
How The Madeleine McCann Story Was Hijacked By Web Trolls
FROM the Anorak Forums - by AGW:
One of the most bizarre and troubling aspects of of the Madeleine McCann story has been the way the coverage of the story has itself become the story.
Anorak is not a site which has ever been (or ever will be) dedicated to the alleged crimes of abduction and subsequent claim and counter-claim of deeper, darker deeds involving in turn a resident Englishman in the Portuguese holiday complex where the McCann family had been staying and then the parents and their friends themselves.
Right at the beginning of all this I had predicted it was a complex story which would run and run. I confess to being bemused by the the tale’s longevity. The Madeline McCann story has become Dianaeque in its telling and re-telling, worse it is on a par with the empty and drifting ship the Mary Celeste.
The story of a photogenic, pretty little white girl from a professional and middle-class background was sure to attract attention.
I had always expressed serious doubts about the wisdom of the parents’ determination to avoid clear police advice and follow their own route to infamy…because that it what it has become.
The story divided neatly pro and anti. Not pro and anti the hunt for a little girl or her remains but pro and anti the parents. It has become a love-hate story. Every day in Anorak there are those who praise or condemn, support or vilify.
Professional journalists have watched with increasing bemusement, bordering on horror, at the activities of sites created and devoted exclusively to the Madeleine McCann story. They have risen, flowered and been cut down. The same individuals, only the names have been changed to protect the guilty, have in their turn raged or praised as each site flourished and then fell by the wayside.
The same experts and lost souls appeared again and again, and yet again, during the brief existence of these sites. Sometimes only the keystrokes or style and use of phrases and words revealed their true identity. They took full advantage and became legends in their own lunch-times, master spies, superheroes CyberMan or DigiWoman each using the Internet’s basic anonymity to change gender, location and re-invent themselves as brilliantly clear thinkers, defenders of the faith and public morale and morals or, very sad solicitors posing as desperate housewives.
The 3 Arguidos site is probably the strongest of the allegedly Madeleine McCann dedicated sites. I have no access to it nor seek any since it regularly appears to be an outrageous vipers nest of sad people, many of whom have had brief cyber-existences here. It has attracted an interesting group of supporters and helpers and we should genuinely wish them well. They are the Jerry Springer end of the coverage.
The McCann story can not sustain sites like this and they have to diversify. Recruitment from sites such as ours is one way of doing it.
The Moderators here at Anorak have noted a recent surge of activity as the once-again revamped team at the 3As have become our new friends. Avid letter writers to Anorak and when gently challenged, retreat to vent their spleen within their own site. We had such an incursion yesterday.
We are aware the 3As site has suffered dreadful problems lately and we sympathise but do have our own course to run.
There is always a suspicion, often borne out by later scurrilous attacks, the new best friends have their own agenda. That’s fine we all do…and I do not intend to give the 3As site any further creditability by association with us.
It is worth passing on one of the alleged solicitor types in there tried to publish our editor’s telephone number. Why? It is freely available on this site and he is more than well-equipped to be happily entertained by the odd moronic or dirty phone call.
We remain secure in the knowledge of many things but among them are:
Anorak is the leading site of its genre
It has the most experienced and competent team of Moderators
Its writers are skilled and entertaining
It is growing and constantly evolving which is a healthy thing
It is often not a comfortable place to be but remains vibrant and exciting
Imitation and jealous rages remain the sincerest forms of flattery.
…and the headline to this piece? It is often forgotten that the very next line in that quotation is:
“You ought to be ashamed of yourself”
Posted: 30th, June 2008 | In: Anorak Says, Madeleine McCann Comments (626) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





June 30th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Mods and Admin
Garth stop fucking around
June 30th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Lone
I beat your record on saturday
June 30th, 2008 at 11:45 am
#
109
wtf Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
melanie
Your right, will bite my tongue!
————-
Careful wtf. You might not be able to type!
June 30th, 2008 at 11:44 am
Thanks for the recap Garth
But what I stated was not drivel!
I stated the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth …… Torres scored the one and only winning goal!!!!
BTW …. would you like my phone number?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:44 am
#
105
Elvera Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:42 am
90
Garth Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:26 am
88
Elvera Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:23 am
————
And what questions might they be?
———————————————————————
Why didn’t you search more for her yourself?
