S And M: Paul Burrell And Sex With Princess Diana
“PAUL BURRELL: ‘I HAD SEX WITH DIANA,” screams the News of the World’s front-page shocker. And we wonder if the Rock has sunk to a new low? Loyal servants pine for their lost masters but Diana is dead and this… This is sick.
This is the “sick boast exposed by his wife’s brother”, says the paper. Know that “disgraced royal butler Paul Burrell has plumbed shocking new depths of treachery, with vile boasts that he secretly BEDDED Princess Diana.”
Better in secret than atop of fourth plinth of Trafalgar square, so allowing Dian’s other sexual conquests to pass by and apprise the efforts in a live TV spectacular.
But still, it’s a shock that Burrell is a grave robber. How much worse can it get?
The slimy flunky bragged to his wife’s brother Ron Cosgrove that he was on call for sex 24/7. Ron told us: “Burrell said Diana was so demanding. And he told me he’d caught the Queen naked.”
SHAMELESS Burrell once bragged to his stunned family about seeing the Queen “starkers” while he was chasing a royal corgi around her bedroom at Buckingham Palace.
What sink of depravity is Buckingham Palace? Is Philip so cold that it should come to this?
And with these revelations, the word of one man, there opens up a new avenue of intrigue:
* Was her Majesty engaged in a secret romance with Diana?
* Are Corgis part of an elaborate foreplay?
* Did the Queen Mother, who confided in Old Mr Anorak that she was to marry Burrell and make him her King, get wind and unleash the Fiat Unos on love rivals?
* Did the Queen want to get caught by Burrell, a man desired by all the Windsor women, although not Princess Anne nor Prince Edward, obviously?
* Is Prince Harry;’ ginger pelt part Corgi?
The NOTW has already failed to see Burrell charged with wrongdoing, but now it has surely got its man.
Indeed, Ron makes mention of the Sun’s video telling its Sunday organ: “The final straw came when he was caught on video admitting how he lied to Diana’s inquest. I hope I never see him again.”
But what of this dalliance with Diana, now ten years passed? Says Ron:
“He clearly had something on his mind so we went to the Peal of Bells in Holt for a few pints. Then during the conversation he suddenly tells me he’s been having a sexual relationship with Princess Diana.
“He said they did it in the bedroom, the bath, everywhere. He claimed Diana liked to be domineering.”
Some relief that this alleged assignation occurred when Burrell was a jobbing butler and Diana a living and breathing thing.
“Paul told me that he’d get a call from Diana in the middle of the night specifically to have sex with her. He said she was very sexually demanding—’a bit ****ing kinky’ were his words—and if you worked for the princess you worked for her 24/7.”
And there is more: “Ron also reveals that after Diana’s death the butler spirited THREE bin liners out of Kensington Palace and hid them in his mother-in-law’s attic.”
Were Diana’s bin bags monogrammed, limited edition bin liners, taken by Burrell to remind his of those salad days of duty and cleaning?
Or do they contain evidence, scarping from mattress and bathmat, to be distilled into a signature perfume and a new book: Burrell: Master & Servant?
Posted: 15th, June 2008 | In: Princess Diana Inquest, Royal Family, Tabloids Comments (20) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- susan jones on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- The Real Stig on The Great Cathay Pacific Blocked Toilet Mystery
- SoDak-GhostDog on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Katie Norman on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
June 16th, 2008 at 9:09 am
…it’s keeping his profile up though, isn’t it…?
June 16th, 2008 at 7:11 am
17
lyn Says:
June 16th, 2008 at 12:30 am
Paul Burrell has now denied everything!! The relative claims Paul did tell him about with a straight face too.
##############################################
…and has the Odious One had any thoughts as to what effect his fantasising may have had on the boys ?? The Tower would be too good for him ………….
June 16th, 2008 at 12:30 am
Paul Burrell has now denied everything!! The relative claims Paul did tell him about with a straight face too.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:07 am
Did she say whether he was any good in bed though?
June 15th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
When there is so much despair and hurt in the world…. with news of chinese orphans being executed i find it hideous that anyone with any brain could possibly believe what so called ‘revelations have emerged for Paul Burrells family today!….. get real!!!! hello!!!!wake up!!!
