
Our Madeleine McCann: Colin Stagg, Mad Dogs And Lucy Cavendish, And Amaral’s True Lies
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “We’ll savage bungling cops on Oprah [Winfrey] show - CLEARED McCANNS VOW TV ONSLAUGHT”
Cleared?
“At noon tomorrow a judge will formally lift the cloud of suspicion.”
Is that a fact?
The couple are likely to focus their fury on top cop Goncalo Amaral, who was kicked off the Madeleine case last October following allegations of incompetence and attacks on his British police counterparts.
“I’LL NEVER HAVE MY LIFE BACK – MURAT” - ‘I don’t know if I will ever be able to shake off the stigma of being ‘that Maddie man‘.”
“People say there is no smoke without fire and there may always be some who still doubt me. I have to live with that for the rest of my life.”
Let’s play a game of word association: Colin Stagg.
He’s the one set up by those bungling UK cops. Colin Stagg was accused of murdering Rachel Nickell on Wimbledon Common. Colin Stagg is innocent.
There being no forensic evidence, they were forced to look for likely suspects, and in Colin Stagg they found a man who ideally suited the tabloid agenda. He was runtish and rat-like, and yet also into body-building. He lived on his own. He was given to wearing dodgy-looking singlets and he was a devotee of the ancient pagan religion called Wicca. He had a picture of the Cerne Abbas giant inscribed on a black-painted wall in his flat.
Someone said that they had seen him, or a man very like him, on the common on the morning of the murder - and that was enough.
SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY: “After 445 days of missing Maddie, cloud of suspicion over parents lifts”
Tomorrow Kate and Gerry McCann hope the suspicion that they played a role in her disappearance from a Portuguese beach resort will finally – and officially – be lifted.
Hope? But in The People it’s a fact?
The Portuguese authorities are believed to be ready to remove the official arguido – suspect – status from the couple and clear them of any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance from Praia de Luz in May last year.
Believed.
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann abduction leaves family holidays haunted by fear”
The exodus to the sun starts this weekend - but since the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, parents are feeling paranoid about the safety of their offspring. Foreigners think we are mad, reports Lucy Cavendish from Mallorca
Mad pervs and Englishmen…
Says Lucy Cavendish:
You can always spot the English abroad. Not by the way they dress or their sunburnt skin but by how protective they are of their children.
Always!
“I feel I can’t leave my children alone for a second,” says Joanne Brown as she sits in a café next to the beach at Port de Soller in Mallorca. “It’s a nightmare. I’ve always been conscious of where my children are on holiday, but now I feel much more aware of them. If I shut my eyes for a moment, I feel terrified that they won’t be there when I open them.
Abracadabra. Fish ‘n’ chips. Poof!
But ever since last May, when three-year-old Madeleine McCann disappeared from her bedroom in Praia da Luz, Portugal, there is an almost tangible parental fear that underlies family holidays: that someone will take our children and we will never see them again.
Matchsticks in the eyes. Don’t dare to look away.
Post-Maddie, holidaying abroad has become a minefield. The parameters have shifted. Where once parents might have left children in a play area/on the beach/in a café while they quickly whipped off to go to the loo/order a meal/get some drinks, now we dare not. We reappraise all the time, scan people’s faces on beaches, by the swimming pool, in the play area. We are constantly asking ourselves: who is safe? What is safe? Are kids’ clubs fine? Are the staff vetted properly?
Anorak advocates the CoZee Reins – modelled on the penal system of Alabama, these handy chains with optional heavy ball attachment ensure the kidz are kept within shouting distance.
Tell Armani to “come ‘ere or I‘m, gonna kill yer”, and see her find no way of escape”.
On holiday with the Lucy Cavendishes:
One night, my 11-year-old son asked if he and his brothers, aged five and three, could sleep in this separate room. “Of course!” I replied.
Later on, when they were asleep, I got myself into a terrible panic. My eldest son had said he didn’t want to lock the door in case any of them needed to go to the loo in the night. This seemed to make sense.
At 2am, I woke up in a hot sweat. I imagined nameless, faceless marauders creeping up from the beach, slipping into the place and making off with one of them.
I woke my husband up. “The boys are ALONE!” I screamed. “It’s not going to happen here,” he said, immediately knowing what I was referring to. “This is Devon.”
But, as every parent now knows, it doesn’t matter if it’s Devon or Praia da Luz. Everyone is afraid of the stranger, the person out there who, in our minds, wants to steal and harm our children.
Was that her husband screaming?
THE GUARDIAN: “Madeleine police chief to launch ‘explosive’ book”
Gonçalo Amaral, who was chief of the criminal investigation police for the Algarve region, has scheduled a news conference in Lisbon on Thursday to launch the book, just three days after the widely expected announcement tomorrow that the case is being shelved by prosecutors for lack of evidence.
In the book, provisionally entitled True Lies, Amaral is also likely to reopen his assault on the role of the British police in the investigation. He has publicly suggested that they were influenced throughout by the leads which Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, wanted pursued.
He is said to be convinced that Madeleine is dead, while the McCanns have continued to press investigators to follow the trail of potential kidnappers and ensure their daughter’s safe return.
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Murder most modern- Kate Summerscale’s prize-winning account of an 1860 killing shows how little we’ve changed”
Ed Caesar looks at the 1860 murder of Saville Kent in The Suspicions of Mr Whicher.
What is most striking about her account (and this, perhaps, is what won the judges’ favour) is that it echoes contemporary culture. The huge interest in, and continual theorising about, the disappearance of an infant; the castigation of detectives for their incompetence; the swings of compassion towards or against suspects — all mirror the case of our own missing child, Madeleine McCann.
Our Maddie.
