
Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat’s Relief
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “Murat: It’s big relief”
Madeleine McCann suspect Robert Murat, 34, last night spoke of his joy that he looks likely to be officially cleared in days.
After having his computers returned, he said at his Praia da Luz home last night: “I’m so relieved.”
No mention of the Mirror’s super sleuth Lori Campbell who fingered “weird” Murat.
DAILY MAIL: “Murat could soon be cleared as Madeleine suspect after police return his possessions”
Even his computer - with the Sun’s “kid porn”.
His lawyer Francisco Pagarete said: “The police received an order from the public prosecutor to give everything back to Robert. All his items have been returned. We believe it is another step towards his clearance as a suspect. It’s a good sign.
“But we will have to wait and see. There is nothing official saying his status as an arguido is being revoked.”
Even if yesterday the Sunday People had “CLEARED” him.
No word from the The Mail’s Neil Sears, who told us: “There was something more to the friendly expat who called himself ‘Rob’ than met the eye.” Murat made Sears “feel slightly uncomfortable”.
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Robert Murat close to being cleared over Madeleine McCann disappearance”
Robert Murat has moved a step closer to being cleared as a suspect in Madeleine McCann’s disappearance after police returned possessions seized from him 10 months ago.
Says hi mother, Jenny Murat, 74: “Every single item that the police took has been returned to us. Of course we hope it means Robert’s arguido status will be lifted shortly. But we’ve had no official confirmation that that is the case and we’re not getting too excited.”
Madeleine McCann: Speculation and survival
Posted: 24th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (978) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





March 24th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
249
Cheshire Set Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
243 Garth
‘Direct’ involvement? Did they not ‘directly’ leave their children alone night after night and therefore facilitate her disappearance?
——————-
Yes they did. But that would be ‘indirectly’ have something to do with her disappearance dont you think miss intelligence?
March 24th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
The day ‘witnesses’ can be sued for finger-pointing will be the day justice dies.
Robert Murat is free to sue the papers and if he WASN’T
March 24th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
249…Cheshire Set
You have to make allowances for poor garfie….ever since that RSJ crashed
onto his little head….he has never been the same.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
#
249
Cheshire Set Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
243 Garth
‘Direct’ involvement? Did they not ‘directly’ leave their children alone night after night and therefore facilitate her disappearance?
Oh and dont partonise me…on your best day you are not brighter than me…I guarentee it.
——————-
I am gonna patronise you if you keep coming up with daft comments. And guarantee is spelt with an ‘a’ oh intelligent one!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
248
delboy Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
Hello……………..why hasnt murat sued for liable if he is innocent?,kate and gerry are arguido status and they successfully sued!
Maybe RM is not a money grabbing, fame hungry lying neglectfull lunatic? or maybe he wants to wait until the hideous pair are charged and sue them and their lying mates for ‘finger pointing’ aswell?
March 24th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
244
Ian Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Well, got to go. Give garth a chance to think up an explanation to Gerry contradicting Tanner————————
Well thanks for that. I will now go and study the g blogg and hopefully come up with a reason as to why Gerry contradicted himself which Im sure will then make it clearer for all to see that the McCanns are not guilty of murdering their daughter………..and…
……concealing her body somewhere for 25 days right under the noses of the PJ and worldwide media and then transporting her little body in the boot of the hired car to somewhere still undetected.
Thankyou.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
240
Ian
There are many questions which need answers Ian
May things have been put forward and dropped quickly without answers I believe they are the real important elements of the case and require silence
This is exactely what we are trying to find out- the heart of the mystery- but we simply cant
The PJ made a good choice in naming only 3 arguidos and Murat wont have his status lifted before the investigation is over to stop him from talking.
This is obvious
March 24th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
224
Ian
That Gerry Murat had better watch out now then??
March 24th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
243 Garth
‘Direct’ involvement? Did they not ‘directly’ leave their children alone night after night and therefore facilitate her disappearance?
Oh and dont partonise me…on your best day you are not brighter than me…I guarentee it.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
Hello……………..why hasnt murat sued for liable if he is innocent?,kate and gerry are arguido status and they successfully sued!
Why isnt Max clifford already doing his PR bit for murat?instead of waiting for “arguido” to be lifted.. kate and gerry have a PR and again they are “arguidos”,?so whats all this about….cant do this and cant do that because “arguido” its total codswallap…
wonder what is really going on behind the scenes!!!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
242 jo:
I mean, given Mrs. Müller is obviously a PRO-McCann.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
afternoon all
great debate
….
thanks for your links…
and
I agree, doctors, fully aware of dna etc., would be aware that the scene of the crime must not be contaminated , they had every one trample she carried cuddle cat around even though it was stated that the ‘abductor’ put it on a shelf. Asif an abductor would stop and do that!!!
no one wants to believe they are guilty either, we all have a heart and want to believe the best …but unless they go back and let the Portugeses police do their job then who does the buck stop with, not the press or speculaters…
and, as you say, may be we will never know … and that suits them!
and as for garthy -
Coolandcalm
afternoon
hope they find the boy
i do not agree about an average man simili with a paedo,
i would put them in a category of opportunists and going for the nearest and most available target-
not where the chances of discovery are too higher risk…
and in maddies case there were too many people about…
not unless it was someone allowed in the appartment …..imo
March 24th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
243 Belief as opposed to knowledge.
Personally I dont see how anyone can doubt that they are responsbile, directly responsible.
