
Our Madeleine McCann: Colin Stagg, Mad Dogs And Lucy Cavendish, And Amaral’s True Lies
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “We’ll savage bungling cops on Oprah [Winfrey] show - CLEARED McCANNS VOW TV ONSLAUGHT”
Cleared?
“At noon tomorrow a judge will formally lift the cloud of suspicion.”
Is that a fact?
The couple are likely to focus their fury on top cop Goncalo Amaral, who was kicked off the Madeleine case last October following allegations of incompetence and attacks on his British police counterparts.
“I’LL NEVER HAVE MY LIFE BACK – MURAT” - ‘I don’t know if I will ever be able to shake off the stigma of being ‘that Maddie man‘.”
“People say there is no smoke without fire and there may always be some who still doubt me. I have to live with that for the rest of my life.”
Let’s play a game of word association: Colin Stagg.
He’s the one set up by those bungling UK cops. Colin Stagg was accused of murdering Rachel Nickell on Wimbledon Common. Colin Stagg is innocent.
There being no forensic evidence, they were forced to look for likely suspects, and in Colin Stagg they found a man who ideally suited the tabloid agenda. He was runtish and rat-like, and yet also into body-building. He lived on his own. He was given to wearing dodgy-looking singlets and he was a devotee of the ancient pagan religion called Wicca. He had a picture of the Cerne Abbas giant inscribed on a black-painted wall in his flat.
Someone said that they had seen him, or a man very like him, on the common on the morning of the murder - and that was enough.
SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY: “After 445 days of missing Maddie, cloud of suspicion over parents lifts”
Tomorrow Kate and Gerry McCann hope the suspicion that they played a role in her disappearance from a Portuguese beach resort will finally – and officially – be lifted.
Hope? But in The People it’s a fact?
The Portuguese authorities are believed to be ready to remove the official arguido – suspect – status from the couple and clear them of any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance from Praia de Luz in May last year.
Believed.
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann abduction leaves family holidays haunted by fear”
The exodus to the sun starts this weekend - but since the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, parents are feeling paranoid about the safety of their offspring. Foreigners think we are mad, reports Lucy Cavendish from Mallorca
Mad pervs and Englishmen…
Says Lucy Cavendish:
You can always spot the English abroad. Not by the way they dress or their sunburnt skin but by how protective they are of their children.
Always!
“I feel I can’t leave my children alone for a second,” says Joanne Brown as she sits in a café next to the beach at Port de Soller in Mallorca. “It’s a nightmare. I’ve always been conscious of where my children are on holiday, but now I feel much more aware of them. If I shut my eyes for a moment, I feel terrified that they won’t be there when I open them.
Abracadabra. Fish ‘n’ chips. Poof!
But ever since last May, when three-year-old Madeleine McCann disappeared from her bedroom in Praia da Luz, Portugal, there is an almost tangible parental fear that underlies family holidays: that someone will take our children and we will never see them again.
Matchsticks in the eyes. Don’t dare to look away.
Post-Maddie, holidaying abroad has become a minefield. The parameters have shifted. Where once parents might have left children in a play area/on the beach/in a café while they quickly whipped off to go to the loo/order a meal/get some drinks, now we dare not. We reappraise all the time, scan people’s faces on beaches, by the swimming pool, in the play area. We are constantly asking ourselves: who is safe? What is safe? Are kids’ clubs fine? Are the staff vetted properly?
Anorak advocates the CoZee Reins – modelled on the penal system of Alabama, these handy chains with optional heavy ball attachment ensure the kidz are kept within shouting distance.
Tell Armani to “come ‘ere or I‘m, gonna kill yer”, and see her find no way of escape”.
On holiday with the Lucy Cavendishes:
One night, my 11-year-old son asked if he and his brothers, aged five and three, could sleep in this separate room. “Of course!” I replied.
Later on, when they were asleep, I got myself into a terrible panic. My eldest son had said he didn’t want to lock the door in case any of them needed to go to the loo in the night. This seemed to make sense.
At 2am, I woke up in a hot sweat. I imagined nameless, faceless marauders creeping up from the beach, slipping into the place and making off with one of them.
I woke my husband up. “The boys are ALONE!” I screamed. “It’s not going to happen here,” he said, immediately knowing what I was referring to. “This is Devon.”
But, as every parent now knows, it doesn’t matter if it’s Devon or Praia da Luz. Everyone is afraid of the stranger, the person out there who, in our minds, wants to steal and harm our children.
Was that her husband screaming?
THE GUARDIAN: “Madeleine police chief to launch ‘explosive’ book”
Gonçalo Amaral, who was chief of the criminal investigation police for the Algarve region, has scheduled a news conference in Lisbon on Thursday to launch the book, just three days after the widely expected announcement tomorrow that the case is being shelved by prosecutors for lack of evidence.
In the book, provisionally entitled True Lies, Amaral is also likely to reopen his assault on the role of the British police in the investigation. He has publicly suggested that they were influenced throughout by the leads which Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, wanted pursued.
