Comments on: S And M: Paul Burrell And Sex With Princess Diana

By: dairy

dairy — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:09:34 +0000

…it’s keeping his profile up though, isn’t it…?

By: Ann

Ann — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:11:57 +0000

17
lyn Says:

June 16th, 2008 at 12:30 am
Paul Burrell has now denied everything!! The relative claims Paul did tell him about with a straight face too.
##############################################

…and has the Odious One had any thoughts as to what effect his fantasising may have had on the boys ?? The Tower would be too good for him ………….

By: lyn

lyn — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:30:25 +0000

Paul Burrell has now denied everything!! The relative claims Paul did tell him about with a straight face too.

By: yampster

yampster — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:07:33 +0000

Did she say whether he was any good in bed though?

By: milly jancarjones

milly jancarjones — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:13:44 +0000

When there is so much despair and hurt in the world…. with news of chinese orphans being executed i find it hideous that anyone with any brain could possibly believe what so called ‘revelations have emerged for Paul Burrells family today!….. get real!!!! hello!!!!wake up!!!
The lowlife that has made these silly billy claims is more than likely the local alcoholic….. he probably owes lots of money to loads of locals…. hes no doubt a tax dodger….who probably only works in cash … no doubt he would be a bragger and a ‘walter mitty’ liar…. he would be the sort to cheat on his wife with undoubtedly have another family abroad….. and the ridiculous money he has probably earned from the gutter press for telling lies has allowed him to do a runner !!!!
money is obviously the root of all evil…. especially if you dont have any…… and maybe the driving force would have been the bank is just about to reposess ones home… for the 6th time….. or that would probably be another lie as well???

[rel - dr}

By: clicc cocker

clicc cocker — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:43:22 +0000

The ghost of Diana visited me last night and whispered in my ear Paul Burrell is a champion fantasy merchant and deserves a lifetime stay in the Tower with full board and lodgings.

By: chenier

chenier — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:29:05 +0000

12
DuncanR Says:

June 15th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
11 Chenier

——————————————

As far as I know the proposal to extend the law of defamation to the dead has died the death; no-one can think of a way to draft it without it having ‘ludicrous’ results, though I gather Tasmania continues to uphold the reputation of anyone, living or dead, with enough money to pay a lawyer.

Then again, Tasmania is a somewhat odd place.

I’m fairly sure that remark is not libellous, since Tasmania is not a human being, living or dead, nor is it a body corporate in the way that Macdonalds, say, is….

On the other hand, it seems well established that if someone accuses a UKIP candidate of being a lardarse on a message board, without having evidence to substantiate that claim, then our Courts will provide a means of redress.

I remain somewhat baffled as to why the appellant chose to sue, thus ensuring that the allegation, together with a number of much nastier ones, would reach a far larger audience than the message board itself could ever have done, but lawyers move in mysterious ways their wonders to perform…

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article743741.ece

By: patch

patch — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:40:57 +0000

I always had a sneaking suspicion that the butler did it!

By: DuncanR

DuncanR — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:37:21 +0000

11 Chenier

Bow to your expertise.

As an aside, can you provide us with an update re current position in relation to this article - - -

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1687280.ece

Thanks!

P.S. Still working on a way to get that Glenlivet to you - but Gloria and Noseycow on our case now

By: chenier

chenier — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:21:31 +0000

Um, I think the NOTW might be proceeding on the principle that the law on libelling a dead person is somewhat opaque…

By: Daisy Frost

Daisy Frost — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:31:01 +0000

Maybe just maybe this is all made up by the brother in law because the NOTW were prepared to pay him lots of money.?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Do you think NOTW would risk publishing anything that would put them at risk of being sued for libel ? [duncanr]

By: Ann

Ann — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:51:30 +0000

I think “kiss-and-tell” is the lowest of the low, it is the ultimate betrayal by someone in whom you have confided all, bared your soul and other parts, someone who knows you fart in bed and then goes and tells anyone who will listen !! or - in the case of most of the sleaze-balls she got involved with - anyone who willpay !!

By: JuneJohnson

JuneJohnson — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:47:20 +0000

What Diana told us is one thing, but who likes a kiss’n'tell?

By: Ann

Ann — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:29:04 +0000

It is possible that Diana had an affair with Scum bag Hewitt as she was at an all-time low spot because of the “Three in this marriage” thing. He - like most opportunists - leapt in with both feet to “comfort” her and then betrayed her with his kiss-and-tell revelations which just showed him up for the arse he is. I wouldn’t like Harry to have a DNA test either……….

But as far as Burrell is concerned …..oh !! in his dreams, and if he did, why wait until interest in him is waning before “revealing” such a gem ?? Incidentally, my friend in the USA says they don’t know the half of what he is like, just know him as an ex Royal employee and he is quite in demand for functions over there so she loves it when I point her in the direction of his latest crap.

By: lyn

lyn — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:43:36 +0000

The Queen stood up for Paul Burrell, or else he would have had a trial. Surely not! Still look at the other chaps Diana was supposed to have had an affair with. Could this be the secret that Paul Burrell was, note, was keeping secret, ’cause he couldn’t tell? If he had had an affair with Diana his wife would have kicked him out sooner.

By: Noseycow

Noseycow — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:11:17 +0000

I still like to think that Princess Di had more taste….

By: cabin3boy

cabin3boy — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:46:41 +0000

So odd for an obviously gay man to claim such activities. Public flogging and humiliation are too good for this piece of scum.

By: Ann

Ann — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:48:09 +0000

Pleeeeeaasse let us not give this odious, attention-seeking deviate the satisfaction of commenting upon this latest horrific “revelation” !!

By: yampster

yampster — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:45:43 +0000

The Princess: ‘Oh, Paul! Did we really do that last night? I must have been really tight’

The Butler: ‘Not after the first time, your Majesty’

(This joke is brought to you by the Charly Chester Archives of 1956)

By: Ann

Ann — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:45:40 +0000

Oh Lor’…!! Is it not about time this creature was detained in the nearest Loony Bin ??