<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poldraw Plagiarism At Private Eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barker</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html/comment-page-1#comment-398336</link>
		<dc:creator>Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/celebrity/185178.html#comment-398336</guid>
		<description>Chenier,

There is a, obvious world of difference between inspiration and blatant copying - the former is of course what Morten was and is talking aboout the latter is what the plagiarist did to his work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chenier,</p>
<p>There is a, obvious world of difference between inspiration and blatant copying - the former is of course what Morten was and is talking aboout the latter is what the plagiarist did to his work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html/comment-page-1#comment-332621</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/celebrity/185178.html#comment-332621</guid>
		<description>Chenier, 

I still defy any cartoonist to cast he first stone when it comes to 'inspiration' and inadvertent copying of other people's work. It can happen to anyone, and it will have happened to most. 

This particular case was not about that. 
It was about tracing, and back in January I used it as an extreme, almost laughable example of copying to round of a post on the wider subject of plagiarism. 

There is nothing accidental or coincidental about tracing. 
There might be other reasons of course - like desperation and panic. Neither of those justify it, but can explain why people do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chenier, </p>
<p>I still defy any cartoonist to cast he first stone when it comes to &#8216;inspiration&#8217; and inadvertent copying of other people&#8217;s work. It can happen to anyone, and it will have happened to most. </p>
<p>This particular case was not about that.<br />
It was about tracing, and back in January I used it as an extreme, almost laughable example of copying to round of a post on the wider subject of plagiarism. </p>
<p>There is nothing accidental or coincidental about tracing.<br />
There might be other reasons of course - like desperation and panic. Neither of those justify it, but can explain why people do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html/comment-page-1#comment-332266</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/celebrity/185178.html#comment-332266</guid>
		<description>Er, back in January Poldraw was defying any cartoonist to cast the first stone, having confessed himself to an inadvertent copying of another cartoonist's masterpiece. What happened to once is accident, twice is coincidence, thrice is enemy action?

Of course, he could always call in the GMC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, back in January Poldraw was defying any cartoonist to cast the first stone, having confessed himself to an inadvertent copying of another cartoonist&#8217;s masterpiece. What happened to once is accident, twice is coincidence, thrice is enemy action?</p>
<p>Of course, he could always call in the GMC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html/comment-page-1#comment-332160</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/celebrity/185178.html#comment-332160</guid>
		<description>Man oh man. This stuff just is wrong, wrong, wrong. 

Looking at your original; the way Obama's head is slightly turned, the stripe tie, etc. -- all points to a blatant copy. No real pro cartoonist would ever want to do this. It just boggles me. One thing for sure: her editor deserves a wake up call about this.

Why don't you send this copying cartoonist a bill for developing the original cartoon concept for her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man oh man. This stuff just is wrong, wrong, wrong. </p>
<p>Looking at your original; the way Obama&#8217;s head is slightly turned, the stripe tie, etc. &#8212; all points to a blatant copy. No real pro cartoonist would ever want to do this. It just boggles me. One thing for sure: her editor deserves a wake up call about this.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you send this copying cartoonist a bill for developing the original cartoon concept for her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mic</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/185178/twitterings/poldraw-plagiarism-at-private-eye.html/comment-page-1#comment-331993</link>
		<dc:creator>Mic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/celebrity/185178.html#comment-331993</guid>
		<description>Spot the difference? Easy... one is black and one isn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot the difference? Easy&#8230; one is black and one isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
