
Now I understand why I want to leave the UK!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:13 pm
Karen, I am not getting at you I have made lots of daft assumptions, like I could talk and walk at the same time after 14 pints of stella, assumptions are dangerous, a bit like Russian roulette, and that tree could always fall on your heid.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
who’s been slating Karen? all my 5 sprogs have got different farvers, so what innit? blimey, you lot dunno how good it is on da dole! anyway heres a pic of me and my lot…
Im so effin proud too innit!
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/kids.jpg
March 4th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
215
Hiya
March 4th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
afternoon all
March 4th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
211
Just trying to ‘find’ your missing 2 & try & match up?
Too complicated for me!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:07 pm
195
Karen
++++
Thankyou for the clue
March 4th, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Gandolf
I know I’ve got into trouble for this. And I should leave it.
But I know that assumptions have no proof.
I was agreeing with you that any suspicions about x were without proof.
There were 3 or 4 posters who thought x was suspicious and I was interested in their reasons for it, because no one else posted any other explanation. Personally, I thought that Shannon had run off and died of cold.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Fair
sorry read it wrong. you mean added to the other 2 the 5 and 2 year old.
gottcha now!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
209
Thought there were 5 dads & 7 kids? No?
March 4th, 2008 at 3:01 pm
fair
‘We need 3 more dads so far & 2 kids.’
that cant be right!
March 4th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Denzylle
‘ We’re all in this together…….’ High school the musical song springs to mind!!
March 4th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
192
brandon flours Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Karen’s seven kids had five different dads. Four of the youngsters live with her and boyfriend Craig Meehan, 22 - Tony, 11; Shannon; Cameron, five; and Courtney, two.
Theres Ian 10 who lives with her dad Leon.
Wheres the other 2?
———————————————————–
So we have….11,10,9,5 & 2
10 & 9 yr olds have same dad.
So maybe the eldest (11) is 1st dad.
Next two (10 & 9) 2nd dad. We need 3 more dads so far & 2 kids.
Bar the 5 year old there is a bit of a gap. So maybe they are around 7 & 4?
Who knows?
March 4th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Gandolf,
The Esoteric One.
Of everyone I have come upon, you are the one I would most like to read this article.
I hope you do.
http://lesvisible.blogspot.com/2008/02/all-life-is-pain-caused-by-ignorant.html
March 4th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Does anybody know where Karen Matthews other 2 children are?
Are they 16?
in care?
with their dad?
granny?
March 4th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
June
Sorry.
I know it was a convoluted argument - but I wasn’t saying anyone was guilty.
————–
M and a
But ensuing gossip could ‘make ‘ someone guilty, especially as thought has been applied to it.
Someones ‘gut’ feeling is just that in early days.
But given the heavy investigation, and I somehow think we won’t get any ‘pro’s’ on here to balance arguments/discussions, and to be blunt this is more of ‘accepted family scenario’ for missing child than ever MM ’s could have been, perhaps less ’sleuthing’ than there has been? It may not be so typical after all.
Does anyone think though the McC’s situation have set a trend for kids going missing, I don’t really know how typical they are, but with the heavy pro patrol we had on here , it makes one think
March 4th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Karen, that I can assure you would be another of your assumptions, to add to your no doubt huge list of flawed ones.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
“More than 200 officers and 60 detectives are involved in the investigation which Mr Brennan said amounted to 10% of West Yorkshire Police’s operational strength. ” - BBC.
And how many officers and detectives of the Leicestershire Constabulary are involved in the investigation of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, and matters relating thereto, and what percentage is that number of Leicestershire Constabulary’s operational strrength?
Shall we say zero?
——–
Mods and Admin
We have no idea if they even need be, after all do they have any jurisdiction on Portuguese soil?
March 4th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Denzylle
198
Not to mention the parents themselves.
If I were GM or KM (if myself was…) - unless I believed my partner 103% and much more - I’d want separate representation.
————————————————————————————–
Mmm, that was ambiguous. I meant that KM should be thinking about separate representation from GM, or vice versa, rather than the parents having separate
lawyers to the other Tapas crew. Altho’ that, too, of course; ie. if (IF) there are nine Tapas, then nine lawyers.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Mods and Admin
Karen you must take care over your interpretations of assumptions and facts.
This is how gossip starts, ‘do you know if’ turns into ‘did you know that’ and a life could be in ruins because of it.
Your philosophy in your own life is clearly your own business,but what you expound here could affect Anorak, and until I can present your posts to Admin I am going to ask you to stop ‘presenting a case’ as guilty because YOU presume it could be.
If you continue they will be pulled - a hard fact.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Gandolf
Oh, fucking hell - that’s exactly what I’ve been saying it is.
I’m going to have to assume you’re thick.
March 4th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
Seriously, is there any indication the Tapas crew due to be interviewed have hired separate lawyers yet?
Not to mention the parents themselves.
If I were GM or KM (if myself was…) - unless I believed my partner 103% and much more - I’d want separate representation.