
Our Madeleine McCann: Colin Stagg, Mad Dogs And Lucy Cavendish, And Amaral’s True Lies
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “We’ll savage bungling cops on Oprah [Winfrey] show - CLEARED McCANNS VOW TV ONSLAUGHT”
Cleared?
“At noon tomorrow a judge will formally lift the cloud of suspicion.”
Is that a fact?
The couple are likely to focus their fury on top cop Goncalo Amaral, who was kicked off the Madeleine case last October following allegations of incompetence and attacks on his British police counterparts.
“I’LL NEVER HAVE MY LIFE BACK – MURAT” - ‘I don’t know if I will ever be able to shake off the stigma of being ‘that Maddie man‘.”
“People say there is no smoke without fire and there may always be some who still doubt me. I have to live with that for the rest of my life.”
Let’s play a game of word association: Colin Stagg.
He’s the one set up by those bungling UK cops. Colin Stagg was accused of murdering Rachel Nickell on Wimbledon Common. Colin Stagg is innocent.
There being no forensic evidence, they were forced to look for likely suspects, and in Colin Stagg they found a man who ideally suited the tabloid agenda. He was runtish and rat-like, and yet also into body-building. He lived on his own. He was given to wearing dodgy-looking singlets and he was a devotee of the ancient pagan religion called Wicca. He had a picture of the Cerne Abbas giant inscribed on a black-painted wall in his flat.
Someone said that they had seen him, or a man very like him, on the common on the morning of the murder - and that was enough.
SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY: “After 445 days of missing Maddie, cloud of suspicion over parents lifts”
Tomorrow Kate and Gerry McCann hope the suspicion that they played a role in her disappearance from a Portuguese beach resort will finally – and officially – be lifted.
Hope? But in The People it’s a fact?
The Portuguese authorities are believed to be ready to remove the official arguido – suspect – status from the couple and clear them of any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance from Praia de Luz in May last year.
Believed.
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann abduction leaves family holidays haunted by fear”
The exodus to the sun starts this weekend - but since the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, parents are feeling paranoid about the safety of their offspring. Foreigners think we are mad, reports Lucy Cavendish from Mallorca
Mad pervs and Englishmen…
Says Lucy Cavendish:
You can always spot the English abroad. Not by the way they dress or their sunburnt skin but by how protective they are of their children.
Always!
“I feel I can’t leave my children alone for a second,” says Joanne Brown as she sits in a café next to the beach at Port de Soller in Mallorca. “It’s a nightmare. I’ve always been conscious of where my children are on holiday, but now I feel much more aware of them. If I shut my eyes for a moment, I feel terrified that they won’t be there when I open them.
Abracadabra. Fish ‘n’ chips. Poof!
But ever since last May, when three-year-old Madeleine McCann disappeared from her bedroom in Praia da Luz, Portugal, there is an almost tangible parental fear that underlies family holidays: that someone will take our children and we will never see them again.
Matchsticks in the eyes. Don’t dare to look away.
Post-Maddie, holidaying abroad has become a minefield. The parameters have shifted. Where once parents might have left children in a play area/on the beach/in a café while they quickly whipped off to go to the loo/order a meal/get some drinks, now we dare not. We reappraise all the time, scan people’s faces on beaches, by the swimming pool, in the play area. We are constantly asking ourselves: who is safe? What is safe? Are kids’ clubs fine? Are the staff vetted properly?
Anorak advocates the CoZee Reins – modelled on the penal system of Alabama, these handy chains with optional heavy ball attachment ensure the kidz are kept within shouting distance.
Tell Armani to “come ‘ere or I‘m, gonna kill yer”, and see her find no way of escape”.
On holiday with the Lucy Cavendishes:
One night, my 11-year-old son asked if he and his brothers, aged five and three, could sleep in this separate room. “Of course!” I replied.
Later on, when they were asleep, I got myself into a terrible panic. My eldest son had said he didn’t want to lock the door in case any of them needed to go to the loo in the night. This seemed to make sense.
At 2am, I woke up in a hot sweat. I imagined nameless, faceless marauders creeping up from the beach, slipping into the place and making off with one of them.
I woke my husband up. “The boys are ALONE!” I screamed. “It’s not going to happen here,” he said, immediately knowing what I was referring to. “This is Devon.”
But, as every parent now knows, it doesn’t matter if it’s Devon or Praia da Luz. Everyone is afraid of the stranger, the person out there who, in our minds, wants to steal and harm our children.
Was that her husband screaming?
THE GUARDIAN: “Madeleine police chief to launch ‘explosive’ book”
Gonçalo Amaral, who was chief of the criminal investigation police for the Algarve region, has scheduled a news conference in Lisbon on Thursday to launch the book, just three days after the widely expected announcement tomorrow that the case is being shelved by prosecutors for lack of evidence.
