
Madeleine McCann: A Jetski, A Bag And Terrorist Attacks On Israel
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann and Shannon Matthews
DAILY MAIL: “Couple saw bundle taken out to sea near where Madeleine disappeared but police ignored them”
A bundle?
A British couple saw a package being bundled onto a jetski on a beach just six miles from where Madeleine McCann went missing. The tourists had been for a morning swim just nine hours after the little girl disappeared when they spotted the jetski.
A man in a dark wetsuit was riding it, with a 2ft- to 3ft-long black package on the front. He took it to a small “official-looking” grey boat moored just off the coast at Salema.
Man with bag spotted… Read all about it!
The McCanns’s spokesman said they were concerned the Portuguese police had not followed up such a “potentially significant lead”. Really.
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: “Maddie Jetski Snatch Riddle”
A riddle? A man with a bag on a jet ski? A riddle? Or a man with a bag on a jetski?
CHILD snatchers may have smuggled Madeleine McCann out of Portugal on a jetski within 10 hours of her kidnap. Two new witnesses have emerged saying they saw a man carrying a large bundle on a beach near Praia da Luz the morning after Madeleine vanished.
They said the man sped off on a jetski with the 3ft-long load on his lap and met a small boat offshore.
A boat. Offshore. On the sea. Not on the land…
One witness, a 58-year-old British woman, says: “The man was acting very strange, he was dressed in black and left on a black jetski with a bundle on his lap. The bundle was definitely big enough to hold Madeleine. It could have been her.”
McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “If these people had a sighting which is potentially significant, then clearly our investigators will require this information as a priority.”
THE SUN: “MADDY OFF ‘ON JET SKI’”
Say the Policia Judiciaria: “The Policia Judiciaria have carried out all the pertinent and sensible operation”
ARAB NEWS (Saudi Arabia): “Israel’s Moral Compass Is Flawed”
A propagandist called Linda Heard manages to aliken the disappearance of a missing child with terrorists firing rockets upon Israel and that country’s response:
Ponder on the morality of the media-inspired public response to Madeleine McCann as opposed to Gaza’s maimed and orphaned babies. According to the British newspaper Independent, there were 465 stories about her in the British press, the family received 1.1m pounds in public donations, while a host of celebrities — including Simon Cowell, Sir Richard Branson and J.K. Rowling — offered rewards totaling 2.6m pounds.
To the best of our knowledge, Kate and Gerry McCann have not vowed to push an entire nation of people’s into the sea, fired rockets upon them and used children as a human shield…
Madeleine McCann: The media frenzy so far
Posted: 4th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, War On Terror Comments (382) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





March 4th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
46
Ian Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
***************************
you didnt think he’d really dissapeared did you. Old pinky keeps coming back
March 4th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
41
RedRooster Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:58 am
39
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
**************************
ok rock if i’ve made a mistake I will apologise….just bring up your post from the other day and I will explain or apologise and then we can move on…fair..?
====================
That’d be fair, except it’s difficult for me to drag up a post from yesterday when I maintain I didn’t make any posts slagging off single mothers, you seem to think that I did make such a post so perhaps it’d be better for you to show me the offending post.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Is it only me losing patience with this tosspot Clarence!
Now we have Milk Tray man and he is on about their investigators again! FFS!!
March 4th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
44
dcb Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:59 am
*****************************
blimey that was scary i thought my time was up mate…… I think im back now
March 4th, 2008 at 11:59 am
43
RedRooster
+++++++++
Yep sorry - I’ll go back to being grumpy old fart again - it doesn’t get me moderated!
**********
See your earlier post
March 4th, 2008 at 11:58 am
41
dcb Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:56 am
*************************
so it was you that got me put in the pen
March 4th, 2008 at 11:58 am
39
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
**************************
ok rock if i’ve made a mistake I will apologise….just bring up your post from the other day and I will explain or apologise and then we can move on…fair..?
March 4th, 2008 at 11:56 am
RR - sorry it seems like my fault - you commented about my Brian Johnston cricket quote which is now in moderation.
_——————-
Mods and Admin
We do try to keep things satirical, rather than smutty, can everyone slow right up on the double entrendres until we have cleared it with Admin
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
Mods and Admin …..what have i done…..? why am i in moderation..?
————-
Mods and Admin
Finding out just how blue we can let the double entendres become, the original post has disappeared too
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
31
RedRooster Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:47 am
23
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:39 am
===================
My point is that I think you’ve got me mixed up with someone else. I certainly didn’t slag off “single mothers”
I’ve got things wrong a few times on here and always apologized when my error was pointed out to me, I think M&A would confirm that to be the case. Why can’t yo do the same, we can all make mistakes.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
Matt
See - that’s why I was on the fence. I don’t know what Gandolf and Rockhopper were complaining about….
I did about an hour of research and now I’ve got a headache.
