
Madeleine McCann: Prayers, Bones And Media
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
Remember, everyone, to play Anorak Bingo you must mention Madeleine McCann, Shannon Matthews and – here’s the tie-breaker – Scarlett Keeling. Eyes down…
DAILY MAIL: Amanda Platell
There cannot be a person in the country who didn’t feel a surge of delight on learning that little Shannon Matthews has been found alive and well.
We can think of one.
All the more so in these days when good news has become such a rare commodity. Yet even as we celebrate, we should spare a thought for Gerry and Kate McCann, for whom Shannon’s discovery, wonderful as it is, will be a fresh reminder of their own terrible loss. The return of one lost girl is a marvel. The return of two . . . now that’s a miracle worth praying for.
Was it the power of prayer that got Shannon Matthews found? If so, who gets the reward?
Tick. Tick.
THE INDEPENDENT: “Deborah Orr: Wonderful news that carries a message for the media”
It isn’t often that the papers have some really wonderful news to report. But it really is wonderful that Shannon Matthews has been found alive.
Amanda Platell agrees.
This amazing news also carries a lesson for the media, about the way it turns horrible crimes into great stories, and what an unpleasant, self-regarding business this can be.
There were suggestions that Shannon’s disappearance was not getting the coverage afforded to another lost child, Madeleine McCann, because the latter was a middle-class child and the former a child from a more modest and chaotic background. There is some truth in this argument, of course.
You can read about it all over the media.
But the underlying assumption is that all the publicity around the McCann case is something desirable and useful, while the more meagre reporting about the Matthew case is undesirable and useless. If children really could be reunited with their parents because of the magical power of speculative column inches, though, then Madeleine, not Shannon, would have been returned to her family by now. The very idea that the hypocritical furore around Madeleine is something to be aspired to, a benchmark of any positive kind, is quite wrong and ought to be challenged.
The McCanns should not be the media’s benchmark for missing children. We’ve heard that before…
True, the “debate” helped to keep Shannon’s abduction in the public domain, just as the “debate” around Made-leine continues to keep her case in the public domain.
A debate. On what? What was being debated?
It might be argued that there would have been no great endeavour to find Shannon had the press not made the supposedly modest fuss it did.
MEdia.
I believe this isn’t the case. The local media has a vast part to play, but the national and international press, apart from reporting facts about the investigation, can offer little but intrusive “colour”. The reality is that the vast majority of the “stories” written about the McCann case have been prurient and sensational pieces of cynical propaganda, serving no practical purpose at all except for the selling of newspapers.
Indeed. Read all about selling papers in the Independent.
Tick. Tick.
IRISH INDEPENDENT: “Divers recover bag of small bones in search for Maddy”
DIVERS searching an Algarve reservoir for Madeleine McCann yesterday found a plastic bag containing small bones. Police experts were last night examining the gruesome find made by a frogman working for a Portuguese lawyer.
Gerry and Kate McCann were informed immediately by a private detective who was observing the search. Madeira-based lawyer Marcos Aragao Correia says he was tipped off by underworld contacts that Madeleine was murdered and her body thrown into the reservoir last May.The search turned up the bones in the murky waters of the Barragem do Arabe reservoir yesterday at 3.30pm.
Mr Correia said last night: “We found two bags one of which contains some small bones. We don’t know if they are human bones or not at this stage. If they are human bones, they look like they come from a child’s fingers.”
Tick. And a half tick for speculation.
THIS IS LONDON: “Bag of small bones found in reservoir where lawyer claims Madeleine McCann’s body was dumped”
Says Clarence Mitchell: “We have not been informed of anything by the police to indicate that this find is significant. There is nothing to indicate at this stage that they are human bones and they could easily be from an animal. There is nothing at the moment to indicate that this find has anything to do with Madeleine. We continue to believe she is alive.”
THE SUN: “Shannon: 24 days of tears”
IN the end, the prayers were answered – as yesterday the tears of anguish over missing Shannon Matthews turned to sobs of relief.
Prayers. What of the tip off? The police work?
TIMELINE:
Sunday, February 24: CHURCHGOERS pray for Shannon’s safe return. Madeleine McCann’s parents send a message of support.
Tick. Tick.
THE GUARDIAN: “What women want”
Following last year’s Booker win, Anne Enright is finally enjoying wider recognition - despite her work’s reputation for being gloomy and obsessed with sex and death
She became the target of ire in the tabloids when they picked up an article she wrote in the London Review of Books dissecting her reaction to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. The piece was full of ambivalence, describing her suspicions of Gerry and Kate McCann but in the end condemning her own voyeurism. She refuses to say whether the fracas upset her, but seems sensibly resigned, agreeing that events proved how she was naive to think her nuances would be understood in the grotesque guessing game that the story had become: “I was misread and I hoped that would become apparent, but there’s no point in me stomping around and fighting with shadows.”
