Madeleine McCann: More Evidence, Tony Parsons Knows And Claims
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MAIL: “McCanns win right to see key evidence about Madeleine’s disappearance held by police”
The parents of Madeleine McCann today won the right to see key documents held by police relating to her disappearance.
Won?
The McCanns had planned to take Leicestershire Police to the High Court but no case was heard as the force agreed to give them access to 81 pieces of information gathered as part of the investigation.
Progress? Elsewhere, in the same online article:
The couple, who are both 40, are not expected to attend today’s hearing in London before Mrs Justice Hogg…The hearing is scheduled to take place in the High Court’s family division, although it will be held in open court.
Such is the news.
DAILY MIRROR: “Portuguese police to rule out Madeleine McCann abduction theory”
Portuguese police have decided that Madeleine McCann could not have been abducted, it was claimed yesterday.
Claimed.
They believe the youngster died in her family’s rented holiday flat in Praia da Luz.
Believe.
The newspaper Correio da Manha said a 50-page report, handed to prosecutors last week, reveals “new and strong doubts” about Gerry and Kate McCanns’ claim that their daughter was snatched.
So says a report about a report in a Portuguese newspaper.
TONY PARSONS: A case of cruelty
It happens less and less these days, simply because the story of Madeleine McCann is slipping from the news.
But every time that little girl’s face appears on the TV screen, our five-year-old daughter looks up and says exactly the same five words: “Did they find Madeleine yet?”
That little girl, the one who disappeared.
Somebody knows something. Almost certainly more than one person knows something. It’s not enough to shrug and walk away.
The Mirror’s Lori Campbell didn’t shrug.
Posted: 7th, July 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (522) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on X Factor: Jedward Go GAY, Win I’m A Celebrity And Hate Susan Boyle
- Nomadic View on Bolivian Police Release Video Of World’s Worst Photo-Fit Killers’ Capture
- June on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- Katie Norman on X Factor: Jedward Go GAY, Win I’m A Celebrity And Hate Susan Boyle
- THENTHEREWERE4 on Madeleine McCann: Kevin Halligen Becomes The ‘Maddie Faudster’
July 7th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Mods and Admin
Jo calm down, if you can’t hack it tonight on site, take a break. There is no need for such rudeness
******
I was very fine so far but no…they seem to take turns and I am not having it.Thats all
I think chenier IS rude and not only to me but to JHL with no reason whatsoever
I just say what I think
July 7th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
whoops
Some people just dont like it up em. But then some do.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
I should think so too….mate!!
July 7th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
344 I think Justice Hogg showed true compassion for Madeleine today-she is doing her job after all, and is ound within that remit. She can’t go screeching accusations or blubbing-she is a professional.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:44 pm
Fair
I was only joking about the riot bit, but i know you knew that.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
microwave not working then
July 7th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Chenier
How many reporters were in court today? any idea who they represented?
July 7th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
341
whoops
Lots of subnormal people in the mccanns world,thats why
July 7th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Only joking mate!
July 7th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
332
Garth
The mccanns left her alone,abandonned to her fate with 2 other little children.
Makes me angry
They were not around them to defend them from an adbductor if any,for example.
Makes me angry
Then we have the following never ending saga in the mist of it all Madeleine is still not defended,protected,respected….
The uk court todays sad words makes me angry
She is lost.
Makes me angry
July 7th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
#
340
clouseau Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
evening all
————
Bog off clueless.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
336 Garth
Shut it
You trying to get me banned again eh??
Hopefully ”’all” ‘will now see? nudge nudge?
July 7th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
I’ve never undrstood why anyone would climb through a window when the flippin’ door was open-they could have come down the night before also to see what all the noise was about and realised then the door was unlocked.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
evening all
July 7th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Thanks Chez, go on then……….
July 7th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
So-could it have been someone from a neighbouring appartment-tired of the crying?
July 7th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
334
Garth Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Does Chenny also know the details of the 81 articles?
———————–
Well, I can tell you what the Judge and Counsel said about the 81 items of information, if you can’t be bothered to look at the earlier posts…
July 7th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Dont bring Fair into it. We could have a riot on our hands.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
328
jo Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
322
chenier
How do YOU know if he was there or not?
