
Shannon Matthews: Bratz, Mystic Babies And Sir Norman Bettison
SHANNON WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Shannon Matthews
Shannon Matthews has been in the care of the local authority since she was found. The media had a few hours to speculate and focus on Shannon “what ifs” but now the shutters are down. The man has been charged and will appear in court today.
DAILY MAIL: “Don’t let Shannon go home because her mother’s not ‘ready’, say her grandparents”
You can always interview the family.
“We just don’t want Shannon going back to that house. She can stay with us,” said the nine-year-old’s grandfather Gordon Matthews. “I don’t think that Karen and Craig are ready to look after her properly. While all this has been happening, we had Shannon’s brother and sister staying here with us and they were both so happy - they didn’t want to go back.”
Wonder why? Let’s speculate…
He and his wife June are fearful that Shannon, who is in foster care after her 24- day abduction ordeal, could soon be back at home. Mrs Matthews, 64, added: “I have been thinking of Shannon going back to Karen. It’s just not right. Karen was a great mum before she took Craig in. Since he arrived they’ve had a terrible life.”
Craig Meehan is innocent. Why mention him?
Mr Matthews added: “Craig is like a tiny child. He’s so immature. He rings Karen all the time on the phone, literally 20 times a day.”
Maybe it’s love? Maybe Karen Matthews likes children?
“Karen is like a taxi service for him. She picks him up and drops him off everywhere. I have never liked him and I don’t want Shannon going back to her mother while he is around, you just wouldn’t want him looking after your child.”
DAILY MIRROR: “SHANNON WILL STAY WITH COPS”
Shannon Matthews will not return to her mum and stepdad but will be looked after by specialist carers. Police chief Sir Norman Bettison confirmed that the nine-year-old will not be going home just yet to Karen Matthews, 32, and 22-year-old Craig Meehan for the moment.
Norman Bettison. West Yorkshire’s leading copper. After listening to the grandparents, listening to Norman is the next story. Prepared to update the Wikipedia entry, sir!
Says Sir Norman B-E-T-T-I-S-O-N: “She is safe. She’s well. She’s in the place where we think that she’s safest at the moment.”
He singles out Detectives Paul Kettlewell and Nick Townsend who refused to leave when they got no answer at a flat where neighbours said they could hear a child’s footsteps. They watched the front and back entrances and called for a battering ram. They broke down the door and discovered Shannon.
Says Chief Constable Sir Norman: “I think it is amazing and I think it is a question of pride for me that they started to make inquiries of the neighbours. Given this was the 700th action they had undertaken since the start of the investigation…
“It’s been phenomenal and it’s been unprecedented [“You’ve already used ‘amazing’ sir!] and let me tell you where I’m standing it’s been entirely professional. It’s painstaking methodical work.”
Of his officers: “They’re special people, extraordinary people doing an extraordinary job.”
Wikipedia: Sir Norman Bettison the Amazing, phenomenal, extraordinary, unprecedented…
What of Shannon’s parents?
Karen and Craig had bought a Bratz Chloe doll for her homecoming but sent her a Mystic Babies toy when they realised she would not be back.
The significance of toys cannot be overstated. What can it mean?
THE SUN: “Prezzies and prayers for Shannon”
SHANNON Matthews was bought a doll by her relieved mum yesterday – hours before the man held over the nine-year-old’s kidnap was charged. Two detectives accompanied Karen, 32, and Shannon’s 22-year-old stepdad as they shopped for goodies to give the youngster after her 24-day ordeal.
What do you get Shannon?
Karen and her partner returned to their semi with a Chloe Bratz doll and Mystic Babies toy…Yesterday The Sun chipped in with MORE Bratz toys for her. We delivered a sackful of gifts to her house on behalf of our readers. They included Easter eggs for her brothers Tony, 11, Cameron, five, and sister Courtney, two.
What about the other children? And what make of Easter Egg is it? Sun readers demand to be told how they are being represented…
Grateful Karen said: “Thanks very much for the presents – they are very much appreciated.”
That’s the parents. Any news, you know. Of Sir Norman?
Sir Norman explained: “Talking to a nine-year-old is not a question of sitting them down with a pen and piece of paper. It’s been ten minutes and 15 minutes at a time while we have been building up the information – the evidence that we need in order to take this investigation further.”
