Madeleine McCann: No Portugal Return, Maddy TV And Paris Hilton
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
It’s the Mirror’s “MADELEINE EXCLUSIVE”. The news is – as Anorak reported last night – that the Tapas Seven (surely the Sangria 7? –Ed) will not be returning to Portugal to take part in a reconstruction of the night Madeleine went missing.
A source says: “They were asked informally to return, then asked again in an official letter last week. After some consideration they decided not to go back. They were concerned it would not be televised, and were bemused as to why it was happening so long after Madeleine disappeared.”
And who would play Madeleine? Her? Her? What about “Look Into My Eyes”, a TV talent show search for a Madeleine fronted by Trevor McDonald and GMTV?
Remember Kelsey: “Mummy, I could play Madeleine. I look just like her’”?
THE SUN: “No re-run for Maddie cops”
What does Lorraine Kelly think? It was she who said:
How could someone put their infant child forward as a Madeleine lookalike with the idea of making money? The child obviously has to be around the same age as Madeleine.
Is a Madeleine needed? After all, she is missing…
Unless it was to specifically aid the campaign, how could they all live with themselves for making money out of the tragic disappearance of a little girl?
It makes you recoil to think a lookalike agency would have a Madeleine on their books alongside someone who looks like Jack Nicholson or Paris Hilton.
Disgusting! To think that Maddy should be with the likes of Jack the lads or Hilton makes our flesh turn cold. It’s nothing less than sick.
DAILY MAIL: “Madeleine reconstruction scrapped after ’suspicious’ McCanns refuse to return to Portugal to take part”
The Mail has the details: The McCanns are “both doctors.”
Says a Source: “They also question why it was not to be televised and why police just want the nine and not other holidaymakers and staff to take part.”
GLASGOW DAILY RECORD: Says Clarence Mitchell:
“The friends had a number of serious questions about the value of the reconstruction and what it would do to help find Madeleine. After some discussion, they have informed the Portuguese authorities they do not intend to go back.
“Gerry and Kate have not refused to go back. They were aware of their friends’ view and they are now not needed for the reconstruction. There were a number of serious questions. For instance, why did they want to hold a reconstruction more than a year after the event?
“Why was the reconstruction not to be televised? That would have generated new leads and information but if it is not televised, how on earth is that going to help find Madeleine? Why did they only want the nine people back? Why didn’t they ask all the other holidaymakers back?
“Frankly, the police and the authorities in Portugal did not answer the simple question: what will this do to help find Madeleine?”
Do the police have to televise their police work to make it valid?
Madeleine McCann TV: are you sitting comfortably?
Posted: 28th, May 2008 | In: Celebrities, Madeleine McCann, Paris Hilton, Tabloids Comments (500) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- susan jones on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- The Real Stig on The Great Cathay Pacific Blocked Toilet Mystery
- SoDak-GhostDog on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Katie Norman on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
May 28th, 2008 at 11:29 am
#
135
sam Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:25 am
129
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:16 am
‘C ?’
(i)that’s a consonant.(/i)
Oh yeah fanks!
(i)what’s this about me talking to you re dna in the car ? must’ve been some time ago as i don’t remember.(/i)
You’re right, nor me!
(i) or it was someone else. (/i)
Possibly
(i)but it is a mystery how it got there. do you have any ideas of how it got there ? one thing that is important in the dogs’ ‘evidence’ is how thy are trained, if they’re trained on artificial scents then it’s possible that they mistook a scent. on the other hand they seem to be making great progress in unearthing remains, bits of bones and teeth in jersey, where i think both dogs were used too. so it’s quite a mystery how the scent got there even if the dna results are inconclusive.(/i)
Yeah……. [dr-edit]
May 28th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Garth
CNN news 8th May
“The chances of Madeleine being found are at least as good if not better than in those first few days,” Kate McCann said. “We know she’s been abducted by a man. Other than that WE JUST DON’T KNOW ANYTHING (my capitals). There’s a whole range of scenarios in which she could still be alive.”
Of course they only “know” that based on the assumption that
(a) JT is telling the truth
(b) JT was not mistaken
(c) The child being carried was, in fact, Madeleine
What they say here might be either a lie or wishful thinking. On the other hand, IF they are innocent, it’s natural, perhaps, never to give up hope. I know they’ve certainly mentioned paedophile gangs but I’m sure it’s not the only scenario which goes through their minds, assuming, of course, that they aren’t lying in the first place.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:28 am
134
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:23 am
#
131
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:19 am
128
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:15 am
…I must admit Chez, you got me on that elaborate answer.
———————————————–
It’s the way you ask ‘em…
—————–
Well you could at least have amused me and said ‘affirmative’
**********************************
Knock knock
Who’s there?
The Gestapo
The Gestapo who?
Silence, it is ve who ask the questions!
May 28th, 2008 at 11:26 am
132 - Trainer
Good question !!!
May 28th, 2008 at 11:25 am
129
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:16 am
‘C ?’
that’s a consonant.
what’s this about me talking to you re dna in the car ? must’ve been some time ago as i don’t remember. or it was someone else. but it is a mystery how it got there. do you have any ideas of how it got there ? one thing that is important in the dogs’ ‘evidence’ is how thy are trained, if they’re trained on artificial scents then it’s possible that they mistook a scent. on the other hand they seem to be making great progress in unearthing remains, bits of bones and teeth in jersey, where i think both dogs were used too. so it’s quite a mystery how the scent got there even if the dna results are inconclusive.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:23 am
#
131
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:19 am
128
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:15 am
…I must admit Chez, you got me on that elaborate answer.
