WE the UN and its esteemed leader Ban Ki-Moon condemn the following:
“Secretary-General condemns in the strongest terms the suicide bombing in Kabul today”
“Secretary-General strongly condemns suicide bombing in Islamabad, Pakistan”
“Secretary-General condemns recent bombings on Abkhaz-controlled territory“
As he asks, is there a sliding scale of condemns in the UN, strongly speaking?
Posted: 8th, July 2008 | In: Politicians, War On Terror Comments (5) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
Recent comments
- susan jones on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- The Real Stig on The Great Cathay Pacific Blocked Toilet Mystery
- SoDak-GhostDog on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Katie Norman on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
Regular Features
July 9th, 2008 at 4:13 am
terrorists must be quaking in their boots waiting to see where their particular atrocity falls on the Ban Ki-Moon condemn-o-meter.
July 8th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Cruelty to M&A; I should have stuck with Max Mosley…
July 8th, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Condemnation, condemnation, condemnation…
July 8th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Oh, Goddess, June, did you have to remind me?
M and A
Sorry, it just flowed out, still need therapy…
July 8th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Bit like Blair and his bloody vowing