
Our Madeleine McCann: Colin Stagg, Mad Dogs And Lucy Cavendish, And Amaral’s True Lies
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “We’ll savage bungling cops on Oprah [Winfrey] show - CLEARED McCANNS VOW TV ONSLAUGHT”
Cleared?
“At noon tomorrow a judge will formally lift the cloud of suspicion.”
Is that a fact?
The couple are likely to focus their fury on top cop Goncalo Amaral, who was kicked off the Madeleine case last October following allegations of incompetence and attacks on his British police counterparts.
“I’LL NEVER HAVE MY LIFE BACK – MURAT” - ‘I don’t know if I will ever be able to shake off the stigma of being ‘that Maddie man‘.”
“People say there is no smoke without fire and there may always be some who still doubt me. I have to live with that for the rest of my life.”
Let’s play a game of word association: Colin Stagg.
He’s the one set up by those bungling UK cops. Colin Stagg was accused of murdering Rachel Nickell on Wimbledon Common. Colin Stagg is innocent.
There being no forensic evidence, they were forced to look for likely suspects, and in Colin Stagg they found a man who ideally suited the tabloid agenda. He was runtish and rat-like, and yet also into body-building. He lived on his own. He was given to wearing dodgy-looking singlets and he was a devotee of the ancient pagan religion called Wicca. He had a picture of the Cerne Abbas giant inscribed on a black-painted wall in his flat.
Someone said that they had seen him, or a man very like him, on the common on the morning of the murder - and that was enough.
SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY: “After 445 days of missing Maddie, cloud of suspicion over parents lifts”
Tomorrow Kate and Gerry McCann hope the suspicion that they played a role in her disappearance from a Portuguese beach resort will finally – and officially – be lifted.
Hope? But in The People it’s a fact?
The Portuguese authorities are believed to be ready to remove the official arguido – suspect – status from the couple and clear them of any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance from Praia de Luz in May last year.
Believed.
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann abduction leaves family holidays haunted by fear”
The exodus to the sun starts this weekend - but since the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, parents are feeling paranoid about the safety of their offspring. Foreigners think we are mad, reports Lucy Cavendish from Mallorca
Mad pervs and Englishmen…
Says Lucy Cavendish:
You can always spot the English abroad. Not by the way they dress or their sunburnt skin but by how protective they are of their children.
Always!
“I feel I can’t leave my children alone for a second,” says Joanne Brown as she sits in a café next to the beach at Port de Soller in Mallorca. “It’s a nightmare. I’ve always been conscious of where my children are on holiday, but now I feel much more aware of them. If I shut my eyes for a moment, I feel terrified that they won’t be there when I open them.
Abracadabra. Fish ‘n’ chips. Poof!
But ever since last May, when three-year-old Madeleine McCann disappeared from her bedroom in Praia da Luz, Portugal, there is an almost tangible parental fear that underlies family holidays: that someone will take our children and we will never see them again.
Matchsticks in the eyes. Don’t dare to look away.
Post-Maddie, holidaying abroad has become a minefield. The parameters have shifted. Where once parents might have left children in a play area/on the beach/in a café while they quickly whipped off to go to the loo/order a meal/get some drinks, now we dare not. We reappraise all the time, scan people’s faces on beaches, by the swimming pool, in the play area. We are constantly asking ourselves: who is safe? What is safe? Are kids’ clubs fine? Are the staff vetted properly?
Anorak advocates the CoZee Reins – modelled on the penal system of Alabama, these handy chains with optional heavy ball attachment ensure the kidz are kept within shouting distance.
Tell Armani to “come ‘ere or I‘m, gonna kill yer”, and see her find no way of escape”.
On holiday with the Lucy Cavendishes:
One night, my 11-year-old son asked if he and his brothers, aged five and three, could sleep in this separate room. “Of course!” I replied.
Later on, when they were asleep, I got myself into a terrible panic. My eldest son had said he didn’t want to lock the door in case any of them needed to go to the loo in the night. This seemed to make sense.
At 2am, I woke up in a hot sweat. I imagined nameless, faceless marauders creeping up from the beach, slipping into the place and making off with one of them.
I woke my husband up. “The boys are ALONE!” I screamed. “It’s not going to happen here,” he said, immediately knowing what I was referring to. “This is Devon.”
But, as every parent now knows, it doesn’t matter if it’s Devon or Praia da Luz. Everyone is afraid of the stranger, the person out there who, in our minds, wants to steal and harm our children.
Was that her husband screaming?
THE GUARDIAN: “Madeleine police chief to launch ‘explosive’ book”
Gonçalo Amaral, who was chief of the criminal investigation police for the Algarve region, has scheduled a news conference in Lisbon on Thursday to launch the book, just three days after the widely expected announcement tomorrow that the case is being shelved by prosecutors for lack of evidence.