The lowlife that has made these silly billy claims is more than likely the local alcoholic….. he probably owes lots of money to loads of locals…. hes no doubt a tax dodger….who probably only works in cash … no doubt he would be a bragger and a ‘walter mitty’ liar…. he would be the sort to cheat on his wife with undoubtedly have another family abroad….. and the ridiculous money he has probably earned from the gutter press for telling lies has allowed him to do a runner !!!!
money is obviously the root of all evil…. especially if you dont have any…… and maybe the driving force would have been the bank is just about to reposess ones home… for the 6th time….. or that would probably be another lie as well???
[rel - dr}
June 15th, 2008 at 9:43 pm
The ghost of Diana visited me last night and whispered in my ear Paul Burrell is a champion fantasy merchant and deserves a lifetime stay in the Tower with full board and lodgings.
June 15th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
12
DuncanR Says:
June 15th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
11 Chenier
——————————————
As far as I know the proposal to extend the law of defamation to the dead has died the death; no-one can think of a way to draft it without it having ‘ludicrous’ results, though I gather Tasmania continues to uphold the reputation of anyone, living or dead, with enough money to pay a lawyer.
Then again, Tasmania is a somewhat odd place.
I’m fairly sure that remark is not libellous, since Tasmania is not a human being, living or dead, nor is it a body corporate in the way that Macdonalds, say, is….
On the other hand, it seems well established that if someone accuses a UKIP candidate of being a lardarse on a message board, without having evidence to substantiate that claim, then our Courts will provide a means of redress.
I remain somewhat baffled as to why the appellant chose to sue, thus ensuring that the allegation, together with a number of much nastier ones, would reach a far larger audience than the message board itself could ever have done, but lawyers move in mysterious ways their wonders to perform…
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article743741.ece
June 15th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
I always had a sneaking suspicion that the butler did it!
June 15th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
11 Chenier
Bow to your expertise.
As an aside, can you provide us with an update re current position in relation to this article - - -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1687280.ece
Thanks!
P.S. Still working on a way to get that Glenlivet to you - but Gloria and Noseycow on our case now
June 15th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
Um, I think the NOTW might be proceeding on the principle that the law on libelling a dead person is somewhat opaque…
June 15th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
Maybe just maybe this is all made up by the brother in law because the NOTW were prepared to pay him lots of money.?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Do you think NOTW would risk publishing anything that would put them at risk of being sued for libel ? [duncanr]
June 15th, 2008 at 12:51 pm
I think “kiss-and-tell” is the lowest of the low, it is the ultimate betrayal by someone in whom you have confided all, bared your soul and other parts, someone who knows you fart in bed and then goes and tells anyone who will listen !! or - in the case of most of the sleaze-balls she got involved with - anyone who willpay !!
June 15th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
What Diana told us is one thing, but who likes a kiss’n'tell?
June 15th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
It is possible that Diana had an affair with Scum bag Hewitt as she was at an all-time low spot because of the “Three in this marriage” thing. He - like most opportunists - leapt in with both feet to “comfort” her and then betrayed her with his kiss-and-tell revelations which just showed him up for the arse he is. I wouldn’t like Harry to have a DNA test either……….
But as far as Burrell is concerned …..oh !! in his dreams, and if he did, why wait until interest in him is waning before “revealing” such a gem ?? Incidentally, my friend in the USA says they don’t know the half of what he is like, just know him as an ex Royal employee and he is quite in demand for functions over there so she loves it when I point her in the direction of his latest crap.
June 15th, 2008 at 11:43 am
The Queen stood up for Paul Burrell, or else he would have had a trial. Surely not! Still look at the other chaps Diana was supposed to have had an affair with. Could this be the secret that Paul Burrell was, note, was keeping secret, ’cause he couldn’t tell? If he had had an affair with Diana his wife would have kicked him out sooner.
June 15th, 2008 at 11:11 am
I still like to think that Princess Di had more taste….
June 15th, 2008 at 10:46 am
So odd for an obviously gay man to claim such activities. Public flogging and humiliation are too good for this piece of scum.
June 15th, 2008 at 9:48 am
Pleeeeeaasse let us not give this odious, attention-seeking deviate the satisfaction of commenting upon this latest horrific “revelation” !!
June 15th, 2008 at 9:45 am
The Princess: ‘Oh, Paul! Did we really do that last night? I must have been really tight’
The Butler: ‘Not after the first time, your Majesty’
(This joke is brought to you by the Charly Chester Archives of 1956)
June 15th, 2008 at 9:45 am
Oh Lor’…!! Is it not about time this creature was detained in the nearest Loony Bin ??