Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat’s Relief
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “Murat: It’s big relief”
Madeleine McCann suspect Robert Murat, 34, last night spoke of his joy that he looks likely to be officially cleared in days.
After having his computers returned, he said at his Praia da Luz home last night: “I’m so relieved.”
No mention of the Mirror’s super sleuth Lori Campbell who fingered “weird” Murat.
DAILY MAIL: “Murat could soon be cleared as Madeleine suspect after police return his possessions”
Even his computer - with the Sun’s “kid porn”.
His lawyer Francisco Pagarete said: “The police received an order from the public prosecutor to give everything back to Robert. All his items have been returned. We believe it is another step towards his clearance as a suspect. It’s a good sign.
“But we will have to wait and see. There is nothing official saying his status as an arguido is being revoked.”
Even if yesterday the Sunday People had “CLEARED” him.
No word from the The Mail’s Neil Sears, who told us: “There was something more to the friendly expat who called himself ‘Rob’ than met the eye.” Murat made Sears “feel slightly uncomfortable”.
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Robert Murat close to being cleared over Madeleine McCann disappearance”
Robert Murat has moved a step closer to being cleared as a suspect in Madeleine McCann’s disappearance after police returned possessions seized from him 10 months ago.
Says hi mother, Jenny Murat, 74: “Every single item that the police took has been returned to us. Of course we hope it means Robert’s arguido status will be lifted shortly. But we’ve had no official confirmation that that is the case and we’re not getting too excited.”
Madeleine McCann: Speculation and survival
Posted: 24th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (978) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- June on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- justlooking on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Cheryl on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- Anorak on Join The Campaign For Straight Gay Marriages
- justlooking on Bolivian Police And Maddie McCann Introduce The Worst Photo-Fits Ever
March 24th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
*play*
March 24th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Garthyyyyy
Why wont you answer questions? ie 199?
You are making yourself look like a silly spoilt child by refusing to paly nicely!
March 24th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
223
Matt
There may have been a suffocation, new sheets were required werent they?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Excellent news that Robert McCann is to be released from the status and we can focus on the parents - the only remaining suspects!
March 24th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
219…Garth
It would seem that your Theory re suffocation has a few loose ends.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
219
Garth
Thats an intelligent response.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
215 Garth
How about you answer the question, why did Gerry contradict Tanner with the 9:10 timing and why did Kate wish to communicate abduction so soon in a search for her child?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
206…lucy
“”"How do you know they haven’t? You don’t know anything just like the
rest of us.. so why think you do?”"”
Who haven’t what ?
Who doesn’t know what ?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
#
214
Matt. Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
209…coolandcalm
How much time did this phantomn have at his/her disposal ?
Strewth.
And all those checks going on too.
#
————–
The good thing about internet chat is that you cant put your hands through the monitor and throttle somebody! If you know what I mean Matt?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
201
lucy
Rubbish.
They hide away from their accusers, behind legal defence. They have claimed abduction from the very first moment - too soon Kate cried abduction. She didn’t go to Jane next door, Gerry contradicts Jane’s abduction sighting.
Do you think we should allow their neglect and even worse to go uncommented?
They are damned, thats right. But they can do the right thing - they can clear up the little ‘misunderstandings’ by going back to Portugal and facing their accusers. Simple solution. I wonder why they are advised not to?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
206
lucy Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
How do you know they haven’t? You don’t know anything just like the rest of us.. so why think you do?
******
Very simple: they are arguidos precisely because they refused to answer
This is a fact
March 24th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
201 Lucy
Shannon Mathews family kept their daughters profile ‘high’ without going on a sickening PR trawl round several countries using OUR monies which were donated in good faith to help MM but used to fund their lifestyle and housing.
They negleted their children NOT ONCE but every evening of their holiday (and chucked them in the creche every day - lovely parents!) and THEIR CHILD paid the ultimate price….
We have no concrete proof that they harmed their child but then neither is there any concrete proof that they didnt and someone else did.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
198
Ian Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
—————–
Too many contradictions ?
Ian
Take some time out and view the cbs reports. Whilst you’re doing that, I’ll have a sarny and then we can talk them over after. Hows that?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
209…coolandcalm
How much time did this phantomn have at his/her disposal ?
Strewth.
And all those checks going on too.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
It is a general comment Matt.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Rather tough interview 07/06/2007
Only 4 days after Madeleine”s disappearance
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2007/06/07/mccanns-appalled-by-newsgirl-s-slur-89520-19257865/
March 24th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
193
jo
March 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
206…lucy
It is customary to add Name and post number to replies to posters…then
someone might know what it is you are talking about.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Matt. 192………… is there a possibility that an abductor was too rough during the abduction and smothered / killed madeleine trying to keep her silent but didn’t realise until he had got away? I doubt he would have been checking for a pulse.
Just a thought, not a positive!
March 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
204
Matt
Easyjet or private jet, they are spoilt for choice!
March 24th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
202…coolandcalm
I can understand banter….but I do draw a line at arrant abuse and foul language.
Perhaps you overlook Garth’s little tendencies in that respect.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
How do you know they haven’t? You don’t know anything just like the rest of us.. so why think you do?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
202
coolandcalm
I understand your reason for supporting weak childcare , but I dont understand Garth’s.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
201…lucy
They only have to get on the plane to Portugal and answer truthfully all
Police questions.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
193 Matt
Suffocated in record time too! Why would an abdcutor do that! Garth bollocks.
He knows its bollocks, he is here to distract. Garths law - whats it for? Why would Garth want to defend people who send a clea message, that parents arent responsible for the care of their children? Why garth WHY?
March 24th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Matt 197…. Garth and I never conflict (well not much) because he does make me laugh sometimes. As do you (sorry to take away your street cred!) and also Ade and the divide couldn’t be any bigger there!
A bit of humour and satire go a long way to making this site ‘fun’ and satirical. The poison ones I don’t bother with at all!
March 24th, 2008 at 12:41 pm
164. The family are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. If they made no attempt to keep their daughters profile high some people would be suspicious and because they do - it is a “drug” staying on the front page.
There are many very sick evil people on this planet who murder, abuse and do and yet some can only focus on a couple who have lost their daughter and with no proof that they have harmed her in anyway at all.
Get a life!
March 24th, 2008 at 12:40 pm
May the scales lift from your eyes.
http://www.4ni.co.uk/northern_ireland_news.asp?id=71958
March 24th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
191 Garth
You just ’shout’ people down and become rude and aggressive when you dont want to answer…do you think that if the Mcscams had stayed in or taken their children with them that MM would have still ‘gone missing’?
No? Thought not….
March 24th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
187 Garth
Name one piece of unsubstantiated ‘mud’ I have thrown Garth.
My judgement seems to provoke vitriol quite easily from you, but never a logical defence.
No attempt to explain Gerry’s deliberate contradiction of Tanners time
then?
Why attempt to send me off down tangent boulevard instead of stating what wonderful new evidence you have uncovered? Like sending people off to prove their statements whilst you continue to repeat the same ‘abduction’ claim with no evidence (and in fact contrary evidence!).
There was no abduction Garth, too many contradictions and too much odd behaviour…avoiding court cases and accepting money on the extreme claims….the evidence is damning.