Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Police Errors, Kate And Gerry McCann Speak, And Amaral’s Book

By: coco

coco — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:37:39 +0000

MODS ans ADMIN! Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! To the above comments made to Patch.

By: patch

patch — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:02:13 +0000

Read them. I still have the same opinion.

By: patch

patch — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:04:34 +0000

I am unaware that I made a complaint. I voiced an opinion. Perhaps an opinion is not welcome on this ‘neutral’ site.

Mods and Admin

Suggest you read Cheryls’ posts for the past few days, she told Chenier on several occasions to ‘fuck off’.
Best to read all posts of all posters before you offer an Opinion on their good or bad manners

By: Undertaker

Undertaker — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:55:22 +0000

Understand or Overstand? No one wants to understand, it is to dam nauscious and the evil that erupts makes us all feel very unconfortable! THESE so called Parents, are a bunch of irresponsables, and all the actions taken are even making them more guilty onto everybody’s eyes! This situation as reach a scale never seen before, can anyone awnser some questions:
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?
FROM WHOM THEY CAN RETRIEVE THIS POWER?
THEY CAN EVEN SUE BRITSH NEWSPAPERS, HOW?
HOW WERE THEY CAPABLE TO MANIPULATE AND SPREAD VISCOUS RUMORS ABOUT PJ (one of the Wordl’s more reputed investigation police force)?

Poor MADDIE, WHAT HAVE THEY OR OTHERS DONE WITH HER?

……Good Bye and continue to OVERSTAND

By: patch

patch — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:57:00 +0000

It seems that certain posters are allowed to constantly to tell others to ‘fuck off’ and use ad hominem attacks. I have also noted threats made by one poster on more than one occasion. Gandolf, Garth, Rasputin, Cheryl, Maria and coolandcalm seem to be criticised on a regular basis when they don’t deserve it.

Mods andAdmin

Patch could you explain then why I pulled 3 extremely rude and insulting posts from Gandolf last night.
I suggest you take your complaint to Admin

By: Gandolf

Gandolf — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:52:22 +0000

Willo you’re a wanker. Now my little ones and windylickers, the excercise for today is, what part of “”no evidence” are you finding hard to understand, Garth that excellent wordsmith shall be along later, to assist those slow to grasp this simple statement.

Administrator: Carry on with unnecessary abuse like that and you’ll not be along for a wee while. Stop yer tickling Jock. -agw

By: yampster

yampster — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:25:00 +0000

No dating please! We’ve seen enough of that

By: willo

willo — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:28:16 +0000

Gandolf you strike me as being as thick, slow witted and obnoxious as much as chenier seems vibrant, intelligent and pleasant.

I think Gandolf is a bully.

By: coco

coco — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:52:02 +0000

See you for the elections then! I’ve already bought my popcorn! X

By: Ciara

Ciara — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:50:24 +0000

Goodnight all who care..xx

By: Ciara

Ciara — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:48:00 +0000

Goodnight annie1, hope to meet up with you soon…in another thread or world, take care..xx

By: annie1

annie1 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:34:06 +0000

Coco, Ciara, Veritable - now I know that you are all well versed on lots of different subjects - we got the US elections in November!!! Anorak will play a blinder on that one - less chance of being Clarrified!! lol - see you all soon - goodnight

By: Ciara

Ciara — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:30:15 +0000

annie1,

You are not really gone for good??
I hate goodbyes…please. No…come back.xx

By: coco

coco — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:22:43 +0000

annie1 …….. I hope something hauls you back soon. I enjoy your contributions. X

By: annie1

annie1 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:21:27 +0000

Hi Veritable - I will look in on Anorak - you are all an interesting crowd and it has been interesting and amusing - but no more McCann for me - I dont want to give them the satisfaction of knowing that anyone is remotely interested in them - you surely understand what I mean?? other Anorak subject - great but for me no more of the Rothely duo

By: coco

coco — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:21:22 +0000

Real Stig ……… You have missed the point.

A parent or responsible cat-owner/dog owner would answer questions freely if they wanted to find their missing loved one.

I would not ask a fucking lawyer to help me trace my movements and actions prior to the disappearance of said loved one.

Any innocent normal person being interviewed in a foreign nick would be only too glad to sit there going over and over the same questions to clarify exactly and precisely what happened.

I would tell any lawyer to shut the fuck up if I wanted my daughter back.

I would then instruct a different lawyer who wanted to help me recover my daughter/cat/dog.

Lawyers only tell you to shut the fuck up if they think that you are going to incriminate yourself further or open a can of worms! Or sardines!

By: veritablequandary

veritablequandary — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:16:26 +0000

annie, come on now, drop in now and again

By: annie1

annie1 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:12:35 +0000

Well - Im off now and I wish you all a McFree life - Best thing now to just leave them to get on with whatever they intend to . I have done with it all - its been interesting on here the past months - everyone had a good argument ( whichever way their thoughts were) and there have been confrontations between perfectly normal human beings - all because of the pair from Rothley. They aint worth a light from a match, in my opinion - especially now that they are free to speak freely - the very few encounters we had when they were sworn to secrecy was nausiating - so God alone knows what crap will be broadcast from now on. Anyway - maybe if something else which hold the imagination comes along - I shall meet all of you interesting and wise folk again - but until then, Goodnight and Goodbye! I shall not be McCannising again

By: The Real Stig

The Real Stig — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:03:56 +0000

Night all - Stig out.

By: Gandolf

Gandolf — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:48:39 +0000

Well someone did, but the Portuguese attorney gen wouldn’t buy it.