<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Clarence Mitchell&#8217;s Gloves, Portuguese Police Deny And Kate McCann&#8217;s Tears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-59#comment-317320</link>
		<dc:creator>lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-317320</guid>
		<description>Must go now so will see you all later, bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must go now so will see you all later, bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-59#comment-291350</link>
		<dc:creator>lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-291350</guid>
		<description>1160 Think About It

Agree with your theory.  I think Maddy was in trouble earlier than the 3rd.  Something of course has gone terribly wrong here and there is a cover up by a lot of people.  The PJ are not letting go are they.  They are definitely on to something!   I have been told to be careful what I say on here, so will be, but I do believe there would be a bad history regarding Madeleine.    There is also the possibility that should facts get out, heads will roll like never seen before!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1160 Think About It</p>
<p>Agree with your theory.  I think Maddy was in trouble earlier than the 3rd.  Something of course has gone terribly wrong here and there is a cover up by a lot of people.  The PJ are not letting go are they.  They are definitely on to something!   I have been told to be careful what I say on here, so will be, but I do believe there would be a bad history regarding Madeleine.    There is also the possibility that should facts get out, heads will roll like never seen before!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Think about it</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-288811</link>
		<dc:creator>Think about it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-288811</guid>
		<description>After following this story from the beginning there seems to be a likely scenario that would explain why the pj are not letting go. It is clear that someone was in that room.  Possibly on the night before - and possibly abusing the child - the had woken up for a reason.  On the last night, according to the reports, one of the friends checked on the children but said he didnt have a clear vew of Maddie and didn't enter the room - impossible - every parent or acting parent checks to see if the child is covered.  If the molester was in the apartment at that time and heard footstepts - he would have had to either tried to smother the childs' cries, or hit her - hard to knock her out.  It would explain the traces of blood.  Anyway, realising that his DNA was all over the child - he waited - and picked up the child and carried her away with him. If she had been awake/alive she would have reached for her soft toy Cuddle Cat and the abductor would have given in to keep her quiet. The toy was left behind. The  sighting by Jane Tanner seems to confirm that the child seemed asleep - something she has not strayed from since the beginning. But remember, if the abductor was a stranger - he would have had to enter and leave in the middle of a bustling tourist arena full of parents - twice! Un-noticed!. From there, there were sightings near the beach, where the dogs went, and more than likely she was dumped at sea. So I think it is safe to say that she was killed in the room.  A fact that the parents have strongly denied since the dsicover and still do everything they can to not allow that possiblity into the light of day. The media, the fund, Metado 3 whose expertise are questionable , and now Mitchell- it goes on. Everything else since then has been a distraction. So back to the abuser/molester in the room - who was it?.  Extensive investigation has turned up nothing but the PJ keeps returning to the group. They are not as incompetent as the Mcann team have led us to believe. The senior investigator on the case now is well respected - and even he - won't let go. Why? Was it one of them?  Why do thier stories not add up? Why did they allow all those people in the room.   These are smart people.  They refused to accept that the child was killed in the room - but the facts do seriously point to that - and the new investigation team are not letting this fact go.  PS - I think Kate is innocent.

