
Madeleine McCann: The First Robert Murat, McCanns’ Neglect Charge And Old Portugal
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “MCCANNS FACE NEW CHARGE
EXCLUSIVE SCANDAL OF PLAN TO CHARGE MADDIE MUM ‘KEYSTONE COP’ FURY”
A shock new plan to charge Kate McCann over daughter Maddie’s kidnap was last night condemned as “spiteful and shameful”. British legal experts branded bungling Portuguese detectives “Keystone Cops” for considering neglect charges.
But are these comedy cops the only ones who think the McCanns erred?
One lawyer said: “After an inquiry costing millions and unprecedented international help, these Keystone Cops still haven’t got a clue what happened to Madeleine. The investigation was a mess from Day One.”
Says McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
Or why not now?
MAIL ON SUNDAY: “Madeleine special investigation: The damning case against the Portuguese police - and how Kate and Gerry are coping one year on”
At the holiday home where Madeleine was last seen:
The apartment gate was padlocked, but in the little paved front yard, a purple hibiscus and some dusty geraniums were coming into bloom. The Algarve spring is finally coming.”
Such are the facts in this special investigation.
“It’s a new season,” said a British woman who works in a local restaurant. “It’s tragic they haven’t found Maddie. But the time has come to move on.”
Moving on:
Of course, moving on is one thing Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry, cannot do. They remain arguidos, official suspects, - as does Robert Murat, a British expat living in Praia da Luz who has strenuously protested his innocence - still supposedly being investigated on the grounds that they may have caused her death or disappearance.
“Intellectually, they have grasped what has happened,” said Gerry’s elder brother, John. “Emotionally, they have learnt, to an extent, to cope: one’s psychology adapts. But they haven’t really come to terms with it. There are times when they can seem cheerful, but then the devastation bursts through. Madeleine’s disappearance is a cataclysm that is horrendous for them, and horrendous for all of us close to them.”
“It’s an intense, full-on existence for both of them,” said the McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. “Gerry is back at work [as a cardiologist] full-time, but when he gets home the campaign to find Madeleine is like having a second job.”
And what of Portugal, Britain’s oldest ally?
“You have to remember: until 1974 Portugal was a dictatorship,” said a veteran Algarve journalist, who asked not to be named. “That was the climate in which the PJ was created. Their methods were pretty rough.”
Rough?
Brutal treatment of suspects was routine. One expatriate British woman told me how a friend of her mother had been arrested in the late Eighties on suspicion of breaking and entering a house - only to be savagely beaten in custody.
“She was bruised all over her body. Of course, the police said they hadn’t done anything, and were never called to account,” the woman said.
Rough. Very rough:
“This is Heartbeat country,” another expat said.
Heartbeat, Why do you miss when my baby kisses me? Greengrass - take him to the ‘pit’
“People talk to the police, and so often they think they know who’s guilty, but can’t prove it. So they make an arrest and turn up the pressure in the hope of getting a confession.”
Portugal. A place of rare dangers:
Thirty miles east of Praia da Luz lies the resort of Albufeira, where a collection of clifftop villas known as Val Novio was once a thriving development, favoured by British expats. Now largely abandoned, it was there, on November 19, 1990, that Rachel Charles, aged nine, went missing.
Neil McKay, a Bafta-winning TV scriptwriter who has specialised in factual dramas about crime, was on holiday nearby with his father at the time. “We were sitting in a bar having a beer one evening,” he recalled.
“This English guy came in, saying a little girl had disappeared two days earlier but the police were refusing to mount a proper search. He said her family wanted every British tourist or expat to meet on the beach at seven next morning to try to find her.
“So we went. There must have been more than 200 of us. Tragically, it didn’t take long to find her body, hidden among some pines.”
Those Portuguese police:
Len Port, now an Algarve publisher who covered the case for The Portugal News, said: “The police search was highly inefficient, as, frankly, was everything else about the case. The way the police handled it was desperately amateurish - and ultimately, a travesty of justice.”
Just as they would later do with the McCanns, the PJ soon hit on a suspect who knew the victim and her family. But according to Port, who attended his trial, it had “no real evidence. It was an unjust trial”.
Robert Murat:
The defendant was Michael Cook, a British expat businessman who had taken part in the search, and in 1992 he was convicted and sentenced to 19 years. Having protested his innocence, he was released in 2002. Last week, he told of his ordeal for the first time.
“This has ruined my life,” he said. “I still carry the scars from the six times I was stabbed in prison; as for the times I had the s*** kicked out of me, I long ago lost count.”
Posted: 20th, April 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,270) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





April 20th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
445
DCB
Did ya see my first post ,today ?
Brits reporters already in Algarve
Big spins to come
April 20th, 2008 at 6:03 pm
461
Maravilha Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 5:44 pm
If the police think it is necessary to make a reconstruction of the night, they have to do it.
Maybe it will be a window of opportunity for the McCanns to get rid of their status of arguidos.
If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.
Besides, Murat can also be cleaned by a judge.
If the McCanns refuse to go back, it will be more then a confession.
They can better go.
——————————————————-
I think that in the long term it will be seen as a bad decision.
It probably looked good to Team McCann at the time, but it is a question of law as to whether they could be required to return to Portugual.
The Courts here are not going to be impressed by articles in the Mail.
That’s OK for a spin campaign, but it won’t work on the people who have the real power to determine the issue.
The Law lords dismissed Ian Norris’ claim that he would not get a fair trial in US almost with contempt.
