
Madeleine McCann: The First Robert Murat, McCanns’ Neglect Charge And Old Portugal
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “MCCANNS FACE NEW CHARGE
EXCLUSIVE SCANDAL OF PLAN TO CHARGE MADDIE MUM ‘KEYSTONE COP’ FURY”
A shock new plan to charge Kate McCann over daughter Maddie’s kidnap was last night condemned as “spiteful and shameful”. British legal experts branded bungling Portuguese detectives “Keystone Cops” for considering neglect charges.
But are these comedy cops the only ones who think the McCanns erred?
One lawyer said: “After an inquiry costing millions and unprecedented international help, these Keystone Cops still haven’t got a clue what happened to Madeleine. The investigation was a mess from Day One.”
Says McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
Or why not now?
MAIL ON SUNDAY: “Madeleine special investigation: The damning case against the Portuguese police - and how Kate and Gerry are coping one year on”
At the holiday home where Madeleine was last seen:
The apartment gate was padlocked, but in the little paved front yard, a purple hibiscus and some dusty geraniums were coming into bloom. The Algarve spring is finally coming.”
Such are the facts in this special investigation.
“It’s a new season,” said a British woman who works in a local restaurant. “It’s tragic they haven’t found Maddie. But the time has come to move on.”
Moving on:
Of course, moving on is one thing Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry, cannot do. They remain arguidos, official suspects, - as does Robert Murat, a British expat living in Praia da Luz who has strenuously protested his innocence - still supposedly being investigated on the grounds that they may have caused her death or disappearance.
“Intellectually, they have grasped what has happened,” said Gerry’s elder brother, John. “Emotionally, they have learnt, to an extent, to cope: one’s psychology adapts. But they haven’t really come to terms with it. There are times when they can seem cheerful, but then the devastation bursts through. Madeleine’s disappearance is a cataclysm that is horrendous for them, and horrendous for all of us close to them.”
“It’s an intense, full-on existence for both of them,” said the McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. “Gerry is back at work [as a cardiologist] full-time, but when he gets home the campaign to find Madeleine is like having a second job.”
And what of Portugal, Britain’s oldest ally?
“You have to remember: until 1974 Portugal was a dictatorship,” said a veteran Algarve journalist, who asked not to be named. “That was the climate in which the PJ was created. Their methods were pretty rough.”
Rough?
Brutal treatment of suspects was routine. One expatriate British woman told me how a friend of her mother had been arrested in the late Eighties on suspicion of breaking and entering a house - only to be savagely beaten in custody.
“She was bruised all over her body. Of course, the police said they hadn’t done anything, and were never called to account,” the woman said.
Rough. Very rough:
“This is Heartbeat country,” another expat said.
Heartbeat, Why do you miss when my baby kisses me? Greengrass - take him to the ‘pit’
“People talk to the police, and so often they think they know who’s guilty, but can’t prove it. So they make an arrest and turn up the pressure in the hope of getting a confession.”
Portugal. A place of rare dangers:
Thirty miles east of Praia da Luz lies the resort of Albufeira, where a collection of clifftop villas known as Val Novio was once a thriving development, favoured by British expats. Now largely abandoned, it was there, on November 19, 1990, that Rachel Charles, aged nine, went missing.
Neil McKay, a Bafta-winning TV scriptwriter who has specialised in factual dramas about crime, was on holiday nearby with his father at the time. “We were sitting in a bar having a beer one evening,” he recalled.
“This English guy came in, saying a little girl had disappeared two days earlier but the police were refusing to mount a proper search. He said her family wanted every British tourist or expat to meet on the beach at seven next morning to try to find her.
“So we went. There must have been more than 200 of us. Tragically, it didn’t take long to find her body, hidden among some pines.”
Those Portuguese police:
Len Port, now an Algarve publisher who covered the case for The Portugal News, said: “The police search was highly inefficient, as, frankly, was everything else about the case. The way the police handled it was desperately amateurish - and ultimately, a travesty of justice.”
Just as they would later do with the McCanns, the PJ soon hit on a suspect who knew the victim and her family. But according to Port, who attended his trial, it had “no real evidence. It was an unjust trial”.
Robert Murat:
The defendant was Michael Cook, a British expat businessman who had taken part in the search, and in 1992 he was convicted and sentenced to 19 years. Having protested his innocence, he was released in 2002. Last week, he told of his ordeal for the first time.