He is said to be convinced that Madeleine is dead, while the McCanns have continued to press investigators to follow the trail of potential kidnappers and ensure their daughter’s safe return.
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Murder most modern- Kate Summerscale’s prize-winning account of an 1860 killing shows how little we’ve changed”
Ed Caesar looks at the 1860 murder of Saville Kent in The Suspicions of Mr Whicher.
What is most striking about her account (and this, perhaps, is what won the judges’ favour) is that it echoes contemporary culture. The huge interest in, and continual theorising about, the disappearance of an infant; the castigation of detectives for their incompetence; the swings of compassion towards or against suspects — all mirror the case of our own missing child, Madeleine McCann.
Our Maddie.
SUNDAY HERALD: “Courts make editors think hard before delving into private lives - Judiciary increasingly taking the view that public interest must be stronger than potential harm”
Although Madeleine McCann “aguido” Robert Murat’s £600,000 payout last week from 11 newspapers after successfully suing for the separate offence of defamation, editors are being forcefully reminded to think longer and harder about what stories papers can and should run.
Indeed. A current story in Correio da Manha has not repeated in the UK press about the case.
Posted: 20th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (431) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 20th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Nosey, you are good at this!
July 20th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Gandolf Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Lucid, concise and enlightening.
http://tinyurl.com/5vfh9t.
————————————————————————–
Yeah, clear as mud….
July 20th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Or the McC’s announce the third pregnancy of the beautiful K.
G is quoted as saying ‘ Of course noone could ever replace our ‘lovely’ daughter’.
When asked about names K replies ‘Madeleine of course’
July 20th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
veritable
re: unexpected twist. The ultimate coup de grace (?).
the Pink one announces that the generous McC’s have concluded their search for their daughter and are going to had the contents of the fund over to ‘whichever’ missing childrens charity.
Headlines all the Papers - another round of couch sitting, and call’s for Knighthood are heard in the commons.
An anorak sleuth then discovers that the actual amount handed over was £5.53
July 20th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
Jo, I have no idea, just speculating.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
veritablequandary
Whats the twist then? an other spin?
The case being shelved?
Excellent fun
July 20th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Lucid, concise and enlightening.
http://tinyurl.com/5vfh9t
July 20th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Anyone think there is any chance they left the twins with the Aunt in Vancouver?
July 20th, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Some news about “an unexpected twist” tomorrow being reported.
Could be what we are not supposed to speak of, which really hasn’t hit the fan.
Or maybe your little voice, Whoops?
Or maybe no voice at all?
Or . . . or . .. or?
I am guessing that Murat’s a status will be lifted, but not that of the other two.
Could we get another arguido to bring the number back up to 3?
July 20th, 2008 at 8:22 pm
whoops
I see
Better brush the whole stank under the rug,I am afraid! Its rather serious and we”d better keep low profile on that one
I have been tempted to comment on the sad stuff but opted for self ban as well,like all of us
July 20th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Châtelaine
That’s what criminals do, Cheryl … And he’ll get even better at it when he’s in jail, I’m afraid.
******
Yes,a big risk for both society and him
July 20th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
See earlier unnumbered post!!!-about 6 up.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
whoops Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Jo-point is would he? Doesn’t sound so to me. Whoops, forgot I’m banned.
******
If well coached some youngsters can actually be rehab.
It depends of the individual,his history,his /her mental/emotional/intellectual set up and to each one applies different therapy and handling …not easy at all.
We cant say if in this case,he would benefit or not….behind a computer its a bit difficult isnit?
Now,why are you banned?what have you done?
July 20th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Cheryl Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
[...] Let’s face it, he was just taking his time and playing the game…
****
That’s what criminals do, Cheryl … And he’ll get even better at it when he’s in jail, I’m afraid.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:08 pm
A thought that may have occurred rather belatedly to a certain police force.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:04 pm
look up at the sad new spin
Ansa
20/07/2008
“English Journal offers U.S. $ 3 million for clues to the whereabouts of Madeleine McCann
News of the World confirmed that JKRowling donated half a million dollars for the highest reward offered by a newspaper.
The English Sunday newspaper,News of the World has offered today a reward of 1.5 million pounds sterling (approximately $ 3 million), against the return of the British child Madeleine McCann, missing since May 3, 2007 in the south Portugal.
The weekly confirmed that British stars and local and international entrepreneurs donated “large sums of money” to the campaign “Find Maddie” .
This is the world’s largest reward ever offered by a newspaper.
Also donated local entrepreneurs Philip Green, and Richard Branson, owner of the Virgin group, the producer Kenwirght Hill, the owner Eggert Magnusson of West Hamm, and Reading, John Madejski.
Other donors were the Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney, and the English Cricket player, Michael Vaughan.
News of the World confirmed that the author of the Harry Potter saga, the writer JKRowling, donated half a million dollars for the reward, the greatest contribution to the fund.