———————————————–
It’s the way you ask ‘em…
—————–
Well you could at least have amused me and said ‘affirmative’
May 28th, 2008 at 11:21 am
132 trainer
Too much to hope for?
May 28th, 2008 at 11:19 am
anyone with any ideas if “perverting the course of justice” could be applied to paid posters on web discussions?
May 28th, 2008 at 11:19 am
128
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:15 am
…I must admit Chez, you got me on that elaborate answer.
———————————————–
It’s the way you ask ‘em…
May 28th, 2008 at 11:17 am
IMO the PJ know where when etc just not exactly who (they have a fair idea :))
May 28th, 2008 at 11:16 am
#
125
sam Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:11 am
Jeez………… what do you think this is……. bleedin countdown?
i’ll take a vowel , morning all.
————-
C ?
May 28th, 2008 at 11:15 am
#
126
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:12 am
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:03 am
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:32 am
90
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
87
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
————-
Do they really?
————————
Yes.
————-
I must admit Chez, you got me on that elaborate answer.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:12 am
124 garth
Just knew you would find something!
May 28th, 2008 at 11:12 am
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:03 am
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:32 am
90
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
87
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
————-
I’ll say it again Chenier just for you………… the PJ have the problem.
The McCanns know what happened they just dont know by whom. And theirs no way on this earth that the PJ could help them out with that.
———————————————-
The McCanns claim that Madeleine was kidnapped to order by a professional gang.
Indeed, they tell anyone who will listen that they ‘know’ this.
————
Do they really?
————————
Yes.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:11 am
122
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:05 am
#
114
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am
As opposed to a ’tissue of prevarication and obfuscation’…
————-
Jeez………… what do you think this is……. bleedin countdown?
i’ll take a vowel , morning all.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:09 am
#
123
wtf Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 11:08 am
morning
Garth your my hero
——–
‘you’re’
May 28th, 2008 at 11:08 am
morning
Garth your my hero
May 28th, 2008 at 11:05 am
#
114
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am
As opposed to a ’tissue of prevarication and obfuscation’…
————-
Jeez………… what do you think this is……. bleedin countdown?
May 28th, 2008 at 11:03 am
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:32 am
90
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
87
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
————-
I’ll say it again Chenier just for you………… the PJ have the problem.
The McCanns know what happened they just dont know by whom. And theirs no way on this earth that the PJ could help them out with that.
———————————————-
The McCanns claim that Madeleine was kidnapped to order by a professional gang.
Indeed, they tell anyone who will listen that they ‘know’ this.
————
Do they really?
May 28th, 2008 at 11:01 am
#
118
Rasputin Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:58 am
M&A yes they got the evidence from the rocking horse shit shop.
—————
That goat got away the twat!
May 28th, 2008 at 11:00 am
Rasputin 108
Yes. That’s the one.
I’d like to read the whole thing. Didn’t have time to try to access the whole document yesterday.
I thought it might have been jo as she often posts stuff from Portuguese sources. Sounded like the list of crimes she mentioned in her earlier post today. Thanks.)
May 28th, 2008 at 10:58 am
M&A yes they got the evidence from the rocking horse shit shop.
M and A
Come on Rasputin, even the antis think thats not a nice name to call the fragrant duo…..
May 28th, 2008 at 10:47 am
115…Rasputin
Maybe the Parents could help them in that respect.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:46 am
Garth has gone to take his scapegoat for a walk.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:45 am
Trainer here is another phrase to consider, Madeleine despite all the PJ’s evidence is still missing, it appears the PJ’s evidence amounts to rocking horse shit.
M and A
There is an answer to that, where or whom they got that evidence from…….
May 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am
113
Trainer Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:41 am
If i were a Tapas eater i would be worried about taking advice from a legal team working for someone other than myself.
perverting the course of justice is a phrase that springs to mind its also a phrase that a “spokesman” may wish to consider
another phrase they may wish to consider is “the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth”
IMO of course
————————-
As opposed to a ’tissue of prevarication and obfuscation’…
May 28th, 2008 at 10:41 am
If i were a Tapas eater i would be worried about taking advice from a legal team working for someone other than myself.
perverting the course of justice is a phrase that springs to mind its also a phrase that a “spokesman” may wish to consider
another phrase they may wish to consider is “the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth”
IMO of course
M and A
Trainer, you may have ‘got’ it they are just ‘Tapas’ eaters, not the more successful ‘Lotus’ eaters…….
May 28th, 2008 at 10:40 am
Garth Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:16 am
87
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 10:14 am
————-
I’ll say it again Chenier just for you………… the PJ have the problem.
The McCanns know what happened they just dont know by whom. And theirs no way on this earth that the PJ could help them out with that.
Hi Garth - I think you’ll find it’s ‘There’s’ not ‘theirs’.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:37 am
Chenier
I’ll be back in a mo………… but its actually trafficking!
May 28th, 2008 at 10:33 am
99 jo Says:
” Garth/Rasputin
cant you see the PJ WANTED the reconstruction to fail? think about it ”
We all see this. They now have scapegoats to present to the Portuguese audience: Certainly they would have solved the case, but the unwilling British witnesses have botched it…