“This has ruined my life,” he said. “I still carry the scars from the six times I was stabbed in prison; as for the times I had the s*** kicked out of me, I long ago lost count.”
Posted: 20th, April 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,270) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





April 20th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
247
Marie Nicholas Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Val 68
What is the date of the article? I can’t find it! Is it an ald one?
—————————————
Yes; I pointed out to Val earlier that the article dates back to September…
April 20th, 2008 at 2:31 pm
245
PeterMac
Interesting what you say about dogs not picking up tracks from somebody being carried.
April 20th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Val 68
What is the date of the article? I can’t find it! Is it an ald one?
April 20th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Val 68
Val, I am only reading your post now. The article is very interesting. It seems that more and more, the British Police are also working on the case, and that they have the same general appreciation and method of working as the PJ.
It makes me understand now why the re-activation of the smear campaign. But the smear campaign on the Portuguese is going to be more difficult to sustain with the public if it also means a smear campaign on othe British Police.
It makes you wonder if Clarrie isn’t really short sighted. As is said, you can win one victory, but lose the war.
______________________________
M&A
Clarrie’s dress sense makes me assume he’s short-sighted
- meercat
April 20th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
233 SteveT
Thanks for that link. I had not seen it before.
It is full of the most extraordinary stuff, which we now know to be total rubbish. Why were they saying any of those things ? Even the cots have changed places with M’s bed placed between them. (Do we know when that particular detail was changed and M was in her bed by the wall just inside the door ?)
Secondly, if the dogs did indeed track M’s scent 400 yards to the supermarket, then she was NOT carried. If you are off the ground you do not leave a scent for a dog to track.
So if we follow that particular lead, she walked. And therefore either on her own, lost and trying to find her parents, or alternatively with a close family friend. Someone she knew.
Not with a random bundleman / werewolfman / George Harrison / Robert Murat - (unless she already knew him and that was the reason for GM’s evasion when asked the question).
And therefore the Tanner testimony is yet again proven to be total nonsense and fabrication.
And so on.
April 20th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Gandolph even.
April 20th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
237
Marie Nicholas Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
If we use Amnesty International reports as a pretext to say that the Police shouldn’t investigate on anyone, no police in the world will be allowed to investigate on any crime, as almost all countries have been criticised by Amnesty International (rightly so, I agree). How nice for the criminals! The argument would bear more credibility, though, if it wasn’t used on the behalf of people under investigation, or if it applied to their case.
Amnesty International’s aim isn’t to help the criminals thrive for lack of law enforcement. If you look at the MC’s case, I doubt their rights have been seriously infringed on. If they had,wouldn’t their lawyers have filed a complaint to the European court of law?
—————————————-
In order to go to the European courts you have to have exhausted all legal process in your own country.
The McCanns have made no attempt at doing anything to assist the legal process.
They appear to concede that they gave an undertaking to return to Portugual if they were asked to do so.
Clarrie appears to be trying to spin a possible refusal to return as a justifiable act.
The European courts would’t touch it with a barge pole…
April 20th, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Feeling better today Gandoplph?
April 20th, 2008 at 2:13 pm
It was actually the prosecutor, who refused to let Amaral arrest KM for abandonment that said there was not enough evidence. Don’t even begin to insult your own intelligence never mind any one else’s, by claiming that is because he had bigger more serious charges in mind. There aint gonna be any charges, and we will be none the wiser what has become of Madeleine.
April 20th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
235
Just_me
I dont worry about the stated times they checked as I think the PJ know these are fictitious, especially as IMO the PJ know she wasnt alive on the 3rd May.
April 20th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
234 Just_Me
I completely agree with you, Just_Me, but I am fathoming the depth of illogical, sophistic argumentation that they use to prove it is not negligent to leave small children at night, to go out.
April 20th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
Passing Through:
“What a lovely picture of dear little Madeleine having a go at the twins birthday candles! Notice how protective Kate is, holding her little arm as she leans forward in her grand aunt’s arms. The kitchen is immaculate and the child obviously beautifully cared for. Oh look! Kate is trying to help her with the candles. What a lovely picture. I presume the cake will later be carried to the dining/party area, for Sean and Amelie and the candles relit. What a lovely moment. I am sure Kate treasures this photo. Bah humbug to those who bleat neglect and abuse!”
So it’s the twins’ birthday, is it? Which one?
But why is Kate holding that knife ready to cut the cake if it’s about to be carried through to another room?