Whoah, wing commander. Slow down, sir Norman. Wikipedia doesn’t write itself…
FERGUS SHANAHAN: “Shannon must not be allowed home”
“How can Shannon Matthews go back to the hell she has had to call home? How can she be allowed to live in that mad managerie of fractured relationships, bitter resentments, shouted insults and warring relations?”
Shanahan investigates. And his judgement: “The truth is that we don’t know the truth.”
Such are the facts…
DAILY EXPRESS: “SHANNON POLICE ‘ARE HEROES’”
It’s Sir Norman Bettison – B.E.T.T.I.S.O.N:
Sir Norman said: “The jigsaw pieces came together and gave us what we needed to give Paul and Nick the opportunity to go to an address on Friday morning. Given that this was the 700th action they had undertaken since the start of the investigation, I think it is amazing.
“It is a question of pride for me that they then made inquiries of the neighbours and they heard for the first time about the pitter-patter of the girl’s footsteps in the maisonette above them.”
THE SCOTSMAN: “Police chief praises work of officers in Shannon search”
B-E-T-T-I…
West Yorkshire chief constable Sir Norman Bettison highlighted the work of detectives Paul Kettlewell and Nick Townsend in finding the missing nine-year-old as he defended the professionalism of his force.
THE GUARDIAN: “Man charged with abducting and imprisoning Shannon”
West Yorkshire’s chief constable, Sir Norman Bettison, yesterday described as “fantasists” those critics who claim to have pointed the finger at Donovan early in the huge inquiry, unaware of his detectives’ jigsaw puzzle of clues.
THE TIMES: “Michael Donovan is charged over Shannon Matthews kidnap and false imprisonment”
The chief constable said that the child, who has been under an emergency police protection order and has not yet been reunited with her mother, 32-year-old Karen Matthews, was “in safe and caring hands. Shannon is in the place where she is the safest at the moment. She is away from the flashing lenses and the glare of publicity.”
Police chief? Surely the paper means to say Sir Norman B-E-T-T-I-S-O-N…
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Michael Donovan charged with kidnapping Shannon Matthews”
Sir Norman said the three-week long investigation involved searching 3,000 houses and interviewing 6,000 people, mostly within a mile radius of Dewsbury Moor, West Yorks. He said officers had received 2,000 calls from the public “with just a hook in there about a weirdo, paedophile, living at X or living at Y”.
THE INDEPENDENT: “Shannon suspect charged with kidnapping
Police have charged Michael Donovan with the kidnap and false imprisonment of nine-year-old Shannon Matthews, who was found on Friday after being missing for 24 days.
Officers had been granted an extra 24 hours to question Mr Donovan, 39, of Lidgate Gardens, Batley Carr, Dewsbury, and announced at 10.15pm last night that he would be charged and would appear at Dewsbury magistrates’ court this morning.
Peter Mann, of the Crown Prosecution Service, said that charges were being brought by officers from West Yorkshire police after they had carefully considered all the material in the case. He warned the media to report the case responsibly. He added: “Michael Donovan stands accused of this offence and has a right to a fair trial.”
HOLD THE FRONT PAGE: “News agency’s Shannon photo exclusive brings massive exposure”
Where there’s missing kids, there’s PR…
Ross Parry Agency, based in Pudsey near Leeds, acquired a photo of Michael Donovan, the suspect arrested after missing schoolgirl Shannon Matthews was found.
When reporters started asking questions, they discovered a family connection that led them to the suspect’s sister Alice Meehan, mother of Shannon’s step-father Craig Meehan. Staff at Ross Parry Agency learned that Alice’s maiden name was Drake – the same as Michael Donovan’s birth name, Paul Drake.
Reporter Liam Miller visited Mrs Meehan Friday night, a few hours after Shannon had been found, and bought the old photograph of Michael Donovan and his young nephew Craig Meehan.
It has since been used carrying the Ross Parry Agency byline on Sky and BBC News, their websites and countless other national news papers and news organisations, bringing the agency unparalleled exposure.
Hurrah!
News editor Sam Yule said: “There was word going round that he (Donovan) was related to the Meehan family. In the run up to Friday we had spoken to a lot of the family and got some phone numbers. We ended up getting hold of Caroline who is Craig’s sister. We met both Alice and Caroline and Alice gave us the photo. It was the only one she could find.”
