That Disgusting Photo Of Hannah Montana’s Miley Cyrus
THE Mail’s vicar smacks his lips together and hisses: “The revealing picture of Hannah Montana star Miley Cyrus that forced the 15-year-old to apologise to fans.”
Miley Cyrus, singing teen sensation and 15-year-old star of Disney series Hannah Montana has been photographed by Annie Leibovitz, for Vanity Fair magazine. That’s her in the picture.
Much shock and scandal. The vicar wonders what right-minded soul does not look at the craven picture and imagine Cyrus naked beneath, her chest pushed forward, alabaster breasts touching the…
“My goal in my music and my acting is always to make people happy,” says Miley. (Did no-one tech her it’s rude to interrupt?) “For Vanity Fair I was so honoured and thrilled to work with Annie.
And now: “I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for this to happen and I apologise to my fans, who I care so deeply about.”
“The photo suggests that she is naked but she is not. She is covered by a sheet but beneath the sheet she is clothed. Originally she was in a flesh-coloured tank top but was asked to remove it.”
Mail readers may wonder how long it will be before all teenage girls and young women are aping their idol and going about the place in flesh-coloured tank tops, not to mention tank bottoms and tank knickers.
Says a spokesman for the Disney Channel, which broadcasts Hannah Montana: “Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines.”
Disgusting. And we should all thank the Mail for shining a light on this filth before it got out of hand…
Posted: 28th, April 2008 | In: Celebrities, Tabloids Comments (27) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- agw on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- Bat E Bird on I’m A Celebrity: Samantha Fox Is Shrinking As ‘Lesbian’ Lover Katie Price Quits
- Bat E Bird on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- yampster on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
September 29th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
KK LOL SORRY FOR THE BAD WOPRDS BUT THEY NARK YOU OFF SOS AGAIN I. D .S .T
September 29th, 2008 at 7:13 pm
SHE IS FINE SHE IS NOT SHOWING HER TITS SO WATS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT LEAVE HER ALONE YOU FUCKIN ARSEHOLES GO ON GET TO YOU PLACE ATLEAST SHE DOSENT DRINK HER MAMS MILK STILL OUT OF HER TITS
September 17th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
OMG!!! SHE IS THE WORST THING TO HAPPEN TO THE MUSIC AND ACTING INDUSTRY!!! SHE SHOULD GO BACK TO TENNESSEE AND STAY THERE!!! SHE SUCKS!!!! BBBOOOOOOO MILEY!!! edit
M&A
Artemis
July 23rd, 2008 at 11:26 am
hannah stinky banana is a fugly slut.
May 23rd, 2008 at 11:03 pm
I think it was stupid what she did but she is 15 her life is almost where she can be free and live on her own. She made a mistake, thats okay she apologized didnt she? Give her a break. If i was everyone i would put it behind me! what about you? God gave sinners a second chance and Disney should give MILEY CYRUS A SECOND CHANCE!!! Nobodys perfect! Like her song!
Ps.- Hi Hannah Montana! I see you two as two different people! You rock!
May 14th, 2008 at 1:41 pm
i agree…. but she is beautiful. personally i love her
May 4th, 2008 at 4:47 am
i think that miley is becoming a horrible romodle cuz there r soo many kids that absolutly love her i think its sooo stupid that she would be soo freaki n stupid seriouisly but if she will turn the page pple should let her
May 4th, 2008 at 3:22 am
i think there is nothing wrong with that picture nothing was shown but her back so why does everyone make a big deal out of it ?
May 3rd, 2008 at 2:46 pm
this was kinda bad and se souldent have done that she is only 15 and thats kinda bad but hannah montana i still love u ur ma idle
May 3rd, 2008 at 2:45 pm
I dont even think this picture really came out that bad. It looks like she just woke up. Big deal ? We all have pitcures like that. I still see her beauty in this picture. MILEY DONT LET PEOPLE BREAK YOU.