rel.aw0939</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After following this story from the beginning there seems to be a likely scenario that would explain why the pj are not letting go. It is clear that someone was in that room.  Possibly on the night before - and possibly abusing the child - the had woken up for a reason.  On the last night, according to the reports, one of the friends checked on the children but said he didnt have a clear vew of Maddie and didn&#8217;t enter the room - impossible - every parent or acting parent checks to see if the child is covered.  If the molester was in the apartment at that time and heard footstepts - he would have had to either tried to smother the childs&#8217; cries, or hit her - hard to knock her out.  It would explain the traces of blood.  Anyway, realising that his DNA was all over the child - he waited - and picked up the child and carried her away with him. If she had been awake/alive she would have reached for her soft toy Cuddle Cat and the abductor would have given in to keep her quiet. The toy was left behind. The  sighting by Jane Tanner seems to confirm that the child seemed asleep - something she has not strayed from since the beginning. But remember, if the abductor was a stranger - he would have had to enter and leave in the middle of a bustling tourist arena full of parents - twice! Un-noticed!. From there, there were sightings near the beach, where the dogs went, and more than likely she was dumped at sea. So I think it is safe to say that she was killed in the room.  A fact that the parents have strongly denied since the dsicover and still do everything they can to not allow that possiblity into the light of day. The media, the fund, Metado 3 whose expertise are questionable , and now Mitchell- it goes on. Everything else since then has been a distraction. So back to the abuser/molester in the room - who was it?.  Extensive investigation has turned up nothing but the PJ keeps returning to the group. They are not as incompetent as the Mcann team have led us to believe. The senior investigator on the case now is well respected - and even he - won&#8217;t let go. Why? Was it one of them?  Why do thier stories not add up? Why did they allow all those people in the room.   These are smart people.  They refused to accept that the child was killed in the room - but the facts do seriously point to that - and the new investigation team are not letting this fact go.  PS - I think Kate is innocent.</p>
<p>rel.aw0939</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Passing Through</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-288467</link>
		<dc:creator>Passing Through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-288467</guid>
		<description>982
chenier Says: 
April 15th, 2008 at 11:50 pm ——————————

"It is logically impossible to disprove a negative, which is why no legal system requires litigants to do so.
Madeleine could have been abducted by little grey aliens from the planet Splog; no judge would accept that as a reason to believe that she had been, in the absence of evidence to prove that she had been.No police force can ever disprove the billions of possible series of events. They can, however, set about trying to prove a positive, but to do that they need to gather as much evidence as possible.And in fairness to other posters here who may sometimes seem somewhat inflammatory, not everybody can look at the disappearance of a small child dispassionately…"


In fairness to those who are receiving the brunt of that passion, perhaps it would be wise to take a leaf out of the book of the said police force  and await some real evidence, before the burnings and dunkings. I don't think any police force would concern themselves with some of the possible series of events suggested by some posters. They are about as likely as little grey aliens from the planet Splog working with the police to solve the case.
It is insulting in my opinion to those who  wisely wish to refrain from unsound attacks on the McCann family, to call them dispassionate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>982<br />
chenier Says:<br />
April 15th, 2008 at 11:50 pm ——————————</p>
<p>&#8220;It is logically impossible to disprove a negative, which is why no legal system requires litigants to do so.<br />
Madeleine could have been abducted by little grey aliens from the planet Splog; no judge would accept that as a reason to believe that she had been, in the absence of evidence to prove that she had been.No police force can ever disprove the billions of possible series of events. They can, however, set about trying to prove a positive, but to do that they need to gather as much evidence as possible.And in fairness to other posters here who may sometimes seem somewhat inflammatory, not everybody can look at the disappearance of a small child dispassionately…&#8221;</p>
<p>In fairness to those who are receiving the brunt of that passion, perhaps it would be wise to take a leaf out of the book of the said police force  and await some real evidence, before the burnings and dunkings. I don&#8217;t think any police force would concern themselves with some of the possible series of events suggested by some posters. They are about as likely as little grey aliens from the planet Splog working with the police to solve the case.<br />
It is insulting in my opinion to those who  wisely wish to refrain from unsound attacks on the McCann family, to call them dispassionate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-288108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-288108</guid>
		<description>1157
Ferdinand

Its very important actually. I believe it was the McCanns and Clarence via M3. I hope that Nachos is called to account for it, he chose when to releas it after all, did he not? He is a McCann supporter is he not? 

