Madeleine McCann: Anjos Calls Mitchell A Liar And Madeleine One Year On: Campaign For Change
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN: “Cop: McCanns’ spokesman ‘lies’”
Carlos Anjos, president of Portugal’s Police Federation, says of Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns’ spokesman: “He lies with as many teeth as he has in his mouth.”
The accused the former BBC man of leaking police statements Kate and Gerry made within hours of Maddie disappearing last May. These were aired on Spanish TV last week. Anjos said the aim was to give the McCanns an excuse not to attend a reconstruction.
Says Mr Mitchell: “It is categorically untrue that I leaked them. There was absolutely no benefit for us to do that.”
THE TIMES: Andrew Billen on TV:
“It was going to be called Madeleine McCann, but now ITV1’s exclusive, has a longer name: Madeleine, One Year On: Campaign for Change. The programme will follow her parents as they campaign for an American-style Amber Alert system, in which law enforcement agencies are empowered to commandeer airtime when a child goes missing. Ah, lack of television coverage. That must have been the problem.”
Indeed.
Madeleine McCann: A show with punch
Posted: 16th, April 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,584) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Evie Walton on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- yampster on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- yampster on Join The Campaign For Straight Gay Marriages
April 16th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
950
Ian
One way ticket to hell?
April 16th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
wtf - I have my pinny on and I am ready…
April 16th, 2008 at 6:34 pm
#
943
Ian Says:
April 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
I do like motor racing (though he likes two wheels) and I do think he isnt beyond hope!
————–
Powered skate boards?
April 16th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
944 wtf
They are unreal arent they? But if you think about it, they will have completed their grieving and as they are religiously inclined, they will have convinced themselves that the is in heaven now, one day to be reunited with them.
Its shame they only have tickets for the other place though!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
No news from clarrie?
I miss his comments
April 16th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
He is a rotter and a scoundrel!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:33 pm
943 ian
Hate to admit it but he makes me laugh, maybe he is a professional comedian! would make sense wouldnt it
April 16th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
My last dipstick came out full of oil! Garthy, go bath yourself you dirty rotter
April 16th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
942 dee
think your right!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
939 julie
I find i dont like to dwell on what could have happened to her and what she went throuhg, its horrible. Unlike the parents who dont seem to be suffering in that direction do they? treated like a princess! their faces should be contorted with grief imagining what she is going through, but imo they know she has been “taken”
April 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
I do like motor racing (though he likes two wheels) and I do think he isnt beyond hope!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Wow, i really thought the Pro’s would tear me to pieces about the sacrifice story?? have i said something worthy of being passed over??? something best left alone
April 16th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
#
936
Ian Says:
April 16th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
931 Gary
Surely even a total dipstick like yourself is realising that the McCanns arent as clean as you hoped?
———–
Ooh you…. you you youuuuu ooo o rotter!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
I think Ian and Garth are going to be friends for life.
April 16th, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Why should we argue about whether we are pro- or anti-McCann? Surely this whole thing is about wanting justice to be done for a small child who couldn’t defend herself, it does not matter if you think her parents are guilty or not, there is a little girl involved here who needs justice done for her.
Yes, I know which side of the fence I’m sitting, but ultimately my whole objective is Madeleine, and to know that what she went through does not come to a dead-end, and those responsible will ultimately pay for their actions!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Ian
You’re such a knobber
…… a funny knobber though 
April 16th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Matt - well said
April 16th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
931 Gary
Surely even a total dipstick like yourself is realising that the McCanns arent as clean as you hoped?
April 16th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
ooops moral, not morale (though morale is high on the side of the angels!).
April 16th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
sc46 are you in the bushes, theres washing up to be done!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
928
Garth
Gary, come on mate, you know its slipping out of the McNeglectors stained hands now!
COme on over to the morale high ground! I’d hate to see you labelled in a risk category!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
910…Nostradamus
Incorrect….on several counts.
It is not my Domain.
And you may be surprised to hear that I, and most others are not
antiMcCann…we certainly anti McCann Circus…but a better
description would be…we are very ProJusticeFor Madeleine.
So…please take your superscillious sneers and contemplate
upon being a less judgemental person.
April 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
#
926
Dee Says:
April 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
None of it makes any sense i’m afraid to say, but i’m sure it will soon
————
Im sure it wont! Well, not to some at least ……….
April 16th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
924 Gary!
Hi!
Hey, what about this theory that it was Shaun and Amelie who were crying and calling not ‘Daddy’ but ‘Maddie’?!
What about the news that Carlos Nachos (who released the ‘leak’ to the TV) is a long time communicator with Clarence and the McCanns and he chose when to contact the TV station! Carefully released after the McCanns had left Brussels!
All falling in to place now isn’t it!
April 16th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Nostradamus 910
I don’t place myslf in an anti MC camp, as I just hold for the truth, like you say you do, and I don’t bear any bad feelings towards the McCs. As I already said, as long as the truth is eventually known, I’ll be satisfied, and if they are involved, you will not certainly not find me screaming for them to be punished.
Yet, I don’t place myself in a pro MC camp, certainly not.
Being “pro” or “against” isn’t the issue at all, as far as I am concerned. It is a dead end. I want to know what happened. I don’t want to have to believe what the press have been telling day after day, that the PJ aren’t to be taken seriously, and that we have to believe the MCs and their PR against the police. I want a real investigaation to be carried without interferences, and if necessary, I want a fair trial to decide of the guillt or innocence of the defendants.
Nostradamus, if you say this is being anti MC, it means that, deep inside, you think they are guilty. Otherwise, the outcome of the investigation wouldn’t worry you.
April 16th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
#
921
wtf Says:
April 16th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
915 julie
Theres no such thing as the perfect crime, and i agree not all of them are involved. thats why i cant get my head around the fact that gerry denied seeing tanner, if she was with them on it, doesnt make sense does it?
#
—————-
What doesnt make sense is thinking that they are in on it………..
Anyway, whats this rubbish about Tanner retracting her claim about seeing the abductor? Pmsl.
April 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
906…SC46
I think the recent interviews in Enderby give a clue.
April 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
None of it makes any sense i’m afraid to say, but i’m sure it will soon
April 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
910
Nostradamus
Camps? You meant here is a camp that supports people who use their superior strength to bully and neglect children?
Are you proud to be in that camp?
April 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
#
850
Ian Says:
April 16th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Sorry, there are of course ‘bobs’ - its mobs that exist only in the mind o ‘Nostradamus’ who seeks to divert attention from the real issue, parents who ultimately failed in their duty of care to Madeleine. [edited - dr]
#
————-