April 20th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
If we use Amnesty International reports as a pretext to say that the Police shouldn’t investigate on anyone, no police in the world will be allowed to investigate on any crime, as almost all countries have been criticised by Amnesty International (rightly so, I agree). How nice for the criminals! The argument would bear more credibility, though, if it wasn’t used on the behalf of people under investigation, or if it applied to their case.
Amnesty International’s aim isn’t to help the criminals thrive for lack of law enforcement. If you look at the MC’s case, I doubt their rights have been seriously infringed on. If they had,wouldn’t their lawyers have filed a complaint to the European court of law?
April 20th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
229
âde Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
————————————-
Ah, the tried and tested method of ’sudden retirement’.
Or the terrible health problems which miraculously disappear when the threat of extradition is lifted…
April 20th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
SteveT - Someone checked at 9.15. But when Kate went later Madeleine had gone………….so its not a check every 20 mins or even 30 mins, that was 45 mins….when was the last check then? I’m confused now. or do they mean it was the last check when someone actually saw M in her bed?
April 20th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
230
Marie Nicholas - even if Madeleine was fine, the fact they have admitted leaving the childrens evry night should still call for a neglect charge dont you think? what about the twins? they were neglected too, even though luckily they came to no harm. Is it only neglect if a child is hurt or goes missing now? what is this world coming to
April 20th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
In this report of 5th May, Kate says the shutters were “smashed”. How could she have got it that wrong?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/tm_headline=maddy–3-goes-missing&method=full&objectid=19048526&siteid=89520-name_page.html
April 20th, 2008 at 1:50 pm
.. stop writhing, you wriggling wizard, let me get those cuffs on you ..
April 20th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
What a lovely picture of dear little Madeleine having a go at the twins birthday candles! Notice how protective Kate is, holding her little arm as she leans forward in her grand aunt’s arms. The kitchen is immaculate and the child obviously beautifully cared for. Oh look! Kate is trying to help her with the candles. What a lovely picture. I presume the cake will later be carried to the dining/party area, for Sean and Amelie and the candles relit. What a lovely moment. I am sure Kate treasures this photo. Bah humbug to those who bleat neglect and abuse!
April 20th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
Gail,
I agree with you.
It isn’t you who got it wrong, they were neglectful.
Supposing the abduction theory was the right one, it would completely prove the point that they shouldn’t have left the children on their own.
April 20th, 2008 at 1:48 pm
226 chenier
nice to think some countries prosecute their police
but not all:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/7357141.stm
April 20th, 2008 at 1:47 pm
227
Gloria Smudd Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Looks like I’m being Smudd The Bounty Hunter again …
——————————-
It’s the hat. Draws them like flies…
April 20th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Looks like I’m being Smudd The Bounty Hunter again …
April 20th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
219
AgendaWide Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
128 Chenier
‘Well, having read the Amnesty International Reports, the position seems to be that Portugual is not perfect, but it’s a very long way from achieving the really professional sort of abuse of human rights managed in places like the White House…’
=======
Yes that is what I thought, but then less than ideal for PJ. Probably not a strong card for Clearance to play especially if British Embassy were not so helpful (if possible) in the case of the ‘First Murat’. Off to feed hungry ‘horses’ at home - some burning smells and they won’t believe I was checking if …:)
——————————————-
Portugual does at least appear to recognise that it has problems, which is important.
They are expanding the definition of ‘domestic violence’ to bring more people into the Courts for assaults on their partners.
And the fact that Amaral is to be tried is an important indication that the PJ are not going to cover up their own problems.
Hope lunch didn’t get too burned…
April 20th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Well, Linda’s not up there! (Oops, just shifted a bit and Andorra is no more-a.. )
April 20th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
Gloria Smudd, you are awful but I like you, I was thinking more along the lines of Belgium ?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ONc3OMOb98I
April 20th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
197 Chenier
Try this rewording:
“We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering charging me with peverting the course of justice. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
——
Worth the try. Excellent!
April 20th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Just_me. You’re great!
Interesting to see that the expression on the women’s faces seems to have changed. Nearly a 100 year ago this effect of montage was proven by the Russian director Kuleshov. He took a neutral head shot of an actor and inter-cut with various other shots. Every time it looked like the expression on the man’s face had changed, depending on what he was supposed to be looking at.
April 20th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Just settling comfily on my country-sized arse when - whoosh, clunk - Luxemburg gone!
April 20th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
sc46 Bye, sorry was cleaning!!!! Have a lovely day, see ya later