
Madeleine McCann: Josef Fritzl, Tabloid Bingo And Watching Kate McCann
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MIRROR (front page): “We’ll find Madeleine ourselves”
It is the McCanns’ “EXTRAORDINARY VOW”.
Any news of Metodo 3, the sleuths who would find Madeleine by last Christmas?
TWINS IN VOW TO FIND SIS - MISSING MADELEINE McCANN: ONE YEAR ON
The McCanns’ three-year-old twins Sean and Amelie have promised their grieving parents they will rescue their missing big sister.
Well, why not let them have a go?
Says Gerry McCann: “Madeleine is everywhere in our lives.” All our lives.
IRISH INDEPENDENT: “’One year on, we’re no closer to finding Maddy’”
Says Kate McCann: “There has been that much speculation in a lot of the media, particularly the written press. It’s taking away people searching for Madeleine.”
Says Kate McCann, and not Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns’ media handler.
POLO SHIRTS (a company selling T-shirts): “T-Shirts can be very valuable tools in helping to find missing children. Think about how many people see you each and every day. If you are wearing a T-shirt with the picture of a missing child on it then all of those people are also seeing the child and, hopefully, watching for her everywhere that they go. In the case of Madeleine McCann, the sale of T-Shirts is also helping to raise money for Madeleine’s fund: Leaving No Stone Unturned.”
Let’s hear it for the T-shirts!
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: “Tragedy Breeds Tourism”
It is a year since Madeleine McCann vanished.
Madeleine McCann and Josef Fritzl? We’ve already had the McCanns and Elisabeth Fritzl. There’s a link? Joan Burnie sees one..
The apartment from which the then three-year-old disappeared has now become a sick tourist attraction, where people take their own kiddies to be photographed where once Madeleine slept.
Next year, can we expect the Austrian Tourist Board to promote tours of the dungeon in which Josef Fritzl incarcerated and abused his daughter?
THE SUN: “Dungeon rescue gives me hope”
Madeleine McCann and Elisabeth Fritzl? A link?
MISSING Madeleine McCann’s mum told yesterday how the astonishing rescue of Austrian dungeon girl Elisabeth Fritzl has given her fresh hope that her daughter is still alive.
Kate, 40, said that hearing how Elisabeth was saved after 24 years imprisonment renewed her belief that little Maddie may also be held captive somewhere.
It’s Tabloid Bingo! Bingo! Bingo!
METRO: “Dungeon fear for Maddy”
THE GUARDIAN: “Fritzl case proves long-term missing can re-emerge, say McCanns”
The couple had taken hope from the case of Elisabeth Fritzl, the Austrian woman whose father locked her in a cellar beneath his house for 24 years, and fathered seven children with her, said Gerry McCann.
DAILY MAIL (front page): “Kate: one year on: A portrait of torment”
Kate McCann is a “GP”.
DAILY TELEGRAPH (front page): “MADELEINE JUST FEELS VERY CLOSE”
Kate McCann:
It’s a sense, really. Madeleine just feels very close. It’s more of a kind of sensation that she’s there. You try to be objective and think, ‘Is that just because I’m her mum and I want to believe it?’ But it hasn’t changed.
Posted: 2nd, May 2008 | In: Josef Fritzl, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (1,111) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





May 2nd, 2008 at 10:07 pm
856
Maria Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:26 pm
‘I’d do absolutely anything, anything, pay anyone, follow up any leads, take any chances, if there was the tiniest, slightest possibility of it bringing me to the truth. But somehow, I don’t think the Mcs are too wise to do anything which could get them into further legal difficulties just now.’
i kind of agree with you here, yes, it makes sense from the viewpoint of a desperate innocent parent. but it can also bee seen as something else as you know, a huge smokescreen, carrying on the lie to it’s logical end. perhaps they really are so desperate that it does not matter about breaking the law.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:06 pm
891
Matt
Poor clarrie?
It whats happen when we paly with fire: it burns
Dont be dulled:he is behind the screen of course…..hence the whole swirling week we had! and more to come although I dont find it specially amuzing at all
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:06 pm
868…sam
In the link I posted earlier.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:06 pm
Whoops,
Just I see that your posts sound sincere and thinking, and maybe when the full scale of shamelessness of their behaviour unfolds, you will see where anti-s are coming from.
Just nice to read, and I will be looking forward to your posts - wanted you to know that.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Body language …… Re. above picture of Dr. Kate, hand on throat, suggest the person is
not being honest or is hiding the something!!!!!!!
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:04 pm
887
Matt
Sic transit gloria mundi
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:04 pm
875 jo Says:
” Why lawyers and backers have made sure to have the backing of british authorities?why are those 2 so important to some?they ARE arguidos.I agree they tend to forget this samll detail but arguidos they are and for a little bit longer”
Maybe them being declared arguida and arguido has made part of the public suspicious. But the arguido state has since expired in the public opinion, no extension admissible. “If they are guilty, they would have long been charged.” seems to be the prevailing public opinion now.