SUNDAY HERALD: “Courts make editors think hard before delving into private lives - Judiciary increasingly taking the view that public interest must be stronger than potential harm”
Although Madeleine McCann “aguido” Robert Murat’s £600,000 payout last week from 11 newspapers after successfully suing for the separate offence of defamation, editors are being forcefully reminded to think longer and harder about what stories papers can and should run.
Indeed. A current story in Correio da Manha has not repeated in the UK press about the case.
Posted: 20th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (431) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 20th, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Is this silly because very off topic or may I ask if anybody of you kind people has a word of comfort for me? Had such a bad day today.
Gandolf, I think, even one of your genuine Konfuze-sentences would help. Something like: “Everything will be fine.”
July 20th, 2008 at 9:36 pm
Can you elucidate as to the actual time this occurred Duncan.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:32 pm
Off to play cards with Maman. May BBL
July 20th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
I quite like it-TEE HEE.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
DuncanR Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 9:28 pm
[...]
P.S. There is absolutely no truth in the suggestions that the Mods quite like the new arrangement
*****
Well … don’t know. It’s absolutely discouraging, since time-consuming, to post something off-topic
July 20th, 2008 at 9:28 pm
Châtelaine Says
Can please something be done about the “upgraded” site
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hopefully our tech Guy will be able to sort things out when he returns after the weekend.
P.S. There is absolutely no truth in the suggestions that the Mods quite like the new arrangement
July 20th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
something horrible happened to a friend of mine-she came home rather excitedly aged 6, told her parents of this event-her father went looking for the guy with a hammer-never found him.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
While we’re talking, Duncan. Can please something be done about the “upgraded” site. Not only are there no numbers anymore, has one to post - go back - refresh to be quoted, but also “refreshment” insists to take me back to 11:22 am today, so have to scroll down to get à jour every tiem and again. The same happens, when I’ve been visiting another site or a link, whether I open in this window or in a separate window….
July 20th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Gandolf
July 20th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Now now Duncan, jo called into question my grasp of Portuguese, never ever judge a book by its cover, isn’t that right jo.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:18 pm
DuncanR Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Thank you, Châtelaine.
Our posts crossed.
So basically - a load of bollocks ???
***
Would say so …
No other reference to be found; at least not by me
July 20th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Thank you, Châtelaine.
Our posts crossed.
So basically - a load of bollocks ???
July 20th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
noseycow-I meant in an innocent childish sort of way-I know my little one would but in all innocence as she wouldn’t know it was wrong.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Duncan, good evening 2u2. See my post 9:14. Only source I found, with the addition of “She said”
July 20th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
3arses myth as they are best at creating, fukwits..
July 20th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Châtelaine Says:
*****
Good evening, Irene. Where ever did you get this quote from?????
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Just reading back through posts.
I too would be interested to know the answer to that question !!!
July 20th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
HM, with a little bit of Google found out that it’s the “motto” of a poster on the 3A’s. Complete reads:
“She said: “But you said we had no need to lie, you said we did nothing wrong, we have nothing to hide from them”. “Did I say that”? he said. “I mean, we have done nothing wrong, but we have to make them believe it, we have to get our story right”
July 20th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Irene Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Anyone know the source of the quote, or even if it is a McCann speaking?
“But you said we had no need to lie, you said we did nothing wrong, we have nothing to hide from them”. “Did I say that”? he said. “I mean, we have done nothing wrong, but we have to make them believe it, we have to get our story right”
*****
Good evening, Irene. Where ever did you get this quote from?????
July 20th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Noseycow Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Or the McC’s announce the third pregnancy of the beautiful K.
[...]
****
I thought she was wearing rather wide clothing on the Vancouver photos …
July 20th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
whoops
If at all.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
whoops
In general children don’t talk until they are much much older.
July 20th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
veritable
re tomorrow: how about a confession - well that WOULD be unexpected now wouldn’t it.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
No, I mean she was going to talk about something that somebody had done to her.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
Jo
All the reports that people have posted today have expressed the concern about this evidence when taken in isloation. That does not necessarily make it inadmissable, as it would add to the whole of the evidence to enable the judge/jury to establish whether its beyond a reasonable doubt (or whatever the portuguese equivalent is).
If each piece of evidence given in court had to be conclusive, then noone would ever be convicted of anything.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Sorry,here is the link
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/07/evidence-of-death-convinces-pj-but.html
have you inderstood what I understand? the jugde saying “it is better to remember that the childs parents called the televisions before they called the police”?
What do you make out of this?
I am off now
bbl
July 20th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
jo Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 8:04 pm
look up at the sad new spin
Ansa
20/07/2008
“English Journal offers U.S. $ 3 million for clues to the whereabouts of Madeleine McCann
——————-
Jo, this is news from May 2007, not July 2008.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:53 pm
Whoops
i had thought that she was going to start school, but she was already in nursery, so I doubt that that was a concern.
July 20th, 2008 at 8:53 pm
“Although he mistrusts this isolated type of evidence, the judge that was heard by DN argues that there is matter to take the parents of Maddie McCann to court. “They could be judged over the crime of endangering a minor, because leaving their daughter alone inside a hotel room while they go to dinner is not acceptable within the social patterns, and over obstruction of justice. It is better to remember that the child’s parents called the televisions before they called the police.”
oh dear…….I wonder how the mccfools feel tonight
July 20th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Did it occur to anyone else that Madeleine was going to speak out about something?
July 20th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Gandolf Says:
July 20th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Lucid, concise and enlightening.
**********
Are you sure your command of portuguese is accurate?
Whats so “lucid,concise and enlightening”?
More slagging of Portugal and its police force?
The case is that they might well end up in JAIL in the UK.
TOMA YA joder