
Find Madeleine McCann On Facebook
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SAY the McCanns: “We strongly support and encourage this new initiative to use Facebook to increase awareness of missing children.”
Wherever you are, whatever you are doing, you will know that children go missing.
Although not if you’re watching the TV news of reading the newspapers because Madeleine McCann is no longer in the mass media.
But the campaign has not been in vain. She is on a press release.
And the better news is that no children have gone missing in the past few weeks. We look through the mainstream press every day. It’s a fact. But what of life on the internet?
The statement goes on: “Using the power of social media in this way will undoubtedly capture the attention - and hopefully the help - of a younger population who are a hugely valuable and resourceful group.
“We would urge the millions of Facebook users around the world to keep looking and to do what they can to help bring these children home.”
Missing People has set up a widget for Facebook users to download, which will mean information on current appeals will be displayed on their homepage.
Says missing People Chief Executive Paul Tuohy: “If every Facebook user downloaded our BT-powered application, millions of people internationally could see an appeal that could help us to reunite a family.”
Because BT cares…
Madeleine McCann: Fighting the PR war
Posted: 25th, May 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Online-PR Comments (1,240) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





May 26th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
garth, were posting here long after you ever started with you dribble. most left cause of your inane boring repetative posts, sorry to bring it too you but you bring nothing to the table
May 26th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
999
bulldump Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
ohhhh!!! multiple post, not sure how that happened
———————————
Might it possibly have something to do with the much coveted 1000 award?
May 26th, 2008 at 7:30 pm
What if the McCanns are innocent, that would be far from funny.
May 26th, 2008 at 7:30 pm
#
1008
Julie Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:27 pm
You said OPPOSITE Garthy!
(Unlike you to make such an error!)
———–
Yeah but seriously Julie anyone with a bit of common
would understand that theirs no apartments opposite the patio doors. They’d be in the bleedin swimming pool wouldnt they?
May 26th, 2008 at 7:29 pm
004
bulldump Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
garth, i would have to post 3 times a minute every hour of the day for at least 3 months to catch up to the same repetative dribble you spout
————-
Well come on then matey. You’ve made the claim so give an example? And let me just say…… if you dont like it then feck off. Simple really…………
May 26th, 2008 at 7:27 pm
You said OPPOSITE Garthy!
(Unlike you to make such an error!)
May 26th, 2008 at 7:25 pm
#
1002
Julie Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Garthy, what’s funny about that is you made a slight error! (But I know you’re going to wiggle your way out of it)
————
What like ‘opposite’ instead of adjacent? …………. and thats hilarious?
May 26th, 2008 at 7:25 pm
Thanks Jo - all of you for advice,

I shall be the sweetest smelling gal in town if nothing else
Mozzies watch out
………
came across this piece, i know its fairly old, but still worth another read,
“The Mystery of Madeleine McCann ”
BBC 21st November 2007.
It’s a long piece and wont let me copy paste, perhaps someone else can.
“”KATE McCANN
Speaking in August
They’ve been watching us over a matter of days, I’m sure, you know, they know.. you know, they must have known that Gerry had just been into the apartment and then…. you’re right, there was only a small window of opportunity but.. you know”"”
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
976
Garth Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
#
974
whoops Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 6:57 pm
chenier-it seems you know everything about everything-and also have the final word if someone doesn’t agree with you. You’ve won-well done.
————–
I think Chenier argues for arguments sake.
—————————————–
As opposed to Garth, who only argues because he is chained to the keyboard…
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
garth, i would have to post 3 times a minute every hour of the day for at least 3 months to catch up to the same repetative dribble you spout
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
976-Garth-Ah, I see. Some people, yourself included, manage to argue with everything and be humorous and entertaining as well.
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Garthy, what’s funny about that is you made a slight error! (But I know you’re going to wiggle your way out of it)
May 26th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
You’re looking in the wrong place………….. try between your ears!