In the book, provisionally entitled True Lies, Amaral is also likely to reopen his assault on the role of the British police in the investigation. He has publicly suggested that they were influenced throughout by the leads which Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, wanted pursued.
He is said to be convinced that Madeleine is dead, while the McCanns have continued to press investigators to follow the trail of potential kidnappers and ensure their daughter’s safe return.
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Murder most modern- Kate Summerscale’s prize-winning account of an 1860 killing shows how little we’ve changed”
Ed Caesar looks at the 1860 murder of Saville Kent in The Suspicions of Mr Whicher.
What is most striking about her account (and this, perhaps, is what won the judges’ favour) is that it echoes contemporary culture. The huge interest in, and continual theorising about, the disappearance of an infant; the castigation of detectives for their incompetence; the swings of compassion towards or against suspects — all mirror the case of our own missing child, Madeleine McCann.
Our Maddie.
SUNDAY HERALD: “Courts make editors think hard before delving into private lives - Judiciary increasingly taking the view that public interest must be stronger than potential harm”
Although Madeleine McCann “aguido” Robert Murat’s £600,000 payout last week from 11 newspapers after successfully suing for the separate offence of defamation, editors are being forcefully reminded to think longer and harder about what stories papers can and should run.
Indeed. A current story in Correio da Manha has not repeated in the UK press about the case.
Posted: 20th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (431) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 20th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Chenier
I’m am getting an insight into your charactor…
Glenlivet obsession
Black leather
Sit on your face
Familiarity with the High Court..
mmm - now let me think
July 20th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
You appear to be confusing blame with intent, an argument that the prosecutor is finding very hard to reconcile, me I have no doubt that they were negligent, as to whither they harmed Madeleine that is another matter. A bit like blaming Eve or the inventor of gunpowder or the automobile, you know the rest.
July 20th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Coco said……..
I’ve got a Coolandcalm doll that has a hissy-fit every time somebody in the room swears. It tell everybody how sophisticated and classy it is. Gonna send you one!
…………………….
Thanks coco. that is so flattering, no-one has ever called me sophisicated, let alone classy, before. Mr C&C is rolling on the floor as we speak!
July 20th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
I prefer Sharon at the back gate !
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ujnH4yNqL8E
July 20th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Who said they didn’t leave the kids alone shame or not, the prosecutor doesn’t seem to think it constitutes neglect, have a dig at him.
M and A
Thats right blame anyone, but not the ickle wickle parents.
perhaps all babysitters should be pilloried for not throwing themselves wholesale and demanding they look after OPK for free?
Come on Gandolf there is an element of irresponsibilty here…perhaps MM herself was to blame?
Anyone I know but not the parents
July 20th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
I prefer Aragorn at the Black Gate…
July 20th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
My country is the land of the free and the brave fuk utube…………..
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-CD9oObwxlU
July 20th, 2008 at 1:26 pm
Fekin bollox……. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3DjRJ9ubbJQ
July 20th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
jo, thanks for the comment regarding your dad and doctors… I went to a university that had lots of pre-med students. They were more materialistic than the Wharton (business school) undergrads, and that’s saying summat!
July 20th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
‘This video is not available in your country’
July 20th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Fekin board’s drivin me mental………… http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=nSL4Eqpm9l4
July 20th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
Just about caught up, PMSL, the windylickers spent all day yesterday bullshitting a non sequitur, they have already been told countless times the DNA is a crock of shit and the dogs couldn’t find a fart in a space suit, case closed keystone cops lots of awkward questions to answer. The fragrant duo may well find their long lost daughter, if the authorities actually get to grips with reality instead of fannying about……wonder what the sainted and learned Lady Justice Hogg makes of all this subterfuge.Definitely the end of the line.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=nSL4Eqpm9l4
M and a
Shame the fragrant duo left the kids alone in the first place, but at least only one went missing , not all 3….
July 20th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
yes!
That’s the one!
Though, since these are pre-watershed family viewing hours, I hasten to add that of course I am not talking about the content of the lyrics, merely commenting that the bit at the end summarises my reaction to Clarrie and co.
By the way, have you made a donation to the Mezes Nine Fund, yet?
July 20th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
chenier
yer tiz…
python waiters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5hJWBow2HU
sit on my face always makes me smile
July 20th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
georgie harrison having some fun…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSIjlUMV6Is
i love the dancing girls
July 20th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Carmen and DuncanR! Are we running a book on here to have bets on whether or not any of the Tapastwats are being prosecuted for leaving the kids out of ear-shot - in a place where they have already admitted they left doors ajar in case there were fires??????????????????????????????????????????????????