Sam added: “It was just good journalism, a bit of persistence. We worked very, very hard for that and it was not just one day’s work. We got to the stage where a couple of reporters were working on the story all the time. We got the picture exclusive and everybody has no alternative but to use our picture. We feel proud of ourselves.”
Will Alice and Caroline now get a share of any monies earned form such terrific exposure, or Craig Meehan whose face features in the celebrated picture?
Posted: 18th, March 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (94) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





March 18th, 2008 at 9:00 am
29 - agreed! the grandparents were even saying they saw bruises on Shannon and that the stepdad was violent. Why oh why did they send her back home, when Shannon asked to stay with them?
March 18th, 2008 at 8:59 am
4…just_me
Nothing “new” under the sun.
Just call it recycled.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:59 am
13 PeterMac
Agree. There will be a lot more to come out about the extended family. For Shannon to be in foster care says a lot. Her Grandparents have spoken out about the situation at home. It sounds a dreadful situation. This has been on everyone’s mind too. Do hope Shannon is permanently taken away from home into proper care. Once she starts talking she will have an awful lot to say don’t you think. If she has not been an abused child, she needs to not go back home.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:58 am
jo - its on sky news on tv, but not a link on their site yet
March 18th, 2008 at 8:58 am
Those grandparents have a lot to answer for IMO….not a word said and then when they can put their posh frocks on and have their pictures in the paper they suddenly get all loosed lipped…
parasites IMO.. :grrr:
March 18th, 2008 at 8:57 am
or even 23
March 18th, 2008 at 8:56 am
24
Why don’t they ever say that when i go to pick my child up at nursery….
March 18th, 2008 at 8:55 am
I wish the Grandparents would stop telling the Newspapers their “stories” and
relate any relevant information to the Police/Social Services only.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:52 am
24
just_me
Oh I didnt know this
May be Karen”s best decision ever but I believe she didnt have the choice either
Any link about the court order?
March 18th, 2008 at 8:48 am
jo - seems the court order has expired and karen has agreed voluntarily to let Shannon stay in care
March 18th, 2008 at 8:47 am
DAILY MAIL: “Don’t let Shannon go home because her mother’s not ‘ready’, say her grandparents”
Poor Karen
Has she ever be ready to have children?
March 18th, 2008 at 8:46 am
still jogging tho I see…
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/k.jpg
March 18th, 2008 at 8:44 am
I make no bones about it, she is looking better than I’ve seen her look for a while!
She did look so relaxed and happy at the beginning (as did her man) but since the dreaded ‘A’ status, she (and he) has looked a little rough and upset.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:42 am
Very funny this morning!
March 18th, 2008 at 8:42 am
17
She’s got her foot in her mouth if I’m not mistaken.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:41 am
SteveT - has she put on weight? or is it me?
March 18th, 2008 at 8:40 am
16
just_me
Yes, shes looking much better!
March 18th, 2008 at 8:32 am
Poor Kate, look like she is finally showing some emotion… totally fallen apart today..
http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/2196429/2/istockphoto_2196429_pile_of_human_bones.jpg
March 18th, 2008 at 8:32 am
11
just_me
Poor Kate!
March 18th, 2008 at 8:32 am
Just _me
Classic!!
March 18th, 2008 at 8:32 am
12 lyn
I am sorry to say this, but families like that are beyond help.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:21 am
Shannon was abducted after all-maybe she had been through this situation before, and this time things got out of hand. For her mother to have said publicly that she had an idea Shannon was being held by someone she may know, shows the mother could have enemies. They (family) don’t seem too bright IMO. Do hope they get help from now on.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:21 am
10 - no she is still married to Gerry as far as we know!
March 18th, 2008 at 8:20 am
Any news on the bag of bones?
March 18th, 2008 at 8:04 am
…….and you can’t wash them.
March 18th, 2008 at 8:00 am
So charges have been made against a certain person, and possible other charges against certain other people may be brought too, and a certain person still not returned to a certain family. I wonder if a certain small person gets a choice if she wants to be returned or will all the decisions be made for her.
March 18th, 2008 at 7:58 am
Is the Sun spending it’s own reward money ‘cos them Bratz don’t come cheap …
March 18th, 2008 at 7:56 am
Jill who?….You can call me Whoops or Mrs A Daisy!
March 18th, 2008 at 7:54 am
Hello
March 18th, 2008 at 7:49 am
Good morning

Another newbie, hello Jill
Hi Anorak