Had to make that comment before I go - Garthy, I’m looking forward to your explanation of the contradiction!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Well, got to go. Give garth a chance to think up an explanation to Gerry contradicting Tanner.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
#
226
Cheshire Set Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Garthyyyyy
Why wont you answer questions? ie 199?
You are making yourself look like a silly spoilt child by refusing to paly nicely!
#
———-
Chesty luv
If it makes things a little sweeter for you then what I should have said for you to get a grip on it is that I dont believe the McCanns had any direct involvement with the disappearance of their daughter.
Better now?
March 24th, 2008 at 1:05 pm
237
Ferdinand
What a job!
Freedom of speech
March 24th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
235, Ian,
I know what you mean, and I hope the same, but still: Just because he hopes his status will be lifted and interprets the return of the PC as a sign, it doesn’t mean anything.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
233
jo
Pity we dont get any information on what was going on in McCanns world before their holiday. Its amazing that facts about the multiple cadaver handling of Kate McCann hasn’t got out into the public domain. Very interesting that no positive comments have come out on that one.
Also, I’d love to know who paid for the holiday and what their finances had looked like! They certainly have shifted into a whole new financial bracket and the mortgage doesn’t seem to be a problem now!
The state of childcare is hardly surprising when you have people like Kate and Gerry being considered capable of making judgements about other people and their child care capabilities!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:03 pm
233 Jo
I wouldnt have asked the grandparents to look after my cat while I was on holiday let alone a child…..they looked lieke something off The Adams Family and only crawled out from under their rock when they could have their 15 minutes of fame/money
Not a word beforehand….
March 24th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Ian
You may know this article
Very iterestig including the whole panorama article within the link
http://cuttingthroughtherubbish.blogspot.com/2007/11/jane-tanner-has-night-time-vision.html
March 24th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
212 jo:
Still funny to read about the insensitivity, shamelessness and defiance.
QUOTE
With an insensitivity that beggared belief, German Radio’s Sabine Mueller coolly asked: “How do you feel with the fact that more and more people seem to be pointing the finger at you?
(…)
Afterwards an unashamed Ms Mueller, 35, insisted her question was legitimate. She said defiantly: “I knew it was a difficult question but I felt it had to be asked. I didn’t think it improper. I didn’t want to hurt and I don’t suspect the McCanns of being involved. Gerry McCann was very calm and I was completely convinced by his reply. Either they’re very good actors or they’re telling the truth.”
END QUOTE
March 24th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
234…Garth
Not my kind of toilet paper…..and they never included that bit…you added
it only when questioned on here. Method of life disposal was not discussed
by The Sun.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
229
BabyJane
Clearly not evidence you see baby jane.
We have two suspects refusing to talk and one suspect talking and having his property returned to him.
Certainly looks like things are going in the right direction (toward those who are acting and have acted suspiciously from the first day).
March 24th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
#
223
Matt. Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
219…Garth
It would seem that your Theory re suffocation has a few loose ends.
———–
No it doesnt. Read the sun
March 24th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
About Shannon
TIMESONLINE
Poverty has a very broad meaning
Poor Karen and poor Shannon
SHANNON CLOSE TO BEING TAKEN INTO CARE BEFORE SHE WAS KIDNAPPED.
So much for the channel 4 documentary done by Karen, where she claimed that her family was being discriminated against because they were poor!!!! Even if you are poor, you don’t make your children’s lives a misery. There are ways and means. Even the natural grandparents say this is a dysfunctional family who seem to be unable to connect with their children/child’s needs. If Karen finds it hard to cope, she only needs to ask her parents for help. This is the beauty of extended family. There are those who really do care, but they do not have any legal rights as to the care of these children.
March 23, 2008 9:43 PM
March 24th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
225…Ian
And not by a passing Phantom.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
172
Matt
March 24th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
225…Ian
Not that the McCann’s have admitted to.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
224, Ian
His laywer just interpretates the fact Mr. Murat got back his PC as a sign that the status will be lifted. Mustn’t mean anything.
March 24th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
219…Garth
What was it Dennis Healey said ….”Being attacked by Garth is like being
savaged by a dead sheep”.