
Madeleine McCann: Rachel Oldfield
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
BBC Radio: Rachael Oldfield, who was with Kate and Gerry McCann in Portugal, is on the radio. Says she:
“We were made to understand we could face two years in prison for speaking out, so as a group we’ve not said anything from day one.
But people did talk? And there was a spokesperson?
“And there have been all these rumours flying around and leaks from sources close to the PJ [the Policia Judiciaria - Portuguese police].”
Asked to characterise police actions, she replied: “Well, double standards. They leaked information and these rumours which have flown around for the past year…
“We would have loved to have put the record straight.”
What of Robert Murat?
Separately, a senior figure in Portugal with direct knowledge of the investigation has told a BBC Radio 4 documentary there is only a slim chance of murder or manslaughter charges being filed against Kate and Gerry McCann or Robert Murat, the third arguido.
LEICESTER MERCURY: “‘LIGHT A CANDLE FOR MADDY’”
The Helping to Find Madeleine group, which is affiliated to her parents’ official organisation, has called its campaign Lighting the Way Home.
Member Maxine Harris, of Market Harborough, said: “Just light a candle or leave an outside light on - that is what we would like people to do.
Like for Elijah. Is it energy efficient?
“We are concerned with keeping Madeleine’s profile high and making sure people don’t forget her.”
Today’s other non Madeleine news here
Posted: 24th, April 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, TV & Radio Comments (651) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





April 26th, 2008 at 1:26 am
588
chenier Says:
“that nasty Chenier ”
M&A
Please kindly note these were never my words!
However if Chenier thinks so …who am I to argue..?
April 25th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
638 Delboy
They may perfectly well have had dinner at the Tapas and then gone on to Chaplins for a drink or something like that. People don’t necessarily stay in the same place all evening.
April 25th, 2008 at 11:06 am
646
patch
I feel the same about you [as you should know].
April 25th, 2008 at 10:58 am
Totje
You are most astute. And a very good friend.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:50 am
533
False Flag
Thank you, yes that’s the song.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:38 am
Garth
If the PJ have bent the truth or planted evidence do you think that the British police are aware or complicit in any way? It would be bad policing by our Boys in Blue if either were condoned .
April 25th, 2008 at 10:25 am
#
637
delboy Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Garth…let me turn the question….
So you know they didnt go to chaplins then hey?
————–
Gawd your hard work!
April 25th, 2008 at 10:18 am
Just_me
If you think swapping details on here is bad - I had my full name, address, email address, telephone and mobile number on Facebook (and I forgot to set it to private) - I was plagued with dirty old men to the point I had to move flat, change my phone numbers and change my email address.
I’m an idiot.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:18 am
609 just_me
Very sound advice. Thank you for posting it.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:17 am
Why doesn’t a journalist call Chaplin’s and simply asks the manager if the McCanns were there?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:17 am
629 lyn Says:
” There is still hope perhaps, that Maddy is still alive, but living somewhere else. Could there be a chance she suffered a head injury and was taken to some other people some distance away for care, and possible adoption. ”
There seems to be no evidence for a head injury. Why would she be able to cry if she suffered a serious head injury?
So if we follow the line of enquiry that Mrs. Fenn did it, she must have had accomplices. Is she a catholic?
Wasn’t the solution in the Affleck movie that the child was taken by a “well meaning” person?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:14 am
631,
brandon
Very probably. And if it was that way we have to ask ourselves how “strange” it is for a mother to let her missing (”abducted” or maybe dead) child give her an ALIBI, so to speak.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Garth…let me turn the question….
So you know they didnt go to chaplins then hey?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:12 am
619
SteveT Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 10:02 am
—————
They dont trust the PJ. I honestly believe that they think the PJ might be ‘bending’ some truths. No matter how good a lawyer it wont help you if evidence has been planted. They dont trust them and thats why they wont go back until the status is lifted. And they are quite right imo.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:11 am
lone
Wher are you?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:11 am
NEW THREAD!