Anorak wont help, but hey…
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
30…val
Ah….I’d staggered over to this thread. Will have a look.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:53 am
Nevermind RR - I’m being moderated out now
so much for double entendres!
March 4th, 2008 at 11:51 am
34
dcb Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Crouched in the slips legs wide apart waiting for a tickle.
*******************************************
im off i think i’ve come to the wrong forum again
March 4th, 2008 at 11:50 am
Shannon’s DNA profile put together
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5h6vNKdWh91hL0dfJoSV4Qo4wzKvw
March 4th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Crouched in the slips legs wide apart waiting for a tickle.
whatever ???jj 4/3
March 4th, 2008 at 11:48 am
26
just_me Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:41 am
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/ski.jpg
just for you RR
*****************
nice one, i knew you’d come up with something
March 4th, 2008 at 11:48 am
As he comes in from the pavilion end, The bowler is Holding the Batsman’s Willy.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:47 am
23
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:39 am
*************************
look rock im in a good mood ok and I dont want a row with you so give it a rest hey….The way I read your post the other day it sounded to me as that YOU were slagging off single mothers…If you want to continue with this fine but I cant be arsed.
So please shut up and move on….have a nice day mate…
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=omFdpnSu57U this will cheer you up
March 4th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Matt
I just posted a reply to you and Brandon, and lo and behold…..you”d gone !!!!. With my
typing speed it took a while, so if you want to check it out feel free. I also gave another
couple of examples of double-entendres and asked about Sheree Dodd.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:42 am
you missed it on the other thread RR
March 4th, 2008 at 11:41 am
Police investigating a known sex offender in area…but not divulging
any other info re that presently.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:41 am
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/ski.jpg
just for you RR
March 4th, 2008 at 11:40 am
Where just_me ..? this calls for one of her super pictures
March 4th, 2008 at 11:40 am
Police not entirely concentrating on close family re Karen’s suspicion
expressed yesterday…still a policy of extended search.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:39 am
21
RedRooster Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:33 am
20
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:29 am
************************
mate you’re the one throwing your toys out the pram…chill out man whats wrong with you.. If you’re gonna slag people off you’ve gotta expect a response. Take some deep breaths and calm down. Todays a new day. Just dont do it again hey now was there something else you wanted to talk about or are you just having hissy fit
===============
“but im not gonna sit here while you slag off single mothers.”
That’s a staightforward allegation against me. Once more I’m going to ask you to provide an example of my having slagged off ’single mothers’, if you can’t then why not summon up the bottle to apologise?
March 4th, 2008 at 11:37 am
Sniffer dogs have been used in over 500 Dewsbury houses.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:33 am
20
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:29 am
now was there something else you wanted to talk about or are you just having hissy fit
************************
mate you’re the one throwing your toys out the pram…chill out man whats wrong with you.. If you’re gonna slag people off you’ve gotta expect a response. Take some deep breaths and calm down. Todays a new day. Just dont do it again hey
March 4th, 2008 at 11:29 am
19
RedRooster Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:26 am
16
Rockhopper Says:
March 4th, 2008 at 11:23 am
339
Rockhopper Says:
March 3rd, 2008 at 4:38 pm
330
RedRooster Says:
March 3rd, 2008 at 4:28 pm
325
Rockhopper Says:
March 3rd, 2008 at 4:23 pm
*************************
no i havent, but im not gonna sit here while you slag off single mothers.
=============================
Example please.
===================
Good morning RR. Fancy dealing with this today?
********************
you off again are you….go and do one hey ….
=======
Oh dear, do you ever have a day on here without throwing your toys out of your pram?
March 4th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Look to Jersey to see what a motivated police force can do. Straight down the line, traditional police work and investigation, together with a stark warning to any who might seek to interfere with it.
Compare and contrast to a certain mainland police force. That there were a cluster of suspected crimes in Portugal last summer, involving child abuse by neglect, unexplained disappearance, cover-up, collusion, conspiracy to pervert justice, and conspiracy to defraud, and that these alleged crimes were committed by perhaps nine and probably more British citizens, seems to have escaped their attention.
Much has been made about British police officers assisting the Policia Judiciaria in their investigation, but there has been, and is not, a separate, independent British police investigation of these alleged crimes. Further, the co-operation requested by the Policia Judiciaria has been met lately by what they describe as a ‘wall of silence’. There is suspicion of an insidious, politically motivated factionalism within the British judicial establishment. Treaty obligations are perhaps being disregarded, and it is feared that a legal request for assistance by the sovereign Republic of Portugal has been pigeon-holed by the Home Office.
We wonder what causes the British police to disdain to investigate the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. The young girl in West Yorkshire, and the abused children of Jersey, have champions in the officers leading these investigations. Officers in whom, from their reported remarks, the public may repose the utmost confidence.
We suggest that those who consider themselves defrauded by the McCann ‘funds’ make a complaint to their respective constabularies. This might enable honest, conscientious police officers in another part of the country to launch a thorough, painstaking and implacable investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, and all matters relating thereto.