And one day (or two days) plus 45 minutes is even lo nger.

that is a well thought out and written comment. Having read some of the previous entries, it’s unlikely that Ian would respond. He dictates rather than debates.

Coming back?

“Interestingly Clarence (who has sunk to a new low by his accusing Madeleine, by implication, of lying about crying)

You know he need not necessarily have been lying. Children of 3-4, while they may have well developed verbal skills, often have difficulty differentiating days weeks and months. In other words last night could very well have been the previous night ,or two nights previous etc., or in fact as Clarence said , it could have been a dream or merely imagination , which also is quite well developed at that age. At 3-4 this isn’t unusual. The point is, the child was happy to reprimand her parents and toddle off happily, when she felt her job was done. This is actually an indication that she felt comfortable and secure with her parents and a sign that they were doing something right. Don’t get me wrong, I am not for one minute saying that leaving her that night was right, what I am saying is that the above and indeed other signs point to otherwise good parenting . There is no evidence to suggest otherwise. Now will you dismiss colourfully and without thought ? No matter to me. I was only passing through and now I have to go.

DAILY EXPRESS (front page): “MADELEINE – McCANNS: OUR MISTAKE”
The paper says that Kate and Gerry McCann admit being wrong in leaving Madeleine in their holiday apartment. ANORAK

Are those essays not done yet????? Anyone would think you were penning ‘War and Peace’ ! Why don’t you just throw the titles up here and we’ll do them for you chuck.

Josephine.

Regarding Tanner.

My own recollection is that Tanner said she had seen someone but ‘carrying something’ which could have been a child and it was as she was going to the Tapas Bar.

It was with some surprise that I watched the Panorama interview where it had changed to going to the apartment and she could see it was Madeleine.

If she altered it back then she is simply re-stating the ’secret’ interview with the police.

Interestingly Clarence (who has sunk to a new low by his accusing Madeleine, by implication, of lying about crying) claims that the other T9 members statements had been leaked - which they do not appear to have been (maybe he was making that as a suggestion to them?).

Apart from it being irrelevant who leaked the awful depths of neglect which had only been surmised by most of us before, it is worth remembering that it was a pro-McCann leaning ‘journalist’ who told the TV and chose the time to tell them! Note how carefully that release was aimed, AFTER the ‘triumph’ in Belgium (which I have read described as ‘Guy Fawkes selling smoke alarms!).

“time is running out to charge the arguidos”

If an investigation takes very long and needs time to collect facts, a judge will always

give more time to the police.

you can not compare solving a crime to a quizz on television when you have ten seconds to tell the name of Napoleon’s wife.

where did you get this story?

The PJ are not lying at all. The PJ are not saying anything.
They still have to analize everything they have heard from the witnesses. Compare everything to find out if there are new contadictions. Compare them to the old contradictions.
And than send the results to the Public Prosecuter.

This will be a horrible amount of work.

They will transcript every recorded word on paper. Check on every written word if they wrote the text correctly.

They will have to make a repport about every day they spent in England.

But now spanish and portuguese news say that tanner has come clean, hence the cops rushing back to portugal cos that have got what they came for.

British press claim that the Mcconns will soon be cleared cos they went back non the wiser and dont have a clue. (probaly written by someone comical). Anyway who is lying now?

The British press
The PJ
The portuguese press
The Mccons
Clarence the clown

Just for once i dont think its JT.

Madeleine suspect to sue media

Robert Murat denies any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance
A suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is to sue 11 leading British newspapers and one TV station over allegedly libellous stories.

London-based law firm Simons Muirhead & Burton said it was representing Robert Murat against Sky, the Sun and others.

The 34-year-old Briton, who lives near the Algarve holiday apartment from where Madeleine went missing, denies any involvement in her disappearance.

Reports suggest the action could lead to a record payout of more than £2m.

Villa searched

In a statement, the solicitors, who are specialists in media litigation, said they were taking action against Sky, the Sun, the Daily Express, the Sunday Express, the Daily Star and the Daily Mail.

They also listed the Evening Standard, the Metro, the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror, the News of the World and the Scotsman.

LIBEL ACTIONS
Sun
Daily Express
Sunday Express
Daily Star
Daily Mail
Evening Standard
Metro
Daily Mirror
Sunday Mirror
News of the World
The Scotsman
Sky
Media lawyer Caroline Kean of media law specialists Wiggin told the Observer newspaper that if Mr Murat successfully argued the papers inferred he was involved in Madeleine’s abduction or murder, he could win a record payout.

“You could expect £200,000 per paper, per claim, and that would clear £2m,” she told the paper.

Joshua Rosenberg, legal editor of the Daily Telegraph, which is not being sued, told the BBC the papers will try to prove that what they printed was true.

“The newspapers will now be making their own investigations to see if they can find more information about Mr Murat in order to justify the allegations they printed,” he said.

“So they may well be digging around in Portugal to see what they can find out.”

Curtesy of the beeb…..

So the papers are now dong some investigative jurnalism…..figures..

Since coming to British soil, Paulo Rebelo remained exactly the same attitude towards journalists who had been in Portugal: as soon as the topic of conversation concerned the case McC., was silence. On leaving the premises of the British police, after interrogation, the silence of the inspector, even with the Portuguese journalists, was betrayed by a slight smile. Those who are familiar with the inspector by other cases, we know that this can only mean one thing: air to move as they please.

And we have come to understand the smile of the inspector. According to several British officers of the Leicestershire police, the case of kidnapping and cohesiveness of the group known as Lids 9 (including K. and G. McC.) begin to crumble.

“If there was a pact of silence has been broken and I am sure that my colleagues will come to solve Portuguese,” said an official of the British police in Enderby.

According to the same source, the testimony of Tanner and Jane Russell O’Brien, which directly involves G. and K. McC., enabled researchers to understand why the mother Madeleine® had refused to answer many questions. In September, the day he was nominated arguida before leaving the partner for the United Kingdom, K. had refused to cooperate with the Judicial Police, including the refusal to explain why he had changed his clothes or why Madeleine® since they arrived at the Ocean Club, cried often when he stayed with his mother, but never cried with G..
Duarte Levy

And now!! all you have been waiting for,in regarding the Tapas interviews, NOTHING!!! Knew it!

Did they leave their children alone on holiday on the nights prior to the abduction?
If so, what were the timings?

A couple that had a pattern of leaving their children alone would make an enticing target for an observant predator.

Take my hand and I’ll lead you to paradise……..

http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182923.html

You have to run to keep up these days, they’re all on the other thread…………………