In the book, provisionally entitled True Lies, Amaral is also likely to reopen his assault on the role of the British police in the investigation. He has publicly suggested that they were influenced throughout by the leads which Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, wanted pursued.
He is said to be convinced that Madeleine is dead, while the McCanns have continued to press investigators to follow the trail of potential kidnappers and ensure their daughter’s safe return.
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Murder most modern- Kate Summerscale’s prize-winning account of an 1860 killing shows how little we’ve changed”
Ed Caesar looks at the 1860 murder of Saville Kent in The Suspicions of Mr Whicher.
What is most striking about her account (and this, perhaps, is what won the judges’ favour) is that it echoes contemporary culture. The huge interest in, and continual theorising about, the disappearance of an infant; the castigation of detectives for their incompetence; the swings of compassion towards or against suspects — all mirror the case of our own missing child, Madeleine McCann.
Our Maddie.
SUNDAY HERALD: “Courts make editors think hard before delving into private lives - Judiciary increasingly taking the view that public interest must be stronger than potential harm”
Although Madeleine McCann “aguido” Robert Murat’s £600,000 payout last week from 11 newspapers after successfully suing for the separate offence of defamation, editors are being forcefully reminded to think longer and harder about what stories papers can and should run.
Indeed. A current story in Correio da Manha has not repeated in the UK press about the case.
Posted: 20th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (431) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 20th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
chenier Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
It began with ‘a pair of tights and two rings’…
Sounds like a creative writing exercise; who’s going to do the first chapter?
and ended with a pair of lost glasses.
July 20th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
Noseycow:
I have never wanted to be a man, but I’ve devoted some time over the years to wanting the privileges attached to that state.
But I agree wholeheartedly about the Mail.
What puzzles me is that there’s no story on the tragic duo’s imminent sanctification tomorrow; the headline is all about the ‘Explosive revelations’ of the Amaral book.
Does the Mail scent a change in the wind?
Or is it simply that it is descending so rapidly into the News of the Screws category that explosive revelations are mandatory?
It has helpfully blanked out the face of the dominatrix whose husband has allegedly been sacked from MI5 because of the Mosley caper…
July 20th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Right… ejem…
“solution” or “decision” tomorrow?
Enough evidence for charges?
Enough evidence for being cleared?
In both instances: trial o no trial?
Gone…again
July 20th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Annie-Do we have to go to bed now? I’m not in the least bit tired-can I stay up a bit just this once.
July 20th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
It began with ‘a pair of tights and two rings’…
Sounds like a creative writing exercise; who’s going to do the first chapter?
July 20th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
enjoy annie1
July 20th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
Derbyshire is somewhere I have only seen on - what was it? Prime suspect? maybe not . Anyway - I shall get in the saddle and trot off to find it. I recon I got about a 2 hour drive. Bloody old cars!! cant be doing with it all - I suggested he sold it a few months ago (he could have donated the proceeds to the “fund” couldn’t he?) but you would have thought I had suggested he sold his right hand to a left handed bowler!!
So, we shall all be waiting with baited breath tomorrow!!
Sleep well everyone!
July 20th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
Chenier-yes, but did they do a head count on return?
July 20th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
Chenier
But the Mail is always having a go at someone or something
It seems to feel its job is to slate everything about this country but never puts forward any positive alternatives.
I gave up buying it years ago, one day it was slating mothers who stay at home to look after their kids, the next it was slating working mothers for causing kids psycological damage, and the next it was slating women who chose not to have children and continue concentrating on their career. Oh to be a man…
July 20th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
chenier Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
———————
Perhaps, but the Tyne or the Wear won’t have one of these.
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/art/news/story/0,,2290249,00.html
July 20th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
I honestly cannot see that tomorrow will bring a shelving of the case. I think, and hope that some charges will be brought against someone. Maybe not a full conclusion, but surely the pj will not just drop everything after 17 months of investigation. I feel pretty sure that had that been the senario, they would not have announced a day - which in itself suggests that they are going to say something pretty dramatic. If they are going to shelve and release the 3 suspects from that status, then I think it would have been done in a quiet and quick way - after all to stand up in public after making a big anouncement that they were about to conclude and just say - shelved - they would look foolish, and I really do not think that they are stupid - I think they are estute
July 20th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Quite so, Noseycow.
The Mail is doing the three weeks before the files all become public bit; allegedly the lawyers get first dibs for that period and then anyone can look at the information. I doubt that is a prospect cheering the hearts of all concerned…
The Mail is also having a go at our police, or at least one of our police:
‘Britain’s top policeman is to be questioned following allegations that Scotland Yard contracts worth more than £3million were awarded to a firm run by a close personal friend. Sir Ian Blair will be grilled by officials on the Metropolitan Police Authority, which employs him, over claims of a potential conflict of interest relating to his links with entrepreneur Andrew Miller. The Met Commissioner and Mr Miller have enjoyed several skiing holidays together.’
