
Madeleine McCann: The First Robert Murat, McCanns’ Neglect Charge And Old Portugal
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “MCCANNS FACE NEW CHARGE
EXCLUSIVE SCANDAL OF PLAN TO CHARGE MADDIE MUM ‘KEYSTONE COP’ FURY”
A shock new plan to charge Kate McCann over daughter Maddie’s kidnap was last night condemned as “spiteful and shameful”. British legal experts branded bungling Portuguese detectives “Keystone Cops” for considering neglect charges.
But are these comedy cops the only ones who think the McCanns erred?
One lawyer said: “After an inquiry costing millions and unprecedented international help, these Keystone Cops still haven’t got a clue what happened to Madeleine. The investigation was a mess from Day One.”
Says McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
Or why not now?
MAIL ON SUNDAY: “Madeleine special investigation: The damning case against the Portuguese police - and how Kate and Gerry are coping one year on”
At the holiday home where Madeleine was last seen:
The apartment gate was padlocked, but in the little paved front yard, a purple hibiscus and some dusty geraniums were coming into bloom. The Algarve spring is finally coming.”
Such are the facts in this special investigation.
“It’s a new season,” said a British woman who works in a local restaurant. “It’s tragic they haven’t found Maddie. But the time has come to move on.”
Moving on:
Of course, moving on is one thing Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry, cannot do. They remain arguidos, official suspects, - as does Robert Murat, a British expat living in Praia da Luz who has strenuously protested his innocence - still supposedly being investigated on the grounds that they may have caused her death or disappearance.
“Intellectually, they have grasped what has happened,” said Gerry’s elder brother, John. “Emotionally, they have learnt, to an extent, to cope: one’s psychology adapts. But they haven’t really come to terms with it. There are times when they can seem cheerful, but then the devastation bursts through. Madeleine’s disappearance is a cataclysm that is horrendous for them, and horrendous for all of us close to them.”
“It’s an intense, full-on existence for both of them,” said the McCanns’ spokesman, Clarence Mitchell. “Gerry is back at work [as a cardiologist] full-time, but when he gets home the campaign to find Madeleine is like having a second job.”
And what of Portugal, Britain’s oldest ally?
“You have to remember: until 1974 Portugal was a dictatorship,” said a veteran Algarve journalist, who asked not to be named. “That was the climate in which the PJ was created. Their methods were pretty rough.”
Rough?
Brutal treatment of suspects was routine. One expatriate British woman told me how a friend of her mother had been arrested in the late Eighties on suspicion of breaking and entering a house - only to be savagely beaten in custody.
“She was bruised all over her body. Of course, the police said they hadn’t done anything, and were never called to account,” the woman said.
Rough. Very rough:
“This is Heartbeat country,” another expat said.
Heartbeat, Why do you miss when my baby kisses me? Greengrass - take him to the ‘pit’
“People talk to the police, and so often they think they know who’s guilty, but can’t prove it. So they make an arrest and turn up the pressure in the hope of getting a confession.”
Portugal. A place of rare dangers:
Thirty miles east of Praia da Luz lies the resort of Albufeira, where a collection of clifftop villas known as Val Novio was once a thriving development, favoured by British expats. Now largely abandoned, it was there, on November 19, 1990, that Rachel Charles, aged nine, went missing.
Neil McKay, a Bafta-winning TV scriptwriter who has specialised in factual dramas about crime, was on holiday nearby with his father at the time. “We were sitting in a bar having a beer one evening,” he recalled.
“This English guy came in, saying a little girl had disappeared two days earlier but the police were refusing to mount a proper search. He said her family wanted every British tourist or expat to meet on the beach at seven next morning to try to find her.
“So we went. There must have been more than 200 of us. Tragically, it didn’t take long to find her body, hidden among some pines.”
Those Portuguese police:
Len Port, now an Algarve publisher who covered the case for The Portugal News, said: “The police search was highly inefficient, as, frankly, was everything else about the case. The way the police handled it was desperately amateurish - and ultimately, a travesty of justice.”
Just as they would later do with the McCanns, the PJ soon hit on a suspect who knew the victim and her family. But according to Port, who attended his trial, it had “no real evidence. It was an unjust trial”.
Robert Murat:
The defendant was Michael Cook, a British expat businessman who had taken part in the search, and in 1992 he was convicted and sentenced to 19 years. Having protested his innocence, he was released in 2002. Last week, he told of his ordeal for the first time.
“This has ruined my life,” he said. “I still carry the scars from the six times I was stabbed in prison; as for the times I had the s*** kicked out of me, I long ago lost count.”
Posted: 20th, April 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,270) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





April 20th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
605 babyjane
thank god your here
April 20th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
602 saul
Nobody expects one!
April 20th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
April 20th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
601 chenier
You and me both, im still here, thought i was all by myself
April 20th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
595 - Ian
++++++++++++++
‘ … iusnt quie right’
Normally, Admin & Mods frown upon ‘non-english’ text being posted to Opinions. In this case, I have decided to turn a blind eye
April 20th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
597
chenier Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
593
Saul Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Who mentioned the PJ?
