Find Madeleine McCann On Facebook
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SAY the McCanns: “We strongly support and encourage this new initiative to use Facebook to increase awareness of missing children.”
Wherever you are, whatever you are doing, you will know that children go missing.
Although not if you’re watching the TV news of reading the newspapers because Madeleine McCann is no longer in the mass media.
But the campaign has not been in vain. She is on a press release.
And the better news is that no children have gone missing in the past few weeks. We look through the mainstream press every day. It’s a fact. But what of life on the internet?
The statement goes on: “Using the power of social media in this way will undoubtedly capture the attention - and hopefully the help - of a younger population who are a hugely valuable and resourceful group.
“We would urge the millions of Facebook users around the world to keep looking and to do what they can to help bring these children home.”
Missing People has set up a widget for Facebook users to download, which will mean information on current appeals will be displayed on their homepage.
Says missing People Chief Executive Paul Tuohy: “If every Facebook user downloaded our BT-powered application, millions of people internationally could see an appeal that could help us to reunite a family.”
Because BT cares…
Madeleine McCann: Fighting the PR war
Posted: 25th, May 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Online-PR Comments (1,240) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- agw on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- Bat E Bird on I’m A Celebrity: Samantha Fox Is Shrinking As ‘Lesbian’ Lover Katie Price Quits
- Bat E Bird on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- yampster on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
May 25th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Ciara,
It may be that pikey was a victim of your bullying and rudeness when you thought you and RR ruled Anorak.
Your behaviour was really offensive, all sex-talk and showing off.
But if anyone objected, you were both incredibly nasty and contemptuous.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Interesting, Garth does not want to answer my question.
McCanns yes, Mccanns no to Algarve?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
539
Saul Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
Looks like it’s chucking out time at The Nag’s Head again.
————————-
Not again; anything but that!
Well, not quite anything, but in the ballpark of anything…
May 25th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Who couldn’t wait to distance himself and his Church from them…..
May 25th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
Garth, are you the abductor?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
497
Garth Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
‘A burgler will find the easiest way to get into a property. Once in he will escape with his rewards out the safest way without getting caught………. which in most cases wouldnt be back out the front door.’
it would be out of the window next to the front door ?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
538…gillyflower
Just poor lost souls…needing a Pope’s blessing.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
541 Garth
Thanks!
A fellow Pythonite.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
537
jass Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
Just a reminder about what the old lying shyster said:
———–
You sure you dont mean shister?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Who else is coming out of the woodwork?
Must be the bad weather. They’ve all appeared……
Poor Madeleine. A bunch of trols to defend her.
Justice for Madeleine I say.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Maravilha:
Yes of course there was no abductor.
But Garth’s raison d’etre is to spend hours saying there was an abductor, and to rubbish everyone else.
He is either paid for this, in training for Prime Minister-ship, or not quite all there.
Anyhoo,
I feel someone has to try to press the little liar against a wall to try to get to the truth.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
529
pikey
You really do not know how to conduct yourself and are as transparent as cling film! I hope you are exposed for the nasty, rude person you are. I’m sure it won’t take long for posters to realise.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
492
Garth Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
‘I’ve said this before but i think it is apparent the way Tanner claimed she saw this person carrying the child. Her head was to the left shoulder. This to me suggest only two things as we know that Madeleines was in the bed against the bottom wall nearesgt the door. The abductor either picked her up and carried her to the bed below the window, clambered out and picked her up again and scuttled off. Or she was passed to someone else through the window. In both cases the child would end up with her head to the left should of the abductor.’
assuming she was lying with her head towards the headboard, someone picking her out of the bed would have her head on their right arm, carry her over to the other bed (all in darkness of course and past two cots) and lay her down, she would have her head to the foot of that bed, he or she would then clamber over her and out the window to pick her up and then he would have her on his left side, yes. were he to pass the child out through the window to someone else they too would have her on their left, true too. but why do that instead of going out the door, the entrance of which is shielded from view, that bit doesn’t make sense. and why didn’t maddie wake through all of that one wonders. she would’ve had to have been sedated then do you think ?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
#
533
gillyflower Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
527 Matt
Your clues are A1!
I thought that it was rather a large permanent stone they’d crawled under.
Who else is going to appear from the undergrowth?
A shrubbery, with a white picket fence and the Knights who say Nee?
———–
Its Ni
May 25th, 2008 at 11:40 pm
Garth, are the McCanns going to Algarve?
your opinion?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
Looks like it’s chucking out time at The Nag’s Head again.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
530 Matt
Shouldn’t they be home from Playgroup and in bed?
Or are they out on broomsticks and past their bedtimes?
No parental controls on their computers obviously.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
Just a reminder about what the old lying shyster said:
384
Garth Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 10:21 pm
#
377
jass Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Garth!
So, in through the front door, out by the window.
But how did the abductor get in through the front door? Apparently it had a tricky and elaborate key system.
And why did the abductor not go out the same way, having mastered the lock?
—————–
Who said in through the front door?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
pickey
shows its true colours, thug/thugette
part of the hyena pack, time for them to come out cackle. cackle
May 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
I like mooses.
Thank you for the compliment.
Moron
May 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
why making problems with Garth and doors?
There was no abductor.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
527 Matt
Your clues are A1!
I thought that it was rather a large permanent stone they’d crawled under.
Who else is going to appear from the undergrowth?
A shrubbery, with a white picket fence and the Knights who say Nee?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
515
bountyhunter
There’s always one bounty. Thanks. x
May 25th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
#
526
Maravilha Says:
May 25th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
I’m not Garth but I always thought it was said the abductor went through the patio doors.
———–
Well it would make sense in this case………. lets just say that Maravilha.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:36 pm
528…gillyflower
Branch Meeting has just finished.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
522 Garth
Only if you play nicely.
And put your toys away now youve finished with them
Thats a good boy.
Mummy’ll tuck you up nice and tight.
And I’ll lock the doors when I go to the pub.
It’s only a mile away
You’ll be quite safe.
———————-
Where the hell have all the old evil rude posters come from?
May 25th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
521…gillyflower
The term….”don’t tell them your name Pike”…is a clue.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
I’m not Garth but I always thought it was said the abductor went through the patio doors.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
Jass
The only was confused is you me ol cock.
May 25th, 2008 at 11:32 pm
Garth:
You are a lying fool.
You have tried to use this front door/back door thing before to confuse the situation.
The front door and windows are at the “front” of the apartment, leading to a car park and road.
The patio doors, unlocked, are up a few steps from a path that leads eventually to the Tapas Bar.
You have said the abductor came in the patio doors and out of the window, shutters or no shutters.
This is because you can’t explain how a strange abductor would have had the keys needed for the elaborate lock on the front door. Or out through the patio doors.
NOTHING you say makes sense.
But you are happy to lie and obfuscate forever.