All these people going on holiday together…
http://tinyurl.com/636jrl
July 20th, 2008 at 3:57 pm
annie1
Derbyshire sounds good and if you can’t find hubby you can always enjoy the scenery
July 20th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Mary
I think you know the answer to that question - don’t you!
Chat shows, books, more law suits, movie deal… and just when we think its finally all over in 20 years time a fair haired young woman will appear out of nowhere just like anastasia, and it will all start over again. sigh
July 20th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
No more news then? Just popped in before I shove off to meet up with the other half for a meal - he’s gone off to some vintage car event and I have no clue how to get to where I am supposed to be going - need to google a map me thinks! Anybody know Ashover? - I think I have to head for Derbyshire!!
July 20th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
chenier Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
edit
But most of their journos seem to think that if they click their heels together they’ll be able to go home to Kansas…
—————————————————————————————————
If only..
July 20th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
I don’t know what the demographics are on the Mail; I assume that it is predominantly south, southeast.
But most of their journos seem to think that if they click their heels together they’ll be able to go home to Kansas…
July 20th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
If the case is shelved tomorrow and the parents “officially cleared” - what is likely to happen next? Will they have the decency to piss off back into obscurity and raise their twins as best they can or will there be another flurry of interviews, books, chat shows, Kate looking beautiful in her anguish etc. Will they gloat and carry on making a whole cottage industry out of their missing kid? Will we have to listen to the likes of Alison Pearson and Tony Parsons pontificating? If there really is no case then I am truly sorry for their loss and pain but I still find their whole roadshow thing immensely sickmaking.
m and a
OOOh mary , how can you say that? they’ll be diligently hunting their daughter, leaving no stone unturned, they won’t have time for chat shows/ hairdressers/their lovely house.They’ll need funds though for the creche bill….
July 20th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
Chenier
But most Mail readers have never heard of either.
July 20th, 2008 at 3:43 pm
You may, but it wouldn’t get you very far!
Since my mother came from Durham City I am a little horrified by the offspring’s distinct preference for Newcastle, but we are united in our agreement that the Tyne and the Weir are superior to the Tee.
Wonder whether the tabloids can tell the difference?
My grasp of matters geographical is pretty appalling, but even I know the difference between Leicestershire and Lancashire, which is more than can be said for the Mail..
July 20th, 2008 at 3:21 pm
May I suggest the James Cook university Hospital.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cook_University_Hospital
July 20th, 2008 at 3:16 pm
Saul Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Ah, The Talk of the South in Southend, one night in 1976 I was thrown out for having a Northern accent.
——————————-
Southend?
Nothing about Southend would surprise me.
Being serious, for once, the offspring regards the prospect of coming south again with some trepidation. Needs must when the CV drives, but Newcastle upon Tyne is in many ways a much nicer place than London…
July 20th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
m and A
Um well mine did fit perfectly after that…..this was back in the days when I smoked , and not only in the bath, read, drank coffee til the percolator ran cold,they called it YOUTH?
———————————–
You too!
And, for the benefit of any libel lawyers reading this post, the ‘You Too’ means ‘You Too’ and is not a reference to a group of musicians known for their wonderful music and charitable endeavours.
Right, where was I?
Youth.
Wasted on them, in my view…
July 20th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
Ah, The Talk of the South in Southend, one night in 1976 I was thrown out for having a Northern accent.
July 20th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
whoops Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
So WFMs and tight jeans are no longer the craze then-why didn’t someone tell me?
————————-
Because you were having so much fun!
July 20th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Definitely waffle, read the post in the context V asked the question. Take it you are not a fan of Lewis, more of a Morse fan myself, I admire his endeavour
Am a Lewis fan the Lion Witch and Wardrobe cannot be beat;have you been to the Bird and Baby?
I too enjoy Morse’s Endeavour, and have treated myself to the whole set of dvd’s, and am finding Lewis very good too.
July 20th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
So WFMs and tight jeans are no longer the craze then-why didn’t someone tell me?
July 20th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
M and A
Chenier, I did have a pair of white ‘heels’ when I was 13, and living in Cardiganshire.
—————————————–
I promise not to tell anyone if you pledge an oath of secrecy about the time I sat in the bath with my jeans on to get them to fit perfectly…
m and A
Um well mine did fit perfectly after that…..this was back in the days when I smoked , and not only in the bath, read, drank coffee til the percolator ran cold,they called it YOUTH?
July 20th, 2008 at 2:45 pm
DuncanR Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
whoops Says
TEE HEE-I’m just trying to get on your nerves
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Oh, you’re such a tease !!!
————————–
That would be Dita Von Teese, then?
July 20th, 2008 at 2:43 pm
I do believe you are waffling, at whom or what is beyond me, your reference to 3arses puzzles me, a sort of trinity, ah well it is Sunday.
M and A
read your own post at 2.29, we have to, so you can too.
I never waffle, I leave that to certain doctor/parents and certain characters who could have emerged from a CS Lewis novel