May 26th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
988
AgendaWide Says:
It’s just I find Maria’s comments harshly anti-McCann at times
All that relief at the propect of them being found guilty:)
maria anti maccann ? i thought i was more that than maria so i don’t understand how you come to that view, she seems to be far more understanding and forgiving than i think i am.
May 26th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
ohhhh!!! multiple post, not sure how that happened
May 26th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
a third time if you like?
May 26th, 2008 at 7:22 pm
P.S. just for the people that keep a diary of my wellbeing and antics, i was joking, i have never had a fungal infection
May 26th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
i have clean toes now the fungal infection has departed
May 26th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
#
989
Julie Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
· 880
PeterMac Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
492 Garth
EDIT
“We do know that the patio doors were unlocked. This may well have been apparent to the abductor/s had they observed the apartment from the ones opposite. ”
———————–
Garth, I don’t normally reply to your posts, but this is a very simple factual error.
There are no apartments ‘opposite’ the patio doors. That is in fact the whole basis for the McCs defence that they were not negligent. They said they could see the patio doors from the Tapas bar, although in fact it has been repeatedly shown that they couldn’t.
There are eventually apartments ‘opposite’ the front door and Madeleine’s bedroom window, but they are across the car park and some bushes and a wall and a road and a pavement and another wall and a garden.
If you are trying to support the McCs you should not start chopping into their only line of defence.
================================
PeterMac - you are a MASTER! If you had clean toes, I’d kiss them
Garthy, sorry that I’m laughing at your expense … but I still like you
—————-
But Jues…………… whats funny?
May 26th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
Bulldump … you’re such a treat - just love the link
May 26th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
987 whoops
So you will see I took her comments as representative of her personal opinion
bye now
May 26th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
#
986
bulldump Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
i have been busy with but I have monitored garth’s ( lower case, since doen’t qualify as proper noun) dribble for sometime now
————
Dribble? What do you think i am………… a bleedin baby?
May 26th, 2008 at 7:18 pm
hello julie
May 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
· 880
PeterMac Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
492 Garth
EDIT
“We do know that the patio doors were unlocked. This may well have been apparent to the abductor/s had they observed the apartment from the ones opposite. ”
———————–
Garth, I don’t normally reply to your posts, but this is a very simple factual error.
There are no apartments ‘opposite’ the patio doors. That is in fact the whole basis for the McCs defence that they were not negligent. They said they could see the patio doors from the Tapas bar, although in fact it has been repeatedly shown that they couldn’t.
There are eventually apartments ‘opposite’ the front door and Madeleine’s bedroom window, but they are across the car park and some bushes and a wall and a road and a pavement and another wall and a garden.
If you are trying to support the McCs you should not start chopping into their only line of defence.
================================
PeterMac - you are a MASTER! If you had clean toes, I’d kiss them
Garthy, sorry that I’m laughing at your expense … but I still like you
May 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
984 sam
:) XXX
It’s just I find Maria’s comments harshly anti-McCann at times
All that relief at the propect of them being found guilty:)
May 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
978-I think she writes truthfully and eloquently. I don’t think she has a side. But then again I’m just a simple soul.
May 26th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
i have been busy with but I have monitored garth’s ( lower case, since doen’t qualify as proper noun) dribble for sometime now
May 26th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
#
981
bulldump Says:
May 26th, 2008 at 7:13 pm
GARTH, IF YOU TEXT ME ONE MORE TIME TO SAY YOU HAVE HAD INTIMATE MOMENTS WITH GERRRY MACCANN AND BARAK OBAMA 1 MORE TIME I’LL CALL THE F.B.I AND MOSAD AND OPRAH WINFREY
————
Hilarious. Go and have a lie down.
May 26th, 2008 at 7:15 pm
978
AgendaWide Says:
sorry agw, it’s a bit different to usenet, but yes, perhaps i can next time prefix the quotes or something.
May 26th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
BULLDUMP!!!! I’m just sooo happy to see you! Where’ve you been