May 3rd, 2008 at 3:41 am
My name is Tiffanie Marie. I am seventeen years old. I will say from my own personl opinion, this girl is amazing. She has a lot going for her. Everyone should really leave her alone. She is not even naked. I have seen so much worse on the internet. I must say, The photographer sucks. Lol. [=
May 1st, 2008 at 11:29 pm
If Miley Cyrus has pictures of herself taken with a digital camera showing her bra on the internet taken by God knows who, then she should be able to handle taking pictures for Vanity Fair by a professional photographer and accept thats what she has done. She wasn’t worried about thr pictures when they were taken but now has complaints. When she saw that all she had was a sheet that was going to be wrapped around her, she should have said that she wasn’t comfortable and this isn’t what she thought was the artistic vision she was told. Her parents were there. They should have said that they didn’t want their 15 year old daughter photographed in a sheet. So i don’t feel bad for her in the least bit. She has parents; use them. She wasn’t tricked or picked on. She knows that she is a role model and should conduct herself in that matter. Not attack a famed photographer because the pictures were different than what she thought they would be. She had a sheet and should have said wheres my pajamas instead of wrapping up in it. But kids are way too fast these days.
April 30th, 2008 at 1:36 am
Now a days 15 yrear olds wear alot of things that people think are unappropriate. In miley’s case its just one of those honest mistakes. Regardless of how old someone is at least 89% of young teens and Adults have an emberrassing photo. Lets just hope and pray this will be her last one.
April 29th, 2008 at 10:28 am
My work here is done
April 29th, 2008 at 7:10 am
Where are the parents”"” A 15 yr odl with little on posing before cameras for a magazine. For a 15 yr old she is very forward indeed - what a life is ahead of this kid. Look at all the others, what an example they are. Poor kid. Why should she apologize. She is under age for that sort of thing. She is in USA though and hopefully the welfare people will step in ASAP.
April 29th, 2008 at 6:50 am
I think the point is, a teenager was tricked into posing as a tart so a supposed news outlet could flog its wares. Speaking as a parent of two teenage daughters (19 and 17), if they had done something like this to one of mine, the editor of Vomity Fair would be picking his/her nashers out of her shag pile carpet. And as for the salacious newspaper feigning outrage so it can flash the soft porn about on its page - no shock there, really!
April 29th, 2008 at 6:38 am
OMG. IT’S HER BACK. WOW…
Im sure everyone has seen a girl wearing a backless dress/top before…
people should stop fussing just because she’s famous and all…
April 29th, 2008 at 1:27 am
SHE’S HOT
April 28th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
She is 15 - not yet reached the “old fashioned” age of consent. The photograph is deliberately provocative and in my humble opinion - should be illegal. So much talk about child abduction and abuse - and SO little concern about portraying a “child” as a vamp. What happened to childhood? the “learning” years of the teenager? and the eventual reality that we do not live in a kind world. For heavens sake - let our kids be kids - they will be adults, along with everything that goes with it - for long enough
April 28th, 2008 at 11:20 pm
GIVE HER A BREAK SHES ALREADY UNDER ENOUGH PRESSURE
SHE DOESNT NEED ANY MORE BULL SHIT
April 28th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
SHE’S NOT SHOWING A DARN THING LEAVE THE GIRL ALONE , THE MEDIA IS THAT KEEPS TALKING ABOUT IS WHAT WILL DETROY HER IMAGE , SHE A GOOD KID ,
April 28th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Whoever wants to complain about these pics surely has forgot what it is to come into their own adulthood. Everyone wants to look good. Pardon but i see many children these days dressed far worse than what this picture protrays.
No offense, but back off conservative snobs. Let the girl be a girl.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
The only problem is that she’s only 15, which is so clearly underage. She shouldn’t have been asked to do a semi-nude photoshoot in the first place even if it was purely ‘artistic’, it’s inappropriate and exploitive.
April 28th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
LMAO
She’s 15. She should be smart enough to know that the photo’s weren’t going to turn out artistic. She would have seen them after the shoot, before the magazine was published, and she could have protested, but she obviously didn’t. I have no sympathy for her. As far as i’m concered, she’s old enough to make her own decisions. She choose to do the shoot. She knew what the photo’s looked like and she didnt say anything until they had been published. This is just more publicity for her.
April 28th, 2008 at 7:34 pm
What are the parents thinking of?That’s child neglect that is. Social Services should be………………….
Oh bugger…………………..
My brain has burst
April 28th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
she not nude nothing wronge her pic she shows nothing so what all fuss about just ferget them dont even talk to them u done nothing wrong liveu life u r ok bye
April 28th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
She’s 15, why the hell should she apologise? lust like beauty surely is in the eye of the beholder….