Posted: 15th, March 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (621) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





March 15th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
352
Denzylle
I was more worried about the 69 story
We havee already Spongebob
March 15th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
351
bountyhunter
Rapier like wit
March 15th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Julie, no it just feels like it.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
#
346
Gandolf Says:
March 15th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
bountyhunter, I aint going anywhere only one viable leg at this moment.
———————————-
Have you broken BOTH your legs
March 15th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
CSN
The truth will emerge.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
YAMPSTER
Spell JAAPIE just as your dutch incubus directs you, but only one way to spell skatula, now buzz off and take a torch and inspect your incubus trollops bush.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
#
344
Denzylle Says:
March 15th, 2008 at 9:12 pm
Julie, I thought he had it, but no…
SpongeBobbitt, just Google it.
Duh!
————————–
ROFPML!
March 15th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
cluless, so the cops were looking for a dead Shannon ?? woof woof my sainted arse!!
March 15th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
342
bountyhunter
my slim ankled brunette gypsy wife awaits my attentions and affections. see you
************
Has she got any pegs?
March 15th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
340
Denzylle
ermmmmm
I’m really ignorant
didn’t get it
hope is not for me
March 15th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
bountyhunter, I aint going anywhere only one viable leg at this moment.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Gandy
are you thick ..the dogs only find dead people
March 15th, 2008 at 9:12 pm
Julie, I thought he had it, but no…
SpongeBobbitt, just Google it.
Duh!
March 15th, 2008 at 9:12 pm
313 lilith
Good sleuthing!!!!!!!!
March 15th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
GANDOLPH
Like to chat to you about your job aT PK uni sometime, unfortunatly, my slim ankled brunette gypsy wife awaits my attentions and affections. see you tomorrow ?
March 15th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Châtelaine, do you ever have a point, or do you just like to waffle utter pish,”" the dogs did not find Shannon”", no woof woof there then. I didn’t know your dogs were looking for anything, I’m a trap six man myself.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Spongebob
331
Not a repetition, Spongebobbitt. Notice the nomenclature.
324
Nae sae guid as KMC!
Furry cup? Lesbian 69.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:09 pm
337
bountyhunter
Sorry, how should I spell jarrrpy? You seem confused too. I would like to get it right for next time.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
#
333
SpongeBob Says:
March 15th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
306
Julie Says:
‘“Swooping” is what we do best Spongey …. leave yourself open for it, and you will be pounced upon
Is it indeed Julie. But I thought you were here for Madeleine?
I left myself open for nothing. If you could read from start to finish, you would see that my point is still valid. But sadly, there’s a lot of selective reading to suit your own agenda.. ah - in the ‘gang’
—————————————————
Point? What was that again? Sorry I do selective reading as you point out!
March 15th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
YAMPSTER
so you know who I mean, by the way she is a JAAPIE, not Jarpie. I am not of Dutch descent. i used to like the Dutch till i met up with your incubus, sucubus, have you checked her bush, you are sure, has your sucubus got thick ankles, sure sign of Jaarpie blood. hehe now piss off, you brown nosing piece of skatula.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
331
Denzylle
You are repeating yourself. Was the crack so good the first time?
March 15th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Julie
320
Denzylle Says:
March 15th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
Julie, do you really have the answer?
…….YES
Don’t say.
….. I WONT
I want this SCOTSMAN to answer.
….. HE CAN’T
Maybe I’ll mail you a haggis…
…… YUK, no thanks
——————————————————————–
Aah!
I was hoping you’d say that ‘cos I chased one of the wee beasties all round Princes Street Gardens this afternoona and I cuidnae catch the wee bugger.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:03 pm
—>>>>> have to go
BBL
March 15th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
306
Julie Says:
‘“Swooping” is what we do best Spongey …. leave yourself open for it, and you will be pounced upon
Is it indeed Julie. But I thought you were here for Madeleine?
I left myself open for nothing. If you could read from start to finish, you would see that my point is still valid. But sadly, there’s a lot of selective reading to suit your own agenda.. ah - in the ‘gang’
March 15th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
327
:lol:
?
bountyhunter
HEHEhehe
Coincidences (sorry the spelling)
Don’t you luv our politicos
March 15th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
Spongebob
305
Tidy garden? You won’t find me helping Julie mow your lawn, matey. I’ll be the one trimming off the straggly (superfluous) bits. I take it you’re male. Obviously.
———————————————————————————————–
I’m exceptionally good at the straggly bits, SpongeBobbitt.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
bounty hunter, Polokwane’s University of the North, was where I failed miserably to remove the said bush from various students, judging by the country’s slide downwards.
Coco the clown has not been seen since the Wizard enchanted her.
March 15th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Gandy
she is not dead…dont diss my boy
March 15th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
315
Gandolf Says:
March 15th, 2008 at 8:53 pm
“[...]no my point should not be lost on those who blindly believe in dogs, they DIDN’T find Shannon did they.”
****
I don’t “blindly” believe in dogs. I experience on a daily basis what they’re capable of. And mind, mine are NOT trained to do anything special
March 15th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
CANT SAY NO
yes Miranda suddenlyt saw the light at the beginning of the year, following GM’s sudden visions in early May last year.