
Madeleine McCann: A Jetski, A Bag And Terrorist Attacks On Israel
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann and Shannon Matthews
DAILY MAIL: “Couple saw bundle taken out to sea near where Madeleine disappeared but police ignored them”
A bundle?
A British couple saw a package being bundled onto a jetski on a beach just six miles from where Madeleine McCann went missing. The tourists had been for a morning swim just nine hours after the little girl disappeared when they spotted the jetski.
A man in a dark wetsuit was riding it, with a 2ft- to 3ft-long black package on the front. He took it to a small “official-looking” grey boat moored just off the coast at Salema.
Man with bag spotted… Read all about it!
The McCanns’s spokesman said they were concerned the Portuguese police had not followed up such a “potentially significant lead”. Really.
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: “Maddie Jetski Snatch Riddle”
A riddle? A man with a bag on a jet ski? A riddle? Or a man with a bag on a jetski?
CHILD snatchers may have smuggled Madeleine McCann out of Portugal on a jetski within 10 hours of her kidnap. Two new witnesses have emerged saying they saw a man carrying a large bundle on a beach near Praia da Luz the morning after Madeleine vanished.
They said the man sped off on a jetski with the 3ft-long load on his lap and met a small boat offshore.
A boat. Offshore. On the sea. Not on the land…
One witness, a 58-year-old British woman, says: “The man was acting very strange, he was dressed in black and left on a black jetski with a bundle on his lap. The bundle was definitely big enough to hold Madeleine. It could have been her.”
McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “If these people had a sighting which is potentially significant, then clearly our investigators will require this information as a priority.”
THE SUN: “MADDY OFF ‘ON JET SKI’”
Say the Policia Judiciaria: “The Policia Judiciaria have carried out all the pertinent and sensible operation”
ARAB NEWS (Saudi Arabia): “Israel’s Moral Compass Is Flawed”
A propagandist called Linda Heard manages to aliken the disappearance of a missing child with terrorists firing rockets upon Israel and that country’s response:
Ponder on the morality of the media-inspired public response to Madeleine McCann as opposed to Gaza’s maimed and orphaned babies. According to the British newspaper Independent, there were 465 stories about her in the British press, the family received 1.1m pounds in public donations, while a host of celebrities — including Simon Cowell, Sir Richard Branson and J.K. Rowling — offered rewards totaling 2.6m pounds.
To the best of our knowledge, Kate and Gerry McCann have not vowed to push an entire nation of people’s into the sea, fired rockets upon them and used children as a human shield…
Madeleine McCann: The media frenzy so far
Posted: 4th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, War On Terror Comments (382) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





March 4th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
Rockhopper
Right, I vote the bus driver did it. Failing that the dingo.
March 4th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Beware the Devil Karen, and brickies with eye shadow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luobOzreRq4
March 4th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
252
Karen Says:
I’ll stay away from Logic in future. I’ll just say the Devil did it.
=========================
But I shall deny it young lady!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
(expecting more moderation)
M and A
By’pro’s I mean the emphatic bigotted blind belief preached as though a gospel kind of poster.
For the record I don’t think Karen M harmed her child at all, the multipartners I have no idea,but I think it could be a case of school bullying at the root of it.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Karen : “I feel like the Archbishop of Canterbury”
+++++++++++++
Whatever turns you on!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
dcb
Hopefully.
Gandolf
I’ll stay away from Logic in future. I’ll just say the Devil did it.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
250 - ha ha!!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
247
just_me Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
RR & Rockhopper, i hope you saw my post 224 too
=================
Proof required
March 4th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
I did not say we should bring in Sharia law, I said we could have a debate about it. Ooh, er.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
239
Oh.
Thank you for you insight.
Very valuable information.
Will stand me in good stead for my future.
I will give myself a good slap.
I am indebted to you.
You are most kind.
I wish there were more kind souls like you.
I really really wish I were your child.
Thank you.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
RR & Rockhopper, i hope you saw my post 224 too
March 4th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
My God it is the feast of the Assumption!!!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
dcb
I wasn’t saying that it was my assumption that x was guilty.
I was saying that I know it’s an assumption.
I feel like the Archbishop of Canterbury.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
Fair on second thoughts to be fair or fairer still, I refer you to post 218, you should never make assumptions about people being patronising.
Susannah, if you are feeling backward, what can I say except, of all the people in all the world Iam glad never to have met such a tight ass as you.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
239
Karen
+++++
But I prefer to think that she went to a friends/acquaintances house and is hiding safe and is too scared now to come out.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:45 pm
Just caught up………
Still don’t have a clue what’s going on!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
239
Karen
++++++
Ok - well at least we agree on something.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
217
just_me Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
who’s been slating Karen? all my 5 sprogs have got different farvers, so what innit? blimey, you lot dunno how good it is on da dole! anyway heres a pic of me and my lot…
Im so effin proud too innit!
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/kids.jpg
===================
Is that one of those nighties with a built in mattress back????
March 4th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Fair, christ you must have led one very sheltered life, its called the net not a friggin finishing school, play with the fire eaters at your peril, and lighten up.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
dcb
No.
I think it might be an abduction because they haven’t found a body yet.
But my immediate thought was she ran off to her Dad’s, it got dark, it got cold, she sat down somewhere and died of exposure.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
218
just_me Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
who’s been slating Karen? all my 5 sprogs have got different farvers, so what innit? blimey, you lot dunno how good it is on da dole! anyway heres a pic of me and my lot…
Im so effin proud too innit!
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/kids.jpg
************************
omg
March 4th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
234
You’re very patronising, aren’t you?
Did you never go through growing up & enquiring?
March 4th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Mods and Admin
I know gossip can ruin lives, I didn’t intend anyone to think I thought x was guilty - but some posters were really emphatic about it and then this morning the police said something about the abductor being in the community and I thought that was a hint they suspected one of the family, so that’s why I was interested in that argument today.
I wasn’t presuming nothing, honest.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
My mate has just phoned me and told me, he got warned this morning on another board for calling some one misguided, FFS how nuts is that. Barsteward should have been workin instead of surfin the lazy foxpot.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
M and A
Has anyone noticed the absence of ‘pro’s’ in the case of Shannon?
———————————————————————————–
I felt that over the past few days there had been a lot of ”pro”. That is why I said what I did!
March 4th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
M and A
Has anyone noticed the absence of ‘pro’s’ in the case of Shannon?
++++++++++++++++
By pro do you mean someone who thinks that a parent wasn’t involved - in which case, my name is dcb and I am a pro.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Karen - have you ruled out stranger kidnapping of Shannon?
March 4th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
Gandolf
It’s depressing though.
————
M and A
Has anyone noticed the absence of ‘pro’s’ in the case of Shannon?
March 4th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Karen here is a little something you find comforting, you are not alone with your little foible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5EctmFiEiQ
March 4th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Tax on alcohol expected to go up to curb underage drinking!!
What a load of ****!
‘Those’ kids will only steal more in order to still buy it! Also it’s an underhand way of taxing tax payers…yet again!
Grrr!