I can’t see them doing anything different with the McCanns…
April 20th, 2008 at 6:00 pm
477 -
April 20th, 2008 at 6:00 pm
JUST ME!
How can I ever thank you! It’s brilliant! Smudd the Bounty Kitchen Roll Hunter! (Oh no, I’m so delighted I can feel a few cartwheels coming on ….)
April 20th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
471 chenier
Then you mean Stephanie Plum, don’t you!
We should be a on the Anorak Quiz Team!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
472
Just_me Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
—————————————
Wonderful!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
469
wigit Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
I’m sure that you must have read the various reports re the Portugese methods of policing. Let’s arrest the suspects & fit the cime to them.
I shan’t be going near the place ever again!!!
————————————————————-
Somehow I doubt that you have ever been there…
April 20th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
I reckon there are more curly wurly hunters on here than bounty hunters
April 20th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
Gloria Smudd - http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/bountyhuntercopy.jpg
April 20th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
463
Gloria Smudd Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
chenier .. sound of cogs whirring … no, can’t guess this one yet …
Elmer J Fudd is an incompetent hunter but …
—————————–
Much more frivolous; a female bounty hunter with a remarkable ability to blow up cars…
April 20th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
468 sc46
I thought it was you!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
461 maravilha
I’m sure that you must have read the various reports re the Portugese methods of policing. Let’s arrest the suspects & fit the cime to them.
I shan’t be going near the place ever again!!!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Is wavey davey Mr Sheen?
April 20th, 2008 at 5:49 pm
464 wavey davey
Declare yourself!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Han Solo?
April 20th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Bye Ian. Good post.
April 20th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Just a quick thiught - Probably being repeated?
If the apartment was super clean & tidy after “abduction”, would they not have had to purchase cleaning equipment etc?
I guess PJ etc. checked all the local stores etc. and who’s been buying what
Personally I’ve never needed to buy bleach based prods on hols.
Bleach is really the only thing to destroy stuff - Whiter than white!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
chenier .. sound of cogs whirring … no, can’t guess this one yet …
Elmer J Fudd is an incompetent hunter but …
April 20th, 2008 at 5:44 pm
does the poster bountyhunter still post? she wanted to be called bitch some time ago, does any one remember?
which inspired this..
http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj15/just_meme5/bounty.jpg
April 20th, 2008 at 5:44 pm
If the police think it is necessary to make a reconstruction of the night, they have to do it.
Maybe it will be a window of opportunity for the McCanns to get rid of their status of arguidos.
If they are innocent, they have nothing to fear.
Besides, Murat can also be cleaned by a judge.
If the McCanns refuse to go back, it will be more then a confession.
They can better go.
April 20th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
438
Gloria Smudd Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
chenier
Smudd the Bounty Kitchen Roll Hunter …
———————————–
That bad, is it?
Completely off-topic, but one of my favourite fictional characters is a distinctly incompetent bounty hunter…
April 20th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
455 ian
Hi, bye ian
April 20th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
Bye Ian
April 20th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
(should have been Mr Brown Taking The Tube) :blush:
April 20th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
454 sc46
April 20th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Well, thats it from me! Bye all!
April 20th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Does he accept more hip coats instead?
April 20th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
448
can’t say no Says
+++++++++
It seems as if they could have gone back last Sept and got exactly what they want.
April 20th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
off now to release the children from the cistern…
is that a euphemism like ‘letting the otters out for a swim’ or ‘Mr Brown taking Tube’ ?
April 20th, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Only a short stop here today, came for a quick scan of the Anorak extracts from todays papers.
I dont waste my money on a paper - and would encourage anyone who does to consider the benefits of dropping buying something which, after all, is only a set of opinions prejudiced by the need to make money from you and echoing class based opinions. Maybe there was a time when there were real journalists in the world who sought to reveal injustices - if the treatment of this case is anything to go by, they dont exist anymore.
Nowadays we attack out foreign friends with the xenophobic vitriol of a defeated nation, a nation run by fat cats who have no loyalty to what remains of the original people of the country. A nation which buys cheap rubbish from countries which pour pollutants into the atmosphere, whilst preaching that the ordinary folk - the bottom of the pile consumers - should do more to protect the environment (by being made to pay more for their consumption!).
Interesting that the stories today appear to be from people horrified that child neglectors, failed parents whose appalling behaviour seem to have resulted somehow in the loss of a child, should actually be punished for that failure!
Or is this the last attempt by clever lawyers to stir up a position where they can claim the McCanns will not get a fair trial, in a country which is a member of the EC and is bound by EC laws, is a signatory of the ECHR?
Was it not the UK which failed to bring the ECHR into its laws until 1998?
Is it not the UK which clings on to barbaric rights which allow children to be assaulted legally, whilst this is considered unacceptable when the same kind of assaults are meted out against people over 18?!!!
Hypocrisy of the worst kind, state sanctioned violence against those least able to protect themselves our society.
Final thought, as I know the defence of the parents will be ‘have they not suffered enough?’. If in a rage someone were to kill an object of their love, would that person be said to have suffered enough bu the loss of that loved one? Of course not, this is not written in statute and does not exist in case law in England and Wales.
Remember, criminal law carries sanctions which are intended to deter as well as punish and rehabilitate. Is Madeleines loss of her original life, or loss of any life, sufficient suffering for the parents? Sufficient suffering for her, I say, but for her parents? They seem to have been rewarded sufficiently well for their acts, now lets have them seen top recieve real justice.