Why is it so hard for everyone to make the connection?! Carlos Nachos chose the time - CARLOS NACHOS CHOSE THE TIME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1157<br />
Ferdinand</p>
<p>Its very important actually. I believe it was the McCanns and Clarence via M3. I hope that Nachos is called to account for it, he chose when to releas it after all, did he not? He is a McCann supporter is he not? </p>
<p>Why is it so hard for everyone to make the connection?! Carlos Nachos chose the time - CARLOS NACHOS CHOSE THE TIME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287201</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287201</guid>
		<description>1145 Ian Says:

" Oh well if he says Clarence and the McCanns didnt leak it, of course we have to believe him. So why doesnt he tell us WHO DID? "

The leak is not that important to the investigation. I don't think that "the police" did leak it. It might have been someone who had access to it at any time. Could have been a translator, or a typist. I don't read too much into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1145 Ian Says:</p>
<p>&#8221; Oh well if he says Clarence and the McCanns didnt leak it, of course we have to believe him. So why doesnt he tell us WHO DID? &#8221;</p>
<p>The leak is not that important to the investigation. I don&#8217;t think that &#8220;the police&#8221; did leak it. It might have been someone who had access to it at any time. Could have been a translator, or a typist. I don&#8217;t read too much into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287199</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287199</guid>
		<description>1151 Denzylle Says: 

Burlington, VT and Ann Arbor are also nice.
best dreams, D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1151 Denzylle Says: </p>
<p>Burlington, VT and Ann Arbor are also nice.<br />
best dreams, D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287198</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287198</guid>
		<description>Must to bed. Train journey tomorrow. 

I'm simply intrigued by the leak and wonder who was responsible, that's all!

Good night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must to bed. Train journey tomorrow. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m simply intrigued by the leak and wonder who was responsible, that&#8217;s all!</p>
<p>Good night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287197</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287197</guid>
		<description>1147 Ferdinand Says: 

“BTW, I apologize if I have ever insulted you.”

I am not aware that you have ever insulted me. I’m not that interested in keeping track of insults. Maybe it was too subtile for me to understand?
--
I guess it was.  Or maybe my memory is bad.   Or both.
Anyway . . ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1147 Ferdinand Says: </p>
<p>“BTW, I apologize if I have ever insulted you.”</p>
<p>I am not aware that you have ever insulted me. I’m not that interested in keeping track of insults. Maybe it was too subtile for me to understand?<br />
&#8211;<br />
I guess it was.  Or maybe my memory is bad.   Or both.<br />
Anyway . . ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287196</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287196</guid>
		<description>1144 Maria Says:

"Many thanks! Not that I usually take the Sun as my guide!!! But this does seem plausible. Can’t imagine CM leaking such a damaging bit of info."

It's not that damaging, is it? But it makes no sense for the McCanns exactly to leak it during the Brussels event. It would however make sense to leak it if you are anti-amber-alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1144 Maria Says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Many thanks! Not that I usually take the Sun as my guide!!! But this does seem plausible. Can’t imagine CM leaking such a damaging bit of info.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that damaging, is it? But it makes no sense for the McCanns exactly to leak it during the Brussels event. It would however make sense to leak it if you are anti-amber-alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287195</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287195</guid>
		<description>Nacos refuses to tell us his source and yet people believe him when he says it wasnt Clarence or the McCanns?

Illogical aint it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nacos refuses to tell us his source and yet people believe him when he says it wasnt Clarence or the McCanns?</p>
<p>Illogical aint it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denzylle</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287194</link>
		<dc:creator>Denzylle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287194</guid>
		<description>I liked Madison very much, and also Burlington, VT. I have a friend from Ann Arbor who tells me I'd like it there.

Anyway, 2am. Off to my bed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Madison very much, and also Burlington, VT. I have a friend from Ann Arbor who tells me I&#8217;d like it there.</p>
<p>Anyway, 2am. Off to my bed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287193</guid>
		<description>1147
Ferdinand 

Yes well, Im no sure youd recognise a child neglector if they (he and she) were  on the TV rambling on about Amber alerts  right in front of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1147<br />
Ferdinand </p>
<p>Yes well, Im no sure youd recognise a child neglector if they (he and she) were  on the TV rambling on about Amber alerts  right in front of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287192</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287192</guid>
		<description>meant to say capitol city</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meant to say capitol city</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287191</guid>
		<description>1144
Maria 

Then you are more naive than I thought. How can Nachos be trusted? He is withholding information.

