Madeleine McCann: No Portugal Return, Maddy TV And Paris Hilton
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
It’s the Mirror’s “MADELEINE EXCLUSIVE”. The news is – as Anorak reported last night – that the Tapas Seven (surely the Sangria 7? –Ed) will not be returning to Portugal to take part in a reconstruction of the night Madeleine went missing.
A source says: “They were asked informally to return, then asked again in an official letter last week. After some consideration they decided not to go back. They were concerned it would not be televised, and were bemused as to why it was happening so long after Madeleine disappeared.”
And who would play Madeleine? Her? Her? What about “Look Into My Eyes”, a TV talent show search for a Madeleine fronted by Trevor McDonald and GMTV?
Remember Kelsey: “Mummy, I could play Madeleine. I look just like her’”?
THE SUN: “No re-run for Maddie cops”
What does Lorraine Kelly think? It was she who said:
How could someone put their infant child forward as a Madeleine lookalike with the idea of making money? The child obviously has to be around the same age as Madeleine.
Is a Madeleine needed? After all, she is missing…
Unless it was to specifically aid the campaign, how could they all live with themselves for making money out of the tragic disappearance of a little girl?
It makes you recoil to think a lookalike agency would have a Madeleine on their books alongside someone who looks like Jack Nicholson or Paris Hilton.
Disgusting! To think that Maddy should be with the likes of Jack the lads or Hilton makes our flesh turn cold. It’s nothing less than sick.
DAILY MAIL: “Madeleine reconstruction scrapped after ’suspicious’ McCanns refuse to return to Portugal to take part”
The Mail has the details: The McCanns are “both doctors.”
Says a Source: “They also question why it was not to be televised and why police just want the nine and not other holidaymakers and staff to take part.”
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: Says Clarence Mitchell:
“The friends had a number of serious questions about the value of the reconstruction and what it would do to help find Madeleine. After some discussion, they have informed the Portuguese authorities they do not intend to go back.
“Gerry and Kate have not refused to go back. They were aware of their friends’ view and they are now not needed for the reconstruction. There were a number of serious questions. For instance, why did they want to hold a reconstruction more than a year after the event?
“Why was the reconstruction not to be televised? That would have generated new leads and information but if it is not televised, how on earth is that going to help find Madeleine? Why did they only want the nine people back? Why didn’t they ask all the other holidaymakers back?
“Frankly, the police and the authorities in Portugal did not answer the simple question: what will this do to help find Madeleine?”
Do the police have to televise their police work to make it valid?
Madeleine McCann TV: are you sitting comfortably?
Posted: 28th, May 2008 | In: Celebrities, Madeleine McCann, Paris Hilton, Tabloids Comments (500) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Evie Walton on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- yampster on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- yampster on Join The Campaign For Straight Gay Marriages
May 28th, 2008 at 10:32 am
90
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
87
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
————-
I’ll say it again Chenier just for you………… the PJ have the problem.
The McCanns know what happened they just dont know by whom. And theirs no way on this earth that the PJ could help them out with that.
———————————————-
The McCanns claim that Madeleine was kidnapped to order by a professional gang.
Indeed, they tell anyone who will listen that they ‘know’ this.
The problem is that the people who give their lives to countering the traffic in children do not think that such a gang exists.
Child trafficing is a business like any other business; it’s about making as big a profit as possible with the minimum amout of expenditure and the minimum amount of notice paid to it by police forces around the world.
And you don’t run a successful business by breaking every rule on how to run a successful business…
May 28th, 2008 at 10:31 am
You mean this ? official court statement.
406
Rasputin Says:
May 27th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
This is the interesting bit.
Agree, on a conference in the Criminal Section of the Court of Appeal of Evora
1. In the investigation file No. /, pending Ministry of Public Services in the District of… where investigates the disappearance of MM and the possible occurrence of crimes of kidnapping, murder, exposure or abandonment of minor and concealment of corpse , The Portuguese. Mr Public Prosecutor holder of the process of investigation, invoked under the provisions of art. 15. Article 2 of Law No. 88/89 of September 11, 187. Article 1, alin. a) and 4, alin. a) and b), 252. º-A and 269. thereof No. 1, alin. e) of the CPP.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:29 am
……… is a re-enactment to prove to the McCanns that it was impossible and hence the invitation?
Its not the McCanns they have to prove it to is it?
M and A
You aremissing the point, the McC have to prove things, no one else, everyone else can walk away their families complete…..
May 28th, 2008 at 10:29 am
103…Maravilha
I think it’s called…sorting the wheat from the chaff.
Now I think the PJ are, as I am, awaiting a non-event to occur.
That will be very telling.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:27 am
#
99
jo Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:23 am
Garth/Rasputin
cant you see the PJ WANTED the reconstruction to fail? think about it…..byeeeee
————-
Do you mean the PJ wanted to prove the movements were impossible? Why do they need a re-enactment to do that?
M and A
To convince the Tapas 7,8,9,10.
Garth don’t get too carried away, remember its the McC’s whose child is missing, not the PJ’s, so its a bit of a McC own goal donchya think?