” Golves off,cuffs on then ?
”
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Do you think they will dare build a shrine?
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:03 pm
879…jo
Poor Clarrie….whatever he said….he looked completely stunned by
the PJ response to his allegation.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:02 pm
884-not ingenious then? Oh i am much misunderstood.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:01 pm
883…sam
Ian….ex-poster here…did write a good post about that situation.
But I’ve forgotton the exact content now.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:00 pm
sam,
I wish you will prove right.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:00 pm
866…Maria
“”Too wise”" ???
But aren’t they naive ?
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:59 pm
whoops,
It is so nice to read your posts today.
Seriously.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:59 pm
850
Matt. Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:22 pm
‘842…sam
I think the change re the UK Law….was to encourage interviewees
to co-operate, regarding questioning, more fully.’
perhaps, i really don’t know.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:57 pm
847
Uta Hagen Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:21 pm
840 — Jo:
“…a deal is on the way?”
I hope the PJ will not offer the McCanns a deal without insisting that the McCanns first admit there was no abduction. I cannot imagine the PJ at this point being willing to perpetuate this charade in any way. Likewise, the McCanns will never admit there was NOT an abduction. My prediction is that the PJ will charge manslaughter, etc.; the McCanns’s lawyers will fight their extradition; the McCanns will be tried in abstentia. At this point, I don’t even care if the McCanns manage to avoid jail time, so long as the PJ OFFICIALLY call them liars for claiming Madeleine was abducted.
i think they lied, i think maddie died in the early evening of the 3rd of may in praia da luz.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:57 pm
877…sam
A very valid point that.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:56 pm
873…Maria
Dr G P can be very headstrong….not one who takes other’s advice
easily.
A bit impulsive too I’d say.
Time will tell….as always.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:56 pm
878
Matt
Did Clarrie mean : “gloves off to make place for hand cuffs”? may be it was censured?
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:55 pm
http://www.newsweek.com/id/135145/page/2
Very interesting Newsweek article.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:55 pm
846
Matt. Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:20 pm
‘842…sam
Taking the “Right” not to answer serious questions…is avoiding answering
serious question…in my book. :)’
seeing as it was about their missing child then i dont’ understand the refusing of answering questions at all really.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:54 pm
872…Ferdinand
Hmmmm…backing of the British Authorities….ominous stuff that.
Mitchell did say that the gloves were off….accused the PJ of the
“Crying” leak….got smacked hard for that by the PJ….and whimpered
“I don’t want to get into a fight”.
Lawyer’s advice ?? I would say that they have had some pretty poor
advice myself.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:53 pm
874
Ferdinand Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 pm
791 Matt. Says:
” For an Arguido to even attempt to get them to confide is highly
suspicious….at the very least. ”
They are not calling as arguidos. They are calling as parents.
As I said, I’d expect that the lawyers and backers have made sure that they have the backing of the british authorities.
Mitchell said the gloves are off.
***********
Why lawyers and backers have made sure to have the backing of british authorities?why are those 2 so important to some?they ARE arguidos.I agree they tend to forget this samll detail but arguidos they are and for a little bit longer
Golves off,cuffs on then ?
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 pm
869…Maria
Indeed…..nothing wrong with being prolific.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:47 pm
Matt
May stand corrected myself! Have only just started reading some of the reports now about the “hotline”. Have just read report in Scotsman.
Not sure yet exactly what it is but it does look as if it may be more than I thought. Will carry on reading as many reports as I can find now and maybe come back later. I haven’t even seen the interviews, only the documentary.
Still think, whatever it is, that they’ll have taken advice. Do you?
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:44 pm
791 Matt. Says:
” For an Arguido to even attempt to get them to confide is highly
suspicious….at the very least. ”
They are not calling as arguidos. They are calling as parents.
As I said, I’d expect that the lawyers and backers have made sure that they have the backing of the british authorities.
Mitchell said the gloves are off.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:43 pm
839
Matt. Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:15 pm
‘836…sam
The earlier appeal, months ago, for possible witnesses was quoted
in Dr G P’s blog.’
i haven’t really read his blog much, bit of a turn off, found i was just looking all the time for funny wordings so stopped reading his blog after a couple of entries as i found everything i read on it rantable.
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:43 pm
868
Maria Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:39 pm
….or if they’ve made a terrible mistake.
*******
I think I agree with you for once: yes,a mistake,an other one and a big one.With a taint of spin,special edition for despesparate people
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 pm
862 Matt
Thank you!
So are you Matt…prolific poster! Takes one to know one!
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 pm
838
Matt. Says:
May 2nd, 2008 at 9:13 pm
‘836…sam
Someone seemingly rang the Anon Facility….and was asked for
personal details. :shock:’
you mean someone phoned that number ? how do you know that ? have you tried it yet ? i was going to but himself is watching telly plus i can’t locate the number easily.