Why was some of the money donated used to pay your mortgage?
Why was a ‘tin pot’ agency with links to all sorts of ‘dodgy’ goings on employed?…………
…………………………?
Good questions! Dunno. Next……….
June 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
Aha. I see that Garth made a MASSIVE attempt to take the discussion to a higher level
June 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
he’s just pissed off he wasnt first.
June 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
melanie
Your right, will bite my tongue!
June 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
June 30th, 2008 at 11:42 am
#
102
brandon flours Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:40 am
You came too quickly again
————
Bollox!
June 30th, 2008 at 11:42 am
I really don’t think it was worth posting something i’ve already read Garth. Can you explain your question to me a bit further as i’m not sure I understand what you’re talking about? Brazen?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:42 am
90
Garth Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:26 am
88
Elvera Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:23 am
————
And what questions might they be?
———————————————————————
Why didn’t you search more for her yourself?
Why was some of the money donated used to pay your mortgage?
Why was a ‘tin pot’ agency with links to all sorts of ‘dodgy’ goings on employed?…………
…………………………?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:41 am
Garth
I expect the bills in the post.
£2789.56 for wasted bandwidth
and that was just for post No.98
June 30th, 2008 at 11:40 am
Of course tactic 2 is too waste time reprinting stuff over and over again. If one thinks it was rubbish first time around why repeat it. Answer is becasue they have nothing to say on it
June 30th, 2008 at 11:40 am
You came too quickly again
June 30th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Hell, wot appened there?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Are you getting over excited garth?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:39 am
wtf, when all else fails trash the speaker. It is a tried and tested formula. Ignore it. Ignore them. They don’t want an open debate with you.
June 30th, 2008 at 11:36 am
hi melanie, hi lone
I find it unreal that the posters who defend the mccs are so insulting to other posters who disagree, unreal and not very nice really, wheres the debate in putting people down?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:34 am
The Itchy anfd Scratchy Show? Isn’t it full of nits?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:33 am
the itchy and scratchy show
June 30th, 2008 at 11:31 am
wtf, I had a meeting, what have I missed?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:31 am
#
80
clouseau Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 10:54 am
75
as Margaret was made a ward of court my personal opinion is that the same would apply to the other siblings in the family as the parents are for the want of a better phrase are prime suspects in the disapearence of a child
got to go lots of red Herrings to get through
Mods and Admin
WHO is Margaret?
————
Margaret.
No wonder he’s labelled as bleedin clueless. Fookin ‘ell.
June 30th, 2008 at 11:30 am
Gandolf accuses someone of low level waffle?
Pot kettle black springs to mind.
June 30th, 2008 at 11:26 am
wtf Yes I can answer for myself, same as Garth can. But there is not much point in answering your low level waffle, as you fail to take anything in. Thank you for acknowledging my debating skills, despite having none of your own, have a pleasant and delusional day.
June 30th, 2008 at 11:26 am
88
Elvera Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:23 am
————
And what questions might they be?
June 30th, 2008 at 11:25 am
Oops silly me. Could have sworn you mentioned me somewhere along the line.
But anyway, you know the innuendo Ferdinand was referring to, well would the unanswered questions you refer amount to 40 perchance?
Just interested of course.
June 30th, 2008 at 11:23 am
85
Garth Says:
June 30th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Answer questions to whom
—————————————————————————-
How about to all those to whom they appealled for cash to ‘assist’ them for starters…..
June 30th, 2008 at 11:19 am
garth
sorry thought my reply was to gandolf, cant he answer for himself
June 30th, 2008 at 11:16 am
73 SpongeBob Says:
” The newspapers print copies of other newspapers’ printed rumours, conjecture and fiction. If the rumours are in enough newspapers, they are accepted as ‘fact’. Attempts to redress this by the McCanns via libel action is seen as moneygrabbing, rather than attempting to set the record straight. ”
Well yes, but from what I have learned of this whole story the press is only partially to blame. It’s actually the demand for conjecture and fiction of a certain part of the public which is to blame.
The press has been comparably polite and supportive of the McCanns. Of course, they could make their profit just as well with sympathetic stories as with nasty ones.
What was the result? Those who were happy to spread rumours and accept them as fact organised their own media, investing a huge amount of time and energy, to offer innuendo - on a non profit base! For me, this is the most disturbing lesson.