May 28th, 2008 at 10:27 am
98…Garth
You may think that.
Free speech and all that.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:26 am
Jo, yes, the PJ wanted the reconstruction to fail.
They knew this would happen!
May 28th, 2008 at 10:25 am
97
PeterMac Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:21 am
————-
So what do you think the PJ’s next step will be?
May 28th, 2008 at 10:25 am
Please read todays’s Joana Morais.
They are preparing to start a process against the Mccanns.
About the 4 not going witnesses.
They want to get rid of the story.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:23 am
Mods and Admin
It was Rasputin who posted what I was referring to. (Sorry Rasputin!)
Post 406 in last thread but one.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:23 am
Garth/Rasputin
cant you see the PJ WANTED the reconstruction to fail? think about it…..byeeeee
May 28th, 2008 at 10:22 am
#
96
Matt. Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:20 am
88…Garth
No….I am actually quite honest…and apply it to any of my considerations.
And…as I have already informed you, I am quite impervious to your
immature insults.
———–
Me thinks someone likes to dish it out but cant take it himself?
May 28th, 2008 at 10:21 am
78 Garth
“I think to summarise your post…
A year on is too late to serve any purpose other than to convince the PJ of the movements of that night.
They have the problem. They need to sort it out.”
I think so. The PJ probably have all the circumstantial evidence they need to show that the whole story is an elaborate fabrication, and were hoping that the re-construction would provide the definitive proof. The problem may be that although the police are probably convinced, the judiciary may need something totally overwhelming, as they cannot politically risk an aquittal.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:20 am
88…Garth
No….I am actually quite honest…and apply it to any of my considerations.
And…as I have already informed you, I am quite impervious to your
immature insults.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:20 am
Bye
Have a good day all
Gone to work
May 28th, 2008 at 10:18 am
93
Rasputin
May 28th, 2008 at 10:17 am
92
Matt
aw…… what a good boy he is
might be too late for this now
May 28th, 2008 at 10:17 am
If the PJ are watching jo, I will need to be anything but careful.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
84…AgendaWide
Maybe Clarence is vainly trying to keep up Team spirits.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
87
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
————-
I’ll say it again Chenier just for you………… the PJ have the problem.
The McCanns know what happened they just dont know by whom. And theirs no way on this earth that the PJ could help them out with that.
M and A
So if the McC’s know what happened they must have been there….otherwise they are just guessing
May 28th, 2008 at 10:15 am
83
Rasputin
4
4 years old……
would have been 4
will never be 4
will never be more than 3
ironise,help yourself
but BE careful though…. PJ IS watching
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
83
Matt. Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:11 am
———–
Tis no problem Matt.
It just proves your full of wind.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
78
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:05 am
63
PeterMac Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 9:51 am
—————-
I think to summarise you post…
A year on is too late to serve any purpose other than to convince the PJ of the movements of that night.
They have the problem. They need to sort it out.
———————————————-
No.
Madeleine had a dreadful problem, caused by her parents apparent selfishness and inability to consider anything beyond their own wishes.
It seems that more than a year later Madeleine’s parents are still incapable of considering anything beyond what they want.
Presumably they never went to the seminars on team building…
May 28th, 2008 at 10:13 am
No one really came back to me the other day about who took the Anglican services in PDL before Haynes Hubbard, but hey the Algarve seems to be awash with clergymen so it’s probably like looking for a needle in a haystack.
This is interesting, though, it appears Rev Hubbard was no stranger to PDL when he arrived on an unspecified date in May 2007, also the article throws out another name, David Kirby.
http://www.stvincentsalgarve.org/news.htm
May 28th, 2008 at 10:12 am
#
69
Rasputin Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 9:58 am
What’s to believe jo, so far it is obviously true, no phone records no DNA no blue bag no towel no anything, except bluff, they have cried wolf once to often have the PJ. And no charges or arrests anywhere in sight this century.
—————
The biggest problem the PJ have are unfortunatley themselves.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:12 am
49 Matt
From 4 unwilling to 7 unwilling
———————————
Sky news mention 4
Sky’s Martin Brunt said: “It has been reported in Portugal that the attorney general’s office has announced that the reconstruction, which was planned for Thursday and Friday this week, is not going to go ahead now.
“The reason given is that four of the Tapas Seven, for one reason or another, are not able to be there.”
May 28th, 2008 at 10:11 am
70…Garth
Sorry Garth.
Even for you, I shan’t sucumb to a personal “Theory”.
As you seem to be at pains to be the Champion “Mocker” here…I shall not
intrude upon your achieving your self-cherished Crown.
I do respond in kind to your “mockery” though…otherwise I am very
polite in my attempts to debunk “Theories”.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:11 am
jo, shall I send you some irony,not an electric one, they are dangerous for 5 year olds.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:10 am
#
80
jo Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:08 am
79
Garth
yep!
I agree: the mccanns have a BIG problem
A child is missing
————–
Were talking about the Pj jo
Your sarcasm failed miserably.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:08 am
79
Garth
yep!
I agree: the mccanns have a BIG problem
A child is missing