July 20th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Jo! Thanks! I will sleep this afternoon having read this!
July 20th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
Thanks, ade, that is a seriously shiney track.
Perhaps the reason I find Clarrie so nauseating is the appalling visual libel on The Artist Formerly Known as George Harrison at the faux police press conference….
I have been trying to find the clip from A Song For George featuring the Pythonettes as waiters…
July 20th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Just received this,sorry its a bit long but have no time to make a shorter version
Evidence of death convince PJ but fail in court
PEDRO VILELA MARQUES
Tests. On the eve of the likely announcement of the Attorney-General of the Republic of the closing of the case Maddie, the DN learned from sources close to the process that the analysis of hair found in the car of the McCanns revealed that 16 markers on 18 match the genetic information of the child
Judge suspicious of evidence used in isolation
Tests carried out in hair gathered from the boot of the car rented by the McCann in Algarve determined that 16 markers on 18 match the genetic information of Madeleine. The information put forward by the DN source of PJ adds to the results of the preliminary report of the laboratory of Birmingham in England, where it is noted that “15 of the 19 genetic markers found in traces collected in the boot of the couple’s car match” the child’s.
“The evidence is clear to investigators,” guarantees the source of PJ. “We are talking about a bunch of hair found in the spare wheel site in the boot of the car, which could not have fallen from the siblings’ clothes or arrived there by any other means. The problem is that, to make clear proof in court we must reach 18 markers. But with 16 the investigators don’t have doubts, “says the policeman.
However, for a judge contacted by the DN, there is no reason for so many certainties. “The question is what markers are missing and, if I had to decide based only on this piece of evidence, I would not take the case to trial, because the likelihood of success would be very low. The evidence must always be articulated with other elements.”
Another well-placed source with the process, and with forensic expertise, supports the official version of the PJ claiming that “these tests are like the collection of fingerprints, in which to prove in court we must detect 13 points, but from 11 police already have a certainty. ”
For the source of DN, the conclusions of examinations to hair found in the Renault Scénic used only by McCann were not included in the final report of PJ because “since no evidence would be used in court, the police did not want that prosecutors say that there was persecution in relation to the child’s parents. ”
Though wary of this form of evidence alone, the judge heard by DN argues that there would be matter to take the parents of Maddie McCann to court. “They could be tried anyway for the crime of placing the child in danger, because leaving alone their daughter in the hotel room while going out for dinner is not acceptable by social standards, and for obstruction of justice. It is worth pointing out that parents of the child called the television before the police
http://dn.sapo.pt/2008/07/20/sociedade/provas_morte_convencem_mas_falham_tr.html
gone ….fast….fast before being in the eye of a tsunami
m&a
delete if you feel its not appropriate
July 20th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Chenier Says
Piss off, Harry,
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Pulled this ‘troublesome’ post as soon as I spotted it.
July 20th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Chenier …. Well said. Much more succinctly put than my post!
Yeah fuck off Harry! I am telling you now that somebody is pissing down your neck and telling you it’s raining!
JO ——- The Rasputin dolly is very dark and mysterious and comes with a couple of free Queens. Hours of fun!
July 20th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Châtelaine
i recommend more visits to the pub quiz
July 20th, 2008 at 12:49 pm
chenier Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Harry Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Piss off, Harry, and stop trying to dump us in it.
****
Well that worked! Not a trace of Harry anymore …
July 20th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Harry! It is jolly unfair of you to say that!
Anorak even defends the likes of you. We are all sat here biting out tongues today - to make sure that we don’t upset mods and admin. I suggest that you do the same.
‘Tis an ill wind that be blowing.
And this week people will be pissing down our necks and telling us that it is raining. Beware the Ides of July!
July 20th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
âde Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
[...]
very educational, this site
****
You cannot imagine how much I’ve learned since I’m on this site, âde
Problem is that I haven’t been able to use very much of it in daily life practice
July 20th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Harry Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Piss off, Harry, and stop trying to dump us in it.
July 20th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
chenier
tom petty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHJMp5bz9u8
spot jeff lynne, georgie harrison and ringo…
marvellous stuff
July 20th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
AC/DC are touring again next year!
July 20th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
âde Says:
July 20th, 2008
Thank you, ade.
For some reason AC/DC comes to mind…
The three-neck one looks like a particularly nasty form of torture.
And it is extremely educational; just think how much Carter-ruck’s gofers will learn should they peruse this site. Perhaps Anorak should send them a bill for services provided…
July 20th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
The Cheryl Doll sees the good in everybody but cannot qualify or quantify obvious pertinent observations.
I think she was in Naked Gun! However, when she sees sharks - she swims in the water - and this is not sensible!
The Afghan hound does not go out in the snow! Roger! Over and out! XXXX