—————————
Me.
———-
Lucky I didn’t mention the Spanish Inquisition.
April 20th, 2008 at 8:16 pm
599
wtf Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 8:13 pm
598 ian
godnight ian think everyone is following suit!
——————————-
I’m left to man the barricades, then?
That should probably be:
I’m left to woman the barricades, then?
but it doesn’t look right…
April 20th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
goodnight even
April 20th, 2008 at 8:13 pm
598 ian
godnight ian
think everyone is following suit!
April 20th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Anyway, I refuse to continue to post any further tonight for fear I may make ad hominem statements about ’soothsayer’!
Night night all, may be an interesting news day tomorrow!
April 20th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
593
Saul Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Who mentioned the PJ?
—————————
Me.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1k7U-_tJVmw&feature=related
April 20th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
584
Passing Through
She had someone else to ‘blow out her candle’……..
April 20th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
594
Ian
Sorry link iusnt quie right, but it does take you to the right site.
Out of intrest, I did a site search for the name ‘McCann’.
Incredibly it returned ‘zero hits’!
April 20th, 2008 at 8:07 pm
from http://www.nspcc.org.uk/HelpAndAdvice/W … 36377.html
For the benefit of those hwo believe its just a ‘mistake’ we have apaprently ‘all made’.
‘There is no UK law stating the age at which a child can be left at home alone. However, parents can be prosecuted for wilful neglect if they leave a child alone or unsupervised “in a manner likely to cause unnecessary suffering or injury to health” (Children and Young Persons Act 1933).
Babies should never be left alone, even for a short time. If you notice that a baby or a child under the age of nine has been left on their own, contact the police on 999. They will go to the house to make sure that the child is safe from harm.
Before leaving an older child alone, parents must take into account the child’s age and maturity, their ability to cope in an emergency and how they feel about being left alone. Most children under the age of 13 are not mature enough to cope in an emergency and should not be left alone for more than a short time.
We recommend that children under the age of 16 should not be left alone overnight.’
April 20th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Who mentioned the PJ?
April 20th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
beware of a mod in the guise of the lord of the timeless ones
April 20th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
588
Saul Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
————-
How about unofficial channels?
————————————-
There are none.
It seems unlikely that after the formal pasting the PJ gave to Clarrie over the ‘leak’, someone in the PJ thought it would be nice to drop him some helpful hints?
April 20th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
582
Mods and Admin
Its links sensitive, unfortunately its also emptying itself. If it happens too often stop posting here, (you will ban yourself) and let us know in the forums
——————————————–
And it doesn’t seem to like Amnesty International links…
April 20th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
582
Châtelaine Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
579
JuneJohnson Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Its links sensitive, unfortunately its also emptying itself. If it happens too often stop posting here, (you will ban yourself) and let us know in the forums
***
I thought so too, so carefully avoided including links…
BTW seems to be working more or less now again, otherwise I wouldn’t be visible now
April 20th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
————-
How about unofficial channels?
—-
Fine thanks Chenier
April 20th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
583, chenier
Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge [...]”
———–
Maybe Mr. Mitchell read it on the 3 arguidos. :-))
April 20th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
579
JuneJohnson Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
————————
Thanks, June.
April 20th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Saul: “After the incident, Wikipedia took steps to prevent a recurrence, including barring unregistered users from creating new pages.”
Yes, you’re right. It’s wonderful source of quick info, yet never completely reliable.
How are you today b.t.w.?
April 20th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
You know what is really sad about that picture ? Little Madeleine never got to blow out her own candles.
April 20th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
548
DCB Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 7:26 pm
545
chenier
+++++++++++
Maybe - but there are a lot of items within quotation marks.
———————————————————
But the only ones that matter are these:
Clarence Mitchell: “We haven’t heard through official channels if they are considering this charge. But you’d have to ask yourself, ‘Why now?’”
The People has no source other than Clarence Mitchell.
Who is speculating in the hope of finding something, anything which might spin the McCanns’ not returning to Portugual…
April 20th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
579
JuneJohnson Says:
April 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
***
Ah, could that also be a reason that I ended up in a Spam filter so many times in the past 2-3 days, that I kind of gave up trying to post?
Was wondering if the filter is word-sensitive and, if yes, which words???
Mods and Admin
Its links sensitive, unfortunately its also emptying itself. If it happens too often stop posting here, (you will ban yourself) and let us know in the forums
April 20th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
On the subject of Wikipedia.
The Seigenthaler incident, is an example of how the information seen on the net can be manipulated.
April 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
578 dcb
Oh!
So i can only open an attachment if im prepared to sleep with the sender?
April 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Mods and Admin
Chenier
some of your posts are being spammed, this is NOT our intention. I’ll check from time to time
April 20th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
573
wtf
++++++
Basic computer security - never click on a link from anyone you don’t know or trust, never ever open an attachment to an email unless you go to bed with the sender every night!