Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat’s Relief
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “Murat: It’s big relief”
Madeleine McCann suspect Robert Murat, 34, last night spoke of his joy that he looks likely to be officially cleared in days.
After having his computers returned, he said at his Praia da Luz home last night: “I’m so relieved.”
No mention of the Mirror’s super sleuth Lori Campbell who fingered “weird” Murat.
DAILY MAIL: “Murat could soon be cleared as Madeleine suspect after police return his possessions”
Even his computer - with the Sun’s “kid porn”.
His lawyer Francisco Pagarete said: “The police received an order from the public prosecutor to give everything back to Robert. All his items have been returned. We believe it is another step towards his clearance as a suspect. It’s a good sign.
“But we will have to wait and see. There is nothing official saying his status as an arguido is being revoked.”
Even if yesterday the Sunday People had “CLEARED” him.
No word from the The Mail’s Neil Sears, who told us: “There was something more to the friendly expat who called himself ‘Rob’ than met the eye.” Murat made Sears “feel slightly uncomfortable”.
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Robert Murat close to being cleared over Madeleine McCann disappearance”
Robert Murat has moved a step closer to being cleared as a suspect in Madeleine McCann’s disappearance after police returned possessions seized from him 10 months ago.
Says hi mother, Jenny Murat, 74: “Every single item that the police took has been returned to us. Of course we hope it means Robert’s arguido status will be lifted shortly. But we’ve had no official confirmation that that is the case and we’re not getting too excited.”
Madeleine McCann: Speculation and survival
Posted: 24th, March 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (978) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- ptet on Dietmar The German Stork Has A Wooden Leg
- yampster on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- Nansubuga on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- yampster on Strictly Come Dancing’s Alesha Dixon Sparks I’m A Celebrity Race Row
- Lonnirose on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
March 24th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
286…Garth
Seems you aren’t too sure of that Theory now then.
About time too…..A Sun report indeed.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
#
282
Matt. Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
280…Garth
Elaborate on your “Madeleine was suffocated by a Phantom and then her corpse
was abducted and dumped” Theory.
————-
Not now Josephine!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
chesire set
March 24th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
275
March 24th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
#
279
Ian Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
274
Marie Nicholas
Spot on. Although I have no doubt that there was no abduction, if there were, it would have been caused (almost engineered!) by the McCanns.
Anyone who believes these people were so stupid as to go around the resort actively publicising their flawed child care arrangements and that they were ‘naive’ is a foolish person.
————–
Get on there bay!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
280…Garth
Elaborate on your “Madeleine was suffocated by a Phantom and then her corpse
was abducted and dumped” Theory.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
#
278
great debate Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Here I am garth! Had a life to get on with, sorry I missed your insults!
We all have an opinion on the mystery behind Maddies disappearence, only because we dont agree with you, hurling derogatory remarks to others dosnt sway their decision only makes you seem egoistic
————-
Not at all. I just know Im right and you’re wrong!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
#
273
Cheshire Set Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
267 Garth
You have no point to make with me that I would listen to fool.
You are becoming tiresome now - you refuse to answer questions or become rude and agressive when challenged…you need to grow up.
————–
Well dont aske me to answer your daft questions if you think Im a fool. And certainly dont try and put me down because you think you are in someway superior.
Ya daft ol batt!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
274
Marie Nicholas
Spot on. Although I have no doubt that there was no abduction, if there were, it would have been caused (almost engineered!) by the McCanns.
Anyone who believes these people were so stupid as to go around the resort actively publicising their flawed child care arrangements and that they were ‘naive’ is a foolish person.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Here I am garth! Had a life to get on with, sorry I missed your insults!
We all have an opinion on the mystery behind Maddies disappearence, only because we dont agree with you, hurling derogatory remarks to others dosnt sway their decision only makes you seem egoistic
March 24th, 2008 at 1:33 pm
274
Marie Nicholas Says:
Great post
March 24th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
255
Garth
Cheshire, when people start attacking spelling, you know you have them beaten!
Garths attacking intellect - he’s lost it.
How intelligent does one need to be in order to sell windows?
March 24th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
265 Mic
Bugger off then and come back when ’something happens’
March 24th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
I have just been reading all the posts this morning and noticed that some posters (Garth, Maria) want to separate the two issues of “neglect” and “abduction” from each other, pointing out that they should be studied intdependantly and that the abduction issue is the main one.