You dont like people who have acheive something in their lives,dont ya? This “privilege” is only for people of the higher spheres of your snobbish little circle,is it?
Dont look for me there,chenier,you will find me.Watch your mouth
—————————————-
Jo, your ignorance of even the most elementary facts about the proceedings today is equalled only by your willingness to misrepresent what actually happened.
The public gallery is very small and there was only one guy who was there for the whole of the hearing. He wasn’t an idiot.
Your friend with the obscure blog, on the other hand, doesn’t even know that Counsel for SOCA and the Attorney General were arguing in Court alongside Counsel for the Leicestershire police force.
He knows so little about the Family Courts that he doesn’t even realise that it is unprecedented to hold a hearing involving a minor in public.
He hasn’t a clue, and, in my view, neither do you.
And do stop trying to threaten me; you sound like a bad imitation of the lady on Big Brother chuntering on about her gangsta friends. Only not as amusing…
July 7th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Does Chenny also know the details of the 81 articles?
July 7th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
328, jo, this is not true.
I don’t want to quarell with you, I can’t and won’t, but what you wrote is not true and not fair.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
#
329
jo Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
327
Garth
Yes,Garth,lots of people involved and no one to defend Madeleine
Thats the sadness of it all
—————–
Defend Madeleine from whom jo? Maybe thats the direction in which you should vent your anger.
July 7th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
326
Gandolf Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Her serene goddess was really, really careful not to use the word abduction, despite Scott’s best efforts. ++++++++Excellent Chenny you are getting an idea of the measure of the sainted one.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
They sought various Orders and Directions to assist in ascertaining her whereabouts. Madeleine became a ward of court. It is not known if she is alive, “but there is no evidence to the contrary.”
Can the sainted one the queen of justice m’lady ‘ogg say that, who gives brothel keepers toss……she did!
—————————————–
You keep digging yourself further and further into the hole, along with the rest of your arguments.
That is certainly what Scott said, but it is also certain that Scott has not read all 11,ooo items, and it is also certain that Justice Hogg has not read all 11,000 items either.
In fact neither of them has read any of them. Which means that they haven’t a clue.
The people who have read all 11,000 items are not commenting; they are acting. In this instance they acted to prevent the McCanns from gaining access to an ongoing criminal investigation.
Which suggests that they may not share Scott’s convictions, at the very least…
July 7th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
327
Garth
Yes,Garth,lots of people involved and no one to defend Madeleine
Thats the sadness of it all
July 7th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
322
chenier
How do YOU know if he was there or not?
You dont like people who have acheive something in their lives,dont ya? This “privilege” is only for people of the higher spheres of your snobbish little circle,is it?
Dont look for me there,chenier,you will find me.Watch your mouth
Mods and Admin
Jo calm down, if you can’t hack it tonight on site, take a break. There is no need for such rudeness
July 7th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
#
318
Elvera Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
.295
Garth
…….that the only way would be to hold child vertically and would have to drop through to ground the other side without leaving any disturbance to window frame/ledge……then transfer child from vertical to horizontal position and leg it up the road as testified by JT?
——————
Vera
There may have been two people involved for gawds sake……….. or more, who knows?
July 7th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Her serene goddess was really, really careful not to use the word abduction, despite Scott’s best efforts. ++++++++Excellent Chenny you are getting an idea of the measure of the sainted one.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
They sought various Orders and Directions to assist in ascertaining her whereabouts. Madeleine became a ward of court. It is not known if she is alive, “but there is no evidence to the contrary.”
Can the sainted one the queen of justice m’lady ‘ogg say that, who gives brothel keepers toss……she did!
July 7th, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Whatever bike i ride……… im a tarmac surfer!
http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/8674/dsc0077testlm6.jpg
July 7th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
323 Isn’t it Justice Hogg to us-323
July 7th, 2008 at 8:08 pm
312
jo Says:
July 7th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
ah….my obscure friend from an obscure blog has written one of his written article
———————————–
Your friend wasn’t there and doesn’t have a clue what went on at the hearing.
Which I suppose is par for the course with obscure blogs…