“We are very happy and pleased with what you are doing. Anything that can be done to publicise that Madeleine is missing and help with your search will be very welcome,” said Gerry McCann, father of the girl.”
here you go gerry….difficulties with the lawyers fees may be?
http://latercera.cl/contenido/24_32140_9.shtml
July 20th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
I think, Gandy, that the Learned Lady Judge will be taking a keen interest; as will the Attorney General who is, of course, charged with defending the public interest.
If it should transpire that, say, the English Court, has, no doubt entirely unintentionally, hindered the free flow of information in the investigation of a very serious crime, then the situation would develop not necessarily to the Court’s advantage.
Or, to put it another way, actions have consequences; a thought which appears not to have occurred to Team McCann, but one which is likely to occur to whoever gets lumbered with trying to clear up the mess.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Jo-point is would he? Doesn’t sound so to me. Whoops, forgot I’m banned.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Thank you Nosey cow-well if nothing else they’ll have to deny the accusations I would have thought.
I had a theory a long time ago similar to this but until our self imposed ban is over I will not divulge. i just wondered if a little voice was about to speak out.
Right i’m gonna ban myself before someone else does.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
Cheryl
Not nice at all.He definately learnt of few tricks
He is devious and so young
Do you think jail is going to “help” him at all? he will come out even worse than he went in,dont you think?
I mean,it is the “norme”.The youngest the convict is,the best “prey” he/she becomes to the other inmates who teach him/her all the tricks possible.When they come out,they are HEAVY criminals.
Cheryl,sometimes there is no need to have a gun to kill somebody : we can kill people many different ways…..and he is still very young
I am NOT saying he doesnt deserve a punishment and you certainely deserve and have the right to have justice done to yourself but…..surely,he could do somethingelse than to be locked up up to 5 years? something truly useful and educative?
July 20th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Whoops - sorry - that explaination is naff, if one searches public data bases they could find names that match those in the report who have appropriate connections to the McC’s
July 20th, 2008 at 7:41 pm
whoops Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
has anybody checked whether the two doctors we are not allowed to mention who allegedly reported the other 2 doctors we are not allowed to mention exist?
———————————————————————–
I did find one on the GMC register who graduated in K class, and another with the same surname and her name matches the reports.
I don’t know if its them but they seem to be gp’s in the midlands.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
jo Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
Cheryl
He is not some poor bloke, Jo, he comes from a fine home with well known parents and had a life growing up many would envy.
*****
I meant “poor” in the head and his very “fine home” did certainely not keep him out of mischief
Let him have his punishment.Serves him right.
His parents must be in a terrible state…how comes he went to you for help? is this because his very own parents did not want to know anything about him anymore?
_______
He had gotten trouble quite a few times as a juvenile, from what I hear - police can’t talk about a juvenile’s record or records - and his parents always stood behind him. From what I heard they just reached their wits end when he became an adult (under the law) and laid down strict rules for him and he didn’t adhere to them. So they told him to leave until he got a job and became responsible. They knew he came to me for a place to stay and help as we’d talk on the phone and a few times his Mom came by to visit - we were all proud of the progress he was making and actually obeying my rules! Let’s face it, he was just taking his time and playing the game…
July 20th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
While scrolling through looking for something else (work displacement therapy) I found an interesting Anorak mail from Paolo Reis, he of the Gazeta Digital blog and an alleged confidant of the PJ, stating that Robert Murat was under surveillance from the police from the very next day after madeleine’s disappearance and stating about his PC and malinka etc etc.
Dangerous to perform spectacular Uturns on the internet!! Wonder if he’ll be sued also?
http://www.anorak.co.uk/news/tabloids/173412.html
July 20th, 2008 at 7:27 pm
From what I have been reading, the number of DNA markers found does not reach the threshold required under Portuguese law, but would be sufficient in the UK.
Sort of an irony here, to my mind, if that provides the escape clause.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Anyone know the source of the quote, or even if it is a McCann speaking?
“But you said we had no need to lie, you said we did nothing wrong, we have nothing to hide from them”. “Did I say that”? he said. “I mean, we have done nothing wrong, but we have to make them believe it, we have to get our story right”
July 20th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
Cheryl
He is not some poor bloke, Jo, he comes from a fine home with well known parents and had a life growing up many would envy.
*****
I meant “poor” in the head and his very “fine home” did certainely not keep him out of mischief
Let him have his punishment.Serves him right.
His parents must be in a terrible state…how comes he went to you for help? is this because his very own parents did not want to know anything about him anymore?
July 20th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
has anybody checked whether the two doctors we are not allowed to mention who allegedly reported the other 2 doctors we are not allowed to mention exist?
M and A
yes they do exist.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
Châtelaine Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
_________
Yes he has ruined that also. I feel terrible for his parents such lovely people BUT they are not going to buy his way out of this one with me. I even apologized to them for what I felt I had to do and was going to do.
July 20th, 2008 at 7:12 pm
Yes it will be very interesting to see what evidence the Leics plod were actually in possession of, the Learned Lady Judge will no doubt be very very interested also.