I find it abstract to separate them as in reality they are completely tangled. The most caricatural example of separating them is G. saying that they wish they had been there when it happened. This example shows how the two issues are actually one, since there would have been no abduction (or disappearance of the body) if the parents had been there, supposing we go by the theory of abduction, which is what they want us to believe.
If we keep both issues in sight, we have to think of the parents as people who are “naive”, “trustful”, or “neglectful” -whatever- enough to leave their small children alone night after night. I am not measuring their guilt, just their frame of mind. Of course, it casts a doubt on their reliability as parents, and on their will to obey the common rules as regards children’s safety. In spite of their grief, which I don’t doubt, the feeling that they could let their little girl cry for hours at night while dining out is very disturbing, and gives another image of them.
Because they were too casual doesn’t necessarily mean they are wrong in assuming the little girl was abducted, but knowing how “naive” they are, we can have doubts, all the more because there is also room for doubt for other reasons that the PJ know better than me. I certainly will not state that they are guilty, but I will certainly not blindly agree with their will to be judged innocent, regardless of the questions that haven’t been answered yet. I will wait until I know more.
The way they took care of the children is to me directly linked to the case, and what it says of their views on children’s safety can’t be ignored, even if it has to be kept as just an indication on how they think, judge, and act. It is not a question of condemning them, it is a question of understanding who their mind works.
I certainly do not cleave the case in two.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
267 Garth
You have no point to make with me that I would listen to fool.
You are becoming tiresome now - you refuse to answer questions or become rude and agressive when challenged…you need to grow up.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
267
Garth
Yes, you said the McCanns are innocent of direct involvement in their childs disappearance. How daft is that!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Matt…. dleiberate mistake of course!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
268…coolandcalm
How come “WASN’T” becomes “wishes” ?
We feel cheated by the anticlimax.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
265…Mic
Great Debate is the nickname of poster.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Matt / Garth…… somtimes perfection is such a trial one has to make deliberate, empathic mistakes!!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
3.
261
Cheshire Set Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
255 Garth
Tell me what ‘daft’ comments? Have you read your own??
Hmm a typo makes you brighter does it? You are a fool
—————–
Just making a point luvvy. You have the cheek to claim superior intellect. Nuff said!
And with regard to my ‘own daft comments’ would you like to elaborate a little more as show which one is daft? Can you do that?
March 24th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
248
delboy Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
Murat has acted with discretion and will carry on
He has the right to sue if this is what he wants to do but I believe he will wait and prepare his “home work” before taking action
March 24th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
246 Pat…
“great debate”
Where? Let me at it….
This is the same old polarised shite that gets regurgitated on a several-times-daily basis by the same bunch of sad bar stewards.
I eagerly await the day when SOMETHING ACTUALLY HAPPENS in this case.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Ooooops malfunction in brain again!!
Chesire Set 253
The day ‘witnesses’ can be sued for finger-pointing will be the day justice dies. No more identity line-ups for a start.
Robert Murat is free to sue the papers if he wishes.
However, if, as you say, he ISN’T ‘a money grabbing, fame hungry blah blah blah’ he wouldn’t have approached Max Clifford the first week he was made an arguido! It was Max who refused to take him while he was an arguido!
March 24th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
258
Ferdinand
True
A big one
A big rage
A big tantrum
March 24th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
247
Ferdinand Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
242 jo:
I mean, given Mrs. Müller is obviously a PRO-McCann.
************************
“Struggling to contain his rage, Gerry said in a voice shaking with emotion: “I’ve never heard that anyone considers us suspects. The police certainly don’t.”
You kidding me?
March 24th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
255 Garth
Tell me what ‘daft’ comments? Have you read your own??
Hmm a typo makes you brighter does it? You are a fool
March 24th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
256…coolandcalm
An unfinished post ???
Strewth.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
#
256
coolandcalm Says:
March 24th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
The day ‘witnesses’ can be sued for finger-pointing will be the day justice dies.
Robert Murat is free to sue the papers and if he WASN’T
———–
I hate it when that happens
March 24th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
251 jo Says:
“Murat wont have his status lifted before the investigation is over to stop him from talking.”
Also it would be an embarassement if Murat would be cleared now, but not yet the McCanns.