April 25th, 2008 at 10:10 am
Hello Pat.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:10 am
#
624
BabyJane Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am
If it’s true that someone from the Mark Warner ressort had to call them at Chaplin’s and tell them to look after their kids … how embarassing is THAT for parents?
———————————————-
I think this is why they had to make the comment about Madeleine asking why they left her
IMO
Police question
“Can you tell us what effect leaving your children had on them the previous night?
Were they upset?”
“How did you comfort them?”
Then she came up with the answer, as turning a negative into a positive and used it to try and show she woke up on the 3rd may and was fine about it!! IMO
April 25th, 2008 at 10:09 am
#
621
delboy Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 10:03 am
Garth……..But GM has stated that they ate every evening at the tapas bar. Twas on Panorama.
Well they aint going to admit they were five miles away at another bar,are they?,make them sound even more neglectful,than they are…+ leave them on the 3rd as well,crazy,
The pj have them on cctv dont they? at chaplins…..
————————-
Delboy
Has it occured to you that maybe the staff at the tapas bar could vouch for their whereabouts of every evening? Do you think GM would make such a statement knowing full well that it could be proved him to be lying? Hardly.
With regard to the cctv footage im afraid it appears to me that just its more of the rubbish that you believe which gives the basis for your formed opinion. Unless you can prove otherwise like to failed to do with your other claim. Hmm?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:08 am
619 Ferdinand
There is still hope perhaps, that Maddy is still alive, but living somewhere else. Could there be a chance she suffered a head injury and was taken to some other people some distance away for care, and possible adoption. If she is not the natural child, this could stand quite reasonably so. Hence the mileage on the hire car.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:07 am
624
BabyJane Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am
If it’s true that someone from the Mark Warner ressort had to call them at Chaplin’s and tell them to look after their kids … how embarassing is THAT for parents?
Especially parents who want us to believe they did checks every twenty to thirty minutes………….
April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am
hi every one
April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am
How does Rachel oldfield ever understand a word the mc canns say
April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am
605,Garth…Has the question ever been put to them because it needs to be before you can pass comment.
That is my argument,why has no one ever questioned them,as this is out in the public arena,that they went further afield,so why as no one questioned it?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:06 am
If it’s true that someone from the Mark Warner ressort had to call them at Chaplin’s and tell them to look after their kids … how embarassing is THAT for parents?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:05 am
609
Just_me
Not asking you to name names, but have you had trouble with someone who posts on here regularly?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:04 am
620 Just me
Must mention that on an ancestry site answered an email…failed to see it was from a seizureman, etc. All was fixed up, but by gum….could have been worse!
April 25th, 2008 at 10:03 am
Garth……..But GM has stated that they ate every evening at the tapas bar. Twas on Panorama.
Well they aint going to admit they were five miles away at another bar,are they?,make them sound even more neglectful,than they are…+ leave them on the 3rd as well,crazy,
The pj have them on cctv dont they? at chaplins…..
April 25th, 2008 at 10:02 am
609 Just-me
Thank you for that Warning … always good to keep such things in mind.
April 25th, 2008 at 10:02 am
Garth,
If they are innocent and can explain any evidence that the PJ may or may not have (Clarrie), what is the problem. They have the best lawyers money can buy and it has got to be better for them to go back voluntarily than wait for EAWs.
On the radio program last night it was stated that they have to decide this week whether they are going to go back to Portugal for thre reconstruction. Do you think the PJ dont have a plan B for when they refuse?
April 25th, 2008 at 10:02 am
609
Just_me Says:
April 25th, 2008 at 9:53 am
WARNING
=====
Good beautiful morning Just Me and everybody.
I totally agree 103% - it happened to me - not good!
Beware bigtime.
I have a mother of all feckin hangovers this morning (first in yrs - :evil ) - must have been dodgy ice…
any good cures?