They know its going to come out, much worse in fact.  I dont think Maddie and Shaun werent crying, it was Shaun and Amelie. I dont think they were calling 'Daddy', but 'Maddie'.

You have to realise, the truth is a hell of a lot worse than this 'leak'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1144<br />
Maria </p>
<p>Then you are more naive than I thought. How can Nachos be trusted? He is withholding information.</p>
<p>They know its going to come out, much worse in fact.  I dont think Maddie and Shaun werent crying, it was Shaun and Amelie. I dont think they were calling &#8216;Daddy&#8217;, but &#8216;Maddie&#8217;.</p>
<p>You have to realise, the truth is a hell of a lot worse than this &#8216;leak&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287190</guid>
		<description>1141 veritablequandary Says:

"Do you believe this?"

Why shouldn't I? I don't think that the leak has to do with the McCann case. It would make sense to leak it for someone who wants to undermine the political plans for the amber alert system - to neutralize the Brussels PR event.

"BTW, I apologize if I have ever insulted you."

I am not aware that you have ever insulted me. I'm not that interested in keeping track of insults. Maybe it was too subtile for me to understand? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1141 veritablequandary Says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you believe this?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why shouldn&#8217;t I? I don&#8217;t think that the leak has to do with the McCann case. It would make sense to leak it for someone who wants to undermine the political plans for the amber alert system - to neutralize the Brussels PR event.</p>
<p>&#8220;BTW, I apologize if I have ever insulted you.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am not aware that you have ever insulted me. I&#8217;m not that interested in keeping track of insults. Maybe it was too subtile for me to understand? <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287189</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287189</guid>
		<description>1137 Denzylle 

I worked music tours for a while, and on that one, we did the Winnipeg Folk Festival, Northrop Auditorium in Minn, then Madison, and Chicago in four days.
----
It's been years since I've been in Winnepeg, but I love the Manitobans. 
Madison is one of my top 5 favorite cities in the US!
I am a small city sort of person, but I love the combination of a great university, a state capital city, and a progressive politics.  It's a great place.  Highly recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1137 Denzylle </p>
<p>I worked music tours for a while, and on that one, we did the Winnipeg Folk Festival, Northrop Auditorium in Minn, then Madison, and Chicago in four days.<br />
&#8212;-<br />
It&#8217;s been years since I&#8217;ve been in Winnepeg, but I love the Manitobans.<br />
Madison is one of my top 5 favorite cities in the US!<br />
I am a small city sort of person, but I love the combination of a great university, a state capital city, and a progressive politics.  It&#8217;s a great place.  Highly recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287188</guid>
		<description>1140
Ferdinand 

Oh well if he says Clarence and the McCanns didnt leak it, of course we have to believe him. So why doesnt he tell us WHO DID?

I'll tell you why, because the guys hardly going to tell the truth is he!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1140<br />
Ferdinand </p>
<p>Oh well if he says Clarence and the McCanns didnt leak it, of course we have to believe him. So why doesnt he tell us WHO DID?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you why, because the guys hardly going to tell the truth is he!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287187</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287187</guid>
		<description>1140 Ferdinand

Many thanks!  Not that I usually take the Sun as my guide!!!  But this does seem plausible.  Can't imagine CM leaking such a damaging bit of info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1140 Ferdinand</p>
<p>Many thanks!  Not that I usually take the Sun as my guide!!!  But this does seem plausible.  Can&#8217;t imagine CM leaking such a damaging bit of info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/182964/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-clarence-mitchells-gloves-portuguese-police-deny-and-kate-mccanns-tears.html/comment-page-58#comment-287186</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/182964.html#comment-287186</guid>
		<description>1138
Maria

Clarence is a liar, how can you support the slimey toad who makes money from the loss of a child?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1138<br />
Maria</p>
<p>Clarence is a liar, how can you support the slimey toad who makes money from the loss of a child?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
